0:00
"This is Undaunted Life, a man's podcast.
0:22
I'm your host Kyle Thompson.
0:23
Let's get into it."
0:24
Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man and he brought
0:28
her to the man.
0:29
The man said, "This is now a bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh.
0:32
She shall be called woman, for she was taken out of man.
0:35
That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife and they become one
0:39
flesh."
0:40
Guys, that is Genesis 2, 22 through 24, that is a good thing to keep in mind and guys are
0:44
so glad to have you on today's episode and I just got to be honest with you.
0:46
I'm really excited about today's episode because I'm normally taking notes and trying
0:50
to figure out what I want to do for that week's episode.
0:52
There were so many things that I wanted to talk about and literally everything I want to
0:56
talk about, I'm excited to talk about.
0:57
I'm glad you guys are here with us before we get to everything.
0:59
Just guys remember, if you have not left a review for us and you think we deserve five
1:03
stars wherever you're listening to this, please do a five star review and I just found out
1:07
last week that we were in the top 1% of podcasts shared on the Spotify app.
1:14
So to all of you listening on Spotify, thank you so much because you guys are sharing this
1:18
via text, you're sharing it on Facebook and that's the thing I want to remind you guys
1:21
is there are a lot of guys out there like you that could get benefit from the people
1:24
we talked to on this podcast and the material that we cover.
1:28
So share this around, share this on social media, share this with individuals, share individual
1:32
episodes, share the entire thing.
1:34
We would love that.
1:35
Also guys, just a reminder, we are a donation based ministry.
1:37
So if you guys want to see more content like this and you want to see different unique stuff
1:41
and all stuff we have coming for 2023 is because guys like you have hopped on our donation
1:44
website, undaunted.life/donate and hopped on board.
1:48
We have guys given 20 bucks a month, 100 bucks a month, 500 bucks a month, whatever they
1:52
can do to help us to make sure this content gets out to more people.
1:55
And another way you can support this show is by supporting the people that support us.
1:59
So origin main, they make all this great stuff here in the great United States of America.
2:03
They make the best geese on planet earth.
2:05
They have boots.
2:06
They have jeans.
2:07
They've got these amazing hoodies, this heavy hoodie that is great for this time of
2:11
year.
2:12
And then on the jocko fuel side, they've got jocko go.
2:14
They've got the jocko, the jocko energy drinks.
2:16
They've got the supplements.
2:17
They've got everything else.
2:18
And we are partnered with them so that you guys can try out their products at a discount.
2:21
So if you go to their website is in the show notes, origin main.com that's main, like the
2:25
state origin main.com, use the promo code undaunted.
2:29
So first word of the show, undaunted, you will get 10% off your order.
2:32
Guys, it's in the show notes.
2:34
You should check it out.
2:35
But huge show today, it was real again, like I said, hard to narrow down what I wanted
2:39
to talk about, but you're going to want to listen to every second of the show, even though
2:41
I know I'm preaching in the choir here, I know you guys listened to every second of every
2:44
show, right?
2:45
All right, guys, in the quick hitters segment, we're going to discuss Elon Musk providing
2:48
the receipts that Twitter meddled in the 2020 election to benefit the Democratic Party.
2:53
Balenciaga's new ad campaign featuring children and BDSM gear, Kanye West going full anti
2:59
semi, the totally and completely shocking revelation that liver King is on steroids.
3:05
I know, I know I just recovered recently from that.
3:07
The goat response by a coach during a news conference and also this one's going to be
3:13
my favorite.
3:14
And that's why I held it to the end.
3:15
So you guys will hang with me.
3:16
A woke pastor hiding after I called him out for his heretical tweet, guys, we are going
3:24
to super dooper.
3:25
Get after it.
3:26
All right, let's go and do the thing that we're going to be talking about today before
3:29
we get to the quick hitters.
3:30
And the reason why I titled this episode Republican doesn't mean Christian.
3:35
And if you've never had that thought before, you've probably had that thought in last week,
3:39
because a week ago, the United States Senate voted on what can accurately be called landmark
3:43
legislation and that legislation is called the respect for marriage act.
3:48
So what this would do is it would codify same sex marriage into federal law.
3:53
And you might think, you know, what about the Obergefell decision didn't that already
3:55
codify it into federal law?
3:57
Well, there's there's always loopholes and different statutes and, you know, ways for
4:00
the federalist system to work, but essentially this law would make it impossible for any
4:06
state to move to not recognize same sex marriage.
4:10
And then also to not recognize interracial marriage.
4:13
But I don't think anybody, any state, no matter how read or how blue or how whatever, is trying
4:19
to do either one of those things.
4:20
Okay.
4:21
But in a 50/50 split Senate, this bill passed 61 to 36.
4:26
I think that that would make it three abstentions there, 61 to 36.
4:31
So the bill was unanimously so unanimously supported by Democrats, obviously.
4:35
And additionally, 12 Republican senators voted in favor of this legislation that would basically
4:44
change the definition of marriage and undo the different things that we've done in this
4:49
country to try to honor marriage between one man and one woman.
4:54
Okay.
4:55
So I'm going to list these people here.
4:56
Okay.
4:57
Roy Blunt of Missouri.
4:58
These are all senators.
4:59
Roy Blunt of Missouri.
5:00
Richard Burr of North Carolina, who's retiring, Shelley Moore, Capito, sorry, I didn't haven't
5:06
heard of her before West Virginia, Susan Collins of Maine, no surprise.
5:09
They're Todd Young of Indiana, Joni Ernst of Iowa, Cynthia Loomis of Wyoming, Lisa Murkowski
5:14
of Alaska, also not very surprising, Rob Portman of Ohio, also retiring, Mitt Romney, that
5:20
useless, spineless jellyfish of Utah, Dan Sullivan of Alaska, and then Tom Tillis of
5:25
North Carolina.
5:26
Tom Tillis was actually pretty surprising.
5:28
But all of these Republicans want to be seen as moderate, obviously.
5:32
There's really no other way to look at this and we'll get more into some of the arguments
5:36
here in a second, but they want to be seen as moderate.
5:38
But what you have to ask yourself, if you support the Republican Party and, you know,
5:43
I would count myself in that party and a lot of you would as well, is our moderates effective
5:48
for legislation moving forward.
5:51
Our moderate Republicans, the thing that we want to see a lot more of in the reason that
5:56
you should ask this out loud to yourself is because Democrats expel moderates from their
6:01
ranks regularly and it has made them more powerful overall.
6:07
As we've talked about and we're not going to get into a lot of detail today, but they
6:10
will literally vote for a brain dead person to be president because he's got a D next
6:14
to his name.
6:15
They'll vote for a brain dead person for the Senate because they have a D next to their
6:18
name.
6:19
They literally voted for a dead person for the House of Representatives because they had
6:22
a D next to his name and all those people are very, very left wing radical people.
6:28
So do we want a whole lot more moderates?
6:31
And for the solid Republicans in the United States Senate that voted no, right, they voted
6:36
against this, they mainly did so because the bill would potentially open up and I say potentially,
6:41
but it would open up Christian individuals, schools, hospitals, companies, et cetera,
6:47
to future lawsuits and remove their constitutional protection to act out of act out their religious
6:53
convictions in public, okay?
6:55
And the reason that we know this to be true is because there were three different amendments
6:58
to the legislation that were lobbied for by three Republicans and all of them were rejected.
7:04
They couldn't even get any of those 12 spineless, ridiculous human beings that voted for this
7:10
bill to even accept these amendments, okay?
7:13
So the three amendments were offered by Senator Mike Lee of Utah.
7:16
His suggested amendment was likely the strongest.
7:18
And then you had Senator Marco Rubio of Florida and then my Senator James Langford of Oklahoma.
7:23
So the moronic spineless cowardly Republicans that voted for this legislation said that
7:28
they were given guarantees by the Democrats that this legislation would not infringe on
7:33
the rights of religious people.
7:36
But if you think about that sentence for a little bit, well, how do we guarantee something?
7:41
Well, you put the text in the law.
7:43
I mean, that's what Senator Langford rightly pointed out as he was lobbying in front of
7:48
the Senate.
7:49
And talking about this is that the legal system does not recognize intentions at all.
7:54
It recognizes judicial texts, the actual words, you know, when things go to the Supreme Court,
8:00
if you're an actual, you know, you've take that job very seriously, you're not looking
8:03
at the intention of a law, you're looking at the text of the law and then comparing that
8:07
to the Constitution, right?
8:09
And Senator Lee's amendment to the bill would have allowed people to still act with their
8:13
religious conscience intact.
8:15
Essentially, it would have allowed for a business or a service provider or an individual to be
8:19
able to live out their religious convictions in their lives and their businesses.
8:24
Okay.
8:25
So like a Christian Baker would not be forced to bake a cake for a gay wedding or a lawyer
8:30
being forced to represent a gay couple in an adoption dispute or what we have right now,
8:34
it's that we're hearing oral, oral arguments right now for a website designer in the state
8:38
of Colorado that may be forced to create websites for gay weddings and she's a Christian and
8:43
doesn't want to do that.
8:44
So that's what Senator Mike Lee's amendment would have, you know, made room for and that
8:48
was defeated.
8:50
And I'll just be honest from the very beginning, the great Albert Mueller, whose podcast I
8:55
listened to Monday through Friday called the briefing, he did a tremendous breakdown of
8:59
this legislation on his show last Wednesday, November the 30th.
9:03
Now just be real with you, I don't think I can beat it.
9:05
Okay.
9:06
So I'm not going to try to, I'll put a link to that episode in the show notes.
9:08
Guys, you have to go listen, listen to the briefing with Albert Mueller from Wednesday,
9:13
November the 30th, wherever you get your podcasts, I will link directly to his website, but you
9:16
have to listen to it.
9:17
But I do want to give some random thoughts and then some, some application as we work through
9:20
this.
9:21
The first thing is it was very slick what the Democrats in the media, you know, but I repeat
9:26
myself, are doing with the wording of this bill, okay?
9:30
Because again, the Senate has approved it.
9:31
The house will surely approve it and then it'll go to the White House and I'll be approved
9:34
as well.
9:35
But they always make sure when they talk about the respect for marriage act to mention both
9:39
gay marriage and interracial marriage, as if everyone that opposes gay marriage also
9:46
opposes interracial marriage.
9:49
It's dirty, but it's very, very effective for them because I only know people that disagree
9:57
with gay marriage and don't disagree with interracial marriage.
10:00
I don't know anybody that disagrees with both.
10:02
I like, I don't know a single human that thinks no gay people shouldn't be able to get married
10:05
and people of different, you know, skin tones are able to get married.
10:09
I don't know anybody that's like that, but again, the Democrats in the media are making
10:13
sure that every time they mention this law, they don't talk about gay marriage.
10:17
They talk about gay marriage and interracial marriage because it's a club with which they
10:21
can be conservatives and be Republicans with, right?
10:24
Because at the end of the day, there's no debate about interracial marriage, right?
10:30
Again, a lot of people back in the day would miss you scripture to say we shouldn't have
10:32
interracial marriage or just, you know, people that were bigoted a hundred years ago would
10:35
say we shouldn't have such a thing, but that's not a thing anymore.
10:39
But there's a major issue with gay marriage because it's fundamentally different.
10:43
That's why a lot of people call it gay mirage because that's essentially what it is.
10:47
Another random thought is that you cannot simultaneously vote for this and say that you're a staunch
10:52
defender of religious liberty.
10:54
Especially if you didn't support Senator Mike Lee's amendment or Senator Rubio or Senator
10:58
Langford's amendment.
10:59
So all these Republicans will say as a voting block that they are staunch defenders of
11:05
religious liberty, but how do you square that circle with voting for this?
11:09
There was someone I can't remember.
11:10
It was one of the female folks that voted for this, but that was a Republican.
11:15
She was like, well, we can have a religious definition of marriage, but then we can also
11:19
have a legal federal definition of marriage.
11:22
And those two things can work simultaneously.
11:25
But the reason why we have definitions for words is because words have meaning.
11:28
It's a very postmodern idea that, oh, well, we'll just define marriage this way when we're
11:32
looking through this lens and we'll define it another way when we're looking through
11:34
that lens.
11:35
It's nonsense.
11:36
These people are not defenders of religious liberty.
11:39
Another random idea is this idea that people that are religious, right, whatever your religion
11:44
is, that they're supposed to turn off their religious moral brains when they're in public
11:48
and in the public eye is ridiculous.
11:51
So critics will say that you cannot legislate morality.
11:54
A lot of people say that works great on a bumper sticker, okay, I'll legislate morality.
11:58
But as many people will point it out, every single law in every government puts forth
12:03
a version of morality, all of them, all of them.
12:08
The only difference is what the foundation of that morality is, like, for instance, the
12:13
Judeo-Christian ethic or a humanist ethic, something like that, right?
12:19
And so all these people are basically saying, yeah, yeah, yeah.
12:22
You can be religious.
12:23
You can be religious at church, at least for now.
12:25
You can be religious at home.
12:26
But if you run a business, if you're in the public eye, you can't be religious there because
12:30
that's bigoted.
12:31
And it's obviously going to lead to some major issues in the long term, right?
12:35
That's the argument they're making.
12:36
It's ridiculous, but it's the argument that they're making.
12:39
Another random thought is that many of the supporters of this legislation to include our
12:42
so-called president are saying that this is a win for love and that love is love and
12:46
this is so good and we're so progressive and we're going in the right direction.
12:49
The problem is they don't actually mean that because what I would ask these people, of
12:54
course, they would never answer.
12:55
But what I would ask them is, would you be in support of polygamy?
13:01
Would you be in support of throuples?
13:04
Would you be in support of siblings marrying one another?
13:08
Would you be in support of people marrying animals?
13:11
Would you be in support of adults marrying children?
13:15
I mean, if love is love, where do we stop that?
13:20
And then if you say, okay, love is love up to this point, why that point?
13:23
Yeah, love is love, but only between one human and another human, we can't have three.
13:30
Come on, that's crazy.
13:31
Yeah, one human and another human, but not an adult in someone below the age of 18, which
13:35
is a child.
13:36
No, no, no, no.
13:37
Well, why not?
13:38
Again, I'm extrapolating your worldview out to its logical conclusion.
13:42
You're telling me that love is love.
13:44
You're selling the t-shirts on your website.
13:46
Love is love.
13:47
Great.
13:48
Okay.
13:49
Let's say I'm with you on that.
13:50
Love's got to be love no matter what, right?
13:51
So these supporters of this legislation, they're just completely full of crap.
13:54
And obviously we knew that from the beginning.
13:55
A couple more thoughts, random thoughts here.
13:58
It's legislation like this.
14:00
And I go back to my criticism of what Matt Walsh did on the Joe Rogan experience.
14:07
It's legislation like this that points us out.
14:09
If you don't undergird your moral arguments with the sources of that morality, you have
14:14
left yourself with an unsturdy foundation.
14:17
Because again, when Matt Walsh was on the Joe Rogan experience, he refused to use the
14:20
Bible as his foundation for the moral argument as to one man and one woman being married
14:25
for life before he got.
14:27
He just couldn't do it.
14:28
He couldn't bring himself to do it as a good Catholic or as a whatever.
14:31
He just couldn't bring himself to do it because, well, Joe doesn't believe in the Bible as
14:33
if that matters, as if the person you're talking to's belief system changes what you should
14:39
talk about when it comes to truth.
14:41
And so we have to go back to the definition of marriage and where do we get this concept
14:45
of marriage?
14:46
We get that from somewhere.
14:47
And I started out the episode today with that last random thought here is this isn't
14:51
the end.
14:52
Okay.
14:53
So super, super buckle up.
14:55
The people in support of this bill have already like the day it was approved in the Senate,
15:00
which signal that I was going to be approved all the way through have already signaled
15:03
that this does not go far enough.
15:06
Their argument is that this activist, conservative Supreme Court, you know, would still overturn
15:11
the Supreme Court Supreme Court decisions on gay marriage and interracial marriage, which
15:16
is not being signaled.
15:17
They're going back to the decision from some of the justices, Alito and specifically Thomas
15:21
and saying, Oh, you know, this is something that that they're they're going to look to
15:24
do.
15:25
But rest assured that the people that are in support of this, they will keep trying to
15:28
take a bite of the apple.
15:30
It's going to keep keep coming and keep happening.
15:33
Likely before Joe Biden's out of office, if he can stay alive that long, they're going
15:37
to make another push here and you're going to think to yourself, well, it's legal across
15:41
the board, but they're going to continue to erode the religious freedom arguments that
15:46
would keep churches from having to, you know, host a gay wedding or keeping business owners
15:53
from having to do things for gay weddings.
15:55
Because as you'll remember, you know, with the the cake baker in Colorado thing, he didn't
15:59
say, Oh, y'all are gay.
16:00
We're not going to sell you any of our products.
16:03
Far from it.
16:04
He said, I'll sell you anything in this store.
16:06
Even if you plan to use that at your wedding, I will sell you anything in the store, but
16:10
I'm not going to make you a custom wedding cake using my skill sets as an artist to celebrate
16:14
something that I find to be deeply immoral.
16:19
But they're looking to take that away too.
16:22
When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use indeed sponsor
16:27
jobs.
16:28
It gives your job posts the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the
16:31
right skills, certifications and more spend less time searching and more time actually
16:36
interviewing candidates who check all your boxes.
16:39
Most of this show will get a $75 sponsor job credit and indeed dot com slash podcast.
16:44
That's indeed dot com slash podcast terms and conditions apply need a hiring hero.
16:48
This is a job for indeed sponsor jobs.
16:51
But we need to transition to talking about why this is so important.
16:54
Why is the story so important?
16:56
Well, the first reason is that cultural revolutions guys, they used to move slowly.
17:01
And now they they just move at breakneck speed.
17:04
Okay.
17:05
So it used to be, you know, in the gay marriage issue specifically used to be, you know, just
17:08
leave us alone.
17:09
You know, let's, let's do what we want.
17:10
And then it became, don't worry about what we're doing in our homes.
17:13
It doesn't concern you subtle shift, but a shift, then it became just let us have civil
17:18
unions, right?
17:19
So that we can, you know, enter into legal agreements as a couple and so that we can
17:22
visit each other in the hospital and all that, you know, it's no big deal.
17:26
Then it became just let us get married to it won't affect your marriage.
17:30
Like why do you care?
17:31
Then it became, if you get an invite to a gay wedding, you must go and support it lest
17:38
you be a bigot.
17:39
And then it became you will lend your skills to your business or as a business owner, you
17:45
will lend your skills and your business to supporting our marriage and wedding lest you
17:49
be a bigot.
17:51
And then it's, you know, hey, not only are you going to lend us all these skills and
17:54
all that you will clap and you will celebrate and you will watch this and you will love
18:00
it.
18:01
Guys, 2015 was Obergefeld.
18:03
That's not that long ago, and we've come that long and less than that far and less than
18:08
a decade.
18:09
You want to talk about breakneck speed?
18:12
Cultural never used to move this fast and look at the degradation we're seeing now.
18:16
And then you have to ask yourself what's next, obviously.
18:19
Another thing about why this is so important is it does not matter how any government defines
18:24
a word.
18:25
Ultimately, God gets to define what things are and what things are not now that may not
18:31
apply in the legal system.
18:33
If you make an argument before a judge and you, you know, tell him to repent and you,
18:38
you better do this and sphere sovereignty and whatever the thing is.
18:41
And then you argue that they're probably not going to go along with it because they don't
18:44
have the same worldview that you do.
18:46
And they're undergirding their morality with something else.
18:48
But it's all the people that are worried about the changing of the definition of marriage.
18:52
It's only changing in terms of the United States government.
18:54
I say only.
18:55
It's a big deal.
18:56
Obviously I've spent the last, you know, 20 minutes and going to spend a lot more time
18:58
talking about that on today's show, but ultimately God gets to decide and God will decide justice
19:04
will be done and morality and immorality will be correctly categorized by good and just God.
19:11
And the last reason I want to talk about in terms of why this is important is what this
19:15
Senate vote and, you know, the eventual approval of this legislation in the House of Representatives
19:20
and from the White House shows us is that the powers backing the LGBTQ revolution are
19:26
officially more powerful than the powers backing religious liberty in our country, okay?
19:33
Because if you can peel off a dozen Republicans to vote for something that violates basic
19:38
religious liberty in this country, then that does not bode well for religious liberty in
19:43
the future.
19:44
Now the one thing that's why I always go back to my uncle Dan argument when he said, hey,
19:48
the Supreme Court's too important, you know, plug your nose and vote for Trump.
19:52
If we didn't get those three conservative justices, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and ACB, where
19:57
would we be right now?
20:00
We would be looking at a 100% certainty that this gal that's currently got her case before
20:05
the Supreme Court, that doesn't want to have to use her web development skill sets for
20:09
gay weddings.
20:10
It would be a certainty that she would be forced to do that, that she would be compelled
20:14
to use certain speech that the United States federal government deems necessary in that
20:19
situation.
20:21
That's the only thing keeping us from completely losing religious liberty in this country was
20:26
one election of an orange man.
20:29
I mean, that's just crazy to think about, but that's where we're at.
20:32
So now we need to talk about what we can do about it before we move on to the quick hitters.
20:35
What we can do about it.
20:36
First thing is, is remember that elections have consequences, right?
20:40
And we hold the power in a constitutional republic.
20:44
I know that there are a lot of people listening to this episode right now that have never voted.
20:47
They love to complain, they love to, you know, watch Fox News or watch info wars and they're
20:52
like, Oh, look at that.
20:53
And that's so terrible.
20:54
And this and then our country's going down the crapper.
20:56
They've never voted.
20:58
They've never once gone out on a Tuesday, stood in line and cast a ballot, not once, but they
21:05
want to complain.
21:07
But the reality is, is if you actually care about the story, guys, we cannot let these
21:12
Republicans that voted for this off the hook.
21:15
They need to be challenged in their next selections when they're up, you know, whenever their
21:18
next election cycle is, whether it's in, you know, two, four or six years, they need
21:22
to be challenged.
21:23
They need to be ousted by the Republican party because if these people can't coalesce behind
21:28
religious freedom, they need to be cast out of the party, all of them.
21:32
But I also want you to remember this, right?
21:34
Because I said something, you know, you know, kind of nice about Trump a second ago.
21:38
Do you remember when Donald Trump almost single-handedly blew those two Senate seats in Georgia in
21:44
the 2020 runoff?
21:46
Because he was so mad about the election and what everything about the election, he didn't
21:50
prove anything in court.
21:51
He didn't even ledge in court what he was saying live at his press conferences or having his
21:56
lawyers go out there and say in his press comments, okay?
21:58
So for a guy that, you know, is saying, hey, this was stolen, this was stolen, he proved
22:01
nothing in court.
22:02
He didn't even try to prove it in court.
22:04
And then he basically told the voters of Georgia, ah, don't worry about voting in these two
22:07
Senate races.
22:08
It's going to be fixed anyway.
22:10
They don't Republicans sat on their hands and didn't vote in two radicals were able
22:16
to take seats in Georgia.
22:18
Now, if you think about it, this past this legislation passed with 61 votes, let's say
22:24
two solid Republicans were able to be a part of that, the math, all of a sudden changes.
22:31
And they don't have the 60 votes they need to be filibuster proof for that legislation.
22:37
So for all you big Trump people out there and again, I voted for him in 2020.
22:41
Remember that when you're thinking about who you want to be representing the Republican
22:45
party two years from now, I want you to remember that this guy was such an egomaniac about
22:50
this that he couldn't bring himself to go down to Georgia and say, yeah, I'm dealing
22:54
with my stuff.
22:55
I'm trying to prove that this was rigged and all these different things.
22:57
But right now we need to get these two sentences in Georgia, which were right for the picking.
23:01
And now I'm recording this on Tuesday.
23:03
And so by the time you guys are listening to this, it'll be pretty much found out that
23:07
Raphael Warnock is going to win and get a six year term in the United States Senate and
23:12
which would give the Republicans 49 seats to the Democrats 51, which basically, you know,
23:18
keeps them from being able to, you know, take care of different Senate committees and all
23:22
these different things.
23:23
It completely throws everything off, but it started with Donald Trump not being able
23:26
to get out of his own way.
23:28
And as we wrap up here, I want to talk about this because obviously this is what the episode
23:31
title is, is we have to get used to the fact that Republican doesn't automatically mean
23:39
Christian, because I got to be honest, I used to think that.
23:46
Not even that long ago, I used to think that that the default mechanism of a Republican
23:52
that is voted to public office in this country is Christian.
23:57
Whether they're actually a Christian or not, I'd say, okay, they will still defend a Judeo
24:01
Christian ethic and act as if God is watching, whether or not they believe Jesus rose from
24:05
the dead.
24:06
But that's just not what we're seeing, guys.
24:08
Now, obviously the Democratic platform doesn't align with just about anything that we would
24:14
see from a Judeo Christian ethic or the gospel.
24:17
The Republican position does in more ways than the Democratic positions in more ways, not
24:22
completely, but in more ways.
24:23
Just look at the fact that Democrats want you to be able to kill your baby up to the moment
24:27
of birth for any reason whatsoever and what taxpayers to pay for it.
24:32
Republicans are like, yeah, we don't like that.
24:34
Just that one thing should tell you about the two worldviews that are at play here.
24:38
But I have used and you have used, a lot of you have used it as a cheat sheet or, you
24:43
know, a shortcut to think, okay, if I want to vote for Christian values, I need to vote
24:48
for the Republican party.
24:49
Now, I think it's more apt to say that conservative values for the most part are Christian values,
24:57
but certainly not Republican, big R, Republican, big tent, Republican.
25:01
That's not Christian.
25:02
I don't know that it ever was, but we certainly were convinced about it because a lot of prominent
25:07
Republicans, they want to make sure that the pastors give their support and they want to
25:12
make sure to pray and they end their speeches within God bless America and all these different
25:16
things.
25:17
And in the good Christians will just go along and they'll golf clap and they'll say, oh,
25:19
this is great.
25:21
But no more now, every time that a Republican goes up before Congress or goes up and wants
25:29
to get your vote, that doesn't necessarily mean they need to pass your theology test.
25:34
What you personally believe is the right and most basic thing.
25:38
But when they vote in a way that is so counter to what we know to be true from God's word,
25:45
not what the Bible says, but what God says in the Bible, right?
25:49
What God says in the Bible, when they go against that, they have to pay for that.
25:54
And no, I don't mean physically.
25:55
I don't mean go and throw miles off cocktails at their office.
25:58
I mean, they need to lose their job because if they can't defend the fundamental right
26:04
of religious liberty in this country, they are out because guess what, guys, I just named
26:10
all the people that came up for the Senate, but when this goes before the house, they're
26:13
going to be a bunch of Republicans that vote for this as well and they will be named and
26:18
they should be ousted.
26:20
For them, it's easier.
26:21
It's every two years.
26:22
They need to lose their jobs, but for everybody else, stop thinking because this person is
26:27
a Republican that they're a Christ follower, that they believe in the truth of the gospel
26:32
and that they are sustaining themselves with a moral code and undergird of that because
26:38
it's no longer true.
26:39
All right, guys, let's get into the quick hitter segment with the first one here.
26:43
Elon Musk providing the receipts that Twitter meddled in the 2020 election to benefit the
26:47
Democrats.
26:48
So this is according to the Daily Wire, Twitter CEO Elon Musk released information through
26:52
journalist Matt Taiba Friday afternoon.
26:54
This was last Friday showing that Twitter was working in conjunction with then Democrat
26:58
presidential candidate Joe Biden's team, removing tweets that team Biden won and deleted must
27:03
said that he decided to release the information because it was necessary to restore public
27:07
trust in the platform after it censored the New York Post bombshell report about Hunter
27:11
Biden's laptop just weeks before the 2020 presidential election.
27:15
Taiba's post shows that on October the 24th team Biden asked for five tweets to be removed.
27:20
According to Andrew Kerr of the Washington free beacon, those tweets were either drug-related
27:24
photos of Hunter Biden or pornographic photos of him.
27:28
Celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or reviewed at the behest of a political party.
27:33
Taiba or continued both parties have access to those tools.
27:37
For instance, in 2020 requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were
27:40
received and honored, however, the system wasn't balanced, it was based on context because
27:46
Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation.
27:51
There were more channels more ways to complain open to the left, well, Democrats than the
27:55
right.
27:56
The New York Post published Biden's secret emails on October the 14th of 2020, a report
28:01
about the laptop belonging to Biden's son.
28:04
Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links and posting warnings
28:08
that it may be unsafe, Taiba continued.
28:11
They even blocked his transmission via direct message, a tool hitherto reserved for extreme
28:15
cases, e.g. child pornography.
28:18
And guys with this story, there's so much to talk about when it comes to this story, you
28:22
know, in Musk is saying that he's going to drop even more files in the very near future.
28:28
So we'll have to see what what goes on with that.
28:30
And I've got a lot more ground to cover on today's show.
28:32
So I'll be brief and go brief on the story and go right to the big takeaways.
28:35
So the big takeaway on this for me is two things can be true at once.
28:40
The 2020 election was rigged, quote unquote, rigged and Donald Trump, legitimately lost.
28:47
Okay, I know that seems kind of counter.
28:50
So I'll repeat it.
28:51
The 2020 election was rigged and Donald Trump legitimately lost.
28:55
Okay.
28:56
So let's talk about the first part.
28:57
When we talk about rigged, most people go to, you know, people dropping off a bunch of
29:02
ballots in a drop box or, you know, you know, election machines, counting machines, not
29:07
working or people bringing in, you know, you hold things full of ballots and in the middle
29:11
of the night, oh, the camera doesn't work and they're adding stuff here or there and
29:13
all that.
29:14
Again, a lot of that has been alleged.
29:16
None of it's been proven in court.
29:18
Nobody apparently has the receipts to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt.
29:23
Otherwise, we would have seen the receipts by now, but I think that the election was rigged
29:29
in how everything was covered and how Google will suppress search results for Republican
29:34
candidates, how Gmail will automatically send more Republican emails straight to spam by
29:41
a wide margin than what is on the Democratic side about the shadow banning of Republicans
29:47
and conservatives on social media on the outright banning of stories that would be harmful to
29:52
Democratic candidates.
29:53
In this specific example, the Hunter Biden laptop story, because guys, the 2020 election
29:58
looks like it came down to about 40,000 votes, a little bit more than 40,000 votes in three
30:02
states.
30:03
That's what won the election and swung it for Joe Biden.
30:07
And if weeks before the election, you know, a month, a month before the election or so,
30:11
it had become widely known by a nonpartisan social media class and media class that it's
30:18
very likely that Hunter Biden was going around the world, you know, picking up bags of cash
30:22
because of his last name and that a percentage of that money was going to the big guy, Allah,
30:28
Joe Biden, that changes the election and likely wins it for Donald Trump.
30:33
But when I say Donald Trump legitimately lost, again, I go back to what I talked about earlier,
30:38
is that Donald Trump in public and on social media and on true social is claiming that the
30:43
election was stolen.
30:45
There have been documentaries made about it and all these different things, but he didn't
30:49
prove it in court and he didn't even allege what he's alleging in public in court.
30:56
So yes, I think the system is rigged.
30:58
I think it is rigged to make sure Democrats look as good as possible and that Republicans
31:03
look as terribly as possible and that all these major groups, whether it be social media,
31:08
whether it's, you know, the rest of, you know, Silicon Valley or the media or college campuses
31:15
or the K through 12 schools or Hollywood or whatever, it is rigged against conservatives
31:20
and Republicans, but also Donald Trump legitimately lost.
31:24
He lost an election to a dead person that didn't even campaign and you can point to
31:29
the fact that he couldn't control himself on Twitter.
31:33
He couldn't get out of his own way and he couldn't point at Joe Biden.
31:36
He wanted the story to be about himself.
31:39
That's exactly what it was.
31:41
The 2020 election before January 6 was a referendum on Donald Trump as a person because if you
31:47
did it based on Donald Trump as the leader of the country and the leader of the Trump
31:52
administration, everybody should have voted for him because we had not seen in the first
31:57
three years of his presidency, we had not seen positives for the country across the board,
32:03
maybe ever.
32:04
Those first three years of the Donald Trump presidency is probably one of the greatest
32:09
three year stretches in any presidency in our country's history, right?
32:14
It's up there in terms of how much flourishing was created for the American people and that
32:19
obviously the C word hits 2020 becomes an absolute abject mess.
32:25
Everybody screwed it up including Donald Trump and then we have the election and it was a
32:29
referendum on Donald Trump as a person, not as a politician and not on Joe Biden as a
32:35
person or a politician, okay?
32:37
I think two things can be true at once and I think both of those things are true.
32:41
All right, guys.
32:42
Next quick hitter here, Balenciaga's new ad campaign featuring children and BDSM gear.
32:47
So BDSM, I believe is what is that bondage domination and fatal masochism.
32:51
So don't look up pictures of it online if you don't know what it is because then you're
32:54
going to be on a watch list.
32:55
So this is also according to the Daily Wire.
32:57
The fashion company Balenciaga responded to its ongoing scandal involving a photo shoot
33:01
that featured young children holding BDSM themed teddy bear bags by saying it could have
33:05
done things differently.
33:07
The company issued a statement Monday afternoon.
33:09
This is a week ago Monday after facing severe public backlash when it was accused of sexualizing
33:15
young children.
33:16
Okay, so if you haven't seen these images, I'm going to bring them up if you're watching
33:18
on YouTube or on Rumble.
33:20
So this first one that I've got here is of a little girl looks to be a little girl holding
33:24
a purple teddy bear that's got like leather straps and all that.
33:27
So basically wearing BDSM gear and then this other image here is another what looks to be
33:33
a little girl holding a teddy bear that's got a lock chain around the neck and the leather
33:39
straps and everything.
33:40
And then there's a bunch of interesting things on the bed which we'll get more into later
33:44
about the other symbols and other symbolism that Balenciaga Balenciaga puts in their work.
33:49
But those two images, those are the ones that went viral.
33:51
Okay, so those are the ones that everybody shared that you've likely seen at this point.
33:55
And if you haven't, go check out our show on Rumble or YouTube and you can see it there.
33:59
The brand itself Balenciaga, which celebrities like Kim Kardashian, this is actually going
34:03
back to the archival.
34:04
I'll just go back to the article here from Daily Wire.
34:06
The brand which celebrates with celebrities like Kim Kardashian often wear displayed images
34:10
on its website last week as parts of its Toy Stories campaign.
34:15
The photos showed child models posing with the brand's teddy bear handbags with the bears
34:19
dress and BDSM themed gear from its Paris Fashion Week spring summer 2023 collection.
34:25
The company said it strongly condemns child abuse.
34:27
It was never our intent to include it in our narrative and the two separate ad campaigns
34:31
represented a serious and grievous error.
34:34
According to the Independent, in one of the images are documents from the 2008 Supreme
34:39
Court opinion, United States vs. Williams, a federal statute prohibiting the pandering
34:43
of child pornography, which reaffirmed the Protect Act, a federal law that increased
34:48
penalties for sexual exploitation and other abuse of children.
34:53
And so I'll show a couple more images here.
34:55
So this is exactly what they're talking about here.
34:56
So in one of the ads, you can see this, it's like, it looks like kind of a busy desk or
35:01
something like that.
35:02
You've got a keyboard there.
35:03
You've got files, you've got a purse, a Balenciaga person, all that.
35:05
But if you zoom in here, so I'll kind of bring this up here.
35:09
If you zoom in, that's the court case.
35:12
That's the one they're talking about, okay?
35:13
So that is the 2008 Supreme Court decision, United States vs. Williams, okay, that was
35:17
talking about the prohibition of pandering of child pornography, okay?
35:21
There's people that want to take that a couple of different ways.
35:24
And there's been a lot of responses on this.
35:26
So celebrities have kind of gone one of two ways because I got to be honest, I never
35:30
heard of Balenciaga before this, I don't really care about fashion, definitely not high fashion,
35:33
which is what Balenciaga is considered.
35:35
But Jason Aldine, the country singer, his wife, you know, apparently has a lot of Balenciaga
35:38
stuff.
35:39
You know, she made a big post social social media posts where she's like throwing it away.
35:42
There's a lot of people on social media like cutting up their Balenciaga bags and throwing
35:44
it away.
35:45
And okay.
35:46
But then you have Kim Kardashian, who might be the most famous person that is a supporter
35:49
of Balenciaga or that was sponsored by them or an influencer or whatever.
35:52
And she came out with a statement a few days after all this broke and she said that she
35:57
was reevaluating her relationship with Balenciaga, which is an interesting thing to say.
36:01
I think she's a mother of four, whenever they're creating these images and she's, you know,
36:06
about as rich as God at this point, but she's reevaluating whether or not she can continue
36:11
to accept money from an organization that clearly is okay with child porn and BDSM and
36:16
child domination.
36:17
So that's an interesting take, but then Balenciaga in a very, very strange move, they're suing
36:25
the PR company that apparently put the ad together.
36:28
Okay.
36:29
Now, this is really weird.
36:31
It's a weird move because there are only a couple of different scenarios here.
36:35
Scenario one, this PR company legitimately made this entire ad campaign out of thin air
36:41
without consulting with Balenciaga, but then Balenciaga actually ended up approving it.
36:46
Okay.
36:47
So that's that scenario one.
36:48
And then scenario two is that Balenciaga gave this company the criteria for this ad
36:54
campaign and they did exactly what the criteria spoke to.
36:58
So either way, Balenciaga is solely responsible for this ad campaign, seeing the light of
37:03
day.
37:04
Okay.
37:05
Now, in, in light of all this and all these different things, I felt like there were a
37:09
lot of people that were adding to this story when things didn't need to be added to it.
37:14
So there was this image that was going around of this woman that looked crazy evil.
37:19
She's wearing like a red, you know, leather suit and she's got her cheeks are sunken in
37:24
and her, her makeup was really, really kind of crazy.
37:26
And she's holding these red babies and everyone's like, this is like the founder of Balenciaga
37:30
or this is like the CEO of Balenciaga and look how how satanic she looks and all these
37:34
different things.
37:35
Well, lo and behold, that was just some model, right?
37:38
So there were a lot of people adding some things around.
37:41
But then the thing that I thought was really, really weird at the beginning and I thought
37:43
it was stupid and it was actually hurting this was that people were talking about how
37:49
Balenciaga was spelled.
37:51
So Balenciaga is spelled B-A-L-E-N-C-I-A-G-A, okay?
37:57
So three A's in there and only one at the beginning, okay?
38:00
But people were plugging an extra A in at the beginning to where it would be B-A-A-L-E-N-C-I-A-G-A.
38:08
And then they would plug Balenciaga.
38:11
So B-A-L-B-A-L space E-N-C-I space A-G-A into Google Translate from Latin to English and
38:19
it would translate into Bail is the king or Bail is God.
38:23
So actually show it here because I went to Google Translate and I did Bail, N-C-A-G-N
38:28
Latin, transfer to English and it shows Bail is the king.
38:32
I did this yesterday.
38:33
So this is not some crazy screenshot.
38:35
This is exactly what I did, but I'm sitting here and I'm like, but it doesn't say that.
38:41
Like, they don't they don't spell their name with four A's.
38:44
They spell it with one A. So I thought it was it was kind of a weird thing.
38:48
But then when you dig a little deeper, okay, and we got to kind of talk about Bail because
38:52
a lot of you kind of know who that is, at least colloquially, but Bail is the ancient
38:55
Canaanite, Infinician God that represented a lot of things, but was mainly seen as a fertility
39:00
God and Bail just so happened to be a God or deity that children were sacrificed to
39:06
in ancient times, okay?
39:08
And Christian demonology says that Bail is one of the gods of hell, okay?
39:11
So essentially Bail is the demon of child sacrifice.
39:16
Bail is the demon in charge of child sacrifice, child sacrifice, literally, okay?
39:21
You might also remember the story from First Kings where the prophet Elijah, you know, went
39:24
up against the prophets of Bail and, you know, they're like, okay, you know, we're going
39:27
to see who can consume this altar with fire and then the prophets of Bail are out there
39:30
flailing around and freaking out and doing all these different things and nothing's happening.
39:34
And the thing I love about it is Elijah is like literally giving them crap, go back to
39:37
the First Kings and read that.
39:38
It's so funny.
39:39
There's like sarcasm all through this like, yeah, maybe you're not young loud enough
39:42
and all that.
39:43
And so, you know, the, the prophets of Bail do this all day long and nothing happens and
39:45
then Elijah goes, Hey, watch this.
39:47
And then he prays to Yahweh and then everyone gets consumed.
39:50
And so it's a great, great story.
39:52
But the problem with the adding the A to the spelling of Balenciaga to where you could
39:56
plug it in and Latin and all that.
39:58
So I thought was again that the company does not spell their name that way with four A's.
40:03
They only have it with three.
40:06
But when you plug it into Google translate, the Balenciaga name, just as it's normally
40:12
spelled, you get this and I'll bring it up on the screen.
40:15
BA space, L E in space, CI space, A G A, which translates from Latin to English, do what
40:22
you want.
40:24
So if you spell it their way and break it up, Balenciaga is do what you want.
40:30
Okay.
40:31
So that's something that's really, really important.
40:34
Again, going back to my problem with the people that were adding the A in there is that you're
40:38
adding something that's not there.
40:39
I remember years ago, I watched this video where there was this woman explaining why monster
40:44
energy like the company that makes the energy drinks that they were satanic and they brought
40:48
up their logo, you know, the big M logo and they explained how this, you know, was indicative
40:53
of satanic imagery and all these other different things.
40:56
The only problem with this video was that they altered the monster logo.
41:02
Because if you hold up a monster can next to the image they were shown in this video,
41:05
it's like, okay, this is so clearly not the same image.
41:09
So you got all these people, you know, freaking out going to 7 11, praying over the energy
41:12
drink section.
41:13
And it doesn't matter.
41:14
And so I thought this was another one of those situations.
41:17
And then I saw this, so I'm bringing this up on your screen right now.
41:21
So this is an ad, you know, another Balenciaga ad featuring a child that I had not seen before.
41:27
And I saw it on TikTok and then I saw it some other places.
41:30
This is a very, very hard image to find, okay?
41:32
But I was able to find it.
41:34
So when you look at this and I'll describe it for those of you that are not watching
41:36
on Rubble or YouTube, there is a kid wearing a black hoodie and black pants and red shoes.
41:40
And he's in the middle of this room, it looks to be his room.
41:43
And there is stuff everywhere in this room.
41:47
And there are countless blogs right now and people on Reddit that are breaking down all
41:52
the different images in this particular thing and all the different imagery that is very,
41:58
very, very concerning, okay?
42:00
So the first thing is is what the kid is wearing.
42:02
So he's wearing, you know, what it could be considered innocuous to just be, you know,
42:05
a black track suit or a black hoodie or something like that.
42:08
But when you look to the kids or the kids left, it's right in the picture, there is what looks
42:13
to be a black robe that is tied up on the ground.
42:17
So that is something that is indicative of what Satanists will use or wickens or whatever
42:21
will use when they're doing their different, you know, ceremonies or whatever.
42:25
In the top right of the image, you can see an image of a kid's drawing of Satan to the
42:29
right of that.
42:30
There is a white bunny with tall ears.
42:33
And I've seen some places where that has some occultic appeal or something like that.
42:38
And again, and there's so much thing, so many things here in the image that I can't really
42:41
get into.
42:42
There's a lot of disturbing images written on the walls that, you know, if you were to
42:46
show this to a child psychologist or something like that, they would be like, okay, this shows
42:49
some deeply disturbed behavior that's coming probably from their lived experience.
42:54
In the bottom left of the image, you see one of the BDSM bears, it's one of the bears with
42:57
makeup and it's got the chain, but then if you go to the bottom of the image, a little
43:03
bit to the left of center, you see some caution tape and to the right of the child in the
43:09
image, you see a bear or not a bear, a chair that is wrapped in this caution tape as well.
43:14
But when you go to the bottom again, it's in the bottom of the left, it's caution tape.
43:19
It's caution tape with the Balenciaga name on there.
43:22
The Balenciaga is spelled B-A-A-L-E-N-C-I-A-G-A-B-A-A-L, okay?
43:32
So this goes back to that translation that I was showing where when you plug bail in
43:36
see Aga, bail with two A's in there, it translates to bail is the king, bail is God.
43:44
So apparently this was a not so subtle nod to the people that are actually making the
43:52
claim that this is kind of what this brand is all about.
43:56
And then I saw that before their Instagram account was wiped because they wiped their
44:00
entire Instagram account.
44:01
I think they just deleted it.
44:02
They wiped out some stuff on Twitter, all kinds of things.
44:05
I heard that they would use the hashtag malloc.
44:09
So M-O-L-U-C-H, malloc or molec, okay, if that sounds familiar, that is the Canaanite
44:16
God of drumroll please, child sacrifice, hashtag malloc, okay?
44:26
So with all those things combined, you have to look at this like, this is a very, very
44:31
serious thing.
44:32
And this ad campaign was obviously not an accident or an oversight.
44:36
This was deliberate, obviously it was.
44:40
But Balenciaga just thought that you wouldn't notice or that we collectively as a society
44:44
would not care because again, you look at all the imagery and go back to the image I
44:50
showed of that young boy wearing the hoodie and all those different things.
44:53
There's so much occult and satanic and child sacrifice and pagan imagery in the image.
44:59
Like I kept looking through and it was like, okay, it's kind of like where's Waldo?
45:02
Where's the next thing that points directly to it?
45:05
These people think that we don't care.
45:07
They think that we won't notice.
45:08
We're just rubs.
45:09
Like they put it right in front of our faces so that they can always point back to it and
45:13
say, well, you didn't care about that.
45:16
So when we push for the next thing or push this line of what's acceptable, whenever we
45:20
expand the overton window to include this type of ideology, why do you care now?
45:26
Which leads me to the big takeaway on this story is remember what I've been saying about
45:30
the normalization of pedophilia.
45:33
I've done multiple episodes on this podcast about the normalization of pedophilia about
45:38
how is LGBTQ and then they're going to add P for pedophile.
45:42
But they don't call them pedophiles anymore.
45:44
We're supposed to call them minor attracted persons.
45:47
They're just maps.
45:49
These are just people just like somebody can be gay or somebody can be bisexual or somebody
45:54
can be pansexual or duper, duper, duper sexual or whatever.
45:57
They're just, it's just a sexual preference, but doesn't mean they're going to act on
46:01
it.
46:02
It doesn't mean they need to be expelled from society because they're a potential danger
46:06
to children.
46:07
No, no, no, no.
46:08
We need to be more loving.
46:10
We need to bring these people closer to us.
46:13
They're, they're just like you.
46:15
They just have a different way of seeing the world sexually, no big deal.
46:19
They're normalizing it.
46:21
And the thing about it is guys is these people, these demons that are pushing this ideology,
46:27
they will only succeed if we don't push back.
46:30
Why in the world do you think I constantly talk about equipping men to push back darkness
46:35
because it's our responsibility?
46:36
You know, I talk about this a lot, society wants to take all the strength, all the testosterone
46:41
out of men because they want to make men weak because they're like weak men are safe men
46:46
and weak men are approved, stamped men.
46:49
We love those people, right?
46:51
But a weak man is a useless man.
46:53
A meek man is a useful man, a man that is strong and capable of violence and capable
46:59
of pushing back, but leaves the sword in his sheath until he needs it.
47:03
That's what meekness is.
47:05
But they don't want that.
47:07
Like they don't want a meek man that's got all their strength on their voluntary control
47:10
or under the control of the father.
47:12
They don't want that.
47:14
But people like this, Balenciaga, these brands, these people that are doing these things trying
47:18
to normalize pedophilia and BDSM stuff with children, they will only succeed if we don't
47:23
push back.
47:24
Okay.
47:25
So last week, last Friday, I know a lot of people asked me about this in my interview
47:27
with Ryan George, um, you know, he made this statement that kind of caught me a little bit
47:31
flat footy, he was like, you know, I want to be known for what I'm for, not what I'm against,
47:36
which is such a mealy mouth, vapid thing to actually believe because it sounds good.
47:41
I want to be known for one on four, not when I'm against it sounds great to sound, you know,
47:45
will look good on a t-shirt, right?
47:47
But when you say what you're for, you are automatically saying what you are against.
47:52
Think about it just a silly example, but you know, just kind of an easy one.
47:55
If you say that I'm for cookies and cream ice cream, it is my favorite flavor of ice
47:59
cream, which it just so happens to be.
48:01
I'm communicating that I am against all of the other options when cookies and cream is
48:05
on the table.
48:06
Right?
48:07
That's a silly example.
48:08
But when I communicate what I'm for, I'm also communicating what I'm against.
48:11
If I communicate that I am for the protection of unborn children in the womb, automatically,
48:17
because this is how words work, I'm communicating that I am against killing babies in the womb
48:24
because duh.
48:27
And I got a great message from my buddy, pastor, Joby Martin.
48:30
I know I talked about a model in the show, but he and I communicate a lot because he listened
48:34
to that episode with Ryan George.
48:35
And he's like, Kyle, this is what you should have said.
48:36
So shout out to Joby Martin because this was perfect and I will use this every time for
48:39
the rest of eternity when someone says, I want to be known for what I'm for and not what
48:42
I'm against.
48:43
He said, well, you should have asked that guy is, would you have disagreed with Martin Luther
48:48
King, Jr. using the Bible and a Judeo-Christian ethic to say why black people shouldn't be
48:56
treated the way that they were treated in the United States during the civil rights movement?
49:00
Would you been against that?
49:02
Would you been against William Wilberforce communicating that he was against slavery,
49:08
that he was for the freeing of the slaves?
49:11
Because oh, well, you know, he was, you know, communicating what he was against and not necessarily
49:15
what he was for.
49:17
If you're a person like that, would you disagree with Dietrich Bonhoeffer as he was pushing
49:21
back against the Nazis in the 1930s in Germany, go read Bonhoeffer, the the autobiography by
49:26
Eric Metaxas and then read a letter to the American church, which was released by Metaxas
49:30
this year.
49:31
We had him on the show to talk about it.
49:32
But that is the exact right response.
49:35
Thank you, Joby, for giving that to me, the exact right response because imagine someone
49:40
like Ryan George coming into the public eye and saying, yeah, I would talk about this
49:45
Balenciaga stuff and I would talk about the sexualization of children and I would talk
49:49
about, you know, pedophiles and all that, but you know what?
49:51
The church, you know, we got we got our own problems in the church.
49:55
So I don't think we should be able to push back any darkness and culture until, you know,
49:58
we take care of the stuff in our neck of the woods.
50:01
How ridiculous, what a cowardly and nonsensical way to view the world because we have been
50:08
equipped with the necessary tools and weapons to fight back against the principalities and
50:16
powers of this world.
50:18
Why would we be given the tools and the weapons if we were not to use them?
50:23
Because it's a cowardly point of view coming from people that don't want to push back against
50:27
darkness because they want people to like them.
50:29
What a lot of people said in that interview and pointed out rightly is that, you know,
50:33
Ryan George kept bragging on himself saying, you know, all these people are like, Oh,
50:35
we are not Kyle, but Ryan, we love your version of Jesus.
50:38
And if I were to ever come to church, I would want to go to church with you.
50:41
That should actually concern you when someone looks at you and says, a depraved person
50:45
that doesn't believe in the resurrection and doesn't believe the gospel when they say,
50:48
I really like your version of Jesus because potentially you're not pointing out the level
50:53
of depravity in that person and that Jesus who lived a perfect, sinless life had to sacrifice
50:58
that perfect, sinless life so that you can have your sins paid for so that you could
51:02
be righteous before the just father.
51:05
So again, it sounds good.
51:06
It sounds cute.
51:07
It's going to win you some friends, but it's not going to win souls to the father.
51:11
So enough of all of that.
51:13
If we're going to push back, we're going to push back.
51:16
And that's it.
51:17
All right, everybody, deep breath.
51:19
Let's get into the next quick hitter here Kanye West going full anti-Semite.
51:23
So as we've all seen and I don't want to spend a whole lot of time on this, we've seen a
51:27
precipitous decline of Kanye West, which turned up to 11 last week when Kanye West went on
51:33
Alex Jones's show.
51:35
So first of all, he walks in there.
51:36
He's got this huge jacket on.
51:37
He's got this gimp outfit on, which is basically like a full body suit covering his head and
51:40
his hands and everything like that.
51:42
Which is crazy, but then we've, I've got a clip here.
51:44
I'm going to show you a couple of different clips of some things that he said that are
51:47
just absolutely and completely indefensible.
51:51
So we'll get into the first clip here.
51:52
It's a little bit less than a minute.
51:54
That's right.
51:55
You're not Hitler.
51:56
You're not a Nazi.
51:57
You don't deserve to be called that and demonized.
52:00
Well, I see, I see good things about Hitler also.
52:06
The Jew, I love everyone and Jewish people are not going to tell me.
52:09
You can love us and you can love what we're doing to you with the contracts and you can
52:18
love what we're pushing with the pornography.
52:21
But this guy that invented highways, invented the very microphone that I use as a musician,
52:28
you can't say out loud that this person ever did anything good.
52:31
And I'm done with that.
52:33
I'm done with the classifications.
52:35
Every human being has something of value that they brought to the table, especially Hitler.
52:41
How about that one?
52:42
Ari Emmanuel.
52:43
How you like that one?
52:44
Hey, Ron, you're going to do anything to fix Chicago?
52:48
I mean, what do you do with that?
52:50
I mean, Alex Jones is pretty extreme is looking around like what in the world is he saying?
52:55
Now, I can almost understand what Kanye is trying to do because he's trying to be a
52:59
contrarian.
53:00
Okay.
53:01
And you know, to a degree, I can appreciate contrarians and things like that.
53:05
You can't do that with Hitler, though, because obviously it's well established that Hitler
53:09
probably did some nice things in his life.
53:11
He probably helped a kid, you know, up on newsfeed after he fell down.
53:15
He was probably nice to puppies or all these different things.
53:17
But categorically, you can't say things that are good about Hitler.
53:21
That's never going to win you any points.
53:23
And if that's where he stopped, it would have been egregious enough.
53:26
It would have been bad enough, but then he kept going.
53:29
So let's go back to the clip here.
53:30
So help us God.
53:31
Well, I am worried about the thousands of black folks down a month in Chicago, but let
53:34
me expand on this.
53:35
That's a nuanced issue.
53:36
You know, my grandfather grew up in Dallas from a pretty wealthy family.
53:43
Also Hitler was born Christian.
53:44
Well, I've actually studied some of the history on it, but it's very interesting.
53:49
My grandfather, you know, grew up in actually some of his family spoke some German.
53:53
There's a lot of Germans in Texas, but did you know that he grew up next door to the
53:59
inventor of air conditioning and the inventor of one of the major refrigeration?
54:04
And so my issue was growing up, my grandfather told me the stories about some of the inside
54:08
baseball and the things that went on.
54:11
And but later I'm going to get into that.
54:12
I'm going to tell you some stuff about Hitler that you might not know directly that happened
54:16
to my people.
54:17
I knew.
54:18
I'd love to hear everything because guess what, we don't get to hear.
54:22
It's hidden even like our truth, the fact that African Americans were in America before
54:28
the pilgrims.
54:29
That truth is hidden that we are actually the native Americans or some of us are native.
54:34
Or the fact that what Kyrie got in trouble is pointing out that we're Jewish slave boats.
54:41
Like and then you look at Australia, they've done some of the genetic typing of the aborigines
54:46
there.
54:47
They're basically Africans.
54:48
There you go.
54:49
You know, so all of these truths.
54:51
And then the current truth about banking, about the government.
54:55
My favorite thing that I got to say with.
54:58
So I'll cut it off there.
54:59
So it goes on and on and on and keeps going on like this again saying, you know, Hitler
55:04
was actually raised Christian.
55:06
That doesn't mean anything when you're talking about Hitler as a person because you can be
55:09
raised any number of things.
55:10
But I care about how you act when you're past the age of accountability and when you're
55:14
an adult.
55:15
And when people are like, Oh, the Nazis were Christians.
55:17
It's like, did anything they do, you know, comport with what we see in the New Testament,
55:22
what we see in the gospel accounts, what we see in the words of Jesus and what you should
55:25
and shouldn't do morally.
55:27
Of course not.
55:28
So I'm just going to go to the big takeaway on this one, Kanye may or may not be crazy.
55:33
I think a lot of people are just defaulting.
55:35
Oh, he's crazy.
55:36
He's man.
55:37
He's having a break.
55:38
Maybe, maybe, but he may just be ignorant.
55:40
Like I've been around a lot of conspiracy theorists in my day.
55:44
I don't know why.
55:45
That's, but I'm like the honey to them.
55:46
They're just so attracted to me.
55:48
These people believe that 9/11 was an inside job and yet they root for the United States
55:52
anytime we, you know, we're playing as a, as a national team.
55:55
They believe that, you know, JFK was assassinated by CIA.
55:59
They believe, you know, all these different conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook, about
56:03
all these other different things, every single plausible explanation that could come from
56:07
somebody that has some random website that they put up in their mom's basement or something
56:10
like that.
56:11
They just buy it.
56:12
Okay.
56:13
Kanye could be getting swept up in that right now.
56:16
He could have gone down the rabbit hole on YouTube or on any of these other documentaries
56:21
or something like that that are saying things that are just patently untrue.
56:25
They sound plausible.
56:27
They sound like it's a smart thing to, to say again, if he's trying to be a contrarian right
56:31
now, he's doing a pretty dang good job of it.
56:35
If he's having a break, a mental break, we should obviously be praying for him.
56:39
This is obviously, you know, ammo to the people that for years now, I've been saying, don't
56:44
just buy into the Kanye thing, right, or, or yeah, or whatever supposed to call him now.
56:48
Just buy into that just because he's saying things, just because he's wearing a MAGA hat,
56:51
just because he's saying things that you agree with and you're a big Trump guy and he's
56:54
taking pictures with Trump.
56:55
Don't just go with that.
56:57
I think Ben Shapiro says, you know, live by the Kanye, die by the Kanye and there's a
57:00
lot of people right now that are looking at this man that needs help.
57:05
Again, if he's crazy, he needs mental and physical and, and, and emotional support and
57:09
all these other different things, but if he's ignorant, he needs somebody, not some sync
57:13
of fan that's just going to tell him that he's, he's the best person ever and just trying
57:17
to get famous off his coattails.
57:18
He needs people around him that can put an arm around him and be like, brother, I'm taking
57:21
your phone away.
57:22
You're not tweeting anymore.
57:24
You're not, you're not doing anything anymore.
57:26
We're going to go to rehab.
57:27
We're going to go get some help.
57:28
We're going to go do something like that.
57:29
But apparently and unfortunately he doesn't have anybody's life like that.
57:31
So let's pray for him.
57:33
That's about all we can do at this point.
57:34
All right.
57:35
Next quick hitter here, the shocking, absolutely and completely shocking revelation that liver
57:42
king is on steroids, okay?
57:44
So if you don't know who liver king is, I'm going to bring up a picture of him right now.
57:48
Look at this person.
57:50
So that's apparently a human being.
57:52
That is not a Photoshop picture, okay, because I've seen this video of him doing all these
57:55
different things.
57:56
This is a guy that has built an entire fitness brand on the fact that he's naddy, okay, that
58:03
he doesn't take any steroids.
58:06
And the reason why he says this is because he's built around, you know, a brand around
58:10
being this, you know, organ person guy, he's going to eat liver and eat testicles and eat
58:17
all these different things.
58:18
And, you know, he's going to do these workouts and it's all going to be, you know, caveman
58:20
style stuff.
58:21
And if you want a physique like that, if you want to be, you know, five foot eight, two
58:25
hundred and twenty pounds of solid muscle, then you just need to buy his supplements.
58:30
And the guy makes what I understand to be millions of dollars a month doing this.
58:35
And every time he was asked about whether or not he was on steroids, he would always deny
58:39
it.
58:40
He was very open.
58:41
He didn't off the skate.
58:42
He just straight up said, I'm not on steroids.
58:43
I've never touched the stuff.
58:45
I'm totally natural by my liver supplements.
58:47
Okay.
58:48
Now we need to go to this article according to the Rolling Stone, Brian Johnson, better
58:52
known as the organ devouring masculinity influencer, liver King, has admitted to steroid use in
58:57
a somber video shared on his YouTube and Instagram accounts.
59:00
I fully own that I have to, he said in a six minute confession.
59:03
I am as sorry as a man can be the pain statement comes in response to a video from another body
59:09
builder, Derek of the online fitness brand, more plates, more dates that reported to show
59:13
emails in which Johnson described his steroid regimen, a suite of injections costing some
59:18
$11,000 per month.
59:20
Since launching the liver King persona in August of 2021, Johnson has given several interviews
59:24
during which he categorically denied using performance enhancing drugs to achieve his
59:28
muscular physique.
59:29
He'd also brush the side accusations of steroid use from podcast kingpin Joe Rogan.
59:34
Okay.
59:35
So, so there's liver King.
59:36
I'm not going to put a link to to the apology if you want to go find it, go for it.
59:39
The apology was completely ridiculous.
59:41
You could tell that he didn't mean any of the words that he was saying.
59:44
He wasn't sorry that he did he was sorry he got caught.
59:47
All that's there.
59:48
The thing about this story that's so interesting to me is the people whose worlds fell apart
59:53
when this news hit.
59:54
Now there's a group of people that are just like, no, it's not real, even though he publicly
59:58
said, yeah, it's real and I, you know, he apologized for it or whatever.
1:00:01
They don't want to believe it.
1:00:02
The level of gullibility on people is astonishing.
1:00:05
Again, I'm going to bring up that picture again, or I'll leave it.
1:00:09
You guys saw it.
1:00:10
And if you don't have seen it, just go Google, you know, liver king and you'll get the idea.
1:00:14
This is not a normal physique.
1:00:17
Now there are physical freaks out there and I've trained with a lot of those guys over
1:00:20
the years and I've been around some of those guys, guys that don't really lift at all and
1:00:24
they're just huge.
1:00:25
You know, you see the Bo Jackson stories and the Herschel Walker stories and all those
1:00:27
different things.
1:00:28
People like that exist.
1:00:30
This guy ain't that you can clearly see it.
1:00:33
That is not a normal body.
1:00:35
There's a lot of, you know, people that are like, oh, he even got like ab implants because
1:00:38
his abs literally look like, you know, lunch boxes that were like poof, poof, poof, like
1:00:42
place on his abdomen.
1:00:43
It's not a normal stomach and, you know, he may have gotten some cosmetic stuff done to
1:00:47
his abs to make them look that way and pop and all those different things.
1:00:50
But people are so unbelievably gullible because they want that shortcut and they think that
1:00:57
they who doesn't work out very hard and doesn't have very good genetics, that they can just
1:01:02
spend a few hundred dollars per month or a few thousand dollars per month on supplements
1:01:05
that this guy sells and all of a sudden they'll be enormous.
1:01:07
They'll be a donus.
1:01:08
So my big takeaway on this is in terms of health and fitness, we have a really good idea of
1:01:14
what works and what doesn't work at this point, guys.
1:01:18
Stop buying this nonsense from people purporting to have cracked the code on bodily optimization.
1:01:25
Stop it.
1:01:27
Every few months, there's a new guy that claims I've cracked the code and wouldn't you know
1:01:33
it?
1:01:34
I can actually sell you a program.
1:01:36
I can sell you supplements.
1:01:37
I can sell you injectables.
1:01:38
I can sell you whatever and it'll fix everything.
1:01:42
You'll be able to get hard again and you'll get your muscles back.
1:01:45
You'll get muscles you ever never even thought about.
1:01:47
You'll be able to train longer and push more weight and you'll be able to do all these
1:01:50
different things.
1:01:51
You could be the next Mr. Olympia.
1:01:52
You can win your next powerlifting competition.
1:01:54
You can do all these different things.
1:01:55
I've cracked the code.
1:01:57
You need to stand on one foot, put your finger on your nose and then try to sleep, but only
1:02:00
at this hour, you know, only with this temperature in the room and all those different things.
1:02:04
I'm all for optimization.
1:02:06
I'm all for making adjustments, but guys, if you want to be healthy and fit, you need
1:02:11
to move more, eat less typically for those of you guys that are severely overweight.
1:02:18
That's the advice you need.
1:02:20
Those are the supplements you need.
1:02:21
You need to rewind me saying this over and over and over.
1:02:25
Watch your supplement, move more, eat less.
1:02:28
Now if you're in already in good shape, then it's about optimization.
1:02:31
So are you getting enough protein?
1:02:32
Okay.
1:02:33
Are you getting enough micronutrients?
1:02:35
Are you getting, you know, enough of this thing that you're lacking?
1:02:38
Are you sleeping enough?
1:02:39
Because if sleep could be bottled up and sold, it would be a PED would be illegal.
1:02:43
That's how great sleep and recovery is, right?
1:02:46
If you want to be a, you know, a ice bath person and you want to, you know, get massages
1:02:51
and you want to do all this deep tissue, great.
1:02:53
All that's great, but we know what works and it's actually really, really simple.
1:02:58
When you're at an elite level and you're wanting to get to that next level, yeah, there's maybe
1:03:01
some experimentation that you can do that's not going to make your heart explode, not give
1:03:04
you cancer and you not make it to where your, your penis doesn't work or whatever.
1:03:08
There's plenty of stuff like that out there, but we need to keep things simple.
1:03:12
If you're in good shape and you want to be in better shape, work out harder, clean up
1:03:15
your diet a little bit, skip pizza, skip burgers and fries, skip those different things
1:03:21
and you can optimize, but stop buying in to people like liver, keen, you dummies.
1:03:27
All right.
1:03:28
Next one here, the goat response by a coach during a sports news press conference.
1:03:32
So the coaching question here is Joe Missoula, who is the interim head coach of the Boston
1:03:37
Celtics.
1:03:38
So I don't follow the NBA anymore.
1:03:39
They're still losing me with all that.
1:03:40
Woke stuff.
1:03:41
I'm not going to go back to them.
1:03:42
So I didn't know who Joe Missoula was, but I did know at least, you know, because I see
1:03:45
stuff on Twitter, they currently have the best record in the NBA, okay?
1:03:48
The Boston Celtics do.
1:03:49
He seems to be doing a good job.
1:03:50
Now, after a game last week, he's doing his, you know, normal, you know, typical, typically
1:03:55
useless post game interview, or what went well and what didn't go well, you know, just
1:03:59
absolute nonsense only for like the absolute elite elite of the fans that have to just
1:04:03
hear everything.
1:04:04
And apparently at this game, there were British royals in the crowd for the game.
1:04:10
And this is supposed to make Americans excited for some reason, which all led to this interaction
1:04:16
during the press conference.
1:04:17
Let's go to the video.
1:04:18
Did you get a chance to meet with the royal family?
1:04:20
And if not, how was it like having them there in the building?
1:04:24
Jesus Mary and Joseph?
1:04:28
The Prince and Princess of Wales.
1:04:29
Oh, no, I did not.
1:04:32
I'm only familiar with one royal family.
1:04:34
I don't know too much about that one.
1:04:37
Thank you.
1:04:38
But I'm glad they're hopefully their Celtic fans.
1:04:43
Yeah.
1:04:44
Yeah, thank you guys is legitimately impossible for me to love that response and that interaction
1:04:55
more because the gal that asked the question, she did it in a nice polite fashion.
1:05:00
She kind of responded in a kind of a funny way because it's like she all of a sudden
1:05:03
realized, okay, I kind of asked him a ridiculous question and he hit me back with this.
1:05:06
It wasn't rude.
1:05:07
It wasn't mean spirited.
1:05:09
And apparently this guy, Missoula, apparently he's a Christian, all those different things.
1:05:12
He didn't know that question was coming, but he was so ready for it, right?
1:05:17
Because we're supposed to care here in America about, you know, the, the Prince and Princess,
1:05:21
you know, flying around the country and doing all these different things.
1:05:23
I don't give a crap.
1:05:24
There was a war fought in the 1770s that the winner of that war led me to believe that I
1:05:28
don't really need to care about what's happening with the royal family in another country.
1:05:31
But that's another discussion for another day.
1:05:33
Let's go to my big takeaway here.
1:05:35
This is the greatest answer I've ever heard during a sports press conference.
1:05:40
And I've got to make a specific call out right now because I was part of a group text that
1:05:44
included one of our gal listeners of this show, okay?
1:05:46
And this is a gal named Cassidy and she is a big supporter of this show and we're so thankful
1:05:50
for her.
1:05:51
But she responded to that press conference to that little clip and was like, eh, it wasn't
1:05:56
really the mic drop moment that I thought.
1:05:59
So I am calling you out, Cassidy.
1:06:02
You're super duper wrong, okay?
1:06:04
And you need to repent for the sin of not realizing that that was a tremendous mic drop
1:06:09
moment.
1:06:10
And if you keep going on like that, I'm going to prevent you from listening to the show.
1:06:13
I'm kicking you out.
1:06:14
I'm going to cancel you.
1:06:15
You'll no longer be able to do this.
1:06:17
Get with a program that is legitimately one of the greatest things that I've ever seen
1:06:21
in any news conference ever.
1:06:22
But it is the number one greatest response of all time in a sports news conference.
1:06:26
All right.
1:06:27
Okay, guys, let's get to the last quick hitter of the day.
1:06:29
So I've teed it up.
1:06:30
I tease it at the beginning.
1:06:31
I know we're over an hour in at this point, but guys, you're already in it with me.
1:06:34
So just buckle up a woke pastor hiding after I called him out for his heretical.
1:06:39
tweet.
1:06:40
So the tweeting question was by a guy named Dr. Kevin M. Young.
1:06:44
So he's at Kevin M. Young, all names spelled normally on Twitter at Kevin M. Young.
1:06:50
This was a tweet that I saw over the weekend and Ryan, one of our team members here at
1:06:53
another live sent it to me again.
1:06:55
And it made me want to talk about this.
1:06:57
I've been chewing on this response to my tweet.
1:06:59
I've realized that for me, gay marriage actually paints a more beautiful semiotic of Christ
1:07:05
and his church than a mere hetero on God's kingdom is diverse in makeup, experience and
1:07:13
belief.
1:07:14
But one thing unites above all love Kevin M. Young is a real person that exists.
1:07:24
That is legitimately something that he wrote.
1:07:27
I feel the need to read it again.
1:07:28
But I won't read it as dramatically.
1:07:29
I'll just read it straight through.
1:07:30
I've been chewing on this response to my tweet.
1:07:32
I've realized that for me, gay marriage actually paints a more beautiful semiotic of Christ
1:07:36
and his church than a mirror hetero on mirror, hetero on God's kingdom is diverse in makeup,
1:07:42
experience and belief.
1:07:43
But one thing unites above all love, love.
1:07:46
So he's one of these love people that he doesn't really know what love means because apparently
1:07:50
he's never actually read the Bible.
1:07:51
But then I went to his Twitter profile.
1:07:53
Okay.
1:07:54
So this guy, he is, you know, according to this, he's a pastor and avid lifter, coach, husband,
1:07:59
dad to Ford, to for doctorate in early church and ancient faith formation, post evangelical.
1:08:06
His podcast is apparently jacked theology, and then he has his pronouns in his bio because
1:08:12
of course he does.
1:08:13
He him rev.
1:08:16
I'm assuming that means reverend.
1:08:17
Okay.
1:08:18
So this is a guy that all that's in the profile.
1:08:21
So I'm, I'm already dying laughing, but then right, right below he him rev, I see his website,
1:08:26
doctor, Kevin young calm, so of course I click on it.
1:08:29
And when I go to the website, I scroll down just a little bit and he has my skills listed.
1:08:34
That's what he writes.
1:08:35
They're not my skills, Kyle, but his skills listed on his website.
1:08:38
Okay.
1:08:39
And it's kind of a unique way of doing it.
1:08:41
It's like percentage wise.
1:08:42
So he's like media and graphic design, 80%, self deprecation, 100% style, 65% bench breast,
1:08:49
95%.
1:08:50
Then he has integrity, 100%.
1:08:54
I am literally gasping for breath on the ground at this point that how ridiculous of a human
1:09:00
being Kevin young is.
1:09:01
I'm dying at this point to put integrity.
1:09:04
He listed that as his first skill.
1:09:06
I read it out of order on purpose.
1:09:07
That's his first skill that he lists on the whole page of his website, integrity, 100%.
1:09:13
It's like someone saying, yeah, yeah, I'm like literally the most humble person ever,
1:09:16
right?
1:09:17
Which is the least humble thing that anyone could ever, ever say.
1:09:20
And so this guy's obviously ridiculous person.
1:09:23
I find out that he's a faculty member at a seminary.
1:09:27
It's called like wind, windstone or whatever, what the heck is I'm just looking up right
1:09:30
here because I've already forgotten north.
1:09:33
I think it's north wind.
1:09:34
All right.
1:09:35
What is it?
1:09:36
North wind seminary.
1:09:37
Okay.
1:09:38
It never heard of it, but apparently it's a super woke lefty seminary.
1:09:41
So I take a screenshot of his original tweet that I read.
1:09:45
I take a screenshot of his profile that shows he him rev his pronouns and that take a screenshot
1:09:50
of his skills page on his website.
1:09:52
And then I post it on our Instagram over the weekend and then I post it with this caption,
1:09:57
which I didn't include here.
1:09:58
So let me go back to what I put here.
1:10:00
So here's the caption.
1:10:02
Imagine just thinking this, much less saying it out loud, much less tweeting it for the
1:10:06
world to see his special brand of heresy is somewhere between laughable and maddening.
1:10:11
It's terrifying to see someone like this as a faculty member of a seminary, which just
1:10:15
speaks to one of the many major issues with many modern seminaries, but I guess you can
1:10:19
expect that from someone with their pronouns and their bio.
1:10:21
And someone that lists quote integrity, unquote, as one of their skills on their website.
1:10:26
I guess it's true for him.
1:10:27
As long as he doesn't mean he's trying to have integrity as it pertains to the word
1:10:32
of God.
1:10:33
Okay.
1:10:34
So I post that on Instagram and I tag him in it.
1:10:37
And I also tag the seminary that he works out in it.
1:10:40
Okay.
1:10:41
And he responds almost immediately in my comments section.
1:10:43
Okay.
1:10:44
So this is at Kevin M. Young on Instagram responding and I got the responses up here on the screen.
1:10:47
Hi.
1:10:48
This is me.
1:10:49
I made a lot of assumptions. I am sorry that you felt the need to be so uncharitable, but
1:10:53
I hope God blessed you anyway.
1:10:55
Be well in Christ.
1:10:57
Okay.
1:10:58
So obviously not one to back away from a fight.
1:11:01
I automatically respond back to him.
1:11:03
I know it's you.
1:11:04
I tagged you in the post.
1:11:06
Feel free to clear up any misconceptions people may draw from your actual words that
1:11:10
you tweeted to which he responded.
1:11:13
It's not the words I posted that concern me.
1:11:16
It's yours and the vitriol based on a single tweet.
1:11:20
You took a lot of liberties, but I can't prevent that.
1:11:23
I can only suggest it was uncharitable and misleading drawing conclusions that were unfair
1:11:28
and false, but sincerely, be well, I just wanted to simply point out you were speaking
1:11:34
about a caricature, not me.
1:11:36
Now, I bet he was super proud of himself after that.
1:11:39
He said his phone down.
1:11:40
He patted himself on his bench press chest and he's like, yeah, this is great.
1:11:43
So I respond like this, this is where I throw down the gauntlet.
1:11:46
Okay.
1:11:47
So you don't wish to defend what you said, which is the crux of the issue.
1:11:52
You'd rather pearl clutch over me calling you out open invitation on our show.
1:11:57
If you'd actually care to interact with someone who won't syncophantically agree with what
1:12:01
you're saying.
1:12:03
Now, this is going to be a shock to probably none of you.
1:12:07
He went very, very silent after that and by very, very silent, I mean crickets.
1:12:12
I mean, not, I mean nothing.
1:12:15
And there are other people in the comments that are tagging him saying, Hey, he gave
1:12:18
you an opportunity.
1:12:19
Go on his show.
1:12:20
Like you're so concerned about his response and you just don't want to dignify the response
1:12:25
by talking about what you originally said.
1:12:28
Hear him out.
1:12:29
Let's go.
1:12:30
He's a fair guy.
1:12:31
Go on his show.
1:12:32
Nothing.
1:12:33
Not a thing.
1:12:34
And guys, I would have bet my left nut to know that he would have never responded because
1:12:40
we need to go right to my big takeaway on this, but there's two of them with this.
1:12:44
Number one, he will not accept my invitation because he's a coward.
1:12:49
And number two, guys like him don't want to be challenged.
1:12:54
They want to be validated.
1:12:55
Okay.
1:12:56
Now, not every one of you out there like that is going to be that aggressive.
1:13:01
Some of you might see see this as like, Oh, this is rather unloving.
1:13:04
I would direct you to Galatians two.
1:13:06
I think it's versus 11 through 14.
1:13:09
This is when Paul called out Peter for basically being racist and communicating to the Jews
1:13:16
or communicating to the Gentiles in Antioch that they couldn't be equal to the Jews unless
1:13:21
they held all the Jewish customs again, go Galatians two, 11 through 14.
1:13:25
I actually just taught that in Sunday school over the weekend.
1:13:27
The short version of that story is that the Judaizers, which was the circumcision party
1:13:33
that was supposedly sent by James, the brother of Jesus from Jerusalem to Antioch came in
1:13:38
and basically said to all the Gentile Christians in Antioch, yes, grace through faith, absolutely.
1:13:44
But also you need to keep all the Jewish customs.
1:13:45
And if you're not circumcised, we need to make that happen too, which if you're 20, 30,
1:13:50
40 years old, man living in that era and you're not circumcised, that's a big commitment,
1:13:54
right?
1:13:55
So going away from the message of the Bible, the message of the gospel and certainly the
1:13:58
message of Galatians, which is grace through faith alone, not grace through faith and not
1:14:03
gospel.
1:14:04
And so what Peter was doing is he had been hanging out with the Gentiles, he had been
1:14:09
eating with the Gentiles and then the Judaizers, the Jewish, you know, you know, the legalist
1:14:14
party or whatever, they came in the circumcision group and they basically said, yeah, you need
1:14:18
to stop hanging out with them and you know, yeah, we get it, but you're Jewish, you understand
1:14:23
this, these people need to become Jewish.
1:14:24
And so all of a sudden Peter stops interacting with the Gentiles.
1:14:28
He stops eating with them, thus communicating that he agreed with the Judaizers that yes,
1:14:34
in order for the Gentiles to be equal to the Jews, they needed to accept Christ, but then
1:14:39
also become Jewish, right?
1:14:41
So these, that was kind of the gist of the story.
1:14:44
There's so much packed in to just a few verses.
1:14:48
But in that, Paul was rightfully rebuking Peter to his face and publicly in front of
1:14:57
people.
1:14:58
Now, I don't know this Kevin guy personally, otherwise I would have rebuked him to his
1:15:03
face publicly.
1:15:04
So I did it in the 2022 version, which is publicly on social media, because there are
1:15:09
people that will read a tweet by a guy like that and think, yeah, that's kind of plausible.
1:15:16
Kind of like last week, when I talked about that guy that was like, Oh, you know, Jesus
1:15:18
had a trans body and they're going to read that because they don't read their Bible and
1:15:22
they don't know anything about church history.
1:15:23
They don't know anything about philosophy.
1:15:24
They don't know anything about anything.
1:15:25
They'll be like, maybe I, I wonder, let me ponder that for about 10 seconds and use a
1:15:31
word like nuance so I can seem super bright and smart, right?
1:15:36
So the reason why I would go out of my way to call this person out publicly and to rebuke
1:15:42
him publicly is because I'm using Paul as my example of when it's biblically inaccurate
1:15:49
to the point of being heretical that somebody is doing or saying a thing.
1:15:54
It is incumbent upon us to call out that behavior.
1:15:58
We see him first Corinthians where Paul basically tells people it's like, what is it your business
1:16:01
of what these people are doing outside of the faith outside the church.
1:16:05
We need to, we need to discuss what's happening inside the church, which we'll see him somewhat
1:16:08
counterintuitive to what I was saying earlier about Ryan George, but that that's just a completely
1:16:12
different scenario because we're talking about overall pushing back of darkness and sin and
1:16:15
Satan and all these other different things, but coming back to this scenario, he's basically
1:16:19
saying that if there is a problem in your midst, you must call it out.
1:16:23
And that is regardless of your wiring, guys.
1:16:25
And as some of you guys are really calm, calm dudes, you don't really like conflict.
1:16:31
You don't really like pushing back, you know, you get really, really nervous and your hands
1:16:34
start shaking.
1:16:35
Even when you get into a serious conversation with somebody that, you know, loves you.
1:16:38
That's just who you are.
1:16:39
That doesn't make you wrong or broken.
1:16:41
That's just how you're wired, but you don't get an out.
1:16:44
You can't read the words of Paul in the New Testament and think to yourself, you know
1:16:47
what?
1:16:48
I don't think that that actually applies to me because I'm wired this way.
1:16:51
So whoopsie Daisy, no, no, you're not absolved of your responsibility to push back against
1:16:56
darkness and to push back against people that are acting out in a sinful way, okay?
1:17:02
So this guy, again, if any of you know him, like, send him this segment of this show,
1:17:07
I should probably clip it out and tag him in it again, because I would love to talk to
1:17:10
him on show because I'm a fair guy.
1:17:12
I'm not going to go look up stuff and hire some private investigator and find all this
1:17:15
other stuff.
1:17:16
I'm going to hit play and I'm just going to record and I'm going to read his tweet and
1:17:19
say, make it make sense, make this make sense to me.
1:17:24
How in the world, I'm going to go back to the tweet because you know, we're, you know,
1:17:27
further on down the line here.
1:17:28
So you may forget what this guy wrote that I called him out for.
1:17:29
This was his tweet, his words, that he's not taken down.
1:17:33
I've been chewing on this response to my tweet.
1:17:35
I've realized that for me, gay marriage actually paints a more beautiful semiotic of Christ
1:17:39
and his church than a mere hetero one.
1:17:42
God's kingdom is diverse in makeup, experience and belief, but one thing unites above all,
1:17:46
love.
1:17:47
This guy is pointing to gay marriage, saying that that's a more beautiful semiotic, which
1:17:51
a, what a, what kind of [inaudible] uses the word semiotic and just everyday parlance.
1:17:56
But that's a more beautiful semiotic of Christ and his church in Christ's relationship to
1:18:01
the church than a mere hetero one, a mere hetero one.
1:18:07
What do you say that Adam and Eve had a mere hetero connection that if you go back to the
1:18:13
beginning of Genesis, when they talked about the mean, joined as one flesh, would that
1:18:16
be the mere joining of a male flesh and a female flesh, because I'm taking some liberties
1:18:21
here.
1:18:22
A guy with his pronouns and his bio and all these other different things.
1:18:25
I'm assuming he's transaffirming to if he's not, and I find that out to be not true later,
1:18:30
I will certainly correct the record.
1:18:33
But a guy like that doesn't want to be challenged.
1:18:35
That's why he went silent.
1:18:37
It's not like he hasn't seen all this.
1:18:38
He saw, he saw the post immediately and immediately responded.
1:18:41
And then when I challenge him to come on my show, to, you know, to be in front of all these,
1:18:46
you know, tens of thousands of listeners and all these other different things to all these
1:18:49
people, right, nothing, not a thing.
1:18:54
He's a coward.
1:18:56
That is the only way to categorize a person like this.
1:18:59
And I don't feel bad for calling him out for that because he's not going to be able
1:19:02
to make that make sense.
1:19:03
And he knows it because he would come on the show and he would probably do something along
1:19:08
the lines of trying to be calm and trying to be whatever, and then he would probably
1:19:11
dip out at some point when he's like, well, it doesn't seem like we're going to be able
1:19:14
to talk about this in a loving fashion and he would try to, you know, hop on his high
1:19:17
horse and hop out when I'm just going to be the one asking questions.
1:19:21
Because I'm not categorizing what he said in a different way.
1:19:23
I literally took three screenshots that were things that he wrote with his own hands.
1:19:29
The tweet, his profile and his website.
1:19:33
The only liberty I've taken so far is thinking that he's probably transaffirming.
1:19:36
I mean, if you got your pronouns and your bio, I'm surprised it didn't have the rainbow
1:19:39
flag.
1:19:40
Okay.
1:19:41
But again, when you guys get into a situation like this, you need to have pre-decided that
1:19:46
you will rebuke somebody that is sinning.
1:19:48
A lot of guys don't really pre-decide anything.
1:19:50
We just want to go with the flow and make a decision when the time comes.
1:19:53
And the example I always use is kind of the easiest one.
1:19:56
If you're a concealed carry person or if you're a gun by your bedside person or something
1:19:58
like that, but you haven't pre-decided whether or not you would use that firearm to potentially
1:20:02
end the life of someone that's trying to hurt you or your family or somebody else.
1:20:05
That's the problem.
1:20:07
Because if you're walking through Walmart and all of a sudden you hear gunshots and you've
1:20:10
got a gun in the appendix position and you know, you've got your, you know, lion's not
1:20:13
sheep shirt on and you've got your, your beard all cropped up and you got your tattoos and
1:20:17
you got all that.
1:20:18
That's great.
1:20:19
But have you pre-decided what you would do in that scenario?
1:20:22
Are you going to run towards the sound of danger or away from it?
1:20:25
If someone's between you and your exit and they have a firearm, are you willing to take
1:20:28
that person's life to save your own or to save others?
1:20:32
Have you pre-decided?
1:20:33
Because guess what? in that scenario, it's too late to decide.
1:20:37
It's too late at that point.
1:20:39
You have to pre-decide.
1:20:41
The same thing is true.
1:20:42
Guys, if you struggle with porn and masturbation and your wife and kids are going to be gone
1:20:45
for the night, you pre-decide that you are not a person that looks at porn and masturbates
1:20:48
when everybody's out of the house and you work with your accountability partners and
1:20:52
you work with whoever and you pray and you do whatever you got to do.
1:20:54
But you've pre-decided that that's not the man that you are.
1:20:58
In these scenarios, you must pre-decide that when someone is saying something heretical,
1:21:04
that is potentially leading people away from the father, that you will be the one to stand
1:21:09
up and call them out.
1:21:10
If it's someone you know, you do it to their face and you do it publicly.
1:21:14
And if you say that's not Christ-like and that's not loving and that's not the answer
1:21:16
that or whatever, go back to Galatians 2 and explain to me why Paul did it and said it
1:21:21
was okay.
1:21:22
Again, if you believe that that is the sufficient word of God, that that is the word of God working
1:21:28
through the Apostle Paul, explain to me why we should delete Galatians 2 11 through 14.
1:21:33
Explain it to me.
1:21:34
I doubt you'll be able to pre-decide.
1:21:36
All right, guys, before we let you go, we are going to do a quick resilience boost.
1:21:39
I don't know if our mission is equipping them in to push back darkness with content that
1:21:43
for just spiritual, mental and physical resilience.
1:21:44
So again, go to the origin website is here in the show notes to check out the full line
1:21:47
of origin and jockofield products, that's keys, jeans, boots, protein, energy drink,
1:21:52
supplements, all that stuff.
1:21:53
Use the promo code undaunted to get 10% off your order.
1:21:56
So I've got a link to our donation page and then I've got links to everything that we
1:21:58
talked about in the quick hitter segment.
1:22:00
But also I got a link to the briefing with Albert Mueller from Wednesday, November 30th
1:22:04
of 2022.
1:22:05
Guys, you have to go listen to that.
1:22:06
It's just a great thing.
1:22:07
You got to make sure you put that in your rotation.
1:22:09
I got to say so much for listening to the show.
1:22:11
We do appreciate it wherever you're listening to this.
1:22:13
Please subscribe rate and leave us a positive five star review.
1:22:15
If you want me to come speak live at your event or on your podcast, you shoot me an email
1:22:18
to info@andonto.life.
1:22:20
That's i-n-f-o-a-andonto.life.
1:22:22
Follow us on Instagram and like us on Facebook and check out our website for everything else,
1:22:25
including how to donate to keep more content like this coming your way.
1:22:27
Just go to www.undonto.life.
1:22:30
And also we want to thank the band, August Burns Red, for allowing us to use their music
1:22:33
for our content.
1:22:34
The music on this podcast is our song, "Cutting the Tides," which is off their 10th anniversary
1:22:37
re-recording of their album, Leveler.
1:22:38
The links are in the description.
1:22:39
I'm your host, Kyle Thompson.
1:22:42
Remember, keep pushing back darkness, keep forging spiritual, mental, and physical resilience.
1:22:48
Keep seeking the lion of Judah.
1:22:55
I know, I know you want, it's a sign, it may stand, it's a virtue, you will be revived.