← All episodes

"Republican" Doesn't Mean "Christian" (Ep. 396)

December 7, 2022 1h 28m Full transcript available
"Republican" Doesn't Mean "Christian" (Ep. 396)
0:00 / 1h 28m
In this episode, Kyle Thompson tackles the misconception that being a Republican equates to being a Christian. He discusses the recent Senate vote on the Respect for Marriage Act and the implications it has for religious liberty, highlighting the need for Christians to hold their representatives accountable.
Transcript
1524 segments
0:00 "This is Undaunted Life, a man's podcast.
0:22 I'm your host Kyle Thompson.
0:23 Let's get into it."
0:24 Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man and he brought
0:28 her to the man.
0:29 The man said, "This is now a bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh.
0:32 She shall be called woman, for she was taken out of man.
0:35 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife and they become one
0:39 flesh."
0:40 Guys, that is Genesis 2, 22 through 24, that is a good thing to keep in mind and guys are
0:44 so glad to have you on today's episode and I just got to be honest with you.
0:46 I'm really excited about today's episode because I'm normally taking notes and trying
0:50 to figure out what I want to do for that week's episode.
0:52 There were so many things that I wanted to talk about and literally everything I want to
0:56 talk about, I'm excited to talk about.
0:57 I'm glad you guys are here with us before we get to everything.
0:59 Just guys remember, if you have not left a review for us and you think we deserve five
1:03 stars wherever you're listening to this, please do a five star review and I just found out
1:07 last week that we were in the top 1% of podcasts shared on the Spotify app.
1:14 So to all of you listening on Spotify, thank you so much because you guys are sharing this
1:18 via text, you're sharing it on Facebook and that's the thing I want to remind you guys
1:21 is there are a lot of guys out there like you that could get benefit from the people
1:24 we talked to on this podcast and the material that we cover.
1:28 So share this around, share this on social media, share this with individuals, share individual
1:32 episodes, share the entire thing.
1:34 We would love that.
1:35 Also guys, just a reminder, we are a donation based ministry.
1:37 So if you guys want to see more content like this and you want to see different unique stuff
1:41 and all stuff we have coming for 2023 is because guys like you have hopped on our donation
1:44 website, undaunted.life/donate and hopped on board.
1:48 We have guys given 20 bucks a month, 100 bucks a month, 500 bucks a month, whatever they
1:52 can do to help us to make sure this content gets out to more people.
1:55 And another way you can support this show is by supporting the people that support us.
1:59 So origin main, they make all this great stuff here in the great United States of America.
2:03 They make the best geese on planet earth.
2:05 They have boots.
2:06 They have jeans.
2:07 They've got these amazing hoodies, this heavy hoodie that is great for this time of
2:11 year.
2:12 And then on the jocko fuel side, they've got jocko go.
2:14 They've got the jocko, the jocko energy drinks.
2:16 They've got the supplements.
2:17 They've got everything else.
2:18 And we are partnered with them so that you guys can try out their products at a discount.
2:21 So if you go to their website is in the show notes, origin main.com that's main, like the
2:25 state origin main.com, use the promo code undaunted.
2:29 So first word of the show, undaunted, you will get 10% off your order.
2:32 Guys, it's in the show notes.
2:34 You should check it out.
2:35 But huge show today, it was real again, like I said, hard to narrow down what I wanted
2:39 to talk about, but you're going to want to listen to every second of the show, even though
2:41 I know I'm preaching in the choir here, I know you guys listened to every second of every
2:44 show, right?
2:45 All right, guys, in the quick hitters segment, we're going to discuss Elon Musk providing
2:48 the receipts that Twitter meddled in the 2020 election to benefit the Democratic Party.
2:53 Balenciaga's new ad campaign featuring children and BDSM gear, Kanye West going full anti
2:59 semi, the totally and completely shocking revelation that liver King is on steroids.
3:05 I know, I know I just recovered recently from that.
3:07 The goat response by a coach during a news conference and also this one's going to be
3:13 my favorite.
3:14 And that's why I held it to the end.
3:15 So you guys will hang with me.
3:16 A woke pastor hiding after I called him out for his heretical tweet, guys, we are going
3:24 to super dooper.
3:25 Get after it.
3:26 All right, let's go and do the thing that we're going to be talking about today before
3:29 we get to the quick hitters.
3:30 And the reason why I titled this episode Republican doesn't mean Christian.
3:35 And if you've never had that thought before, you've probably had that thought in last week,
3:39 because a week ago, the United States Senate voted on what can accurately be called landmark
3:43 legislation and that legislation is called the respect for marriage act.
3:48 So what this would do is it would codify same sex marriage into federal law.
3:53 And you might think, you know, what about the Obergefell decision didn't that already
3:55 codify it into federal law?
3:57 Well, there's there's always loopholes and different statutes and, you know, ways for
4:00 the federalist system to work, but essentially this law would make it impossible for any
4:06 state to move to not recognize same sex marriage.
4:10 And then also to not recognize interracial marriage.
4:13 But I don't think anybody, any state, no matter how read or how blue or how whatever, is trying
4:19 to do either one of those things.
4:20 Okay.
4:21 But in a 50/50 split Senate, this bill passed 61 to 36.
4:26 I think that that would make it three abstentions there, 61 to 36.
4:31 So the bill was unanimously so unanimously supported by Democrats, obviously.
4:35 And additionally, 12 Republican senators voted in favor of this legislation that would basically
4:44 change the definition of marriage and undo the different things that we've done in this
4:49 country to try to honor marriage between one man and one woman.
4:54 Okay.
4:55 So I'm going to list these people here.
4:56 Okay.
4:57 Roy Blunt of Missouri.
4:58 These are all senators.
4:59 Roy Blunt of Missouri.
5:00 Richard Burr of North Carolina, who's retiring, Shelley Moore, Capito, sorry, I didn't haven't
5:06 heard of her before West Virginia, Susan Collins of Maine, no surprise.
5:09 They're Todd Young of Indiana, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Cynthia Loomis of Wyoming, Lisa Murkowski
5:14 of Alaska, also not very surprising, Rob Portman of Ohio, also retiring, Mitt Romney, that
5:20 useless, spineless jellyfish of Utah, Dan Sullivan of Alaska, and then Tom Tillis of
5:25 North Carolina.
5:26 Tom Tillis was actually pretty surprising.
5:28 But all of these Republicans want to be seen as moderate, obviously.
5:32 There's really no other way to look at this and we'll get more into some of the arguments
5:36 here in a second, but they want to be seen as moderate.
5:38 But what you have to ask yourself, if you support the Republican Party and, you know,
5:43 I would count myself in that party and a lot of you would as well, is our moderates effective
5:48 for legislation moving forward.
5:51 Our moderate Republicans, the thing that we want to see a lot more of in the reason that
5:56 you should ask this out loud to yourself is because Democrats expel moderates from their
6:01 ranks regularly and it has made them more powerful overall.
6:07 As we've talked about and we're not going to get into a lot of detail today, but they
6:10 will literally vote for a brain dead person to be president because he's got a D next
6:14 to his name.
6:15 They'll vote for a brain dead person for the Senate because they have a D next to their
6:18 name.
6:19 They literally voted for a dead person for the House of Representatives because they had
6:22 a D next to his name and all those people are very, very left wing radical people.
6:28 So do we want a whole lot more moderates?
6:31 And for the solid Republicans in the United States Senate that voted no, right, they voted
6:36 against this, they mainly did so because the bill would potentially open up and I say potentially,
6:41 but it would open up Christian individuals, schools, hospitals, companies, et cetera,
6:47 to future lawsuits and remove their constitutional protection to act out of act out their religious
6:53 convictions in public, okay?
6:55 And the reason that we know this to be true is because there were three different amendments
6:58 to the legislation that were lobbied for by three Republicans and all of them were rejected.
7:04 They couldn't even get any of those 12 spineless, ridiculous human beings that voted for this
7:10 bill to even accept these amendments, okay?
7:13 So the three amendments were offered by Senator Mike Lee of Utah.
7:16 His suggested amendment was likely the strongest.
7:18 And then you had Senator Marco Rubio of Florida and then my Senator James Langford of Oklahoma.
7:23 So the moronic spineless cowardly Republicans that voted for this legislation said that
7:28 they were given guarantees by the Democrats that this legislation would not infringe on
7:33 the rights of religious people.
7:36 But if you think about that sentence for a little bit, well, how do we guarantee something?
7:41 Well, you put the text in the law.
7:43 I mean, that's what Senator Langford rightly pointed out as he was lobbying in front of
7:48 the Senate.
7:49 And talking about this is that the legal system does not recognize intentions at all.
7:54 It recognizes judicial texts, the actual words, you know, when things go to the Supreme Court,
8:00 if you're an actual, you know, you've take that job very seriously, you're not looking
8:03 at the intention of a law, you're looking at the text of the law and then comparing that
8:07 to the Constitution, right?
8:09 And Senator Lee's amendment to the bill would have allowed people to still act with their
8:13 religious conscience intact.
8:15 Essentially, it would have allowed for a business or a service provider or an individual to be
8:19 able to live out their religious convictions in their lives and their businesses.
8:24 Okay.
8:25 So like a Christian Baker would not be forced to bake a cake for a gay wedding or a lawyer
8:30 being forced to represent a gay couple in an adoption dispute or what we have right now,
8:34 it's that we're hearing oral, oral arguments right now for a website designer in the state
8:38 of Colorado that may be forced to create websites for gay weddings and she's a Christian and
8:43 doesn't want to do that.
8:44 So that's what Senator Mike Lee's amendment would have, you know, made room for and that
8:48 was defeated.
8:50 And I'll just be honest from the very beginning, the great Albert Mueller, whose podcast I
8:55 listened to Monday through Friday called the briefing, he did a tremendous breakdown of
8:59 this legislation on his show last Wednesday, November the 30th.
9:03 Now just be real with you, I don't think I can beat it.
9:05 Okay.
9:06 So I'm not going to try to, I'll put a link to that episode in the show notes.
9:08 Guys, you have to go listen, listen to the briefing with Albert Mueller from Wednesday,
9:13 November the 30th, wherever you get your podcasts, I will link directly to his website, but you
9:16 have to listen to it.
9:17 But I do want to give some random thoughts and then some, some application as we work through
9:20 this.
9:21 The first thing is it was very slick what the Democrats in the media, you know, but I repeat
9:26 myself, are doing with the wording of this bill, okay?
9:30 Because again, the Senate has approved it.
9:31 The house will surely approve it and then it'll go to the White House and I'll be approved
9:34 as well.
9:35 But they always make sure when they talk about the respect for marriage act to mention both
9:39 gay marriage and interracial marriage, as if everyone that opposes gay marriage also
9:46 opposes interracial marriage.
9:49 It's dirty, but it's very, very effective for them because I only know people that disagree
9:57 with gay marriage and don't disagree with interracial marriage.
10:00 I don't know anybody that disagrees with both.
10:02 I like, I don't know a single human that thinks no gay people shouldn't be able to get married
10:05 and people of different, you know, skin tones are able to get married.
10:09 I don't know anybody that's like that, but again, the Democrats in the media are making
10:13 sure that every time they mention this law, they don't talk about gay marriage.
10:17 They talk about gay marriage and interracial marriage because it's a club with which they
10:21 can be conservatives and be Republicans with, right?
10:24 Because at the end of the day, there's no debate about interracial marriage, right?
10:30 Again, a lot of people back in the day would miss you scripture to say we shouldn't have
10:32 interracial marriage or just, you know, people that were bigoted a hundred years ago would
10:35 say we shouldn't have such a thing, but that's not a thing anymore.
10:39 But there's a major issue with gay marriage because it's fundamentally different.
10:43 That's why a lot of people call it gay mirage because that's essentially what it is.
10:47 Another random thought is that you cannot simultaneously vote for this and say that you're a staunch
10:52 defender of religious liberty.
10:54 Especially if you didn't support Senator Mike Lee's amendment or Senator Rubio or Senator
10:58 Langford's amendment.
10:59 So all these Republicans will say as a voting block that they are staunch defenders of
11:05 religious liberty, but how do you square that circle with voting for this?
11:09 There was someone I can't remember.
11:10 It was one of the female folks that voted for this, but that was a Republican.
11:15 She was like, well, we can have a religious definition of marriage, but then we can also
11:19 have a legal federal definition of marriage.
11:22 And those two things can work simultaneously.
11:25 But the reason why we have definitions for words is because words have meaning.
11:28 It's a very postmodern idea that, oh, well, we'll just define marriage this way when we're
11:32 looking through this lens and we'll define it another way when we're looking through
11:34 that lens.
11:35 It's nonsense.
11:36 These people are not defenders of religious liberty.
11:39 Another random idea is this idea that people that are religious, right, whatever your religion
11:44 is, that they're supposed to turn off their religious moral brains when they're in public
11:48 and in the public eye is ridiculous.
11:51 So critics will say that you cannot legislate morality.
11:54 A lot of people say that works great on a bumper sticker, okay, I'll legislate morality.
11:58 But as many people will point it out, every single law in every government puts forth
12:03 a version of morality, all of them, all of them.
12:08 The only difference is what the foundation of that morality is, like, for instance, the
12:13 Judeo-Christian ethic or a humanist ethic, something like that, right?
12:19 And so all these people are basically saying, yeah, yeah, yeah.
12:22 You can be religious.
12:23 You can be religious at church, at least for now.
12:25 You can be religious at home.
12:26 But if you run a business, if you're in the public eye, you can't be religious there because
12:30 that's bigoted.
12:31 And it's obviously going to lead to some major issues in the long term, right?
12:35 That's the argument they're making.
12:36 It's ridiculous, but it's the argument that they're making.
12:39 Another random thought is that many of the supporters of this legislation to include our
12:42 so-called president are saying that this is a win for love and that love is love and
12:46 this is so good and we're so progressive and we're going in the right direction.
12:49 The problem is they don't actually mean that because what I would ask these people, of
12:54 course, they would never answer.
12:55 But what I would ask them is, would you be in support of polygamy?
13:01 Would you be in support of throuples?
13:04 Would you be in support of siblings marrying one another?
13:08 Would you be in support of people marrying animals?
13:11 Would you be in support of adults marrying children?
13:15 I mean, if love is love, where do we stop that?
13:20 And then if you say, okay, love is love up to this point, why that point?
13:23 Yeah, love is love, but only between one human and another human, we can't have three.
13:30 Come on, that's crazy.
13:31 Yeah, one human and another human, but not an adult in someone below the age of 18, which
13:35 is a child.
13:36 No, no, no, no.
13:37 Well, why not?
13:38 Again, I'm extrapolating your worldview out to its logical conclusion.
13:42 You're telling me that love is love.
13:44 You're selling the t-shirts on your website.
13:46 Love is love.
13:47 Great.
13:48 Okay.
13:49 Let's say I'm with you on that.
13:50 Love's got to be love no matter what, right?
13:51 So these supporters of this legislation, they're just completely full of crap.
13:54 And obviously we knew that from the beginning.
13:55 A couple more thoughts, random thoughts here.
13:58 It's legislation like this.
14:00 And I go back to my criticism of what Matt Walsh did on the Joe Rogan experience.
14:07 It's legislation like this that points us out.
14:09 If you don't undergird your moral arguments with the sources of that morality, you have
14:14 left yourself with an unsturdy foundation.
14:17 Because again, when Matt Walsh was on the Joe Rogan experience, he refused to use the
14:20 Bible as his foundation for the moral argument as to one man and one woman being married
14:25 for life before he got.
14:27 He just couldn't do it.
14:28 He couldn't bring himself to do it as a good Catholic or as a whatever.
14:31 He just couldn't bring himself to do it because, well, Joe doesn't believe in the Bible as
14:33 if that matters, as if the person you're talking to's belief system changes what you should
14:39 talk about when it comes to truth.
14:41 And so we have to go back to the definition of marriage and where do we get this concept
14:45 of marriage?
14:46 We get that from somewhere.
14:47 And I started out the episode today with that last random thought here is this isn't
14:51 the end.
14:52 Okay.
14:53 So super, super buckle up.
14:55 The people in support of this bill have already like the day it was approved in the Senate,
15:00 which signal that I was going to be approved all the way through have already signaled
15:03 that this does not go far enough.
15:06 Their argument is that this activist, conservative Supreme Court, you know, would still overturn
15:11 the Supreme Court Supreme Court decisions on gay marriage and interracial marriage, which
15:16 is not being signaled.
15:17 They're going back to the decision from some of the justices, Alito and specifically Thomas
15:21 and saying, Oh, you know, this is something that that they're they're going to look to
15:24 do.
15:25 But rest assured that the people that are in support of this, they will keep trying to
15:28 take a bite of the apple.
15:30 It's going to keep keep coming and keep happening.
15:33 Likely before Joe Biden's out of office, if he can stay alive that long, they're going
15:37 to make another push here and you're going to think to yourself, well, it's legal across
15:41 the board, but they're going to continue to erode the religious freedom arguments that
15:46 would keep churches from having to, you know, host a gay wedding or keeping business owners
15:53 from having to do things for gay weddings.
15:55 Because as you'll remember, you know, with the the cake baker in Colorado thing, he didn't
15:59 say, Oh, y'all are gay.
16:00 We're not going to sell you any of our products.
16:03 Far from it.
16:04 He said, I'll sell you anything in this store.
16:06 Even if you plan to use that at your wedding, I will sell you anything in the store, but
16:10 I'm not going to make you a custom wedding cake using my skill sets as an artist to celebrate
16:14 something that I find to be deeply immoral.
16:19 But they're looking to take that away too.
16:22 When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use indeed sponsor
16:27 jobs.
16:28 It gives your job posts the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the
16:31 right skills, certifications and more spend less time searching and more time actually
16:36 interviewing candidates who check all your boxes.
16:39 Most of this show will get a $75 sponsor job credit and indeed dot com slash podcast.
16:44 That's indeed dot com slash podcast terms and conditions apply need a hiring hero.
16:48 This is a job for indeed sponsor jobs.
16:51 But we need to transition to talking about why this is so important.
16:54 Why is the story so important?
16:56 Well, the first reason is that cultural revolutions guys, they used to move slowly.
17:01 And now they they just move at breakneck speed.
17:04 Okay.
17:05 So it used to be, you know, in the gay marriage issue specifically used to be, you know, just
17:08 leave us alone.
17:09 You know, let's, let's do what we want.
17:10 And then it became, don't worry about what we're doing in our homes.
17:13 It doesn't concern you subtle shift, but a shift, then it became just let us have civil
17:18 unions, right?
17:19 So that we can, you know, enter into legal agreements as a couple and so that we can
17:22 visit each other in the hospital and all that, you know, it's no big deal.
17:26 Then it became just let us get married to it won't affect your marriage.
17:30 Like why do you care?
17:31 Then it became, if you get an invite to a gay wedding, you must go and support it lest
17:38 you be a bigot.
17:39 And then it became you will lend your skills to your business or as a business owner, you
17:45 will lend your skills and your business to supporting our marriage and wedding lest you
17:49 be a bigot.
17:51 And then it's, you know, hey, not only are you going to lend us all these skills and
17:54 all that you will clap and you will celebrate and you will watch this and you will love
18:00 it.
18:01 Guys, 2015 was Obergefeld.
18:03 That's not that long ago, and we've come that long and less than that far and less than
18:08 a decade.
18:09 You want to talk about breakneck speed?
18:12 Cultural never used to move this fast and look at the degradation we're seeing now.
18:16 And then you have to ask yourself what's next, obviously.
18:19 Another thing about why this is so important is it does not matter how any government defines
18:24 a word.
18:25 Ultimately, God gets to define what things are and what things are not now that may not
18:31 apply in the legal system.
18:33 If you make an argument before a judge and you, you know, tell him to repent and you,
18:38 you better do this and sphere sovereignty and whatever the thing is.
18:41 And then you argue that they're probably not going to go along with it because they don't
18:44 have the same worldview that you do.
18:46 And they're undergirding their morality with something else.
18:48 But it's all the people that are worried about the changing of the definition of marriage.
18:52 It's only changing in terms of the United States government.
18:54 I say only.
18:55 It's a big deal.
18:56 Obviously I've spent the last, you know, 20 minutes and going to spend a lot more time
18:58 talking about that on today's show, but ultimately God gets to decide and God will decide justice
19:04 will be done and morality and immorality will be correctly categorized by good and just God.
19:11 And the last reason I want to talk about in terms of why this is important is what this
19:15 Senate vote and, you know, the eventual approval of this legislation in the House of Representatives
19:20 and from the White House shows us is that the powers backing the LGBTQ revolution are
19:26 officially more powerful than the powers backing religious liberty in our country, okay?
19:33 Because if you can peel off a dozen Republicans to vote for something that violates basic
19:38 religious liberty in this country, then that does not bode well for religious liberty in
19:43 the future.
19:44 Now the one thing that's why I always go back to my uncle Dan argument when he said, hey,
19:48 the Supreme Court's too important, you know, plug your nose and vote for Trump.
19:52 If we didn't get those three conservative justices, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and ACB, where
19:57 would we be right now?
20:00 We would be looking at a 100% certainty that this gal that's currently got her case before
20:05 the Supreme Court, that doesn't want to have to use her web development skill sets for
20:09 gay weddings.
20:10 It would be a certainty that she would be forced to do that, that she would be compelled
20:14 to use certain speech that the United States federal government deems necessary in that
20:19 situation.
20:21 That's the only thing keeping us from completely losing religious liberty in this country was
20:26 one election of an orange man.
20:29 I mean, that's just crazy to think about, but that's where we're at.
20:32 So now we need to talk about what we can do about it before we move on to the quick hitters.
20:35 What we can do about it.
20:36 First thing is, is remember that elections have consequences, right?
20:40 And we hold the power in a constitutional republic.
20:44 I know that there are a lot of people listening to this episode right now that have never voted.
20:47 They love to complain, they love to, you know, watch Fox News or watch info wars and they're
20:52 like, Oh, look at that.
20:53 And that's so terrible.
20:54 And this and then our country's going down the crapper.
20:56 They've never voted.
20:58 They've never once gone out on a Tuesday, stood in line and cast a ballot, not once, but they
21:05 want to complain.
21:07 But the reality is, is if you actually care about the story, guys, we cannot let these
21:12 Republicans that voted for this off the hook.
21:15 They need to be challenged in their next selections when they're up, you know, whenever their
21:18 next election cycle is, whether it's in, you know, two, four or six years, they need
21:22 to be challenged.
21:23 They need to be ousted by the Republican party because if these people can't coalesce behind
21:28 religious freedom, they need to be cast out of the party, all of them.
21:32 But I also want you to remember this, right?
21:34 Because I said something, you know, you know, kind of nice about Trump a second ago.
21:38 Do you remember when Donald Trump almost single-handedly blew those two Senate seats in Georgia in
21:44 the 2020 runoff?
21:46 Because he was so mad about the election and what everything about the election, he didn't
21:50 prove anything in court.
21:51 He didn't even ledge in court what he was saying live at his press conferences or having his
21:56 lawyers go out there and say in his press comments, okay?
21:58 So for a guy that, you know, is saying, hey, this was stolen, this was stolen, he proved
22:01 nothing in court.
22:02 He didn't even try to prove it in court.
22:04 And then he basically told the voters of Georgia, ah, don't worry about voting in these two
22:07 Senate races.
22:08 It's going to be fixed anyway.
22:10 They don't Republicans sat on their hands and didn't vote in two radicals were able
22:16 to take seats in Georgia.
22:18 Now, if you think about it, this past this legislation passed with 61 votes, let's say
22:24 two solid Republicans were able to be a part of that, the math, all of a sudden changes.
22:31 And they don't have the 60 votes they need to be filibuster proof for that legislation.
22:37 So for all you big Trump people out there and again, I voted for him in 2020.
22:41 Remember that when you're thinking about who you want to be representing the Republican
22:45 party two years from now, I want you to remember that this guy was such an egomaniac about
22:50 this that he couldn't bring himself to go down to Georgia and say, yeah, I'm dealing
22:54 with my stuff.
22:55 I'm trying to prove that this was rigged and all these different things.
22:57 But right now we need to get these two sentences in Georgia, which were right for the picking.
23:01 And now I'm recording this on Tuesday.
23:03 And so by the time you guys are listening to this, it'll be pretty much found out that
23:07 Raphael Warnock is going to win and get a six year term in the United States Senate and
23:12 which would give the Republicans 49 seats to the Democrats 51, which basically, you know,
23:18 keeps them from being able to, you know, take care of different Senate committees and all
23:22 these different things.
23:23 It completely throws everything off, but it started with Donald Trump not being able
23:26 to get out of his own way.
23:28 And as we wrap up here, I want to talk about this because obviously this is what the episode
23:31 title is, is we have to get used to the fact that Republican doesn't automatically mean
23:39 Christian, because I got to be honest, I used to think that.
23:46 Not even that long ago, I used to think that that the default mechanism of a Republican
23:52 that is voted to public office in this country is Christian.
23:57 Whether they're actually a Christian or not, I'd say, okay, they will still defend a Judeo
24:01 Christian ethic and act as if God is watching, whether or not they believe Jesus rose from
24:05 the dead.
24:06 But that's just not what we're seeing, guys.
24:08 Now, obviously the Democratic platform doesn't align with just about anything that we would
24:14 see from a Judeo Christian ethic or the gospel.
24:17 The Republican position does in more ways than the Democratic positions in more ways, not
24:22 completely, but in more ways.
24:23 Just look at the fact that Democrats want you to be able to kill your baby up to the moment
24:27 of birth for any reason whatsoever and what taxpayers to pay for it.
24:32 Republicans are like, yeah, we don't like that.
24:34 Just that one thing should tell you about the two worldviews that are at play here.
24:38 But I have used and you have used, a lot of you have used it as a cheat sheet or, you
24:43 know, a shortcut to think, okay, if I want to vote for Christian values, I need to vote
24:48 for the Republican party.
24:49 Now, I think it's more apt to say that conservative values for the most part are Christian values,
24:57 but certainly not Republican, big R, Republican, big tent, Republican.
25:01 That's not Christian.
25:02 I don't know that it ever was, but we certainly were convinced about it because a lot of prominent
25:07 Republicans, they want to make sure that the pastors give their support and they want to
25:12 make sure to pray and they end their speeches within God bless America and all these different
25:16 things.
25:17 And in the good Christians will just go along and they'll golf clap and they'll say, oh,
25:19 this is great.
25:21 But no more now, every time that a Republican goes up before Congress or goes up and wants
25:29 to get your vote, that doesn't necessarily mean they need to pass your theology test.
25:34 What you personally believe is the right and most basic thing.
25:38 But when they vote in a way that is so counter to what we know to be true from God's word,
25:45 not what the Bible says, but what God says in the Bible, right?
25:49 What God says in the Bible, when they go against that, they have to pay for that.
25:54 And no, I don't mean physically.
25:55 I don't mean go and throw miles off cocktails at their office.
25:58 I mean, they need to lose their job because if they can't defend the fundamental right
26:04 of religious liberty in this country, they are out because guess what, guys, I just named
26:10 all the people that came up for the Senate, but when this goes before the house, they're
26:13 going to be a bunch of Republicans that vote for this as well and they will be named and
26:18 they should be ousted.
26:20 For them, it's easier.
26:21 It's every two years.
26:22 They need to lose their jobs, but for everybody else, stop thinking because this person is
26:27 a Republican that they're a Christ follower, that they believe in the truth of the gospel
26:32 and that they are sustaining themselves with a moral code and undergird of that because
26:38 it's no longer true.
26:39 All right, guys, let's get into the quick hitter segment with the first one here.
26:43 Elon Musk providing the receipts that Twitter meddled in the 2020 election to benefit the
26:47 Democrats.
26:48 So this is according to the Daily Wire, Twitter CEO Elon Musk released information through
26:52 journalist Matt Taiba Friday afternoon.
26:54 This was last Friday showing that Twitter was working in conjunction with then Democrat
26:58 presidential candidate Joe Biden's team, removing tweets that team Biden won and deleted must
27:03 said that he decided to release the information because it was necessary to restore public
27:07 trust in the platform after it censored the New York Post bombshell report about Hunter
27:11 Biden's laptop just weeks before the 2020 presidential election.
27:15 Taiba's post shows that on October the 24th team Biden asked for five tweets to be removed.
27:20 According to Andrew Kerr of the Washington free beacon, those tweets were either drug-related
27:24 photos of Hunter Biden or pornographic photos of him.
27:28 Celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or reviewed at the behest of a political party.
27:33 Taiba or continued both parties have access to those tools.
27:37 For instance, in 2020 requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were
27:40 received and honored, however, the system wasn't balanced, it was based on context because
27:46 Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation.
27:51 There were more channels more ways to complain open to the left, well, Democrats than the
27:55 right.
27:56 The New York Post published Biden's secret emails on October the 14th of 2020, a report
28:01 about the laptop belonging to Biden's son.
28:04 Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links and posting warnings
28:08 that it may be unsafe, Taiba continued.
28:11 They even blocked his transmission via direct message, a tool hitherto reserved for extreme
28:15 cases, e.g. child pornography.
28:18 And guys with this story, there's so much to talk about when it comes to this story, you
28:22 know, in Musk is saying that he's going to drop even more files in the very near future.
28:28 So we'll have to see what what goes on with that.
28:30 And I've got a lot more ground to cover on today's show.
28:32 So I'll be brief and go brief on the story and go right to the big takeaways.
28:35 So the big takeaway on this for me is two things can be true at once.
28:40 The 2020 election was rigged, quote unquote, rigged and Donald Trump, legitimately lost.
28:47 Okay, I know that seems kind of counter.
28:50 So I'll repeat it.
28:51 The 2020 election was rigged and Donald Trump legitimately lost.
28:55 Okay.
28:56 So let's talk about the first part.
28:57 When we talk about rigged, most people go to, you know, people dropping off a bunch of
29:02 ballots in a drop box or, you know, you know, election machines, counting machines, not
29:07 working or people bringing in, you know, you hold things full of ballots and in the middle
29:11 of the night, oh, the camera doesn't work and they're adding stuff here or there and
29:13 all that.
29:14 Again, a lot of that has been alleged.
29:16 None of it's been proven in court.
29:18 Nobody apparently has the receipts to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.
29:23 Otherwise, we would have seen the receipts by now, but I think that the election was rigged
29:29 in how everything was covered and how Google will suppress search results for Republican
29:34 candidates, how Gmail will automatically send more Republican emails straight to spam by
29:41 a wide margin than what is on the Democratic side about the shadow banning of Republicans
29:47 and conservatives on social media on the outright banning of stories that would be harmful to
29:52 Democratic candidates.
29:53 In this specific example, the Hunter Biden laptop story, because guys, the 2020 election
29:58 looks like it came down to about 40,000 votes, a little bit more than 40,000 votes in three
30:02 states.
30:03 That's what won the election and swung it for Joe Biden.
30:07 And if weeks before the election, you know, a month, a month before the election or so,
30:11 it had become widely known by a nonpartisan social media class and media class that it's
30:18 very likely that Hunter Biden was going around the world, you know, picking up bags of cash
30:22 because of his last name and that a percentage of that money was going to the big guy, Allah,
30:28 Joe Biden, that changes the election and likely wins it for Donald Trump.
30:33 But when I say Donald Trump legitimately lost, again, I go back to what I talked about earlier,
30:38 is that Donald Trump in public and on social media and on true social is claiming that the
30:43 election was stolen.
30:45 There have been documentaries made about it and all these different things, but he didn't
30:49 prove it in court and he didn't even allege what he's alleging in public in court.
30:56 So yes, I think the system is rigged.
30:58 I think it is rigged to make sure Democrats look as good as possible and that Republicans
31:03 look as terribly as possible and that all these major groups, whether it be social media,
31:08 whether it's, you know, the rest of, you know, Silicon Valley or the media or college campuses
31:15 or the K through 12 schools or Hollywood or whatever, it is rigged against conservatives
31:20 and Republicans, but also Donald Trump legitimately lost.
31:24 He lost an election to a dead person that didn't even campaign and you can point to
31:29 the fact that he couldn't control himself on Twitter.
31:33 He couldn't get out of his own way and he couldn't point at Joe Biden.
31:36 He wanted the story to be about himself.
31:39 That's exactly what it was.
31:41 The 2020 election before January 6 was a referendum on Donald Trump as a person because if you
31:47 did it based on Donald Trump as the leader of the country and the leader of the Trump
31:52 administration, everybody should have voted for him because we had not seen in the first
31:57 three years of his presidency, we had not seen positives for the country across the board,
32:03 maybe ever.
32:04 Those first three years of the Donald Trump presidency is probably one of the greatest
32:09 three year stretches in any presidency in our country's history, right?
32:14 It's up there in terms of how much flourishing was created for the American people and that
32:19 obviously the C word hits 2020 becomes an absolute abject mess.
32:25 Everybody screwed it up including Donald Trump and then we have the election and it was a
32:29 referendum on Donald Trump as a person, not as a politician and not on Joe Biden as a
32:35 person or a politician, okay?
32:37 I think two things can be true at once and I think both of those things are true.
32:41 All right, guys.
32:42 Next quick hitter here, Balenciaga's new ad campaign featuring children and BDSM gear.
32:47 So BDSM, I believe is what is that bondage domination and fatal masochism.
32:51 So don't look up pictures of it online if you don't know what it is because then you're
32:54 going to be on a watch list.
32:55 So this is also according to the Daily Wire.
32:57 The fashion company Balenciaga responded to its ongoing scandal involving a photo shoot
33:01 that featured young children holding BDSM themed teddy bear bags by saying it could have
33:05 done things differently.
33:07 The company issued a statement Monday afternoon.
33:09 This is a week ago Monday after facing severe public backlash when it was accused of sexualizing
33:15 young children.
33:16 Okay, so if you haven't seen these images, I'm going to bring them up if you're watching
33:18 on YouTube or on Rumble.
33:20 So this first one that I've got here is of a little girl looks to be a little girl holding
33:24 a purple teddy bear that's got like leather straps and all that.
33:27 So basically wearing BDSM gear and then this other image here is another what looks to be
33:33 a little girl holding a teddy bear that's got a lock chain around the neck and the leather
33:39 straps and everything.
33:40 And then there's a bunch of interesting things on the bed which we'll get more into later
33:44 about the other symbols and other symbolism that Balenciaga Balenciaga puts in their work.
33:49 But those two images, those are the ones that went viral.
33:51 Okay, so those are the ones that everybody shared that you've likely seen at this point.
33:55 And if you haven't, go check out our show on Rumble or YouTube and you can see it there.
33:59 The brand itself Balenciaga, which celebrities like Kim Kardashian, this is actually going
34:03 back to the archival.
34:04 I'll just go back to the article here from Daily Wire.
34:06 The brand which celebrates with celebrities like Kim Kardashian often wear displayed images
34:10 on its website last week as parts of its Toy Stories campaign.
34:15 The photos showed child models posing with the brand's teddy bear handbags with the bears
34:19 dress and BDSM themed gear from its Paris Fashion Week spring summer 2023 collection.
34:25 The company said it strongly condemns child abuse.
34:27 It was never our intent to include it in our narrative and the two separate ad campaigns
34:31 represented a serious and grievous error.
34:34 According to the Independent, in one of the images are documents from the 2008 Supreme
34:39 Court opinion, United States vs. Williams, a federal statute prohibiting the pandering
34:43 of child pornography, which reaffirmed the Protect Act, a federal law that increased
34:48 penalties for sexual exploitation and other abuse of children.
34:53 And so I'll show a couple more images here.
34:55 So this is exactly what they're talking about here.
34:56 So in one of the ads, you can see this, it's like, it looks like kind of a busy desk or
35:01 something like that.
35:02 You've got a keyboard there.
35:03 You've got files, you've got a purse, a Balenciaga person, all that.
35:05 But if you zoom in here, so I'll kind of bring this up here.
35:09 If you zoom in, that's the court case.
35:12 That's the one they're talking about, okay?
35:13 So that is the 2008 Supreme Court decision, United States vs. Williams, okay, that was
35:17 talking about the prohibition of pandering of child pornography, okay?
35:21 There's people that want to take that a couple of different ways.
35:24 And there's been a lot of responses on this.
35:26 So celebrities have kind of gone one of two ways because I got to be honest, I never
35:30 heard of Balenciaga before this, I don't really care about fashion, definitely not high fashion,
35:33 which is what Balenciaga is considered.
35:35 But Jason Aldine, the country singer, his wife, you know, apparently has a lot of Balenciaga
35:38 stuff.
35:39 You know, she made a big post social social media posts where she's like throwing it away.
35:42 There's a lot of people on social media like cutting up their Balenciaga bags and throwing
35:44 it away.
35:45 And okay.
35:46 But then you have Kim Kardashian, who might be the most famous person that is a supporter
35:49 of Balenciaga or that was sponsored by them or an influencer or whatever.
35:52 And she came out with a statement a few days after all this broke and she said that she
35:57 was reevaluating her relationship with Balenciaga, which is an interesting thing to say.
36:01 I think she's a mother of four, whenever they're creating these images and she's, you know,
36:06 about as rich as God at this point, but she's reevaluating whether or not she can continue
36:11 to accept money from an organization that clearly is okay with child porn and BDSM and
36:16 child domination.
36:17 So that's an interesting take, but then Balenciaga in a very, very strange move, they're suing
36:25 the PR company that apparently put the ad together.
36:28 Okay.
36:29 Now, this is really weird.
36:31 It's a weird move because there are only a couple of different scenarios here.
36:35 Scenario one, this PR company legitimately made this entire ad campaign out of thin air
36:41 without consulting with Balenciaga, but then Balenciaga actually ended up approving it.
36:46 Okay.
36:47 So that's that scenario one.
36:48 And then scenario two is that Balenciaga gave this company the criteria for this ad
36:54 campaign and they did exactly what the criteria spoke to.
36:58 So either way, Balenciaga is solely responsible for this ad campaign, seeing the light of
37:03 day.
37:04 Okay.
37:05 Now, in, in light of all this and all these different things, I felt like there were a
37:09 lot of people that were adding to this story when things didn't need to be added to it.
37:14 So there was this image that was going around of this woman that looked crazy evil.
37:19 She's wearing like a red, you know, leather suit and she's got her cheeks are sunken in
37:24 and her, her makeup was really, really kind of crazy.
37:26 And she's holding these red babies and everyone's like, this is like the founder of Balenciaga
37:30 or this is like the CEO of Balenciaga and look how how satanic she looks and all these
37:34 different things.
37:35 Well, lo and behold, that was just some model, right?
37:38 So there were a lot of people adding some things around.
37:41 But then the thing that I thought was really, really weird at the beginning and I thought
37:43 it was stupid and it was actually hurting this was that people were talking about how
37:49 Balenciaga was spelled.
37:51 So Balenciaga is spelled B-A-L-E-N-C-I-A-G-A, okay?
37:57 So three A's in there and only one at the beginning, okay?
38:00 But people were plugging an extra A in at the beginning to where it would be B-A-A-L-E-N-C-I-A-G-A.
38:08 And then they would plug Balenciaga.
38:11 So B-A-L-B-A-L space E-N-C-I space A-G-A into Google Translate from Latin to English and
38:19 it would translate into Bail is the king or Bail is God.
38:23 So actually show it here because I went to Google Translate and I did Bail, N-C-A-G-N
38:28 Latin, transfer to English and it shows Bail is the king.
38:32 I did this yesterday.
38:33 So this is not some crazy screenshot.
38:35 This is exactly what I did, but I'm sitting here and I'm like, but it doesn't say that.
38:41 Like, they don't they don't spell their name with four A's.
38:44 They spell it with one A. So I thought it was it was kind of a weird thing.
38:48 But then when you dig a little deeper, okay, and we got to kind of talk about Bail because
38:52 a lot of you kind of know who that is, at least colloquially, but Bail is the ancient
38:55 Canaanite, Infinician God that represented a lot of things, but was mainly seen as a fertility
39:00 God and Bail just so happened to be a God or deity that children were sacrificed to
39:06 in ancient times, okay?
39:08 And Christian demonology says that Bail is one of the gods of hell, okay?
39:11 So essentially Bail is the demon of child sacrifice.
39:16 Bail is the demon in charge of child sacrifice, child sacrifice, literally, okay?
39:21 You might also remember the story from First Kings where the prophet Elijah, you know, went
39:24 up against the prophets of Bail and, you know, they're like, okay, you know, we're going
39:27 to see who can consume this altar with fire and then the prophets of Bail are out there
39:30 flailing around and freaking out and doing all these different things and nothing's happening.
39:34 And the thing I love about it is Elijah is like literally giving them crap, go back to
39:37 the First Kings and read that.
39:38 It's so funny.
39:39 There's like sarcasm all through this like, yeah, maybe you're not young loud enough
39:42 and all that.
39:43 And so, you know, the, the prophets of Bail do this all day long and nothing happens and
39:45 then Elijah goes, Hey, watch this.
39:47 And then he prays to Yahweh and then everyone gets consumed.
39:50 And so it's a great, great story.
39:52 But the problem with the adding the A to the spelling of Balenciaga to where you could
39:56 plug it in and Latin and all that.
39:58 So I thought was again that the company does not spell their name that way with four A's.
40:03 They only have it with three.
40:06 But when you plug it into Google translate, the Balenciaga name, just as it's normally
40:12 spelled, you get this and I'll bring it up on the screen.
40:15 BA space, L E in space, CI space, A G A, which translates from Latin to English, do what
40:22 you want.
40:24 So if you spell it their way and break it up, Balenciaga is do what you want.
40:30 Okay.
40:31 So that's something that's really, really important.
40:34 Again, going back to my problem with the people that were adding the A in there is that you're
40:38 adding something that's not there.
40:39 I remember years ago, I watched this video where there was this woman explaining why monster
40:44 energy like the company that makes the energy drinks that they were satanic and they brought
40:48 up their logo, you know, the big M logo and they explained how this, you know, was indicative
40:53 of satanic imagery and all these other different things.
40:56 The only problem with this video was that they altered the monster logo.
41:02 Because if you hold up a monster can next to the image they were shown in this video,
41:05 it's like, okay, this is so clearly not the same image.
41:09 So you got all these people, you know, freaking out going to 7 11, praying over the energy
41:12 drink section.
41:13 And it doesn't matter.
41:14 And so I thought this was another one of those situations.
41:17 And then I saw this, so I'm bringing this up on your screen right now.
41:21 So this is an ad, you know, another Balenciaga ad featuring a child that I had not seen before.
41:27 And I saw it on TikTok and then I saw it some other places.
41:30 This is a very, very hard image to find, okay?
41:32 But I was able to find it.
41:34 So when you look at this and I'll describe it for those of you that are not watching
41:36 on Rubble or YouTube, there is a kid wearing a black hoodie and black pants and red shoes.
41:40 And he's in the middle of this room, it looks to be his room.
41:43 And there is stuff everywhere in this room.
41:47 And there are countless blogs right now and people on Reddit that are breaking down all
41:52 the different images in this particular thing and all the different imagery that is very,
41:58 very, very concerning, okay?
42:00 So the first thing is is what the kid is wearing.
42:02 So he's wearing, you know, what it could be considered innocuous to just be, you know,
42:05 a black track suit or a black hoodie or something like that.
42:08 But when you look to the kids or the kids left, it's right in the picture, there is what looks
42:13 to be a black robe that is tied up on the ground.
42:17 So that is something that is indicative of what Satanists will use or wickens or whatever
42:21 will use when they're doing their different, you know, ceremonies or whatever.
42:25 In the top right of the image, you can see an image of a kid's drawing of Satan to the
42:29 right of that.
42:30 There is a white bunny with tall ears.
42:33 And I've seen some places where that has some occultic appeal or something like that.
42:38 And again, and there's so much thing, so many things here in the image that I can't really
42:41 get into.
42:42 There's a lot of disturbing images written on the walls that, you know, if you were to
42:46 show this to a child psychologist or something like that, they would be like, okay, this shows
42:49 some deeply disturbed behavior that's coming probably from their lived experience.
42:54 In the bottom left of the image, you see one of the BDSM bears, it's one of the bears with
42:57 makeup and it's got the chain, but then if you go to the bottom of the image, a little
43:03 bit to the left of center, you see some caution tape and to the right of the child in the
43:09 image, you see a bear or not a bear, a chair that is wrapped in this caution tape as well.
43:14 But when you go to the bottom again, it's in the bottom of the left, it's caution tape.
43:19 It's caution tape with the Balenciaga name on there.
43:22 The Balenciaga is spelled B-A-A-L-E-N-C-I-A-G-A-B-A-A-L, okay?
43:32 So this goes back to that translation that I was showing where when you plug bail in
43:36 see Aga, bail with two A's in there, it translates to bail is the king, bail is God.
43:44 So apparently this was a not so subtle nod to the people that are actually making the
43:52 claim that this is kind of what this brand is all about.
43:56 And then I saw that before their Instagram account was wiped because they wiped their
44:00 entire Instagram account.
44:01 I think they just deleted it.
44:02 They wiped out some stuff on Twitter, all kinds of things.
44:05 I heard that they would use the hashtag malloc.
44:09 So M-O-L-U-C-H, malloc or molec, okay, if that sounds familiar, that is the Canaanite
44:16 God of drumroll please, child sacrifice, hashtag malloc, okay?
44:26 So with all those things combined, you have to look at this like, this is a very, very
44:31 serious thing.
44:32 And this ad campaign was obviously not an accident or an oversight.
44:36 This was deliberate, obviously it was.
44:40 But Balenciaga just thought that you wouldn't notice or that we collectively as a society
44:44 would not care because again, you look at all the imagery and go back to the image I
44:50 showed of that young boy wearing the hoodie and all those different things.
44:53 There's so much occult and satanic and child sacrifice and pagan imagery in the image.
44:59 Like I kept looking through and it was like, okay, it's kind of like where's Waldo?
45:02 Where's the next thing that points directly to it?
45:05 These people think that we don't care.
45:07 They think that we won't notice.
45:08 We're just rubs.
45:09 Like they put it right in front of our faces so that they can always point back to it and
45:13 say, well, you didn't care about that.
45:16 So when we push for the next thing or push this line of what's acceptable, whenever we
45:20 expand the overton window to include this type of ideology, why do you care now?
45:26 Which leads me to the big takeaway on this story is remember what I've been saying about
45:30 the normalization of pedophilia.
45:33 I've done multiple episodes on this podcast about the normalization of pedophilia about
45:38 how is LGBTQ and then they're going to add P for pedophile.
45:42 But they don't call them pedophiles anymore.
45:44 We're supposed to call them minor attracted persons.
45:47 They're just maps.
45:49 These are just people just like somebody can be gay or somebody can be bisexual or somebody
45:54 can be pansexual or duper, duper, duper sexual or whatever.
45:57 They're just, it's just a sexual preference, but doesn't mean they're going to act on
46:01 it.
46:02 It doesn't mean they need to be expelled from society because they're a potential danger
46:06 to children.
46:07 No, no, no, no.
46:08 We need to be more loving.
46:10 We need to bring these people closer to us.
46:13 They're, they're just like you.
46:15 They just have a different way of seeing the world sexually, no big deal.
46:19 They're normalizing it.
46:21 And the thing about it is guys is these people, these demons that are pushing this ideology,
46:27 they will only succeed if we don't push back.
46:30 Why in the world do you think I constantly talk about equipping men to push back darkness
46:35 because it's our responsibility?
46:36 You know, I talk about this a lot, society wants to take all the strength, all the testosterone
46:41 out of men because they want to make men weak because they're like weak men are safe men
46:46 and weak men are approved, stamped men.
46:49 We love those people, right?
46:51 But a weak man is a useless man.
46:53 A meek man is a useful man, a man that is strong and capable of violence and capable
46:59 of pushing back, but leaves the sword in his sheath until he needs it.
47:03 That's what meekness is.
47:05 But they don't want that.
47:07 Like they don't want a meek man that's got all their strength on their voluntary control
47:10 or under the control of the father.
47:12 They don't want that.
47:14 But people like this, Balenciaga, these brands, these people that are doing these things trying
47:18 to normalize pedophilia and BDSM stuff with children, they will only succeed if we don't
47:23 push back.
47:24 Okay.
47:25 So last week, last Friday, I know a lot of people asked me about this in my interview
47:27 with Ryan George, um, you know, he made this statement that kind of caught me a little bit
47:31 flat footy, he was like, you know, I want to be known for what I'm for, not what I'm against,
47:36 which is such a mealy mouth, vapid thing to actually believe because it sounds good.
47:41 I want to be known for one on four, not when I'm against it sounds great to sound, you know,
47:45 will look good on a t-shirt, right?
47:47 But when you say what you're for, you are automatically saying what you are against.
47:52 Think about it just a silly example, but you know, just kind of an easy one.
47:55 If you say that I'm for cookies and cream ice cream, it is my favorite flavor of ice
47:59 cream, which it just so happens to be.
48:01 I'm communicating that I am against all of the other options when cookies and cream is
48:05 on the table.
48:06 Right?
48:07 That's a silly example.
48:08 But when I communicate what I'm for, I'm also communicating what I'm against.
48:11 If I communicate that I am for the protection of unborn children in the womb, automatically,
48:17 because this is how words work, I'm communicating that I am against killing babies in the womb
48:24 because duh.
48:27 And I got a great message from my buddy, pastor, Joby Martin.
48:30 I know I talked about a model in the show, but he and I communicate a lot because he listened
48:34 to that episode with Ryan George.
48:35 And he's like, Kyle, this is what you should have said.
48:36 So shout out to Joby Martin because this was perfect and I will use this every time for
48:39 the rest of eternity when someone says, I want to be known for what I'm for and not what
48:42 I'm against.
48:43 He said, well, you should have asked that guy is, would you have disagreed with Martin Luther
48:48 King, Jr. using the Bible and a Judeo-Christian ethic to say why black people shouldn't be
48:56 treated the way that they were treated in the United States during the civil rights movement?
49:00 Would you been against that?
49:02 Would you been against William Wilberforce communicating that he was against slavery,
49:08 that he was for the freeing of the slaves?
49:11 Because oh, well, you know, he was, you know, communicating what he was against and not necessarily
49:15 what he was for.
49:17 If you're a person like that, would you disagree with Dietrich Bonhoeffer as he was pushing
49:21 back against the Nazis in the 1930s in Germany, go read Bonhoeffer, the the autobiography by
49:26 Eric Metaxas and then read a letter to the American church, which was released by Metaxas
49:30 this year.
49:31 We had him on the show to talk about it.
49:32 But that is the exact right response.
49:35 Thank you, Joby, for giving that to me, the exact right response because imagine someone
49:40 like Ryan George coming into the public eye and saying, yeah, I would talk about this
49:45 Balenciaga stuff and I would talk about the sexualization of children and I would talk
49:49 about, you know, pedophiles and all that, but you know what?
49:51 The church, you know, we got we got our own problems in the church.
49:55 So I don't think we should be able to push back any darkness and culture until, you know,
49:58 we take care of the stuff in our neck of the woods.
50:01 How ridiculous, what a cowardly and nonsensical way to view the world because we have been
50:08 equipped with the necessary tools and weapons to fight back against the principalities and
50:16 powers of this world.
50:18 Why would we be given the tools and the weapons if we were not to use them?
50:23 Because it's a cowardly point of view coming from people that don't want to push back against
50:27 darkness because they want people to like them.
50:29 What a lot of people said in that interview and pointed out rightly is that, you know,
50:33 Ryan George kept bragging on himself saying, you know, all these people are like, Oh,
50:35 we are not Kyle, but Ryan, we love your version of Jesus.
50:38 And if I were to ever come to church, I would want to go to church with you.
50:41 That should actually concern you when someone looks at you and says, a depraved person
50:45 that doesn't believe in the resurrection and doesn't believe the gospel when they say,
50:48 I really like your version of Jesus because potentially you're not pointing out the level
50:53 of depravity in that person and that Jesus who lived a perfect, sinless life had to sacrifice
50:58 that perfect, sinless life so that you can have your sins paid for so that you could
51:02 be righteous before the just father.
51:05 So again, it sounds good.
51:06 It sounds cute.
51:07 It's going to win you some friends, but it's not going to win souls to the father.
51:11 So enough of all of that.
51:13 If we're going to push back, we're going to push back.
51:16 And that's it.
51:17 All right, everybody, deep breath.
51:19 Let's get into the next quick hitter here Kanye West going full anti-Semite.
51:23 So as we've all seen and I don't want to spend a whole lot of time on this, we've seen a
51:27 precipitous decline of Kanye West, which turned up to 11 last week when Kanye West went on
51:33 Alex Jones's show.
51:35 So first of all, he walks in there.
51:36 He's got this huge jacket on.
51:37 He's got this gimp outfit on, which is basically like a full body suit covering his head and
51:40 his hands and everything like that.
51:42 Which is crazy, but then we've, I've got a clip here.
51:44 I'm going to show you a couple of different clips of some things that he said that are
51:47 just absolutely and completely indefensible.
51:51 So we'll get into the first clip here.
51:52 It's a little bit less than a minute.
51:54 That's right.
51:55 You're not Hitler.
51:56 You're not a Nazi.
51:57 You don't deserve to be called that and demonized.
52:00 Well, I see, I see good things about Hitler also.
52:06 The Jew, I love everyone and Jewish people are not going to tell me.
52:09 You can love us and you can love what we're doing to you with the contracts and you can
52:18 love what we're pushing with the pornography.
52:21 But this guy that invented highways, invented the very microphone that I use as a musician,
52:28 you can't say out loud that this person ever did anything good.
52:31 And I'm done with that.
52:33 I'm done with the classifications.
52:35 Every human being has something of value that they brought to the table, especially Hitler.
52:41 How about that one?
52:42 Ari Emmanuel.
52:43 How you like that one?
52:44 Hey, Ron, you're going to do anything to fix Chicago?
52:48 I mean, what do you do with that?
52:50 I mean, Alex Jones is pretty extreme is looking around like what in the world is he saying?
52:55 Now, I can almost understand what Kanye is trying to do because he's trying to be a
52:59 contrarian.
53:00 Okay.
53:01 And you know, to a degree, I can appreciate contrarians and things like that.
53:05 You can't do that with Hitler, though, because obviously it's well established that Hitler
53:09 probably did some nice things in his life.
53:11 He probably helped a kid, you know, up on newsfeed after he fell down.
53:15 He was probably nice to puppies or all these different things.
53:17 But categorically, you can't say things that are good about Hitler.
53:21 That's never going to win you any points.
53:23 And if that's where he stopped, it would have been egregious enough.
53:26 It would have been bad enough, but then he kept going.
53:29 So let's go back to the clip here.
53:30 So help us God.
53:31 Well, I am worried about the thousands of black folks down a month in Chicago, but let
53:34 me expand on this.
53:35 That's a nuanced issue.
53:36 You know, my grandfather grew up in Dallas from a pretty wealthy family.
53:43 Also Hitler was born Christian.
53:44 Well, I've actually studied some of the history on it, but it's very interesting.
53:49 My grandfather, you know, grew up in actually some of his family spoke some German.
53:53 There's a lot of Germans in Texas, but did you know that he grew up next door to the
53:59 inventor of air conditioning and the inventor of one of the major refrigeration?
54:04 And so my issue was growing up, my grandfather told me the stories about some of the inside
54:08 baseball and the things that went on.
54:11 And but later I'm going to get into that.
54:12 I'm going to tell you some stuff about Hitler that you might not know directly that happened
54:16 to my people.
54:17 I knew.
54:18 I'd love to hear everything because guess what, we don't get to hear.
54:22 It's hidden even like our truth, the fact that African Americans were in America before
54:28 the pilgrims.
54:29 That truth is hidden that we are actually the native Americans or some of us are native.
54:34 Or the fact that what Kyrie got in trouble is pointing out that we're Jewish slave boats.
54:41 Like and then you look at Australia, they've done some of the genetic typing of the aborigines
54:46 there.
54:47 They're basically Africans.
54:48 There you go.
54:49 You know, so all of these truths.
54:51 And then the current truth about banking, about the government.
54:55 My favorite thing that I got to say with.
54:58 So I'll cut it off there.
54:59 So it goes on and on and on and keeps going on like this again saying, you know, Hitler
55:04 was actually raised Christian.
55:06 That doesn't mean anything when you're talking about Hitler as a person because you can be
55:09 raised any number of things.
55:10 But I care about how you act when you're past the age of accountability and when you're
55:14 an adult.
55:15 And when people are like, Oh, the Nazis were Christians.
55:17 It's like, did anything they do, you know, comport with what we see in the New Testament,
55:22 what we see in the gospel accounts, what we see in the words of Jesus and what you should
55:25 and shouldn't do morally.
55:27 Of course not.
55:28 So I'm just going to go to the big takeaway on this one, Kanye may or may not be crazy.
55:33 I think a lot of people are just defaulting.
55:35 Oh, he's crazy.
55:36 He's man.
55:37 He's having a break.
55:38 Maybe, maybe, but he may just be ignorant.
55:40 Like I've been around a lot of conspiracy theorists in my day.
55:44 I don't know why.
55:45 That's, but I'm like the honey to them.
55:46 They're just so attracted to me.
55:48 These people believe that 9/11 was an inside job and yet they root for the United States
55:52 anytime we, you know, we're playing as a, as a national team.
55:55 They believe that, you know, JFK was assassinated by CIA.
55:59 They believe, you know, all these different conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook, about
56:03 all these other different things, every single plausible explanation that could come from
56:07 somebody that has some random website that they put up in their mom's basement or something
56:10 like that.
56:11 They just buy it.
56:12 Okay.
56:13 Kanye could be getting swept up in that right now.
56:16 He could have gone down the rabbit hole on YouTube or on any of these other documentaries
56:21 or something like that that are saying things that are just patently untrue.
56:25 They sound plausible.
56:27 They sound like it's a smart thing to, to say again, if he's trying to be a contrarian right
56:31 now, he's doing a pretty dang good job of it.
56:35 If he's having a break, a mental break, we should obviously be praying for him.
56:39 This is obviously, you know, ammo to the people that for years now, I've been saying, don't
56:44 just buy into the Kanye thing, right, or, or yeah, or whatever supposed to call him now.
56:48 Just buy into that just because he's saying things, just because he's wearing a MAGA hat,
56:51 just because he's saying things that you agree with and you're a big Trump guy and he's
56:54 taking pictures with Trump.
56:55 Don't just go with that.
56:57 I think Ben Shapiro says, you know, live by the Kanye, die by the Kanye and there's a
57:00 lot of people right now that are looking at this man that needs help.
57:05 Again, if he's crazy, he needs mental and physical and, and, and emotional support and
57:09 all these other different things, but if he's ignorant, he needs somebody, not some sync
57:13 of fan that's just going to tell him that he's, he's the best person ever and just trying
57:17 to get famous off his coattails.
57:18 He needs people around him that can put an arm around him and be like, brother, I'm taking
57:21 your phone away.
57:22 You're not tweeting anymore.
57:24 You're not, you're not doing anything anymore.
57:26 We're going to go to rehab.
57:27 We're going to go get some help.
57:28 We're going to go do something like that.
57:29 But apparently and unfortunately he doesn't have anybody's life like that.
57:31 So let's pray for him.
57:33 That's about all we can do at this point.
57:34 All right.
57:35 Next quick hitter here, the shocking, absolutely and completely shocking revelation that liver
57:42 king is on steroids, okay?
57:44 So if you don't know who liver king is, I'm going to bring up a picture of him right now.
57:48 Look at this person.
57:50 So that's apparently a human being.
57:52 That is not a Photoshop picture, okay, because I've seen this video of him doing all these
57:55 different things.
57:56 This is a guy that has built an entire fitness brand on the fact that he's naddy, okay, that
58:03 he doesn't take any steroids.
58:06 And the reason why he says this is because he's built around, you know, a brand around
58:10 being this, you know, organ person guy, he's going to eat liver and eat testicles and eat
58:17 all these different things.
58:18 And, you know, he's going to do these workouts and it's all going to be, you know, caveman
58:20 style stuff.
58:21 And if you want a physique like that, if you want to be, you know, five foot eight, two
58:25 hundred and twenty pounds of solid muscle, then you just need to buy his supplements.
58:30 And the guy makes what I understand to be millions of dollars a month doing this.
58:35 And every time he was asked about whether or not he was on steroids, he would always deny
58:39 it.
58:40 He was very open.
58:41 He didn't off the skate.
58:42 He just straight up said, I'm not on steroids.
58:43 I've never touched the stuff.
58:45 I'm totally natural by my liver supplements.
58:47 Okay.
58:48 Now we need to go to this article according to the Rolling Stone, Brian Johnson, better
58:52 known as the organ devouring masculinity influencer, liver King, has admitted to steroid use in
58:57 a somber video shared on his YouTube and Instagram accounts.
59:00 I fully own that I have to, he said in a six minute confession.
59:03 I am as sorry as a man can be the pain statement comes in response to a video from another body
59:09 builder, Derek of the online fitness brand, more plates, more dates that reported to show
59:13 emails in which Johnson described his steroid regimen, a suite of injections costing some
59:18 $11,000 per month.
59:20 Since launching the liver King persona in August of 2021, Johnson has given several interviews
59:24 during which he categorically denied using performance enhancing drugs to achieve his
59:28 muscular physique.
59:29 He'd also brush the side accusations of steroid use from podcast kingpin Joe Rogan.
59:34 Okay.
59:35 So, so there's liver King.
59:36 I'm not going to put a link to to the apology if you want to go find it, go for it.
59:39 The apology was completely ridiculous.
59:41 You could tell that he didn't mean any of the words that he was saying.
59:44 He wasn't sorry that he did he was sorry he got caught.
59:47 All that's there.
59:48 The thing about this story that's so interesting to me is the people whose worlds fell apart
59:53 when this news hit.
59:54 Now there's a group of people that are just like, no, it's not real, even though he publicly
59:58 said, yeah, it's real and I, you know, he apologized for it or whatever.
1:00:01 They don't want to believe it.
1:00:02 The level of gullibility on people is astonishing.
1:00:05 Again, I'm going to bring up that picture again, or I'll leave it.
1:00:09 You guys saw it.
1:00:10 And if you don't have seen it, just go Google, you know, liver king and you'll get the idea.
1:00:14 This is not a normal physique.
1:00:17 Now there are physical freaks out there and I've trained with a lot of those guys over
1:00:20 the years and I've been around some of those guys, guys that don't really lift at all and
1:00:24 they're just huge.
1:00:25 You know, you see the Bo Jackson stories and the Herschel Walker stories and all those
1:00:27 different things.
1:00:28 People like that exist.
1:00:30 This guy ain't that you can clearly see it.
1:00:33 That is not a normal body.
1:00:35 There's a lot of, you know, people that are like, oh, he even got like ab implants because
1:00:38 his abs literally look like, you know, lunch boxes that were like poof, poof, poof, like
1:00:42 place on his abdomen.
1:00:43 It's not a normal stomach and, you know, he may have gotten some cosmetic stuff done to
1:00:47 his abs to make them look that way and pop and all those different things.
1:00:50 But people are so unbelievably gullible because they want that shortcut and they think that
1:00:57 they who doesn't work out very hard and doesn't have very good genetics, that they can just
1:01:02 spend a few hundred dollars per month or a few thousand dollars per month on supplements
1:01:05 that this guy sells and all of a sudden they'll be enormous.
1:01:07 They'll be a donus.
1:01:08 So my big takeaway on this is in terms of health and fitness, we have a really good idea of
1:01:14 what works and what doesn't work at this point, guys.
1:01:18 Stop buying this nonsense from people purporting to have cracked the code on bodily optimization.
1:01:25 Stop it.
1:01:27 Every few months, there's a new guy that claims I've cracked the code and wouldn't you know
1:01:33 it?
1:01:34 I can actually sell you a program.
1:01:36 I can sell you supplements.
1:01:37 I can sell you injectables.
1:01:38 I can sell you whatever and it'll fix everything.
1:01:42 You'll be able to get hard again and you'll get your muscles back.
1:01:45 You'll get muscles you ever never even thought about.
1:01:47 You'll be able to train longer and push more weight and you'll be able to do all these
1:01:50 different things.
1:01:51 You could be the next Mr. Olympia.
1:01:52 You can win your next powerlifting competition.
1:01:54 You can do all these different things.
1:01:55 I've cracked the code.
1:01:57 You need to stand on one foot, put your finger on your nose and then try to sleep, but only
1:02:00 at this hour, you know, only with this temperature in the room and all those different things.
1:02:04 I'm all for optimization.
1:02:06 I'm all for making adjustments, but guys, if you want to be healthy and fit, you need
1:02:11 to move more, eat less typically for those of you guys that are severely overweight.
1:02:18 That's the advice you need.
1:02:20 Those are the supplements you need.
1:02:21 You need to rewind me saying this over and over and over.
1:02:25 Watch your supplement, move more, eat less.
1:02:28 Now if you're in already in good shape, then it's about optimization.
1:02:31 So are you getting enough protein?
1:02:32 Okay.
1:02:33 Are you getting enough micronutrients?
1:02:35 Are you getting, you know, enough of this thing that you're lacking?
1:02:38 Are you sleeping enough?
1:02:39 Because if sleep could be bottled up and sold, it would be a PED would be illegal.
1:02:43 That's how great sleep and recovery is, right?
1:02:46 If you want to be a, you know, a ice bath person and you want to, you know, get massages
1:02:51 and you want to do all this deep tissue, great.
1:02:53 All that's great, but we know what works and it's actually really, really simple.
1:02:58 When you're at an elite level and you're wanting to get to that next level, yeah, there's maybe
1:03:01 some experimentation that you can do that's not going to make your heart explode, not give
1:03:04 you cancer and you not make it to where your, your penis doesn't work or whatever.
1:03:08 There's plenty of stuff like that out there, but we need to keep things simple.
1:03:12 If you're in good shape and you want to be in better shape, work out harder, clean up
1:03:15 your diet a little bit, skip pizza, skip burgers and fries, skip those different things
1:03:21 and you can optimize, but stop buying in to people like liver, keen, you dummies.
1:03:27 All right.
1:03:28 Next one here, the goat response by a coach during a sports news press conference.
1:03:32 So the coaching question here is Joe Missoula, who is the interim head coach of the Boston
1:03:37 Celtics.
1:03:38 So I don't follow the NBA anymore.
1:03:39 They're still losing me with all that.
1:03:40 Woke stuff.
1:03:41 I'm not going to go back to them.
1:03:42 So I didn't know who Joe Missoula was, but I did know at least, you know, because I see
1:03:45 stuff on Twitter, they currently have the best record in the NBA, okay?
1:03:48 The Boston Celtics do.
1:03:49 He seems to be doing a good job.
1:03:50 Now, after a game last week, he's doing his, you know, normal, you know, typical, typically
1:03:55 useless post game interview, or what went well and what didn't go well, you know, just
1:03:59 absolute nonsense only for like the absolute elite elite of the fans that have to just
1:04:03 hear everything.
1:04:04 And apparently at this game, there were British royals in the crowd for the game.
1:04:10 And this is supposed to make Americans excited for some reason, which all led to this interaction
1:04:16 during the press conference.
1:04:17 Let's go to the video.
1:04:18 Did you get a chance to meet with the royal family?
1:04:20 And if not, how was it like having them there in the building?
1:04:24 Jesus Mary and Joseph?
1:04:28 The Prince and Princess of Wales.
1:04:29 Oh, no, I did not.
1:04:32 I'm only familiar with one royal family.
1:04:34 I don't know too much about that one.
1:04:37 Thank you.
1:04:38 But I'm glad they're hopefully their Celtic fans.
1:04:43 Yeah.
1:04:44 Yeah, thank you guys is legitimately impossible for me to love that response and that interaction
1:04:55 more because the gal that asked the question, she did it in a nice polite fashion.
1:05:00 She kind of responded in a kind of a funny way because it's like she all of a sudden
1:05:03 realized, okay, I kind of asked him a ridiculous question and he hit me back with this.
1:05:06 It wasn't rude.
1:05:07 It wasn't mean spirited.
1:05:09 And apparently this guy, Missoula, apparently he's a Christian, all those different things.
1:05:12 He didn't know that question was coming, but he was so ready for it, right?
1:05:17 Because we're supposed to care here in America about, you know, the, the Prince and Princess,
1:05:21 you know, flying around the country and doing all these different things.
1:05:23 I don't give a crap.
1:05:24 There was a war fought in the 1770s that the winner of that war led me to believe that I
1:05:28 don't really need to care about what's happening with the royal family in another country.
1:05:31 But that's another discussion for another day.
1:05:33 Let's go to my big takeaway here.
1:05:35 This is the greatest answer I've ever heard during a sports press conference.
1:05:40 And I've got to make a specific call out right now because I was part of a group text that
1:05:44 included one of our gal listeners of this show, okay?
1:05:46 And this is a gal named Cassidy and she is a big supporter of this show and we're so thankful
1:05:50 for her.
1:05:51 But she responded to that press conference to that little clip and was like, eh, it wasn't
1:05:56 really the mic drop moment that I thought.
1:05:59 So I am calling you out, Cassidy.
1:06:02 You're super duper wrong, okay?
1:06:04 And you need to repent for the sin of not realizing that that was a tremendous mic drop
1:06:09 moment.
1:06:10 And if you keep going on like that, I'm going to prevent you from listening to the show.
1:06:13 I'm kicking you out.
1:06:14 I'm going to cancel you.
1:06:15 You'll no longer be able to do this.
1:06:17 Get with a program that is legitimately one of the greatest things that I've ever seen
1:06:21 in any news conference ever.
1:06:22 But it is the number one greatest response of all time in a sports news conference.
1:06:26 All right.
1:06:27 Okay, guys, let's get to the last quick hitter of the day.
1:06:29 So I've teed it up.
1:06:30 I tease it at the beginning.
1:06:31 I know we're over an hour in at this point, but guys, you're already in it with me.
1:06:34 So just buckle up a woke pastor hiding after I called him out for his heretical.
1:06:39 tweet.
1:06:40 So the tweeting question was by a guy named Dr. Kevin M. Young.
1:06:44 So he's at Kevin M. Young, all names spelled normally on Twitter at Kevin M. Young.
1:06:50 This was a tweet that I saw over the weekend and Ryan, one of our team members here at
1:06:53 another live sent it to me again.
1:06:55 And it made me want to talk about this.
1:06:57 I've been chewing on this response to my tweet.
1:06:59 I've realized that for me, gay marriage actually paints a more beautiful semiotic of Christ
1:07:05 and his church than a mere hetero on God's kingdom is diverse in makeup, experience and
1:07:13 belief.
1:07:14 But one thing unites above all love Kevin M. Young is a real person that exists.
1:07:24 That is legitimately something that he wrote.
1:07:27 I feel the need to read it again.
1:07:28 But I won't read it as dramatically.
1:07:29 I'll just read it straight through.
1:07:30 I've been chewing on this response to my tweet.
1:07:32 I've realized that for me, gay marriage actually paints a more beautiful semiotic of Christ
1:07:36 and his church than a mirror hetero on mirror, hetero on God's kingdom is diverse in makeup,
1:07:42 experience and belief.
1:07:43 But one thing unites above all love, love.
1:07:46 So he's one of these love people that he doesn't really know what love means because apparently
1:07:50 he's never actually read the Bible.
1:07:51 But then I went to his Twitter profile.
1:07:53 Okay.
1:07:54 So this guy, he is, you know, according to this, he's a pastor and avid lifter, coach, husband,
1:07:59 dad to Ford, to for doctorate in early church and ancient faith formation, post evangelical.
1:08:06 His podcast is apparently jacked theology, and then he has his pronouns in his bio because
1:08:12 of course he does.
1:08:13 He him rev.
1:08:16 I'm assuming that means reverend.
1:08:17 Okay.
1:08:18 So this is a guy that all that's in the profile.
1:08:21 So I'm, I'm already dying laughing, but then right, right below he him rev, I see his website,
1:08:26 doctor, Kevin young calm, so of course I click on it.
1:08:29 And when I go to the website, I scroll down just a little bit and he has my skills listed.
1:08:34 That's what he writes.
1:08:35 They're not my skills, Kyle, but his skills listed on his website.
1:08:38 Okay.
1:08:39 And it's kind of a unique way of doing it.
1:08:41 It's like percentage wise.
1:08:42 So he's like media and graphic design, 80%, self deprecation, 100% style, 65% bench breast,
1:08:49 95%.
1:08:50 Then he has integrity, 100%.
1:08:54 I am literally gasping for breath on the ground at this point that how ridiculous of a human
1:09:00 being Kevin young is.
1:09:01 I'm dying at this point to put integrity.
1:09:04 He listed that as his first skill.
1:09:06 I read it out of order on purpose.
1:09:07 That's his first skill that he lists on the whole page of his website, integrity, 100%.
1:09:13 It's like someone saying, yeah, yeah, I'm like literally the most humble person ever,
1:09:16 right?
1:09:17 Which is the least humble thing that anyone could ever, ever say.
1:09:20 And so this guy's obviously ridiculous person.
1:09:23 I find out that he's a faculty member at a seminary.
1:09:27 It's called like wind, windstone or whatever, what the heck is I'm just looking up right
1:09:30 here because I've already forgotten north.
1:09:33 I think it's north wind.
1:09:34 All right.
1:09:35 What is it?
1:09:36 North wind seminary.
1:09:37 Okay.
1:09:38 It never heard of it, but apparently it's a super woke lefty seminary.
1:09:41 So I take a screenshot of his original tweet that I read.
1:09:45 I take a screenshot of his profile that shows he him rev his pronouns and that take a screenshot
1:09:50 of his skills page on his website.
1:09:52 And then I post it on our Instagram over the weekend and then I post it with this caption,
1:09:57 which I didn't include here.
1:09:58 So let me go back to what I put here.
1:10:00 So here's the caption.
1:10:02 Imagine just thinking this, much less saying it out loud, much less tweeting it for the
1:10:06 world to see his special brand of heresy is somewhere between laughable and maddening.
1:10:11 It's terrifying to see someone like this as a faculty member of a seminary, which just
1:10:15 speaks to one of the many major issues with many modern seminaries, but I guess you can
1:10:19 expect that from someone with their pronouns and their bio.
1:10:21 And someone that lists quote integrity, unquote, as one of their skills on their website.
1:10:26 I guess it's true for him.
1:10:27 As long as he doesn't mean he's trying to have integrity as it pertains to the word
1:10:32 of God.
1:10:33 Okay.
1:10:34 So I post that on Instagram and I tag him in it.
1:10:37 And I also tag the seminary that he works out in it.
1:10:40 Okay.
1:10:41 And he responds almost immediately in my comments section.
1:10:43 Okay.
1:10:44 So this is at Kevin M. Young on Instagram responding and I got the responses up here on the screen.
1:10:47 Hi.
1:10:48 This is me.
1:10:49 I made a lot of assumptions. I am sorry that you felt the need to be so uncharitable, but
1:10:53 I hope God blessed you anyway.
1:10:55 Be well in Christ.
1:10:57 Okay.
1:10:58 So obviously not one to back away from a fight.
1:11:01 I automatically respond back to him.
1:11:03 I know it's you.
1:11:04 I tagged you in the post.
1:11:06 Feel free to clear up any misconceptions people may draw from your actual words that
1:11:10 you tweeted to which he responded.
1:11:13 It's not the words I posted that concern me.
1:11:16 It's yours and the vitriol based on a single tweet.
1:11:20 You took a lot of liberties, but I can't prevent that.
1:11:23 I can only suggest it was uncharitable and misleading drawing conclusions that were unfair
1:11:28 and false, but sincerely, be well, I just wanted to simply point out you were speaking
1:11:34 about a caricature, not me.
1:11:36 Now, I bet he was super proud of himself after that.
1:11:39 He said his phone down.
1:11:40 He patted himself on his bench press chest and he's like, yeah, this is great.
1:11:43 So I respond like this, this is where I throw down the gauntlet.
1:11:46 Okay.
1:11:47 So you don't wish to defend what you said, which is the crux of the issue.
1:11:52 You'd rather pearl clutch over me calling you out open invitation on our show.
1:11:57 If you'd actually care to interact with someone who won't syncophantically agree with what
1:12:01 you're saying.
1:12:03 Now, this is going to be a shock to probably none of you.
1:12:07 He went very, very silent after that and by very, very silent, I mean crickets.
1:12:12 I mean, not, I mean nothing.
1:12:15 And there are other people in the comments that are tagging him saying, Hey, he gave
1:12:18 you an opportunity.
1:12:19 Go on his show.
1:12:20 Like you're so concerned about his response and you just don't want to dignify the response
1:12:25 by talking about what you originally said.
1:12:28 Hear him out.
1:12:29 Let's go.
1:12:30 He's a fair guy.
1:12:31 Go on his show.
1:12:32 Nothing.
1:12:33 Not a thing.
1:12:34 And guys, I would have bet my left nut to know that he would have never responded because
1:12:40 we need to go right to my big takeaway on this, but there's two of them with this.
1:12:44 Number one, he will not accept my invitation because he's a coward.
1:12:49 And number two, guys like him don't want to be challenged.
1:12:54 They want to be validated.
1:12:55 Okay.
1:12:56 Now, not every one of you out there like that is going to be that aggressive.
1:13:01 Some of you might see see this as like, Oh, this is rather unloving.
1:13:04 I would direct you to Galatians two.
1:13:06 I think it's versus 11 through 14.
1:13:09 This is when Paul called out Peter for basically being racist and communicating to the Jews
1:13:16 or communicating to the Gentiles in Antioch that they couldn't be equal to the Jews unless
1:13:21 they held all the Jewish customs again, go Galatians two, 11 through 14.
1:13:25 I actually just taught that in Sunday school over the weekend.
1:13:27 The short version of that story is that the Judaizers, which was the circumcision party
1:13:33 that was supposedly sent by James, the brother of Jesus from Jerusalem to Antioch came in
1:13:38 and basically said to all the Gentile Christians in Antioch, yes, grace through faith, absolutely.
1:13:44 But also you need to keep all the Jewish customs.
1:13:45 And if you're not circumcised, we need to make that happen too, which if you're 20, 30,
1:13:50 40 years old, man living in that era and you're not circumcised, that's a big commitment,
1:13:54 right?
1:13:55 So going away from the message of the Bible, the message of the gospel and certainly the
1:13:58 message of Galatians, which is grace through faith alone, not grace through faith and not
1:14:03 gospel.
1:14:04 And so what Peter was doing is he had been hanging out with the Gentiles, he had been
1:14:09 eating with the Gentiles and then the Judaizers, the Jewish, you know, you know, the legalist
1:14:14 party or whatever, they came in the circumcision group and they basically said, yeah, you need
1:14:18 to stop hanging out with them and you know, yeah, we get it, but you're Jewish, you understand
1:14:23 this, these people need to become Jewish.
1:14:24 And so all of a sudden Peter stops interacting with the Gentiles.
1:14:28 He stops eating with them, thus communicating that he agreed with the Judaizers that yes,
1:14:34 in order for the Gentiles to be equal to the Jews, they needed to accept Christ, but then
1:14:39 also become Jewish, right?
1:14:41 So these, that was kind of the gist of the story.
1:14:44 There's so much packed in to just a few verses.
1:14:48 But in that, Paul was rightfully rebuking Peter to his face and publicly in front of
1:14:57 people.
1:14:58 Now, I don't know this Kevin guy personally, otherwise I would have rebuked him to his
1:15:03 face publicly.
1:15:04 So I did it in the 2022 version, which is publicly on social media, because there are
1:15:09 people that will read a tweet by a guy like that and think, yeah, that's kind of plausible.
1:15:16 Kind of like last week, when I talked about that guy that was like, Oh, you know, Jesus
1:15:18 had a trans body and they're going to read that because they don't read their Bible and
1:15:22 they don't know anything about church history.
1:15:23 They don't know anything about philosophy.
1:15:24 They don't know anything about anything.
1:15:25 They'll be like, maybe I, I wonder, let me ponder that for about 10 seconds and use a
1:15:31 word like nuance so I can seem super bright and smart, right?
1:15:36 So the reason why I would go out of my way to call this person out publicly and to rebuke
1:15:42 him publicly is because I'm using Paul as my example of when it's biblically inaccurate
1:15:49 to the point of being heretical that somebody is doing or saying a thing.
1:15:54 It is incumbent upon us to call out that behavior.
1:15:58 We see him first Corinthians where Paul basically tells people it's like, what is it your business
1:16:01 of what these people are doing outside of the faith outside the church.
1:16:05 We need to, we need to discuss what's happening inside the church, which we'll see him somewhat
1:16:08 counterintuitive to what I was saying earlier about Ryan George, but that that's just a completely
1:16:12 different scenario because we're talking about overall pushing back of darkness and sin and
1:16:15 Satan and all these other different things, but coming back to this scenario, he's basically
1:16:19 saying that if there is a problem in your midst, you must call it out.
1:16:23 And that is regardless of your wiring, guys.
1:16:25 And as some of you guys are really calm, calm dudes, you don't really like conflict.
1:16:31 You don't really like pushing back, you know, you get really, really nervous and your hands
1:16:34 start shaking.
1:16:35 Even when you get into a serious conversation with somebody that, you know, loves you.
1:16:38 That's just who you are.
1:16:39 That doesn't make you wrong or broken.
1:16:41 That's just how you're wired, but you don't get an out.
1:16:44 You can't read the words of Paul in the New Testament and think to yourself, you know
1:16:47 what?
1:16:48 I don't think that that actually applies to me because I'm wired this way.
1:16:51 So whoopsie Daisy, no, no, you're not absolved of your responsibility to push back against
1:16:56 darkness and to push back against people that are acting out in a sinful way, okay?
1:17:02 So this guy, again, if any of you know him, like, send him this segment of this show,
1:17:07 I should probably clip it out and tag him in it again, because I would love to talk to
1:17:10 him on show because I'm a fair guy.
1:17:12 I'm not going to go look up stuff and hire some private investigator and find all this
1:17:15 other stuff.
1:17:16 I'm going to hit play and I'm just going to record and I'm going to read his tweet and
1:17:19 say, make it make sense, make this make sense to me.
1:17:24 How in the world, I'm going to go back to the tweet because you know, we're, you know,
1:17:27 further on down the line here.
1:17:28 So you may forget what this guy wrote that I called him out for.
1:17:29 This was his tweet, his words, that he's not taken down.
1:17:33 I've been chewing on this response to my tweet.
1:17:35 I've realized that for me, gay marriage actually paints a more beautiful semiotic of Christ
1:17:39 and his church than a mere hetero one.
1:17:42 God's kingdom is diverse in makeup, experience and belief, but one thing unites above all,
1:17:46 love.
1:17:47 This guy is pointing to gay marriage, saying that that's a more beautiful semiotic, which
1:17:51 a, what a, what kind of [inaudible] uses the word semiotic and just everyday parlance.
1:17:56 But that's a more beautiful semiotic of Christ and his church in Christ's relationship to
1:18:01 the church than a mere hetero one, a mere hetero one.
1:18:07 What do you say that Adam and Eve had a mere hetero connection that if you go back to the
1:18:13 beginning of Genesis, when they talked about the mean, joined as one flesh, would that
1:18:16 be the mere joining of a male flesh and a female flesh, because I'm taking some liberties
1:18:21 here.
1:18:22 A guy with his pronouns and his bio and all these other different things.
1:18:25 I'm assuming he's transaffirming to if he's not, and I find that out to be not true later,
1:18:30 I will certainly correct the record.
1:18:33 But a guy like that doesn't want to be challenged.
1:18:35 That's why he went silent.
1:18:37 It's not like he hasn't seen all this.
1:18:38 He saw, he saw the post immediately and immediately responded.
1:18:41 And then when I challenge him to come on my show, to, you know, to be in front of all these,
1:18:46 you know, tens of thousands of listeners and all these other different things to all these
1:18:49 people, right, nothing, not a thing.
1:18:54 He's a coward.
1:18:56 That is the only way to categorize a person like this.
1:18:59 And I don't feel bad for calling him out for that because he's not going to be able
1:19:02 to make that make sense.
1:19:03 And he knows it because he would come on the show and he would probably do something along
1:19:08 the lines of trying to be calm and trying to be whatever, and then he would probably
1:19:11 dip out at some point when he's like, well, it doesn't seem like we're going to be able
1:19:14 to talk about this in a loving fashion and he would try to, you know, hop on his high
1:19:17 horse and hop out when I'm just going to be the one asking questions.
1:19:21 Because I'm not categorizing what he said in a different way.
1:19:23 I literally took three screenshots that were things that he wrote with his own hands.
1:19:29 The tweet, his profile and his website.
1:19:33 The only liberty I've taken so far is thinking that he's probably transaffirming.
1:19:36 I mean, if you got your pronouns and your bio, I'm surprised it didn't have the rainbow
1:19:39 flag.
1:19:40 Okay.
1:19:41 But again, when you guys get into a situation like this, you need to have pre-decided that
1:19:46 you will rebuke somebody that is sinning.
1:19:48 A lot of guys don't really pre-decide anything.
1:19:50 We just want to go with the flow and make a decision when the time comes.
1:19:53 And the example I always use is kind of the easiest one.
1:19:56 If you're a concealed carry person or if you're a gun by your bedside person or something
1:19:58 like that, but you haven't pre-decided whether or not you would use that firearm to potentially
1:20:02 end the life of someone that's trying to hurt you or your family or somebody else.
1:20:05 That's the problem.
1:20:07 Because if you're walking through Walmart and all of a sudden you hear gunshots and you've
1:20:10 got a gun in the appendix position and you know, you've got your, you know, lion's not
1:20:13 sheep shirt on and you've got your, your beard all cropped up and you got your tattoos and
1:20:17 you got all that.
1:20:18 That's great.
1:20:19 But have you pre-decided what you would do in that scenario?
1:20:22 Are you going to run towards the sound of danger or away from it?
1:20:25 If someone's between you and your exit and they have a firearm, are you willing to take
1:20:28 that person's life to save your own or to save others?
1:20:32 Have you pre-decided?
1:20:33 Because guess what? in that scenario, it's too late to decide.
1:20:37 It's too late at that point.
1:20:39 You have to pre-decide.
1:20:41 The same thing is true.
1:20:42 Guys, if you struggle with porn and masturbation and your wife and kids are going to be gone
1:20:45 for the night, you pre-decide that you are not a person that looks at porn and masturbates
1:20:48 when everybody's out of the house and you work with your accountability partners and
1:20:52 you work with whoever and you pray and you do whatever you got to do.
1:20:54 But you've pre-decided that that's not the man that you are.
1:20:58 In these scenarios, you must pre-decide that when someone is saying something heretical,
1:21:04 that is potentially leading people away from the father, that you will be the one to stand
1:21:09 up and call them out.
1:21:10 If it's someone you know, you do it to their face and you do it publicly.
1:21:14 And if you say that's not Christ-like and that's not loving and that's not the answer
1:21:16 that or whatever, go back to Galatians 2 and explain to me why Paul did it and said it
1:21:21 was okay.
1:21:22 Again, if you believe that that is the sufficient word of God, that that is the word of God working
1:21:28 through the Apostle Paul, explain to me why we should delete Galatians 2 11 through 14.
1:21:33 Explain it to me.
1:21:34 I doubt you'll be able to pre-decide.
1:21:36 All right, guys, before we let you go, we are going to do a quick resilience boost.
1:21:39 I don't know if our mission is equipping them in to push back darkness with content that
1:21:43 for just spiritual, mental and physical resilience.
1:21:44 So again, go to the origin website is here in the show notes to check out the full line
1:21:47 of origin and jockofield products, that's keys, jeans, boots, protein, energy drink,
1:21:52 supplements, all that stuff.
1:21:53 Use the promo code undaunted to get 10% off your order.
1:21:56 So I've got a link to our donation page and then I've got links to everything that we
1:21:58 talked about in the quick hitter segment.
1:22:00 But also I got a link to the briefing with Albert Mueller from Wednesday, November 30th
1:22:04 of 2022.
1:22:05 Guys, you have to go listen to that.
1:22:06 It's just a great thing.
1:22:07 You got to make sure you put that in your rotation.
1:22:09 I got to say so much for listening to the show.
1:22:11 We do appreciate it wherever you're listening to this.
1:22:13 Please subscribe rate and leave us a positive five star review.
1:22:15 If you want me to come speak live at your event or on your podcast, you shoot me an email
1:22:18 to info@andonto.life.
1:22:20 That's i-n-f-o-a-andonto.life.
1:22:22 Follow us on Instagram and like us on Facebook and check out our website for everything else,
1:22:25 including how to donate to keep more content like this coming your way.
1:22:27 Just go to www.undonto.life.
1:22:30 And also we want to thank the band, August Burns Red, for allowing us to use their music
1:22:33 for our content.
1:22:34 The music on this podcast is our song, "Cutting the Tides," which is off their 10th anniversary
1:22:37 re-recording of their album, Leveler.
1:22:38 The links are in the description.
1:22:39 I'm your host, Kyle Thompson.
1:22:42 Remember, keep pushing back darkness, keep forging spiritual, mental, and physical resilience.
1:22:48 Keep seeking the lion of Judah.
1:22:55 I know, I know you want, it's a sign, it may stand, it's a virtue, you will be revived.
Key quotes
1
Kyle Thompson
Republican doesn't automatically mean Christian.
Free Resource
31-Day Resilience Reset
If this episode hit, the next 31 days will be the reset. Free PDF, instant download.
START FREE →
Brotherhood
Apply to Dominion
Six pillars. Application only. The men's program Kyle built around the show.
APPLY NOW →
Dig Deeper
Ask the Archive
"Which episodes cover this topic?" Get answers grounded in all 940+ episodes.
START A CHAT →