0:00
[Music]
0:18
This is Undaunted Life a Man's Podcast. I'm your host Kyle Thompson. Let's get into it.
0:23
All right guys today I've got a special guest on the podcast. His name is Ryan Burge.
0:27
So Ryan is a pastor, writer, and he has his PhD in political science and he is a professor
0:32
at Eastern Illinois University. He's also a pastor of a small Baptist church in that
0:36
area as well. But he wrote this amazing book called The Nuns, where they came from, who
0:41
they are and where they are going. And that's Nuns, N-O-N-E-S. And so this book does a deep
0:47
statistical dive into the increasing number of Americans who have no religious affiliation
0:52
whatsoever. So by now you've likely heard of the Nuns. But again, this guy is giving
0:56
a bunch of data and a bunch of graphs in this book to explain where did they come from?
1:01
Where did this trend start? Like how did we get to where we are? What do we do moving
1:05
forward? And this is an interesting perspective because again, he's a social scientist and
1:09
a pastor. So he can see things for what they are biblically and theologically, but he can
1:13
also see them for what they are from a statistical standpoint. And it's really, really interesting
1:17
guys. I really enjoy this conversation with him because we took a lot of quotes out of
1:21
his book. We tried to create a narrative here for kind of, hey, how did we get to the point
1:25
where we are right now? Because a lot of people are lamenting the fact that there's a tremendous
1:30
rise of a religiously unaffiliated people in the United States, but they don't know how
1:33
that happened. And they certainly don't know what to do about it. So we dig into that on
1:37
this podcast, you're going to make sure you stick around to the end where we get into
1:40
some other really interesting subjects in terms of what we're talking about here. But
1:43
guys, I'm not going to keep them from you any longer. So without further ado, let's get
1:47
into it.
1:48
Ryan Burds, welcome done Dawn to the Life of Man's podcast. Thanks so much for having
1:52
me.
1:53
I'm going to talk to you. I mean, you've done some really, really interesting work that
1:55
we're going to dig into here in just a second. But the, the, I guess the best place to start
1:59
would be you're both a pastor and a polycyte professor. Okay. So the world of faith in the
2:05
world of academia, can you just briefly briefly give me an idea of how the heck that happened?
2:09
I don't even know at this point. You know, like everyone goes, that's so weird. But if
2:13
you, if you've lived it your entire life, it's not weird. It's just normal for you. Right?
2:17
So I was when I was an undergraduate, I needed a job. And so I took a job as a youth pastor
2:23
at a church about half an hour from where I grew up because I basically just needed income
2:27
for the summer, the summer three month internship turned into a three year thing. So I was a
2:31
youth pastor for three years there. And then when I went on to graduate school, I needed
2:35
a job again.
2:36
And I thought, well, the pastoring thing is there's jobs there to be had. And so I started
2:39
at one church for a year and then I quit that job. And then a church called me and asked
2:44
me if I'd come there and I've been there for 15 years now. So it's just always been part
2:48
of my, ever since I was 20 years old, it's always just been part of what I do. And it
2:51
just seems very normal to me. And, you know, it actually helps. I think being a social
2:55
scientist helps the pastoring side. I think being a pastor helps the social science side.
2:58
I think they both compliment each other. I think they're very, very similar in a lot
3:01
of ways because your job is to talk and be interesting and encourage people and all those
3:05
things. So, you know, it's, it's, I don't know anything else. So for me, it just seems
3:09
like day to day life.
3:10
Yeah, I think it's a bit of an issue too. When people think that the world of faith in the
3:13
world of academia can't mix, obviously, the same thing with the world of faith in the
3:16
world of science can't mix. That doesn't make a lot of sense if you spend any time thinking
3:19
about it. But the main thing that I want to spend the bulk of our time talking about
3:22
today is a book that you wrote called The Nuns, where they came from, who they are and where
3:26
they are going. And that's Nuns, N-O-N-E-S, everyone has to spell it every time they talk
3:30
about it. So, two part question to really kick this off, who are the Nuns? And I guess
3:35
for you personally, why did you find it so interesting to write an entire book about
3:39
them?
3:40
Yeah, so the Nuns for me are people when we ask them what their religion is, they say
3:42
they're atheist agnostic or nothing in particular. Basically, they say they're, they're not. They
3:46
don't have any religious affiliation. They're not Jewish Hindu, Buddhist, Mormon Protestant
3:49
Catholic or anything like that. They say they have no religious affiliation. And the genesis
3:54
of the book, which in the, in the introduction, I talk about this tweet I sent. And in 2019,
4:00
the General Social Survey just come out with their newest data from 2018. And everyone,
4:04
all my friends were running all these numbers, posting all these graphs. And I was like, I
4:07
know the graph I want to post. It's about religion. And luckily, I have all this code
4:12
because I'm at the keeper of the code for all this stuff, for whatever silly reason.
4:15
So I got home, I run this graph and I see this, this, this shift. And I see that the Nuns
4:20
now are the largest or the same size as eight as Catholics or evangelicals. So they're
4:25
tied for the largest religious group in America for the first time. And I send this tweet
4:29
out thinking it's going to get like two, two likes and it's just going to disappear in
4:33
the internet ether as things do. And you know, 15 minutes later, I looked down at my phone
4:37
and I've had like 35 retweets and then an hour later was 100. And then the next morning
4:41
it was 300. And then eventually it gets retweeted like 1500 times. And everyone wants to talk
4:46
to me about it. Every news outlet in America, it seems like call me in the next, you know,
4:50
week or 10 days, CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Daily Mail, the New
4:54
York Post. I was on C-SPAN on Easter morning. I mean, it just went on and on and on. And
5:00
all of a sudden, you know, it was like, you know, oh, the front page of Reddit, it made
5:03
the front page of Reddit got 71,000 of votes. So it was just everywhere. I had people from
5:07
high school who hadn't talked to in 20 years, like, I saw you on this thing or that thing.
5:11
So, you know, it became like this, this thing. And I was like, wow, if I want to write a book,
5:16
why would I write a book about something that I care about? Why would I not write a book
5:19
about what other people care about? And obviously, you know, the demand was there and the interest
5:23
was there. And I know that I have a specific set of skills in terms of translating data
5:27
into, you know, understandable ways for the average person. So I thought, well, why not
5:32
take an idea? People are already interested. Why not use the tools I already have in my
5:34
toolbox? And why not just write a book about that? Because that's obviously what people
5:37
want to talk about.
5:38
Yeah, I think that's really important as well. And guys, just as a quick aside, you're gonna
5:42
have to get a copy of this book. It's in the show notes, you can kind of dig into it yourself
5:45
because you do a lot of kind of data driven stuff. There's a lot of graphs. We're not going
5:48
to be able to get into everything. But you do kind of look at this narrative where you're
5:52
digging in to who the nuns are, where they've come from. And you spend some time talking
5:56
about the general social survey, which you actually just mentioned, which is basically
5:59
a survey, which correct me if I'm wrong, it hasn't changed since the 70s. It's been the
6:03
same survey since that time period. So it was a very reliable source. Is that kind of the
6:07
gist of the GSS? Yes, until 2021, then they had to go online and the numbers are all screwed
6:12
up. So that's a whole different story. But the number of Protestants dropped 10% in three
6:16
years somehow because they went from in person online. But from 1972 to 2018, they asked the
6:21
exact same questions in the exact same way. So it's really the only way that we have to
6:25
track religion in America over a long period of time. And now it's a whole different story.
6:30
Right. It's a little bit better than a snap hole on Twitter. So in chapter one of the book,
6:35
it's called what does the American religious landscape look like? And there's only, I think,
6:39
five chapters to this book. So you spend a lot of time, there's really, really meaty
6:42
content in each chapter. Now I realize that this question is going to be overly broad.
6:46
But can you at least give us the 30,000 foot view as to what the religious landscape of
6:51
America looks like right now? Yeah, so we break it down to seven groups. Okay, so Christians
6:56
are broken into four different groups, evangelical Protestants, which I think we all know an evangelical
7:00
Protestant is at this point, you know, they're very conservative politically and religiously.
7:05
Believe Jesus Christ is on a God, literal reading of the Bible, you know, Turner burn, you know,
7:09
Hellfire and brimstone, those kind of people, they're about 22, 23% of the population. The
7:13
other kind of Protestant we don't talk about as much as called mainline Protestant. Those
7:16
are United Methodist Episcopalians and I church of Christ. Those people who are like, yeah,
7:20
we would live in Jesus, but I'm not really sure about heaven and hell. And you know, much
7:23
more modern, they have female pastors, a lot of them are open and affirming to LGBT people.
7:28
They used to be 30% of America in 1975 and now they're 10% of America. So like that,
7:33
that flavor of American Christianity is basically going to die in the next 10, 15, 20 years.
7:38
And then there's black Protestants. And we put those in a separate category because they're
7:41
just so fundamentally different than like white evangelicals. Interestingly enough,
7:45
black Protestants have very similar views of the Bible as white evangelicals do, but
7:50
their view of politics could not be more different. 90% of black Protestants vote for the Democrat,
7:54
80% of white evangelicals vote for the Republican. So they're just politically,
7:58
completely different. And then there's Catholics. Catholics are relatively stable,
8:02
share the population between 20 and 25%. The issue with Catholics is it's become a cultural
8:07
identifier more than it's become a religious identifiers. And in 1972, 55% of Catholics
8:12
said they went to mass every week. And today is 25%. So you know, the numbers,
8:16
the top line number looks fine, but underneath the surface, there's a lot of things changing
8:20
for Catholics. They're just not as devout as they used to be. And then we have a couple
8:23
different groups at the bottom. We have Jews. We have other religious groups, which are everything
8:27
from Jedi's to Muslims to Buddhist, the groups are so small that are hard to really get a good
8:31
number on. And then obviously the nuns. And like we talked about the nuns were 20, you know,
8:35
they were 5% of America. Now they're 21, 22% of America. And actually by some estimates are
8:40
even higher than that, probably 30 or 35% of America. So those are the big seven groups.
8:45
Really, the only change over time is mainline Protestants have gone from 30% to 10%. And then
8:49
the nuns have gone from 5% to 25%. Everything else has been relatively stable over the last 40 years.
8:55
Well, I want to talk a little bit about that because you talk about from, you know, 1972
8:59
to 2018, you talk about the nuns going from around 5% to around 25%. But you say in your book that
9:05
there is, you kind of ask yourself the easy question, which is, so where have all the nuns come from?
9:09
And the easy answer is mainline Protestant Christianity. I want to get your idea. And again,
9:13
I know you like to deal in data, not quite as much in conjecture, but I still kind of why that is
9:18
because from the outside looking in, because I'm not a mainline Protestant Christian,
9:21
it's almost because like when you keep reading cultural things into scripture,
9:25
as opposed to just reading scripture, maybe that doesn't do very well. At least that would be,
9:29
you know, what the Reformed Baptist would say. But if you had to say, why has there been such a
9:33
stark decline over the last several decades in mainline Protestantism?
9:38
That's a great question. That's actually the million dollar question in my world. And so like,
9:42
the second I have another book coming out in March called 20 Miss about religion of politics
9:45
America. But my third book is really going to be trying to understand like what happened in the
9:49
middle of American religion, like what happened to moderate Christians in America. And you know,
9:53
really book about religious polarization that kind of couples with all the political polarization
9:57
stuff that we talk about. I think we forget the fact that religion has also been polarized.
10:01
I think for a lot of it, it was a push in a pull factor. You know, if you grew up mainline,
10:05
all your evangelical friends told you you weren't a real Christian because you didn't believe in
10:08
all the things that they did. And so for a lot of them, you're like, well, if I'm not a real Christian,
10:12
I'm not going to go with it. You know, like, I'm sick of being kind of criticized and ridiculed
10:16
for not believing everything you believe. But on the other side, the nuns see you as still being
10:20
too conservative for them, right? You still believe in, you know, sky fairy and Jesus and all that
10:24
kind of stuff. So you're too liberal for your evangelical friends, you're too conservative
10:29
for your nun friends. So at some point, you feel like compelled to pick a side. And obviously,
10:34
for most of them, the side was the nuns because the nuns don't require you to do anything, right?
10:39
And for a lot of mainline Protestants, they don't really, they don't really accede to that kind of
10:42
very conservative theology and very conservative worldview politically. So the nuns were more liberal.
10:47
And so they're like, well, I'm more like a nun politically and socially. So I'm going to be a
10:51
come and none. Because just honestly, it's easier to be a nun than being evangelical in the 21st
10:55
century, especially. Right. The subject of politics has already come up so much in the first eight
11:00
or nine minutes of the show. We'll get more into that here in just a second. But I did want to dig
11:03
into something that you did in chapter two that I felt was really interesting. You give us some ideas
11:06
as to why the data are trending the way that they are. And so you talk about secularization,
11:11
social desirability bias, the internet, politics, socialization, loss of trust and changes in family
11:17
structure. But you point to three kind of main one secularization politics and the internet as
11:22
the main reasons. So I want to dig into secularization real quick because in chapter two, you show this
11:26
graph with this quote below it. And here's the quote, notice that the trend line is high on the left
11:30
side and the graph of the left side of the graph and low on the right side, which indicates a clear
11:35
negative relationship between GDP and the importance of religion said another way as a country becomes
11:41
more economically prosperous, it is less religious. Now, the knee jerk reaction for me Ryan is because
11:48
if you're not having to pray, give us this day our daily bread. If you're not having to do that,
11:53
if you're not worried about a tribe on the other side of the hill coming over and taking all your
11:58
women and horses, it makes things a lot easier. And you don't feel like you have to rely on this
12:02
deity of any kind. That's kind of my initial, again, like I said, knee jerk reaction to it.
12:06
But why do you think that is that there is that negative relationship between GDP and the importance
12:11
of religion? Yeah, so I talk about Max Weber in the book, who's this German sociologist,
12:16
probably the most important social scientist to ever live. And he talks about secularization theory.
12:20
And he actually uses this term called use a German term because he's German, but you can translate
12:24
this demagication, which I think is a really great translation. Right. So Weber says the more
12:28
science you have, the less magic you need. Right. So like think about the 1800s, if it doesn't rain
12:32
for a year and all your crops die and you, you know, you die a starvation, you're like,
12:35
why is it not raining? Well, because God's mad at us. Or your wife gets sick,
12:39
costs twice and die three days later. Why, you know, why do my wife die? Because God's mad at us.
12:43
Everything becomes cosmic, right? I think it becomes spiritual. With science, you understand why
12:48
your wife died, you got infection, you understand why it's not raining because of weather patterns,
12:51
climatology, all those things. So what Weber says is the more science you have, the less God you need.
12:56
So as a country becomes more educated and more economically prosperous, it's going to find
13:00
natural explanations for things that do not require the supernatural explanations for things.
13:05
So, but the thing is, the United States is a huge outlier on this, you know, in that graph,
13:10
if a United States was on the trend line, zero percent of Americans would say religion is very
13:14
important. Zero percent. And instead, it's like 48 percent. So we are still, even though we're
13:20
less religious, say than we were 30 or 40 years ago, we're still much more religious than we should be
13:25
if we follow the model, let's say in Western Europe. When I think as well, one thing that you hear a
13:29
lot about trends is in sub-Saharan Africa, how Christianity is exploding. But it's almost from
13:34
these cultures where things like magical things, otherworldly things, they're like, oh, someone was
13:39
raised from the dead. Yeah, totally makes sense. Whereas like, you know, skeptical American intellectual
13:43
is going to be like, yeah, that's not going to happen because of science and all these different
13:46
explanations that they can give. But politics, I feel like, is a main through point of this book.
13:51
And so you talk about that in this chapter as well. And you know, you point this out in your book,
13:55
but a lot of hay has been made. And people made a good amount of money writing scathing books about
13:59
the fact that 81 percent of white evangelicals voted for Trump in 2016 during the presidential
14:03
election time period. They're ignoring some of the obvious reasons for that. The most basic data
14:08
showed that, you know, the exact same percentage essentially voted for Romney and McCain in the
14:12
previous election cycles. And those two didn't have the moral issues that Trump did as far as we can
14:17
tell. But there's a key quote from this section that I wanted to get you to give me a little bit more,
14:21
a little bit more context around a liberal is twice as likely as a moderate and four times
14:27
more likely than a political conservative to be unaffiliated. And you're talking about being
14:32
religiously unaffiliated. Now, I try to make sure to take away all the boogeyman stuff where it's
14:38
like, Oh, all liberals are this or all atheists think this way. Because obviously there's a whole
14:43
lot of color and I don't mean that, you know, in terms of race, there's a whole lot of color
14:46
to who a person is and how they got to be the way that they are. But help me understand,
14:50
because it seems in my head, I'm like, well, of course, a liberal is twice as likely as a moderate
14:55
and four times more likely than a politically conservative to be unaffiliated. But why do you
14:59
think it is? And it's because we were searching for a unified self, I think is the answer, right?
15:04
We're looking what we're trying to do is figure out how to get everything in our identity to a line
15:09
with a central cause. So, you know, we used to see people what we call cross pressured, where they
15:14
had like some things that pushed them to the right and some things that pushed them to the left,
15:17
right? Let's say that you're, you know, you're an environmentalist, but you're also a hunter.
15:21
So, you know, you're strong to a, but you're also strong on the environment. Like, what do you
15:25
do? Who do you vote for? Because the parties are obviously opposed on those kind of issues,
15:28
right? Let's say you're, and this actually is becoming less of a thing, but union membership
15:32
used to make you a Democrat, because Democrats support unions very strongly. Let's say you live
15:35
in rural America, which is very white, very, you know, very conservative now. We were seeing people,
15:40
they're throwing off these cross pressured identities now, and they're lining up behind
15:45
the same identity. And so what we're seeing is, and actually had a piece, I wrote a piece of the
15:49
New York Times a couple of weeks ago, the headline was, you know, the top line finding is evangelicals
15:55
are actually growing, but that's actually probably bad news for evangelicals. Because if you dig
15:59
into the data, what you see is the share of Americans who identify as evangelicals as going up,
16:04
but there are two reasons why it's going up. One is it's because people who are conservative
16:08
politically, but never go to church or identify as an evangelical now, because they like the
16:13
fusion of the two ideas. But the other thing that's really surprising is we're seeing the rise of
16:18
evangelical Jews, evangelical Muslims, evangelical Catholics, they're taking on that moniker too,
16:23
because they're very religious and they're politically conservative. So what they see is the word
16:27
evangelical now is not a specific type of theology. It's encompassing of a conservative, I'm very
16:33
religious and I'm politically conservative. That's how people are seeing it in the world now. So what
16:38
we're seeing is now if I'm a liberal and I go to a conservative church, what we see in the data is
16:42
more and more people are leaving their church based on their politics. So now they're not going to be
16:47
going to a church anymore because they understand that church is going to be much more right-wing.
16:52
Reality is, people are really good at this. They sort themselves out insanely well when it
16:57
comes to their friends, their church, the organizations they're a part of, where they live geographically,
17:02
right? Whether it be urban, suburban, rural, people know where their people are and want to associate
17:07
with those people. And so they create this unified and unfortunately they're unifying behind a political
17:12
identity on both sides, as opposed to maybe an other identity in terms of religious identity.
17:17
So now we're seeing this sorting mechanism happen. And now to be conservative is to be religious,
17:23
to be liberal is to be not religious. And it didn't used to be that way 30 or 40 years ago,
17:27
but today it's definitely that way. Well, I'm busting up my interview a little bit here,
17:30
but I want to make sure I was going to ask this later, but I want to ask this now because I think
17:33
it's pertinent to something that you said. One thing that I see in my read of people that are
17:38
liberally minded, and again, I'm not saying classically liberal, maybe I mean more so leftist,
17:43
like more so on that side where everything is politics, is that they're trading in the altar
17:48
of God for the altar of politics. And we can talk about conservatives doing the same,
17:52
but you know, you made the point about liberals being way more likely to be unaffiliated.
17:56
It's like, okay, you can leave that behind, but you're going to make a religion out of supporting
18:01
Bernie Sanders or supporting the squad or supporting whatever your issue is being pro-choice or being
18:07
open borders immigration. Is that what what's happened? Is that just kind of the nefarious
18:12
underbelly of this that we're now or I say we, a lot of people are worshiping at the altar of
18:16
religion or sorry, politics. Yeah, no, I think I think you're right. If you look at the most
18:21
politically active group in America, they're atheists and agnostics are right behind them.
18:25
They're incredibly politically, for instance, in 2020, half of atheists donated money to a
18:29
candidate or campaign, which is insane because in the general population, it's never the more
18:32
than 20%. So they are very, I think for a lot of atheists, politics becomes their thing that
18:38
ties them together and becomes their purpose and their meaning. And if you actually look at
18:42
politics, a lot of things that we do politically actually come from religious backgrounds, like
18:46
conventions come back from denominational meetings, right? Stumps, beaches, or sermons. So there's
18:51
so much that you can tie those two things together. It's just that atheists agnostics are going to
18:55
strip all the religiosity off of it, but kept all the other stuff because they like the meetings.
18:59
They like the rallies. They like the raw raw and the feel good and the donating money, right? You
19:03
donate to a church. You donate to a candidate. There's not a whole lot of difference between
19:06
those two things. Really, if you think about it, what we're seeing is that people are trying to
19:09
make meaning out of their lives. And unfortunately, for many of them, politics is how they make
19:15
meaning. And I think we can all admit that that's probably a bad way to make meaning because politics
19:19
is irredeemable. I think we all can recognize there's no salvation to be found in politics.
19:24
I never feel good about politics anymore. I only feel bad or worse depending on what's going on.
19:29
And I think the reality is that now, one caveat to that though, there's a third group of nuns,
19:34
there's atheists agnostics, there's a third group called nothing in particular, okay? Three and five
19:39
nuns are nothing in particular. 22% of Americans are nothing in particular. And they are not atheists
19:44
and they are not agnostics because they do not engage in politics hardly at all below the national
19:50
average. So they're just floating in social, cultural, religious, and political space. They've
19:56
got nothing to kind of guide them like atheists and agnostics do. So when I think about the nuns,
20:00
I'm not as worried about atheists and agnostics because I mean nothing in particular group for a
20:04
whole bunch of societal reasons. The new LinkedIn hiring pro can't clone you, but it can streamline
20:11
your hiring workflow. From posting jobs to shortlisting candidates to interviewing,
20:16
LinkedIn hiring pro is the hiring partner you need. So you can focus on connecting with the right
20:21
talent. In fact, small businesses report saving over six hours per week. So I write the first time
20:29
with LinkedIn hiring pro. Post a free job today at linkedin.com/quality.
20:34
Yeah, and you talk about later in the book how the nothing in particular is that's the fastest
20:40
growing religious group in the United States, which is funny to say because they're
20:43
irreligious. But again, I think we're we're not on to something people have been talking about
20:47
this forever. They're worshiping at the altar of politics. We typically left leaning politics,
20:51
but also the altar of sports, celebrity, entertainment, drugs, alcohol, video games,
20:56
Netflix, like they're just they're they're worshiping at the altars of these other things,
21:00
they're worshiping at the altar of what's the next show that I'm going to binge watch. But
21:04
I'm going to get back on track here because we talked about secularization, politics,
21:07
and the other thing we talked about was the internet. And you used a phrase that I had never
21:10
heard before called the spiral of silence. Now you explained it well. So I obviously understood
21:14
what it was, but what is the spiral of silence? And I guess why is that pertinent to the discussion
21:19
of the nuns? Yeah, so the spiral of silence is the idea that if you're in a group of people who
21:23
have a different viewpoint than you do, your natural inclination is just shut up because you
21:28
don't want to be it goes back to like evolutionary biology, right? Like you don't want to be singled
21:32
out in a pack because you're singled out, you're going to die, right? You need that pack to protect
21:35
you. Let's say you're out in a tundra, you know, 10,000 years ago. So what we do, we still do it
21:40
naturally. You're in a group of people, they all start talking about politics. Let's say they say
21:42
things that are very maybe extremely left wing or extremely right wing. And you're not that way.
21:46
You're not going to challenge that because you don't want to go against the dominant viewpoint.
21:50
And so what people understand is that silence is complicity. So if you're not challenging them,
21:55
they assume that you agree with them. And it just makes it the spiral gets tighter and tighter and
22:00
tighter and worse and worse, because the more crazy things they say, the less willing you are to
22:03
speak up. So the more marginalized you are. So in reality, what happens in that situation is you
22:08
don't stick around because you realize you're not with your people, you're going to leave.
22:12
And then the people that are left over are just an echo chamber reinforcing the crazy on both sides
22:17
without anyone walking and going, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, that's too far. Don't believe that.
22:21
Don't say that. We can't do that. And I think what's happening in American life is people sort of
22:24
themselves out in such a way that now all we have left are echo chambers on every side. And no one
22:30
comes in and checks you and says, wait, what about this other side? So now what you do is you
22:34
demonize the other side, you look at the worst version of the other side, not the real version of
22:39
the other side, and it just makes the divides between us and them even larger. Well, you're
22:43
straw manning these other sides, but aside from the the actual reason, which is personal cowardice,
22:49
why most people don't actually stand up and say things, I did an episode a few weeks ago,
22:54
talking about cancel culture, like real cancel culture, where it's like, okay, I'm going to get
22:57
your business, you know, out of here, I'm going to run you out of town, like actual cancel culture,
23:02
we're going to kick you off social media. Is that the main reason why you think people,
23:05
especially on the right, are unwilling to kind of speak their mind? Because I feel like,
23:09
especially if you're a gospel believing conservative, let's say, and you feel like you've got the truth
23:14
because you have the gospel, like you have the end of the story, right? Why would you not want
23:18
to say that? Why would you not want to speak that into culture? But I think people are actually
23:22
terrified, especially if you're a conservative Christian who's really nice, and you kind of go
23:26
along to get along, you don't like to ruffle feathers, right? That you're just going to kind of let it
23:30
bull over you at some point. Is that kind of a good way to think about it?
23:34
I think if evangelicals are in a tough spot, right? Because they believe you don't believe
23:37
what they believe. You're going to hell. Exactly. Like there's no there's no all their alternative,
23:42
but they also understand and I think they instinctually understand a lot of things they believe are way
23:46
out of the mainstream culture in terms of, you know, sinfulness and sexuality and gender identity
23:51
and all those things and women leadership way out of step on those things from the general public.
23:56
So they're always walking this line right between like, I want to preach the gospel and fidelity to
23:59
my understanding of the Bible, but also understanding if I do do that, it's going to further isolate me
24:03
from the rest of society. So evangelicals have this difficult thing. I think actually think it's
24:07
getting worse because their views of sexuality and gender identity have not changed over time,
24:12
yet culture has shifted fairly, I mean, incredibly significantly to the left over the last 10 or 15.
24:18
Think about this. In 2004, there were 13 ballot initiatives in 13 different states to make
24:23
marriage between one man and one woman. They passed in all 13 states, including Oregon.
24:28
The liberal fashion of Oregon is still passed. 12 years later, gay marriage is the law of the land,
24:33
right? So things shifted so quickly on that. And evangelicals are sort of reeling from that,
24:36
I think still, because they still want to engage the culture, but where they've staked out a position
24:41
has not moved, but the culture has moved further away from them. So their ability to evangelize is
24:46
getting more and more difficult. So now they have two choices. One, they can change their views,
24:51
which a lot of them won't because they want fidelity to their understanding of scripture.
24:54
Or they can say, okay, we're a happy remnant over here, right? We're going to just keep our little
25:01
insular culture over here and not try to evangelize anymore. I think actually a lot of the battles
25:05
you see in religion is how open you want to be versus how closed you want to be. And I think
25:09
evangelicals are fighting that fight right now, because a lot of them are thinking, who am I
25:13
talking to when I go on social media? Am I talking to my people or am I talking to those people?
25:17
And I think no one really agrees on who they're talking to at this point.
25:20
Right. And I think they're ignoring Jesus's words when he's talking about being salt and light,
25:25
because salt can't preserve anything if it's lost to saltiness. But I feel like a lot of
25:28
churches as well became obsessed with relevance. They wanted to be relevant. There's even a stupid
25:34
Christian magazine called relevant, like basically all they want to do, they want the clothes that
25:39
they're worship pastors to where to be relevant. They want all the graphics to be relevant. And this
25:43
is not, you know, commercial for people making sure that their church service is ugly and people
25:47
wear, you know, ill fitting suits. But it's just like when you worship at the altar of relevance and
25:51
not godliness, it kind of creates a little bit of this issue. I'm sure we could spend the rest of
25:54
our time talking about that. But we've got a lot more stuff to cover. One thing that you talked
25:58
about that I find was that I found very interesting is that the highest percentage of the religiously
26:02
unaffiliated groups are people with postgraduate educations. Okay. And as soon as I read that
26:06
section of the book, it reminded me of this Malcolm Muggerage quote, you know, he was
26:10
an agnostic for most of his life until it became a Christian later in life. So this, this quotes,
26:14
you know, it's a few sentences long, but I want to read it to you because I think it goes into our
26:17
conversation. This is a quote from Malcolm Muggerage. So the final conclusion would surely be that
26:21
whereas other civilizations have been brought down by attacks of barbarians from without,
26:26
ours had the unique distinction of training its own destroyers as its own educational
26:31
institutions, and then providing them with facilities for propagating their destructive ideology far
26:36
and wide, all at the public expense. Thus did Western man decide to abolish himself,
26:41
creating his own boredom out of his own affluence, his own vulnerability out of his own strength,
26:46
his own impotence out of his own erotomania, himself blowing the trumpet that brought the walls
26:51
of his city tumbling down and having convinced himself that he too, or he was too numerous,
26:57
labored with pill and scalpel and syringe to make himself fewer. This is the key quote of the quote.
27:02
Until at last, having educated himself into imbecility and polluted and drugged himself
27:08
into stupefication, he kneeled over a wary battered old brontosaurus and became extinct.
27:14
As soon as I read about that, that high, you know, postgraduate degree, which I have and most of these
27:19
people being being that I thought having educated themselves into imbecility. Is this like what
27:24
you were talking about earlier, Ryan, where these modern cultures, they have scientific explanations
27:28
for seemingly everything that we're just basically, it's the scientific God of the gaps, if you will,
27:33
that we can explain everything with evolution and science. We don't actually need anything
27:37
ethereal. I think that's, that's the issue is people thought that science would solve all our
27:41
problems. You know, there's this great boat by Karen Armstrong called the case for God.
27:44
And in 1900, science was convinced we solve the exact 10 or 12 problems. We would solve all the
27:48
problems of the universe, like we would have it all figured out. We're 100 years later, we've
27:52
solved none of those problems and we actually have less meaning in some ways, right? I think the
27:56
problem is, is that we think that science and, and religion are in conflict with each other.
28:01
And I think they're obviously, I painted that way oftentimes, right? Like, you either believe
28:04
with the Earth's created in six days, you believe in evolution. Like, listen, you can believe
28:08
in both things that God exists, but also the evolution exists at the same time. They don't
28:11
contradict each other that much. I think what we try to do is we try to make science
28:16
explain spiritual problems, and we try to make God explain science problems, right? There are
28:20
two different ways to understand this world. And what you actually see among the educated
28:24
people is the educated people are actually going to church, but they're doing it for early
28:28
interesting reason. They're doing it more for the social reason than they are for the theological
28:32
reason, which I think that's something that people who don't have as much education, I think
28:36
forget is they're falling behind American life because they're not social. They're not joining
28:40
clubs and groups. A story I love to tell is I was at church one time, very liturgical old-school
28:44
church did what's called prayers of the people, which is where the pastor will come up and say,
28:48
you know, who has a prayer quest and we'll all bow our heads and someone will just say something
28:51
from the audience. Like, can you please pray for me? I have cancer and we all say, Lord,
28:55
your mercy, hear our prayer. Well, this 21 year old kid in the back, he's there with his wife and
28:59
his kid and he said, can you all pray for me? I lost my job and I don't know how I'm going to pay
29:02
my rent at the end of the month. We said, Lord, your mercy, hear our prayer. Well, after the
29:07
service is over, one of the older guys in the congregation owns a small business comes up to
29:10
the young man and says, son, you need a job, I can get you a job. And he went and worked for that
29:14
guy at his small business, right? I think what we forget about religion is, sure, we can talk about,
29:19
like, you know, ontology and epistemology and all those things. At the end of the day,
29:23
it's a bunch of people hanging out and supporting each other through the best and the worst of their
29:26
lives. And I think that's the thing that education has taught me as a social scientist is the value
29:30
of church. I used to think was all vertical, but now I understand now vertical still matters,
29:36
don't get me wrong. But the horizontal may be just as important and by cutting ourselves off
29:41
from those social ties, we're actually hurting ourselves emotionally, financially, spiritually,
29:45
and emotionally in every possible way. And we don't see what we don't have. Therefore,
29:50
we don't know what we're missing. When there's these atheist groups that have tried to create these
29:54
non religious churches, I'm sure you've heard about them. And they've basically all failed. I say
29:59
all, a lot of them have failed, because there's nothing actually holding them together, right?
30:04
They all kind of dressed as saying they all kind of come from the same background. They all kind of
30:08
believe the same things politically. There's nothing actually tangible outside of those things
30:12
to keep them there to kind of have that. And I thought it was interesting you brought up the
30:16
science and religion thing again, because Eric Metax has wrote a great book here recently called
30:20
Is Atheism Dead? And he spends the overwhelming majority of that book talking about how science
30:24
was trying to disprove God, but it keeps just proving God. And I think that that's really
30:28
important for people to realize. And for a lot of Christians, and you know, I've talked about a
30:31
lot of my show, so I'll say it again, a lot of Christians are intimidated by science because they
30:35
think if they go digging into science, then their entire worldview is going to crumble.
30:40
And I encourage people know the number of people like the number of world class scientists that
30:44
believe in in a creator God that's like, integrally involved in what the going zone of humanity
30:50
is a lot. There's a lot of them. And these people know more than anything. We've got an
30:54
apologist coming on later this year. That's a biologist, but also a Christian apologist. And
30:58
you're like, how could that possibly happen? But it happens all the time. One thing I did
31:02
want to go into Ryan in chapter three or your book, you say that you say actually this quote here,
31:07
"Thus both genders are walking away from organized religion, but men are doing so at even higher
31:13
rates." Okay, so this is a man's podcast, you know, overwhelming majority of our listeners are men.
31:19
There's a lot of reasons for this, right? There's a lot of reasons why people think
31:22
this is happening. One of the things that I've said, and I've said even recently on a debate
31:26
that I did on the Unbelievable podcast over in the UK is that men will go where they're needed.
31:31
And if they go to church and they realize that they're not needed, then they're going to go wherever
31:36
they want to, right? They're going to go wherever they feel like they can give value. And so that
31:40
may be to their shop, that may be to the shooting range, to the golf course, to the wherever. But
31:44
from what you've seen and what you've experienced as a pastor and a social scientist, why do you
31:48
think men are leaving at higher rates than women? Yeah, I think it's because I think the problem
31:53
with religion, it makes you feel things, you know, like a good religious service is going to make
31:57
you feel things. And men are culturally trained to not feel things, right? Like we've all been,
32:02
I was raised in the 80s where it's like, boys don't cry, right? Boys don't feel emotion. It's odd
32:06
when a man cries, you just kind of turn your eyes avert your gaze. To be spiritual is to be
32:10
emotionally open, right? To be emotionally available and to work on yourself and understand you don't
32:14
have it all figured out. Things that men, by and large, culturally are not to our least when I was
32:19
growing up were not taught to do. The other part is men are not social or less social. We know this
32:24
social scientifically that men are just less social than women are. They don't hang out with other
32:28
other men as much as women hang out with other women. And church is basically a social activity.
32:32
I know my dad is probably one of the least social people I've ever met. And when he does go to church,
32:36
he goes, he comes in right before it starts. He sits for the service. And as soon as it's over,
32:42
he's literally the first person out the back door walking to the parking lot. He does not want to
32:46
engage with anyone, not have no conversation with anyone, does not want to be involved with anyone.
32:50
But so I've done some subsequent analysis looking at like age, like what age men are more likely to
32:55
be, are more likely to be nuns than women. So when men have kids, like in between ages of like 25
33:01
and 45, they're actually just as likely to be religious as women are. But as soon as those kids
33:06
grow up and get out of the house, that's where men sort of drift. Like the 55 year old, 65 year old
33:11
man who's retired, those are the people I really, really worry about because those men don't have a
33:15
lot of purpose in terms of work anymore because they're kind of done with their working life.
33:18
Their kids are out of the house. A lot of them have been married for 30 or 40 or some have been
33:21
divorced. They might be single at that point. What do they really have going for them? A lot of them
33:26
are not choosing to be social in any way. And I think really, if you look at the data, that's a
33:30
really bad outcome for men. We need to understand that being social is okay. You know, being emotional,
33:36
being having friends, it's good to have friends. I don't think men are taught that as much. I think
33:39
women naturally want to have friends and be communicative. Now, obviously, we're speaking in broad
33:43
generality here, but you look at the data, that's what you see. There's a huge gender gap in socialization.
33:47
I think it hurts. It hurts men in a lot of ways. One thing I do want to push back on,
33:51
because I would agree with most of that, and I've said a lot of that on my show already,
33:54
but one thing that I would push back and maybe ask even further questions is a lot of people just
33:58
assume like, oh, men are culturally taught to not have feelings, don't cry. All those things that
34:01
you've said, you know, I was born in the 80s. And so I kind of heard some of the same things.
34:05
But if that were true, though, wouldn't older generations, because I've read books by people that
34:10
linked the, you know, the cultural desire for little boys to be stoic directly to suicide.
34:16
And it's like an egregious thing to go from there to there in such a short period of time.
34:21
And if that were true, suicidality with boomers would be way higher than it would be with modern,
34:26
because I feel like with modern boys, they're constantly being told to share their feelings.
34:30
They're being constantly being told by 98% of their female teachers growing up have emotions,
34:36
but not those emotions. Those ones are scary. Those have too much testosterone.
34:39
But is that really it though? I know that's a univariate analysis and you get into a ton of
34:43
problems when you only use univariate analysis, but it can't just be that because we live in one
34:48
of the most emotional time periods, maybe ever. So I'll tell you the story. My son is fourth grade.
34:53
He, a big part of his class is what's called social emotional learning now. They actually spend
34:59
time every single day on social emotional issues. And last week, he had two days where he came home
35:03
and he was just quiet and bumpy. He's not in these gregarious outgoing kid and he was not those
35:07
things. And we try to figure out what's going on. Well, in class, one of the students said that his
35:12
mom and dad are both in prison. They was not going to see either of them for five or seven years.
35:15
And all the other kids in the class started crying, you know, because they felt so bad for this kid.
35:20
And I was talking to my wife about it. I'm like, we never, we never, in school, we never did that.
35:25
Like, I literally never remember having a moment like that. And then I thought, why are they doing
35:29
that now? Which I love, by the way, I think every school should be doing social emotional
35:31
learning. Why are they doing that? And I realized something. I think part of it is those kind of
35:36
conversations used to happen in church. You know, I can't tell you how many times I cried in youth
35:40
group about God knows what about my girlfriend or my dog or whatever it is. But these kids are
35:44
not going to church anymore, right? They're not going to youth group anymore. So they don't have
35:48
that social emotional outlet. They used to have a church. So now school has become like this all
35:53
encompassing thing where it's like, we're gonna teach you arithmetic and geography and PE. But we're
35:57
also going to teach you how to be a decent human being and have compassion for your fellow man.
36:01
I think that's such an interesting shift that like religion has declined, which used to teach us
36:05
these things. And now we're trying to use other levers to try to bring it back. I'm happy they're
36:10
doing it, but I'm sad they have to do it, you know, well, it, Ryan, it's an interesting shift,
36:14
but I would say potentially a dangerous one. Even here recently, I won't even mention who it was,
36:17
but a prominent business owner here in my city. They were talking about how, you know, their,
36:22
their teenager came back from school and they were, they were talking about the George Floyd case.
36:26
They were talking about all these kinds of, you know, racism topics and all that. And I was like,
36:31
good grief. Like, did they, did they ever learn math that day? Did they learn English that day?
36:36
And so part of my struggle with that is these government employees that are teaching your kids
36:40
that tend to come from one kind of worldview and they're typically feminine, right? Because they're
36:44
female. These individuals are now having discussions with our kids about these macro world topics,
36:51
about LGBTQ issues, about, you know, systemic racism, whatever that is, and about all these
36:55
different things. And, and yet, none of their classes are 100% up to grade level competency.
37:01
And so that's part of my issue to where it's like, okay, you do emotional learning with this kid.
37:05
That's great. Can he tie his shoes? Can he spell his name in cursive? Like, those are the things
37:10
that I'm worried about, but you're, you're right in a way that where the church has abdicated
37:15
responsibility, the, the vacuum is going to be filled. Like, look what happened in Ireland of all
37:19
places whenever they allowed abortion, the murder of unborn children to be passed in Ireland.
37:24
It was because the Catholic church had completely lost their ability to, to influence people in
37:30
that culture because of, you know, stuff that you talked about with the, with the, you know,
37:33
sexual abuse scandals and things like that. But man, I just got to tell you, Ryan, like,
37:36
that scares me that we have these teachers, these union teachers teaching our kids about
37:41
topics that they should have nothing to do with. Am I crazy?
37:45
I think the problem is it's, we, we, we used to rely on many forms of meaning in life and now the
37:49
government's kind of, you know, taken over what, and listen, I'm not going to blame the government.
37:53
I'm going to blame us. Yeah. They're going to be daddy. They're going to act like daddy when
37:56
we let them, you know, exactly. If you give them that space, they're going to take that space,
38:00
right? Well, rightly or wrongly, but the thing is societies created that space for them to take.
38:04
And I think the issue here that I worry about is, and this is what I talked about in the book,
38:07
is this nothing in particular category scares me to death because, you know, the internet can
38:11
radicalize you overnight, right? Whether it be on the left or the right. And I always want to
38:15
recommend not to, this is a great podcast. I'll recommend another podcast called The Rabbit Hole.
38:19
There's on New York Times. They interviewed this kid who was, you know, he talks about,
38:22
I went to college for a couple of years, dropped out because I got in a fight, you know, went home,
38:26
didn't have much going on for me, worked at Dairy Queen as a manager, started watching Steph
38:30
on Molyneux videos on YouTube and got completely radicalized being like anti-woman, anti-black,
38:35
you know, become racist. But he goes, here's the most fascinating thing. 18 months later,
38:39
I was a hardcore Bernie Sanders socialist because I got sucked down the YouTube rabbit hole the
38:42
other direction, right? So if you don't have any guardrails up, you don't have those educational
38:47
guardrails, which in college, we like, I try to teach you how to think, right? Like show you both
38:51
sides and say, let's think about this rationally. Let's think about this logically, right? If we
38:54
don't have those guardrails, and then your pastor, your priest, your rabbi can say to you, listen,
38:58
as a Jew, a Christian, here's what we believe about the world. Here's our broad view of humanity and
39:03
life and everything else. If you don't have those guardrails up, guess what? YouTube and the internet
39:08
can drag you all the way across the spectrum. And no one steps in and says, that's too much.
39:13
That's too far. We don't believe those things here because we believe this thing about people
39:17
or this thing about humanity or race or gender or whatever it is. The problem is,
39:21
in a society with no, with no institutions, the internet pulls us from one side to the other,
39:26
and no one can step in. And I think, unfortunately, I think a lot of times you're seeing radicalization
39:30
on both the left and the right, it's because they have no people in their lives who stand up and say,
39:34
whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. We don't do that. We, this is my hot take. We need more gatekeepers.
39:39
We need more people to stand up and say, that's a radical view. That's too far gone on both sides
39:45
to say, we don't believe those things here, because otherwise, what we get the internet is,
39:49
everyone not only has a voice, they have a megaphone. And unfortunately, the internet,
39:53
the crazy view is what gets the most clicks, likes, retweets, and traffic. The moderate view,
39:59
no one wants to hear about. They want to see the crazy person online, which, don't get me wrong,
40:03
I love to see that too. But it also creates sort of like a car crash culture that we're in,
40:07
where we look at the crazy, not them. And by the way, most people are in the middle.
40:11
Let's not forget that point. Well, Ryan, we like to see it because it's entertaining to us,
40:15
because it's funny. Other people are like, yeah, yeah, that makes sense. That makes total sense.
40:19
But I think part of it, and we definitely don't have enough time left to talk about postmodernism.
40:23
But I think postmodernism is having a little bit of an issue with that, because if everybody's truth
40:27
is their truth and of equal importance, then for one guy to stand up and say, yeah, that's stupid.
40:33
That's a really, really dumb idea. And we should do that. It's like, are you violating their truth?
40:37
How dare you, you bigot? It's kind of that overwhelming sense that culturally,
40:41
we're going to cancel you because you're telling someone that their lived experience is somehow
40:45
not as valid as what is true and what is valid. But again, like I said, we can't talk about postmodernism.
40:49
We only have time for a few more questions. I definitely want to talk about something that you
40:52
said in chapter five, because you make a statement in chapter five that caught me completely off guard
40:58
and completely odd considering that it came from a passer. So I'm going to read this quote here.
41:03
I think it's helpful for people of faith to think about the rise of the nuns in much the same way
41:07
as globalization. In both cases, the same cold, hard fact is true. We cannot stop it. Both waves
41:14
are only continuing to build and strengthen speed. Any efforts to impede them will be futile.
41:20
Okay, so it seems like you're not really leaving any room for the power of God to create a revival
41:27
of sorts. You said, you know, unequivocally, it's gaining strength and speed. There's nothing
41:32
that you can do to stop it. Now, there's nothing that I can do to stop it. There's nothing that
41:36
you can do to stop it. But I feel like God could stop it. No, listen, I'm a social scientist. God
41:40
is not a variable, you know, like every time I write, but the thing is like we have to social
41:46
scientists use explainable factors, right? Like we can't add like a God, a God coefficient in there,
41:51
right? So yeah, I'm listen, I'm not opposed to that. We could have a, you know, a third grade
41:55
awakening in America. But I think the reality is, you know, secularization is there's no laws in
42:00
social science, but it's about as close as we get to a law, right? If you look at all these other
42:04
countries, they are much more secular than we are. And I think the reason I wrote that was,
42:09
because for pastors like me, my church was 300 people in the 1960s. It was 95 people in 1996,
42:14
and now it's 15 people, right? Can I look at myself every day in the mirror and go, the
42:19
church is smaller because I suck, right? It's my fault. And I did that for a while, right? I really
42:24
looked at that. If I preach better, if I do what are outreach, if I'm more relevant to you as the
42:28
term we just talked about, if I'm more relevant, my church is going to grow. I did all those things.
42:31
I tried all those things and our church did not grow. At some level, we are all, and this is what
42:35
social sciences, at least political science has become much more institutional over the last 20
42:39
years, which is we argue that institutions matter more than behavior does, because institutions shape
42:44
behavior. And I think for us institutionalization means secularization, right? We tried to stop
42:49
globalization for the last 30 or 40 years and what have we got? Nothing. More globalization.
42:54
More globalization. That's all we got is more globalization. I mean, I talked in the book about
42:57
Trump went to that plant in Indiana, Maytag plant and tried to say, we'll give you incentives to stay.
43:01
They took the incentives. They sent everyone to Mexico and now they're building robots with the
43:04
incentive money. So it's like, you cannot stop this thing. Secularization. Now, what I do think
43:09
about secularization that's interesting is I'm not sure it's people actually leaving religion.
43:12
I think it's just people more willing to say what they are on surveys, which we didn't even
43:15
talk about, which I think people have been lying on surveys for decades now. And secularization has
43:19
given them permission to say what they really think on a survey, which is they're not
43:23
religious. So what you're really seeing is those people are really just declaring what they already
43:27
were as opposed to people leaving religion entirely. I think that number is actually a lot
43:31
smaller than we think it is. So we're going to be left with is a core of people who are
43:34
still very religious in America. So secularization is going to wash over them, but not push them
43:39
out to see, right? They're still they're still there. But the reality is American society is
43:44
changing rapidly. And a lot of things that pastors are doing really won't stem the tide unless it's
43:50
a supernatural thing, which obviously we can all cry out for revival all we want. It's really
43:54
not on our timeline, right? It's on God's timeline. And I think a lot of pastors should maybe try
43:58
to get out of the way a little bit more to allow for God's timeline and to allow for God's providence
44:03
because, you know, I talked about this with John Cooper, the lead senior of skillet because he had
44:06
this, he had this the viral thing from Facebook where he talked about, Hey, let's make pastors
44:11
uncool again, because all these pastors, again, they're trying to be relevant. They're trying to
44:14
be cool. And they're trying to be the point, right? Look at these amazingly rare Jordan's I'm wearing
44:19
and look at this, this great speech that I just gave and they're not really pointing to the father
44:23
anymore. But again, I keep getting on all these tangents. Let's get back into what we're supposed
44:26
to be doing here, Kyle. So here's the thing. And later in chapter five, you had a quote that I
44:30
absolutely loved. And you mentioned it a little bit earlier if people were paying attention,
44:33
but this is a quote. The reality is simply this Americans used to be Christians simply by default,
44:39
not because of their belief in the words of the apostles creed, secularization merely gave
44:44
permission for a lot of people to express who they truly are religiously unaffiliated.
44:49
Now, I live in Oklahoma. I live in Oklahoma, essentially my entire life, the belt buckle,
44:53
the Bible belt. You are a Christian by dent of birth, right? You were born here in this red clay.
44:59
And so boom, you are a Christian. And a lot of people think that way. They don't believe anything
45:04
about the gospel. They go to church twice a year, Easter and Christmas. And that is it. So to a degree,
45:09
I'm glad about this, because if you are so delusional that you think you're a Christian,
45:14
because you were born in a red state, that's an issue. I think the gospel is going to be,
45:18
it's going to be difficult to penetrate your, your unreality that you have in your brain.
45:23
I would much rather say that they're religiously unaffiliated because I feel like that person
45:26
might be a little bit more logical in terms of the questions that they would ask or the questions
45:30
that they would need answered in order to kind of open up, you know, who they are to who the
45:34
reality of Jesus is. Is that kind of, is that how you feel about the subject as well? Because
45:39
I was actually inspired by that. I wasn't disappointed at all.
45:42
So I was, I was given a talk last week in Atlanta to a bunch of church planters. And I said,
45:46
you know, the main reality is what we're seeing is the real religious landscape,
45:50
not the manufactured or the socially desirable religious land. And they all went, oh, like,
45:54
that you could hear like an audible sigh come across the congregation, right? They're like,
45:57
whoa, like that makes a lot more sense to me. Like, and it really does make a lot. And in the book,
46:01
I talk about like the first step in 12 steps, you know, Alcoholics Anonymous is admits you
46:05
have a problem. And I think for a long time, Christians have kind of floated along on this myth that
46:09
America's a lot more Christian, you know, we're 80% Christian. Our present Christian reality is
46:13
we were never that Christian. We've never been that Christian. We're not that, or not that Christian
46:17
today. We're actually, I think what we're seeing today is actually getting closer to the real number,
46:20
right? Of people who are real true believers. And we're seeing the people who are not culturally
46:24
Christian, I would say, are now saying they're nuns or they're nothing in particular, a lot of
46:28
them. So now we're faced with the reality, as opposed to the, the, the smoke and mirrors that
46:32
we've been seeing for the last 20 or 30 years. But I also think that gives the church a challenge,
46:36
because now, you know, I think it actually makes it easier in some ways though, because now people
46:41
are willing to say, Oh, I'm in nothing in particular. I'm not really religious. When 20 years ago,
46:45
they were said they were a Christian, and you would have just walked on to the next person, right?
46:48
So now you're getting a more honest, transparent answer for them. And when you get a transparent
46:52
answer, I think it's easier to talk to them as a real human being. They're not trying to tell you
46:55
what they want you to hear. They're telling you what they're really feeling. And so I, you know,
47:00
like the internet's been awful, but I think that's one thing internet's done. It's allowed people to
47:03
be more confident in who they really are and say what they really are. And I think we're actually
47:06
getting people to be more honest. Now, don't have this conversation online, because you're gonna
47:10
not it's not gonna be a good conversation. But if you have a face to face conversation with a person,
47:14
I think you are honestly going to get a more real conversation today than at any point in the last
47:18
50 years, which if you're a Christian or a not or not a Christian, I think that's a good that's a
47:23
step forward for us as a society. Well, and Ryan, I don't know if anyone that is vehemently
47:28
nothing in particular, right? Like who who does that to where it's like, I really am neutral on
47:34
pepperoni pizza, right? Like no one like says anything like that before. I can deal with neutral.
47:39
I can deal with lukewarm. So I think about the abortion debate, because I do get into those
47:43
discussions quite often. If someone is like, you know, pink hair, crazy face tattoo, like a pro
47:51
choice like that person, that's a really, really difficult person to bring them to the center and
47:55
say let's have a logical discussion about whether we're actually killing a human being. Where someone
47:59
that's just like, yeah, I mean, I guess a woman should be able to have the right to choose what to
48:03
do with her own body. When I asked that person, Hey, are you sure it's her body or is the entity
48:08
growing inside her someone separate? Oh, like they're more amenable to these things and they're
48:13
more able to be swayed because we're speaking true to them, which really goes nicely into the
48:17
end of your book, because you do a lot of descriptions as to the reality as to what the data say and
48:24
on all those different things. But you do get a little bit into the prescriptions here. So I'm
48:27
going to read this quote from the end of your book. So here's my suggestion. Speak truth to them.
48:32
Preach sound biblical doctrine that cuts across the political spectrum. One of the theological
48:37
principles that shapes the way I view the world dates back to the Old Testament. It's the concept
48:41
of the Amago day, the understanding that every human being is created in the image and likeness
48:45
of God. And because of that, every person on earth is deserving of love and respect. It sounds so
48:49
simple, yet it can be yet it can have profound impact on how we think act and vote. So I talk
48:55
about the Amago day a lot, right? And I talk about it in a myriad of different issues. So like,
49:00
you know, when you're talking about abortion or when you're talking about murder, you're
49:02
talking about someone being raped, it's like, at that moment, you see someone that's being raped on
49:06
a train car, which happened in Philadelphia a few weeks ago, that's not the time to stand up
49:10
and preach scripture to that person. Someone's Amago day, the Amago day is being violated and
49:15
is your job to stop it, right? That's kind of my contention. But the problem, I guess, I, well,
49:19
I don't have a problem with it, is you say the words speak truth to them. But again, Ryan,
49:24
we live in a modern modernity where truth is completely relative. And if you're preaching
49:28
your truth to somebody, you're bigoted for doing so. So I agree with your sentiment. But how do we
49:34
operate? How do we do that in this modern context? We're just doing that makes you bigoted.
49:38
Yeah, no, that's I got asked that the thing last week, right? How do I, how do we, you know,
49:44
churches are being defined by what their view is LGBTQ is not about how they serve people around
49:48
them, right? Because listen, at the end of that, when we talk about car crash mentality,
49:52
it's a car crash mentality, right? We want to look for the example of crazy things happening.
49:56
And even that story that one being raped in the subway in Philadelphia, they're like,
49:59
the initial stories people like watched it happen and didn't do anything about it.
50:01
The reality is that's not what happened at all. That the story was completely wrong from the
50:05
beginning, right? But we pick up on these car crash mentality things. And I think when it comes to
50:10
church, when you see a church discriminate against someone for being gay or transgender or whatever
50:13
it is, that's what makes the headlines. Unfortunately, and I think this is something that we are completely
50:18
unaware of is how much social safety net in America is perpetuated by church and by religion
50:23
of all stripes rather be closed clauses, food pantries, prison ministries, all those things.
50:27
I think the reality is, and this is like my like my doomsday warning thing is in the next 30 years,
50:33
a lot of that safety net is going to crumble away as these churches close. And no one's going to
50:38
realize that until it's too late, how much the church actually did for their local community.
50:42
I saw I think a lot of what we have to do when we talk about speaking truth is saying to people
50:46
like, listen, I know you want to define us by this belief and that position and this thing over here,
50:51
but I want you to know that this is all the other things that we do in the community, right? I'm a
50:55
big believer in churches need to be better at PR. They need to say like, listen, we're feeding
50:59
kids, we're clothing kids, we're doing prison ministry, all those things. Now listen, you can
51:03
disagree with us on views of Jesus and abortion and whatever else, but you cannot disagree with
51:08
us that there are hungry kids in our community. That that's what we need to fix, right? So we
51:11
focus over here. Now listen, there are people who are never going to agree with you on those
51:15
things. That's the thing about religion. There's this great article by Richard Ward. He called
51:19
religion as conversation stopper. That's what he calls religion because if you say have a conversation
51:24
where they say, well, why do you believe that? And if you say, well, God told me so, or the Bible
51:28
says so, where do you go with the rest of that conversation if the other person doesn't believe
51:31
in the Bible? You don't go anywhere. It stops the conversation, right? So we have to understand
51:36
there's an inherent thing about religion that's absolute and you, you're probably not going to
51:40
convince the other person to have your worldview. That's okay, but let's focus. We have to, we have
51:46
to focus on what we have in common, not what we have different. And I think the reality is,
51:49
for most people, they have a lot more in common than they realize. Maybe not theologically, but
51:53
infuse of social issues of the world around them. They want the same things you want. They just don't
51:57
worship the same way you worship. When I think the Greg Cocle approach that as you described in the
52:01
book tactics is like, you're not probably going to get that tear-filled crumble to the floor conversion
52:06
experience. Just put a rock in someone's shoe, right? When I've talked to people that are vehemently
52:10
pro-choice to go back to the abortion thing, like I'm done trying to convince them completely
52:15
that what their, their worldview is completely bankrupt. I'm trying to put a rock in their shoe.
52:19
I'm going to ask them a question that no one has ever asked them before. And if they're intellectually
52:22
honest, they're going to have to really reckon with that and deal with it. Now, Ryan, that would
52:25
have been a great place to leave the interview, but I'm selfish here. I got one more quote that I
52:28
want to get a little bit more context for before we got to get you out of here. There was a quote
52:32
from, I think at the beginning part of your book, it was this, just as I wouldn't want one of my
52:37
political science colleagues to try to explain the evolution of Trinitarian thought in Protestant
52:42
Christianity, I don't want pastors to try to explain how Karl Marx thought about religion
52:47
or expound on the implications of internet-based polling. Now, I think the point more so of that
52:52
was you were talking about internet-based polling because you had these pastors that were doing
52:55
univariable analysis, you're looking at a single variable, and then now using it as a jumping off
53:00
point for a sermon. But for me, personally, I want my pastor to explain to me what Karl Marx was
53:06
thinking. I want my pastor to explain to me what Nietzsche's thoughts did to culture. I want my
53:12
pastor to do those things because pastors are supposed to be purveyors of truth. And one of my
53:16
biggest gripes with a lot of pastors in America, and even for churches that I've attended,
53:20
is they won't go into the real cultural issues, and they leave their flocks confused. So when you
53:26
do your little TED talk and you sprinkle in some Bible verses that you've taken out of context,
53:30
that doesn't help me understand how I should think about what happened in Afghanistan when we pulled
53:34
out. That doesn't help me think about whether or not Black Lives Matter is a sentence or an
53:38
organization that we should fear. Those are things that I feel like pastors should get into. Am I
53:43
reading into your quote too far? Is that something that you think pastors should not touch?
53:48
Here's what I was saying with that. I think the problem is they create a straw man out of Karl
53:53
Marx where he's only someone to critique. They don't try to explain the worldview that he was
53:58
operating in, the culture that he wrote, the communist manifesto in, and the issues that he was facing
54:03
in Western Europe in the 1800s. I think you use Karl Marx as a bludgeon. You never really think
54:08
of his ideas worth considering. His ideas, you don't even allow people to consider his ideas.
54:14
So basically he becomes a totem, as Emile Durkheim would say, a totem for all bad things in the world.
54:20
When in reality, Karl Marx, I want my people to know about class consciousness. I want them to
54:25
understand that Karl Marx thought that religion was bad. It was the opening of the people. But
54:28
then I want to say to them, here's why I don't think it's the opium of the people. So he goes
54:33
from being a one dimensional straw man character to a real person who had real thoughts that do
54:38
have value, by the way. Karl Marx thoughts have value and I will still teach him in my class.
54:43
Now, when I'm done, I have my conservative students walk out and go, you know what? You taught me
54:46
more about Karl Marx than I'd ever heard in my entire life and I still think he's an idiot.
54:49
I'm like, totally fine. That's totally great. But my job, I think what pastors do is when they
54:54
hear Karl Marx, they think communism, bad, Stalin, Mao, all those things, really try to understand
55:00
Marx for what he was trying to say. And then he's not just a person to attack. Karl Marx is a
55:05
person to understand. And I think that's what a lot of pastors miss is they don't try to understand
55:10
the social science side of things. They just use him as sort of a thing to attack against.
55:15
And I think that's unfair to your congregation because you're not really teaching them anything.
55:18
You're just teaching them like, you know, I can apologize class. It was always like,
55:21
okay, if they say this, then you say that. Like, that's not the right way to teach, right? Because
55:26
you're not really listening to what they're saying to you. You're just waiting to respond.
55:29
And I think that's what we do a lot of times with these social science characters is we just teach
55:33
them how to respond to people in our churches. We don't really take them to listen to what they
55:37
have to say and think about what they're saying. I think that's what I was trying to say in that
55:41
passage is pastors will make Karl Marx seriously enough.
55:44
It's easy to teach people shorthand. It's hard to teach people a language. And so
55:48
the shorthand is communism bad, which I agree with, you know, Mao Stalin, Lenin bad, right? So I
55:55
agree with all those things. And so that is a message that you can easily get up. It's bumper
55:59
sticker theology for people or bumper sticker philosophy. Those are easy to wrap your minds around.
56:03
But last year, I kind of was feeling that a little bit the same, Ryan, like I read the communist
56:07
manifesto because I was like, all right, I need to make sure I can read this guy, read his thoughts
56:11
and all that in the context in which he wrote it. And you know, you start reading off the beginning,
56:14
you're like, some of this sounds okay. And then you read to the end, you're like, Oh, my gosh,
56:17
this is absolutely crazy town. So this dude is literally, and he's a fruit basket at this point.
56:22
But you know what, we've got a lot of different areas in this podcast, and we might need to come
56:25
back and do one just on Karl Marx, so we can talk a little bit and go tip for Tat on him.
56:29
But Ryan, that's all for me. Is there anything else you want to get off your chest?
56:32
Read the book, The Nuns, where they came from, who they are, where they're going.
56:35
And I have a new book coming out in March called 20 Miss about religion and politics in America,
56:39
preorder available on Amazon right now. You can follow me on Twitter at Ryan Burge. All I do is
56:44
post graphs all day. Ryan Burge.net is my personal website. You can find all my contact info. It's
56:49
very easily findable online. We're going to have all that information for you in the show notes,
56:53
and we were probably going to have you back on here very, very soon to talk about that next book.
56:56
But Ryan Burge, thank you for coming on on Dante Life, a man's podcast. Thanks so much. Appreciate it.
57:02
There you go, guys. I hope you enjoyed my interview with Ryan Burge. Before I let you go,
57:05
we are going to do a quick resilience boost at undaunted life. Our mission is equipping
57:08
men to push back darkness. And specifically, we do that with content like this podcast.
57:12
It helps you forge spiritual mental and physical resilience. So here are the links I've got for
57:16
you today. I've got an Amazon link to his book, The Nuns, where they came from, who they are,
57:20
and where they are going. I've got a link to where you can preorder his new book,
57:23
which we're going to be talking about with him here in a couple of months. It's called 20
57:26
myths about religion and politics in America. I've also got a link to his website and his Twitter
57:31
page. Thank you guys so much for listening to this show. We do appreciate it. Wherever you're
57:34
listening to this, please subscribe, rate, and leave us a positive review. If you want to come
57:38
speak live at your event or on your podcast, you shoot me an email to info@undaunted.life.
57:42
That's i-n-f-o @undaunted.life. You can also follow us on Instagram and TikTok and like us on
57:47
Facebook. You can check out our website for everything else, including how to donate to keep
57:50
more content like this coming your way. Just go to www.undaunted.life. And we want to also
57:55
thank the band, Argy Springs Red, for allowing us to use their music for our content. The music
57:59
on this podcast is our song, "Cutting the Ties," which is off their 10th anniversary
58:02
re-recording of their album, "Leveler." The links are in the description. I'm your host,
58:07
Kyle Thompson. Remember, keep pushing back darkness, keep forging spiritual, mental,
58:13
and physical resilience, keep seeking the lion of Judah.
58:29
If I can't, you will be revived.