Pro-Lifer Calmly Dismantles Joe Rogan (Ep. 349)

0:00 This is Undaunted Life, a man's podcast. I'm your host Kyle Thompson. Let's get into

0:23 it.

0:24 And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome, but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently

0:29 enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance

0:34 leading to a knowledge of the truth. And they may come to their senses and escape from the

0:38 snare of the devil after being captured by him to do his will. That is second Timothy

0:42 two 24 through 26. So when we get into our main section about what we're talking about

0:46 today, I want you to keep that scripture in mind. But guys, I do want to remind you that

0:49 the algorithm that basically allows people to find our show. They love reviews and they

0:53 especially love positive five star views. So if you not reviewed us yet on Spotify or on

0:58 Apple podcast, please make sure you do that. If you're following us on YouTube, yeah, subscribe

1:03 yet, make sure you go do that. But again, we love the five star reviews. Leave us a few

1:06 lines why you like this in the algorithms. We'll get this out to more people. Again, we are also

1:10 a listener supported mainly listener supported ministry. So we get some money from advertisements,

1:15 but the overwhelming majority of how we're able to keep the lights on here is because we get

1:18 donations. So if you guys will go to undaunted.life/donate, if you like what we do, if you like what

1:24 content we put out there for you guys, if you like this podcast, if you want to see what go

1:28 further and expand and we've got some crazy stuff coming for 2023 that we need your help with,

1:32 go to undaunted.life/donate. And then again, I'm just going to be announcing this every

1:36 week until we actually get there. But I do have a speaking engagement that's open to the public. So

1:40 if you are going to be anywhere near Edmund, Oklahoma, that's just north of Oklahoma City,

1:45 a faith Bible church on Sunday, September the 18th at 6 p.m. I am delivering my speech

1:50 defeating pro abortion arguments and I'm doing that live. But I do want to say one thing because I

1:54 think I mentioned it a couple of other times on the show, you need if you're going to come and

1:58 you have kiddos, they are going to provide childcare at the church, which is a great blessing for a

2:03 lot of people because I know there are a lot of families that are wanting to come out small groups

2:06 and things like that. But there is a link that I'm putting in the show notes today that if you're

2:10 going to come, you just need to let our church know how many kids you're going to be bringing.

2:14 Okay. So we don't want them to be expecting, you know, 50 kids there and then, you know, there's 400

2:18 kids or something like that, that would be a disaster. So make sure if you plan on coming and

2:21 you're bringing your kids that you let the church know that link is in the show notes

2:25 and didn't want to give a little shout out here. So this isn't what we're talking about today,

2:29 but I did want to give a little shout out to a sermon that I just listened to this morning because

2:32 it was legitimately one of the best sermons I've heard recently. So, you know, obviously,

2:36 I listened to the sermons at my church and then I pick up sermons here and there through podcast

2:40 and YouTube videos or whatever. The pastor, Joby Martin out of Florida. So Church of 11 20. So he

2:45 was on the podcast a few months ago. You guys love that interview. He's going through Psalms

2:48 right now. So I forget how many weeks he's doing. I think it's like 20, 21 weeks or something like

2:52 that. But back in, I believe it was June, week seven of his Psalms series, it's called as the

2:57 deer. So it's obviously talking about Psalm 42. Man, he's normally real, you know, happy and

3:04 jovial and he's still hitting his points and he's still hard going, but this one was more serious

3:08 than any of the other sermon sermons that I've heard him do, but he completely changed, completely

3:13 changed. How I view Psalm 42. Okay. And so I think it's an ultimate. It's just a unique thing for you

3:21 guys. I think you should take that in. So in the show notes today, I've provided a link to the

3:25 Apple podcast one since I know most of you listen to podcasts on Apple podcast, but you can easily

3:29 find it on Spotify and everywhere else you get your podcast. But again, that is Joby Martin's Psalms

3:34 week seven as the deer. So today in the quick hitter segment, we're going to discuss the

3:38 University of central Oklahoma employing a compelled speech mandate, concerning student pronouns,

3:44 Boston Children's Hospital taking heat for castrating and mutilation of children,

3:48 Minneapolis public schools targeting white teachers for termination, flash mobs in California

3:53 trading, dancing in for looting and Serena Williams thinking it's unfair that she's a woman.

3:58 But before we get into the meat of the podcast today, I think I've used that transition before,

4:03 but if I have it, that was a nice one because we need to talk about the sponsor for today's show

4:06 that is Casey cattle company. So guys, there are a lot of meat delivery subscriptions out there.

4:11 I've talked about that a lot before, but there is only one that is US military veteran owned,

4:16 US military veteran operated, and all of their beef chicken and pork products are produced here

4:21 in the United States. There is literally one of those companies and that's Casey cattle company.

4:24 So they specialize in Wagyu beef. So if you've not heard of that before,

4:27 this is kind of a different way of breeding the cattle, but it's known for its mutations

4:31 that allow for like up to 10 times the amount of intramuscular fat, which gives you that

4:35 marbling on that steak or on that roast that you really, really want to get the taste that you want.

4:39 It's it's such it's such good stuff. I just got to tell you like, I got an email this morning.

4:43 Let me see if I can go in here and find I'm literally just going to do this live,

4:45 but I got an email this morning because my next shipment's coming in because they do those monthly

4:49 shipments. And I just want to run down the stuff that's going to be in this shipment.

4:52 So there is going to be Wagyu strip steaks. There's a couple of those. There's Wagyu

4:56 swadero. It's taco meat. I've never really heard that before, but I'm excited to try that.

5:01 Boneless Chuck roast a Chuck I steak or two Chuck I steaks a Chuck plate short ribs. I've never

5:08 made short ribs before, but I'm excited to try that and give that a go red, white and boom Berkshire

5:12 pork brought worse. I love brought worse and then some Berkshire Porter house pork chops. And so

5:17 like I haven't made a whole lot of pork chops either. So I'm going to have to like really kind

5:20 of bone up on on the stuff that I'm doing to make sure that I can get all this squared away.

5:24 But guys, they sell everything a lot of stuff that I mentioned. But again, it's Wagyu steaks,

5:27 Wagyu roast, pastor aged chicken, pastor aged Berkshire pork, Wagyu bacon, cheeseburger,

5:32 brought worse and guys. I just got to tell you, their world famous Wagyu gourmet hot dogs. I just

5:37 had them here recently and I gave them to my kid. And I mean, like it doesn't make sense.

5:41 It literally doesn't make sense when you're eating it because food and wine named it, you

5:44 know, the best hot dog in the world. And that's fine because, you know, they could have been paid

5:47 off to do that or maybe they're stupid. But it literally doesn't make sense why you're eating

5:51 it because it's been called a tube steak. But that's exactly what it tastes like. It's like,

5:54 I'm looking at a hot dog, but I'm tasting a steak. It literally does not make any sense.

5:58 But you guys have got to go out and try their products. So guys go to kc cattle company.com

6:03 that will be in the show notes kc cattle company.com use the promo code Kyle to get 15% off your order.

6:09 Again, the promo code is just my first name, Kyle. That's ky le for 15% off your order at kc cattle

6:15 company.com. So now let's go and get into the meat of the show. And that is a pro lifer,

6:21 calmly dismantling Joe Rogan. Okay. So you probably seen this because everything kind of went viral

6:26 in and around this thing. But the pro lifer I'm talking about is the CEO of the Babylon B and

6:31 his name is Seth Dillon. And the subject matter that he calmly dismantled Joe Rogan on was the

6:36 subject of abortion. So this was on Tuesday, August the 16th, Seth Dillon CEO of the Babylon

6:41 B appeared on the biggest podcast in the world, the Joe Rogan experience. It is episode 1857 on

6:46 Spotify. So you can go check that out. That's in the show notes as well. But they talked about a

6:50 lot of stuff. The main thing that he was on there for is because obviously the Babylon B has been

6:54 banned from Twitter for a tweet where they were they looked at Levine, you know, the dude that's

7:00 dressing up as a woman that works for the Biden administration, Rachel Levine, they named him the

7:06 their man of the year or something like that. It was just kind of like this funny tongue-in-cheek

7:09 thing because it was after I believe the USA today had him as a finalist for woman of the year.

7:14 So I thought that that was very interesting, very funny. Twitter thought it was hate speech.

7:17 And so they're demanding that the Babylon B take down that tweet before they can come back on the

7:22 platform and they were refusing to do so. So they spent a lot of time talking about that,

7:26 a lot of time kind of talking about what's going on in the world. And so I was excited to listen to

7:31 that episode. But before I listened to it, there was a clip that Lila Rose from Live Action, who's

7:37 been on the show a couple of times, she tweeted out this three minute little segment of their

7:41 discussion. And this three minute little segment of their discussion went mega viral. I mean,

7:46 that little video has been viewed over a million times in less than a week. And so it was a clip

7:52 of their discussion about the issue of abortion, pro-life versus pro-choice. Now, this clip is edited

7:58 for time, not for content. So if you look at it, there are some transitions. So it's like, oh,

8:04 I wonder if they took this out of context. Guys, you can listen to the entire interview. If you

8:08 listen to everything and listen to all these different things, that's inside that conversation,

8:12 nothing changes about the meat of the conversation. Okay. So in the entire interview, you can see how

8:17 they went back and forth if you go and view it fully. So what I want to do here on this podcast

8:21 is I want to do a breakdown of this clip. Okay, I'm going to go piece by piece on this three minute

8:27 clip to show you literally the masterful job that Seth Dillon did during this part of the interview.

8:34 Okay, because the most of the interview is fun. It's certainly worth your time again. I'm

8:38 a big Joe Rogan fan. I disagree with a bunch of stuff that he says and a bunch of his worldviews.

8:42 But we're going to go ahead and get into this video here. So come along with us.

8:45 You don't have the right to tell my 14 year old daughter, she has to carry her rapist, baby.

8:51 You understand to look at that woman in the eye who who was the one of them. Do you understand

8:54 that? That's a 14 year old child. I do a 14 year old child gets raped. You say that they

8:59 have to carry that baby. So right here from the very, very beginning, Rogan immediately goes to

9:05 the exception of the exception of the exception scenario. Okay. So rape, right a girl, a 14 year old

9:12 girl impregnated by a rapist. Okay. Now one thing that I've seen here recently guys is that more

9:17 and more pro abortion people, especially since the job decision came down, they are starting

9:22 their arguments from there, which is very, very interesting because used to, and perhaps I'm

9:28 missing this, but I don't think so. A lot of these other debates started in other places, right?

9:32 You know, a woman's right to choose my body, my choice. You know, you only care about the baby

9:37 before they're born, you know, just different places, no uterus, no opinion. But now it starts,

9:42 well, what about rape and incest? Like pro abortion people are leading with that in commercials

9:48 and campaign ads and all these different things. Like that's where it's starting. And that's where

9:52 a lot of the misinformation begins with a lot of these things because we're seeing tens of millions

9:56 of dollars dumped into the midterm elections, which we'll talk a way more about that just basically

9:59 putting out abortion, misinformation, disinformation, but literally they kick off Joe Rogan kicks off

10:04 this abortion discussion by going right to that point, which is a very, very disingenuous argument

10:10 because again, if you did what Ben Shapiro does and you just basically put him to a decision

10:14 and say, okay, well, we'll allow abortion in the cases of rape and incest, but then all the other

10:20 99% of abortions are going to be made illegal. Are you okay with that? And a guy like Joe Rogan

10:25 would never, never, ever go for that. Okay, back to the clip here. I don't think two wrongs make a

10:30 right. I don't think I don't think murder is an answer to I don't think murder fixes a rape.

10:35 So this was a perfect response at this point in the discussion. I don't think murder fixes a rape.

10:41 I don't think murder fixes a rape because when you have someone bring up that, you know,

10:47 exception of an exception of an exception scenario, you have to say like, you know, wait a minute,

10:52 like adding a murder to a rape doesn't get rid of the rape. But you know, we've talked about this

10:57 with the guys in 40 days for life. They've talked to so many of these women that had abortions

11:01 after they were raped. And now that woman has two macabre anniversaries in her life. The first

11:06 is the anniversary of the date that she was raped in the second. It was the anniversary of

11:09 the date that she murdered her child, right? And you can tell at this point that Joe Rogan is getting

11:14 very, very agitated, right? He's getting very, very agitated enough to where he's interrupting

11:19 Dylan to where he's just doing everything he can to talk over him. Okay, so keep that in mind

11:24 as we keep this going here. What if we're talking about an abortion when the fetus literally it's

11:31 like six weeks, four weeks, three days? What if she just turned positive just now positive for

11:37 pregnancy? I don't know. Well, I just disagree that what if it just happened to you can like draw

11:41 a line on when you can't. So you can't do that. The very moment. So again, right here, you can

11:47 barely hear what Dylan's saying because Joe Rogan's talking over him. But he says that once this

11:52 is what Dylan's saying, he says that once life has begun, you can't just draw lines, right? This

11:58 is an argument that a lot of pro-life people have made is like, okay, what line is it okay

12:02 to kill this baby, right? You have to draw the line somewhere. So when you say, oh, you know,

12:07 12 weeks of gestation, so you're literally telling me that this thing is somehow more valuable at the

12:12 12-week anniversary date of gestation than 11 days or sorry, 11 weeks, six days. Like what changed?

12:20 What magically changed here, right? And they can't give you an answer, but they usually just kind of

12:26 throw their hands up and say, well, you got to draw a line somewhere. And like, well, why draw it?

12:30 Why they're still in the womb? Why can't you draw draw that line even after they've been born?

12:34 Because again, like I've got a two year old and a five month old, would my life be a lot easier if

12:39 I didn't have them? Yeah, well, why can't I have that same opinion about their life or death as I

12:46 could have had and my wife could have had when they were in the womb? They can't answer that.

12:51 Like they literally don't have a cogent answer for that. All right, back to the clip here.

12:55 I would lay it out like this. I would say it is wrong to intentionally kill an innocent human

13:01 life. Abortion intentionally kills an innocent human life. Therefore, abortion is wrong. And I

13:06 don't think any of the, I don't think any of the examples of like, Oh, well, how developed is it?

13:10 You know, can it, can it think? Is it conscious? Can it dream? Can it feel pain? So for you,

13:14 it's the moment of conception. If it's a human life, an indistinct human life, then I think it's

13:19 wrong to end its life. So that is the pro abortion argument. You've heard it said a few different

13:24 ways. I think I've couched it and said it a few different ways as well. But this is exactly what

13:28 he said. So I'll read it verbatim his quote. It is wrong to intentionally kill an innocent human life.

13:33 Abortion intentionally kills an innocent human life. Therefore, abortion is wrong.

13:38 And the funny thing is when I see people bring this up like this, this logic and kind of this

13:43 way of thinking, pro abortion people can't really destroy any part of that argument. Because everyone

13:49 that has a functioning brain that isn't completely evil would say, yeah, it's wrong to kill innocent

13:54 human life. Yeah, and abortion intentionally kills an innocent human life. Therefore, abortion is

13:59 wrong. That's the only argument that these people have is they go into saying, well, it's not a

14:05 human life yet. Well, it's not viable yet. Well, it's not valuable yet, which is a crazy place for

14:12 them to argue from. But it's what they do. So back to the clip. And so you think that even once,

14:18 do you think that they're like, once the conception happens, there's some sort of a miraculous event,

14:22 like at the very moment, like you could literally get to the point where the sperm cracks the egg.

14:28 If you could scoop that egg out right there, would that be abortion?

14:31 Well, I mean, at some point, you're going to have to say there was a magic moment that happened

14:35 because you believe that we eventually become valuable humans, right? Well, listen, where's the

14:39 moment where you think the magic happened? So a little bit of a weird clip in the original clip.

14:44 So it kind of clip that off at the very end, but it says, where do you think the magic happened?

14:48 Okay. So there's some good and there's some bad here. Okay. So I've been with them. He's been

14:52 doing great this entire time, but I'm going to be a little bit critical here. So when Joe asked him,

14:57 if it wasn't abortion, if you could scoop out that one celled zygote, you know, created after

15:02 the one celled sperm meets the one celled egg and they come together to create a one celled zygote,

15:07 Seth didn't just say yes. And he should have. He should have said, yes. So I didn't think that

15:13 was very good. So he kind of, you know, moved it around a little bit, but then he got to the good

15:18 part, what I thought was good. And he said, where's the moment where you think the magic happens?

15:22 But he kind of, you know, it took him a while to kind of circle the drain before he got to that

15:26 point. And guys, just a little, you know, quick aside, when you're in these conversations with

15:30 people, it's very easy for people that are not a part of the conversation to later,

15:35 look at you and say, Oh, you should have said this or you should have done that. Why didn't you say

15:38 this? Have you ever read a book? Have you ever done this? Have you ever done that? So, you know,

15:41 I'm being critical of a guy that was in the middle of a conversation. So I'm just kind of breaking

15:45 this down for your sake. Because I remember when I went on Mike Ritlin's podcast about a year ago,

15:49 people were like, we talked for three hours and we spent probably an hour, hour and a half of

15:53 it talking about God. And you know, this is a guy that doesn't believe in God and all that.

15:56 And the only people that got mad at me, I've talked about this before were Christians.

15:59 They're like, well, why didn't you use this apologetic technique? And why didn't you

16:02 quote this? And why didn't you do that? And blah, blah, it's like, well,

16:05 because I was in the conversation and you got to hear the words that I said and the words that he

16:10 said, but you weren't in our brains thinking about where this was going to go and where we wanted

16:15 the land and what we talked about before the microphone started recording and after the microphones

16:19 were turned off, you weren't there for that. So I'm very sensitive to that fact. But I just kind

16:25 of get back to my commentary here. When you ask Joe, where's the moment where you think the magic

16:30 happens? Okay. And if you go back, because it doesn't do it in this clip, if you go back to the

16:35 episode, he can't really give an answer. Because if you give an answer, you're giving away the fact

16:40 that you really, really don't believe in biology. Because the only place in the universe where

16:44 DNA sprouts out of nowhere is when that one celled sperm touches the one spelled egg and they become

16:49 by and become a one celled zygote. All of your DNA in that exact moment is there. Nothing changes.

16:54 You are a living human at that point. That is a living human because cell division is taking place.

17:00 Cell repair is taking place. Metabolism is taking place. All that stuff is taking place that only

17:06 happens in living things. Okay. But again, even someone like Joe Rogan, who would purportedly

17:12 say support the science and believe the science and do all those different things. Let's go back

17:15 to the biology. He can't argue based on biology because that doesn't work for him either. Right.

17:21 So a little bit of good, a little bit of bad in that segment. But we'll get back into this one

17:24 here. This is a fairly lengthy quote that we'll let you get into here. So back to the clip.

17:28 When we start talking about harmful misinformation and the types of things that are considered,

17:32 like that I say or that we tweet or the jokes that we make that are considered harmful misinformation,

17:36 I'm like, well, what about what about calling that baby a clump of cells? I think that's harmful

17:40 misinformation because then you're encouraging people to kill it like it's nothing when it's

17:44 actually a human life. It's a developing human life. I think abortion is health care

17:48 the way that rape is love making if we want to if we want to use rape as an example. I think it's

17:52 I think they're opposites and it's like these are euphemisms that we use. You know, we use the

17:59 word health care. We're talking about a procedure that ends an innocent human life and we're calling

18:03 it health care. That's like calling rape love making. And this is why it's such a human issue

18:09 because I see what you're saying. Abortion is health care the way that rape is love making.

18:16 I mean, guys, that is legitimately. I'm not being hyperbolic here. That is legitimate legitimately

18:21 considering the context. One of the greatest quotes I've ever heard. Okay. And it's so, so,

18:26 so true. The only thing I wish he did is I wish he didn't say it again. It's kind of like when

18:30 people say a joke and no one really laughs. They say it again, assuming that everybody wasn't listening.

18:34 It's like, I think he should have just left it the first time, but I understand why he said it

18:38 again. But abortion is health care the way that rape is love making. That is absolutely true.

18:42 Because when people hold up these signs and where the t-shirts that say abortion is health care,

18:45 it's like, what are you talking about? Like, how is it healthy to destroy a human life?

18:50 Same thing that you could say about, you know, these hospitals, which we'll talk about here in a

18:54 second that are chopping off healthy breast tissue and body parts from children and calling it health

19:00 care so that they can somehow have a better trans identity. Okay. But one thing to notice

19:06 towards the end of this little clip is the entire tone of the conversation shifts virtually at this

19:11 moment. Again, go watch the entire interview. The entire tone of this particular segment

19:16 shifts at that moment. You could even hear it in Joe's voice, right? And so this, you know,

19:20 effects as we get into the last clip here, which we'll go ahead and get into now.

19:23 Life is valuable. Like, yes, and people have almost were the victims of abortion, and they weren't.

19:31 They went on to become these amazing people and we would have lost them.

19:34 Sometimes it's a failed abortion. Like, there's people who survived like a saline abortion and

19:39 they had their damages result of it, but they, but they lived and now they're born. They usually go

19:45 on, ironically enough to become pro-life activists. Oh, that's crazy. Yeah. That's wild. But it makes

19:53 sense. I mean, if that's what made you, wouldn't you be a pro-life activist? Probably wouldn't be.

19:57 So did you catch that? There was something very, very subtle there. It wasn't even in my notes.

20:02 It was whenever I was listening back to it just now. Joe Rogan said victims of abortion.

20:06 What does he mean by that? That would have been a great time for Seth Dillon to ask him.

20:11 Like, hey, what did you mean by victims of abortion? If abortion is health care,

20:16 how can there be a victim? Because like, if I were to roll my ankle and go into the doctor

20:20 and they treat me for this rolled ankle, who's the victim exactly? Me?

20:25 Them? I'm not a victim of health care. I'm a beneficiary of health care. So I would have asked

20:30 him, you know, what do you mean by victims of abortion? Because again, you know, within a typical

20:34 abortion scenario, two people walk into the doctor's office, the woman and her baby, and only one of

20:39 them walks out. So what victim are you talking about? But one thing that Dillon gets him to do

20:44 is he gets Joe to admit that life is valuable. And I say that like he was withholding. But

20:50 obviously Joe knows that human life is valuable because he values his own life. I assume he values

20:55 the life of his wife and his daughters. But you get him to admit it in this discussion about abortion.

21:01 That's not an insignificant thing. But I do think that this was also a missed opportunity

21:06 for Dillon to ask Joe Rogan. Why is life valuable? Why? Why should it be protected?

21:14 And you know, when do you Joe Rogan think it's worthy of our protection as a society? Because that's

21:21 what the laws of the land are for for the protection and flourishing of its people inside of its

21:27 populace, right? And again, I thought, you know, he did an amazing job here overall. And there are

21:34 a lot of takeaways. But I love at the end of this clip that it ends with Joe Rogan agreeing that you

21:42 would 100% end up as a pro life advocate advocate if you were saved from abortion. And again, just

21:48 his language, like it's just so interesting. I think there's some internal struggle here,

21:52 but I want to go into my takeaways from this clip. So I have six takeaways, mainly from this clip.

21:57 Here's the first one. It's amazing how a conversation about a controversial topic can go

22:02 if you keep your cool. So when I teach about the abortion subject, and I'll do so, you know,

22:08 at Faith Bible Church in Edmondel in September the 18th, you guys should come out. The first person

22:13 to lose their cool loses. The first person to raise their voice loses because you just need to sit

22:20 on the fact like if you think your position is correct, you shouldn't have to yell it to convince

22:26 people to come to your side, which comes into the next takeaway, which is it's amazing how good

22:31 the pro life side of the argument is if you don't let your own personality or immaturity get in the

22:37 way, because guys, I've been the worst about this over the years when I would get into a debate with

22:42 somebody, whether in person or on social media, which I completely don't do anymore, like I would

22:46 get so fired up. Like from from jump, I'd go from zero to 100 super fast and just jump into the

22:53 argument would be offensive and you know, just try to bull them over. And it was like, I was right

22:58 in a lot of those scenarios, but you would never know it by looking at it. Or even if you knew it

23:02 intellectually that I was right, you'd be like, God, Kyle is just really acting like a jerk during

23:05 that entire situation. It's like, yeah, yeah, I get it. But the pro life side is the moral side.

23:12 Protecting the most innocent humans on this planet, which are humans that are inside their mother's

23:16 wounds is the right position. People on the left love to talk about, Oh, you want to be on the right

23:21 side of history? It's like, how could you be more so on the right side of history than protecting

23:25 the unborn? They don't see it that way, but they should. And hopefully they do someday we should

23:30 all certainly be praying for that. And the next takeaway I have here is that Joe Rogan clearly

23:36 hasn't talked to many people that are genuinely pro life, because there are a lot of people that

23:41 are squishy pro life. And I've talked about that on the show. I try to disabuse you a lot of the

23:45 notions that would lead you to believe that there are certain positions and times and scenarios where

23:50 it's okay to murder a, you know, baby in the womb. And I've again, I've disabuse you guys of all

23:55 those different things. But you can just tell on how Joe Rogan is talking to Dylan that he just

23:59 he doesn't really interact with pro life people. It doesn't really happen very often.

24:03 Which leads to my next point, which is that Joe Rogan clearly has not fully thought through his

24:09 views on the abortion issue. Because again, if you go to the exception of the exception of

24:14 the exception scenario of rape or incest, right from the beginning, it shows that you're a slogan

24:19 nearer, right? That you can see a slogan and then put that into your mental role effects and pulled

24:25 out when you feel like you need it. That's where he began. You don't need to begin there

24:30 if you have a genuine understanding of your position. Now, there is not really a tenable

24:35 position on the pro abortion side of things. There just isn't. But you can just tell by the way he's

24:39 talking about the issue that he really hasn't thought it through. Another takeaway here, we'll

24:44 do a couple more and then we'll move on. I think on the abortion issue, you know, as have, as has

24:50 already happened with many other issues, that Joe's opinion can be swayed to the pro life side,

24:57 okay? I think it can be, but we'll just kind of have to see if it's actually going to be that way.

25:01 Because Joe Rogan is a guy that describes himself as highly liberal. I'm liberal in just about

25:05 everything. And yet he didn't want to stay in the liberal bastion that is California.

25:10 He moved to Texas. Why? Because of liberal policies in the state of California,

25:16 which led to rampant homelessness, out of control, taxation, the COVID lockdowns,

25:22 all these different things. Then he moves to Texas, a red state, and he moves to a deep blue dot in

25:27 a red state. But he also goes there and he's enjoying all the things that were the opposite

25:32 of what he left. And again, he's a purported liberal. But again, this guy is, you know, he wants

25:38 to legalize all drugs. He's he's pretty good with open borders and immigration. But then he's also

25:42 like pro gun and pro hunting and all these different things. So he's kind of this mixed bag. And so I

25:46 think part of that mixed bag could be this issue. Because he very easily mentioned in this whole

25:53 thing that, you know, basically there are victims of abortion. And it's not the woman getting the

25:57 abortion because her body is just the setting for the abortion. The abortion only takes place

26:01 to the baby that's inside of her. It's not the woman's, you know, body parts that are being ripped

26:04 to pieces. It's the babies, right? And he also admitted that life was valuable. And you could see,

26:10 again, Seth Dylan being very calm and almost like slowly pulling him towards the pro life

26:16 side of this particular argument. I thought it was fantastic. But the last thing here on this,

26:21 this whole deal is that we must all, and I mean, I literally mean all of us, we must stand ready

26:27 to give a sound measured God honoring apologetic for the pro life viewpoint, if put in a similar

26:37 situation. Now what I mean by similar situation is not on a podcast show in Austin, Texas,

26:43 that is going to be heard by tens of millions of people. Because literally there are only a handful

26:49 of human beings that will ever be in that situation. The situation that I'm talking about that similar

26:54 is whenever you are eyeball to eyeball with somebody that is pro abortion or somebody that is somewhere

27:00 between the extreme left of the pro abortion side and the extreme right of the pro life side,

27:05 which is where I'm at, right? Abortion should not be legal for any reason whatsoever. Okay.

27:09 If you have somebody that's in between those two extremes and you hold to a significant pro life

27:15 position, you've got to be able to give an apologetic for that. You've got to be ready to give your

27:20 arguments. Now, that doesn't necessarily mean that you have the personality to go out and seek those

27:25 arguments. Just walk up to random strangers on the street and start up that conversation.

27:28 But perhaps that is you, right? But if you're not ready with these arguments, then when you get

27:34 in that position, you will fall to the level of your preparedness. We talk about that all time with,

27:39 you know, concealed carry people or people that fight or, you know, jujitsu or whatever,

27:43 like when you're in that kinetic situation where you need to defend yourself for your loved ones,

27:47 you're going to fall to the level of your training. You're not all of a sudden going to rise to the

27:50 occasion because you bench press once a week, right? So guys, I'm going to just repeat that

27:54 point and then we'll move on. We must all stand ready to give a sound measured God honoring apologetic

28:01 for the pro life viewpoint if put in a similar situation. All right, guys, let's dig into the

28:07 quick hitter segment. Here's the first one. I'm excited and not excited about this one as well.

28:11 But I thought about making this the entire, you know, thing that I would talk about at the beginning

28:15 of the show, but then the Joe Rogan stuff came up and I didn't want this to linger any longer.

28:19 I've been sitting on this one for a few weeks, but the University of Central Oklahoma employs

28:22 a compelled speech mandate concerning student pronouns. Okay. So for those of you that are not

28:27 aware, if you've not been listening to this podcast for a length of time, I am a graduate of the

28:31 University of Central Oklahoma. Okay. So that is the third largest university in the state of

28:35 Oklahoma. Whenever I went there, there were about 17,000 students. I think they're around, you know,

28:39 15, five or something like that right now. So a very large public institution here in the state

28:44 of Oklahoma. I loved my time while I was there. I was like, Mr. UCO, right? Like I was synonymous

28:49 with school spirit and support for the university. And no, we don't wear, you know, other schools,

28:54 you know, shirts when we're on campus here because we're Broncos and blah, blah, like all that.

28:57 That's the guy that I was even after graduation. I would constantly get pulled back to campus

29:02 to do stuff with the athletic department or do stuff with the communication department,

29:06 which is where I got my degree from or the MBA program, which I was on the board there or the

29:10 alumni association, which I was on the board with them as well. But then whenever they got a new

29:15 president, and so the new president is named Patty Newholed Ravica Marr. I was familiar with

29:19 Patty. She was just Patty Newholed at the time whenever she was one of the people working on

29:24 campus. But then she was hand selected to be the president of the university. Okay. And so

29:31 something you need to know about her. She's young, she's smart, but she's also a lesbian. So she checks

29:35 some intersectional boxes, a woman and a lesbian. So hence the last name, Newholed Ravica Marr,

29:40 like her wife is someone named Ravica Marr, but she was placed in the power. And I have it on good

29:47 authority that this lady was not in the final running for the title of being president of the

29:56 university, but that she was selected over all the finalists that were chosen by this entire big

30:01 committee, but she was selected to become the president of the University of Central Oklahoma.

30:05 Now, my ideas as to why that is having not been in the room for these discussions is because it

30:11 was the first female president of the unit or of the University of Central Oklahoma. She could

30:15 also check the other intersectional box box of being LGBTQ plus, you know, because she's a lesbian,

30:20 that that was going to be a big boon for the campus. And she was young. So she could be the

30:24 president for the next 30 years. But for me, it's like, look, I love you, CEO. I have some

30:29 misgivings about what she may do, but I don't know her well enough personally to know which

30:33 direction she's going to push the university in. So while I was on the MBA program board,

30:36 while I was on the Alumni Association board, I'm like, okay, I'm just going to chill and watch

30:40 and see what happens. But then there have been a lot of things that have been not a left word

30:45 lurch for the University of Central Oklahoma, but a sprint towards the left of all these different

30:50 social issues. So a member of the UCO faculty staff reached out to me probably four or five

30:56 weeks ago now and said, Hey, have you heard about the UCO's chosen names and pronouns policy?

31:03 And I immediately rolled my eyes and I was like, I knew there was a reason why I left all the boards

31:08 and basically have distanced myself from the university is because of crap like this. But then

31:13 this individual sent me the document itself. Okay, so I'm going to put the document. If I can figure

31:18 out how to put a PDF in the show notes or something like that, I'll make sure you guys have access

31:22 to the entire document. But this is the University of Central Oklahoma chosen names and pronouns

31:26 documents. So it's a couple of pages long, but I'm just going to look at a couple of sections.

31:30 So if you are somewhere safe or you can look at the PDF as I go through it, you can go ahead and

31:33 pull that up. But I'm going to get into it here. So the first thing is the introduction. So here

31:37 it is. The University of Central Oklahoma affirms the right of students and employees to be addressed

31:43 and be known by the given first names and the pronouns that they choose to express their identity.

31:49 So obviously the given first names part like, yeah, like, you know, my son's name is James. But

31:54 if at some point he wants to go by Jim or Jimmy, okay, well, that's, you know, a chosen first name.

31:58 Like, I'm assuming we're going to continue calling Elijah squish inside this house,

32:02 but he's probably not going to be going to be called that when he's a senior in high school.

32:05 He'll probably go by Eli or Elijah at that point, you would think, right? But then it's the pronoun

32:09 side. Okay. And the pronouns that they choose to express their identity. So no mention of the

32:16 pronouns that are appropriate concerning their biology, but the ones that they choose. So that's

32:21 the introduction. So part two, it's called scope. So it's just one sentence here. This policy is

32:26 intended to apply to all university databases and electronic records and interfaces and or on and

32:33 after the effective date of this policy. Okay. So that's kind of the IT side of this. So there's

32:37 the, you know, diversity department, and then there's the IT side. So I'm going to skip over

32:41 section three and go to section four. And this is the policy statement. So this is where the rubber

32:45 really starts to meet the road. The University of Central Oklahoma, UCO, affirms the right of

32:50 students and employees to be addressed and to be known by the given first names in the pronouns

32:55 that they choose to express their identity. UCO upholds this right by providing both students and

32:59 employees with the opportunity to designate their chosen given first name and pronouns

33:04 through an online self service option accessible to all students and employees chosen names and

33:09 pronouns as designated through this online self service option will appear in all publicly accessible

33:15 and in most restricted fields in the university's databases and systems so that systems users will

33:20 see displayed the students or employees chosen name and pronouns. It is not necessary for students

33:26 or employees to change their names legally in order to designate a different chosen name or

33:31 pronoun to display within these systems. So the rest of it, I for this next section, I don't really

33:37 care about it, but is that interesting there at the end there? It is not necessary for students or

33:41 employees to change their names legally in order to designate a different chosen name or pronouns

33:46 to display within these systems. So the name thing, obviously, like, if you want to change

33:50 your name, but you haven't really got it on your license yet, like I understand that,

33:53 but the pronoun thing is interesting because currently in the state of Oklahoma, there's not

33:56 a third option on your driver's license. It's male or female. X is not an option. Unknown is

34:02 not an option. Like element op is not an option. Okay. So it's interesting that they worded it

34:08 that way. I'm sure they thought it was subtle, but it was like a loud, you know, banging drum for

34:12 me. So we're going to skip down a little bit to a section called the following restrictions apply

34:16 to the designation of chosen given first names and pronouns. So let me read this here.

34:21 Students may designate newly chosen names and or pronouns at their discretion, but newly chosen

34:28 names and or pronouns chosen after the beginning of the semester may not be reflected or printed on

34:33 class roll sheets and other documents prepared by instructors at the beginning of the semester.

34:38 Okay. And this is very, very important. This is probably the most important part right here.

34:41 In these cases, students should notify their instructors that they have designated newly chosen name

34:48 and or pronouns that were not included on beginning of the semester class rosters

34:54 and course sites. Okay. Now, the reason why that's probably the most important section

35:00 is because what if the professor refuses? So let's take a scenario. Let's say in the middle of

35:08 semester. So I walked in as Kyle, you know, he, him pronouns, but in the middle of the semester,

35:14 which is not going to be reflected in the databases or in the role, I say, I'm Carla and my pronouns

35:20 are now her, uh, hers or whatever. She her, whatever. What if the professor refuses to call me Carla?

35:29 Or if they say, Hey, I don't really kind of like how I am. I don't care what you say your name is.

35:34 I'll call you by, you know, your chosen given name that you want to be called by, but I'm not

35:39 going to say something that is untrue. Like referring to a he as a her. Why is that missing?

35:46 There's something missing in here. What if they refuse to do so? So I'm going to get into the last

35:54 section here and then we'll get into some more commentary. So this is the last section before

35:58 the technical standard, which I'm going to ignore because that's just basically it.

36:02 Students and employees may select pronouns from the list provided in the online self service

36:06 option described above. Now, I immediately thought when I read that sentence, guys,

36:11 well, there's an ever expanding list of pronouns. So what if theirs aren't listed? Well, they address

36:15 that immediately. Students and employees who wish to select pronouns that are not available through

36:19 the online self service option may request that additional pronouns be added to the list of

36:24 available options to make a request of this sort. The student or employee should contact

36:29 the university's office of inclusive community. Yes, that is a real office. And that is an inclusive

36:35 community at uco.edu, the office of inclusive community inclusive community at uco.edu.

36:43 So they solve it there. So that's interesting that that you look through all this, but let's be clear

36:49 about what this is, what this policy is. It's compelled speech.

36:56 Now, if you're familiar with that phraseology compelled speech, it probably goes back to before

37:01 you knew the name of a guy named Jordan Peterson. So this was Bill C 16 in Canada, where there was

37:07 going to be a compelled speech mandate around pronouns. And he was very, very open and loud

37:13 and bombastic about his, you know, basically hating that idea, his opposition to that idea.

37:21 And it wasn't because he wanted to be rude. It wasn't because he loves misgendering or dead

37:26 naming people. It was because he understands all the totalitarian regimes that almost ended

37:31 the world in the 20th century, right? He understands Stalin's Russia or Soviet Union. He understands,

37:38 you know, Hitler's Germany, he understands Pol Potts, Cambodia, he understands

37:42 Mao's China, he understands those because he spent hundreds and hundreds of hours reading,

37:47 thinking about and studying those particular things. And a lot of the things that started

37:52 the beginning of those regimes was compelling speech and or acceptable speech versus unacceptable

37:58 speech. That's what this policy is. It seems to be couched in generalized language. And if you're

38:04 not really astute enough to read this and be able to read between the lines, you're going to be like,

38:08 you know, just kind of is what it is. Hey, it's 2022. So people got different pronouns like,

38:12 what's a big deal? They're telling you what words you're not allowed to say. So again, I come in,

38:18 I tell you, my name is Carla, and I'm she her now. And I'm saying, and this policy is saying,

38:24 you have to do that now. That when you're using a pronoun to describe me, it has to not align

38:31 with the truth. The truth does not matter as much as my feelings and my preferences. That is what

38:36 this is. And also, let's be clear about this. The University of Central Oklahoma, my alma mater,

38:43 purposefully put out this policy without addressing what the consequences would be for any faculty

38:51 staff that decide to not go along with the charade. Why? Why did they leave out the potential consequences?

39:01 Because it's not as if there won't be consequences. But where is the section of this, this document

39:07 that says, if any faculty staff member refuses to abide by someone's chosen name or pronouns,

39:13 here's what they can expect. It's because they're going to just make it up on the spot.

39:17 They're going to plan to make an example out of somebody and hope that person's not very

39:22 litigious, right? This isn't a farrier. It really is. Because with any policy prescription that is

39:29 demanding that something go down with people that have autonomy to agree with that or abide by that

39:34 or not, you have to give them an idea as to what the consequences will be if they don't go along with

39:40 that. Now, it's my understanding that there have been different colleges within the university

39:46 that have gotten together to further kind of like pre year discussions about what's going to happen

39:50 for this semester and hear some policy changes and hear some whatever and so whatever. And I do

39:54 have some some knowledge of how one of those went. They basically started with the DEI people,

39:58 the diversity, equity, inclusion people, they kind of kicked off these meetings. And I know

40:02 that there were people that kind of raised their hands and said, Hey, what about this policy? Like,

40:06 you know, what are we going to do? Like, you know, what if somebody changes the size they want to

40:09 change their pronouns multiple times throughout the semester? And like, all I'm trying to do is

40:12 like teach them how to do whatever it is I'm being paid to teach them how to do. And now I'm having

40:17 to worry about names and pronouns and all this other stuff. And you know, I don't know that a lot

40:22 of movement has been made on that. But for one particular person in general, or I guess for one

40:27 particular person in particular, I gave them some advice on what they should do. Okay, for the

40:32 predicament that they find themselves in. So this particular person did not get a great answer

40:37 from the person that runs their department as to what would happen if they themselves decided

40:42 that they weren't going to buy by this. So what I encourage this person to do is to get a sit down

40:48 meeting with that person and or get an email, you know, chained together going with that

40:54 department head to get a defined exact reasoning and understanding of what would happen if they

41:02 decided not to comply. Right. And so if they want to just get it, you know, on an email so they

41:08 haven't in writing or if they want to record the conversation once they go in there, like whatever,

41:12 they I encouraged him to do that. But then beyond that, I encourage this person to also go to that

41:19 person's boss. So you got the department head, go to the department heads boss and get confirmation

41:25 again, start the conversation over from the beginning. Hey, this was, you know, the director

41:29 of the department, this was their understanding. But now for you, what is your understanding of this?

41:33 And literally take that conversation all the way up to the president's office and say,

41:39 if I or if anyone else on campus decides that they don't want to do this, because they believe in

41:45 truth and they believe that this pronoun stuff is nonsense, what are you going to do? And you need

41:51 to get everybody on the record answering that question. Okay. So for this individual or any

41:57 other individual that could ever possibly be in the situation, that is my advice to you. Get them

42:02 on the record and make sure you have it recorded, whether the audio or in writing. So my big takeaway

42:08 on this story is that this cam and will happen at a university near you. And also for your parents

42:17 out there, make sure that you keep track of the universities that don't fold to the pressure of

42:22 the LGBTQ revolution. So there are going to be some conservative holdouts. So think of a Hillsdale

42:29 college, which is like, you know, an old school conservative university, they're going to continue

42:33 to expand and get even bigger over the years as long as they can continue with standing,

42:37 you know, what's coming at them. And part of the thing and the reason why a university like that's

42:41 able to do that is because they take no funding from the federal government, right? It's an

42:45 interesting thing. But guys, this is going to happen. You know, a lot of you are complaining

42:49 about happening at your K through 12 schools. Yeah, I get it. The same thing is going to happen

42:53 within the college programs, which is another reason why I tell all you guys, you really need

42:57 to have conversations about this with your children. Because if you're going to be on the hook for

43:02 potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars to send your kid to a liberal indoctrination camp,

43:07 otherwise known as a state university, like, don't you want to have some say in that?

43:11 Like that's not a good idea. You're going to incur all this debt and or your child's going to incur

43:17 all this debt, especially if they get some useless degree that they're not going to use for their

43:22 next job, have a conversation to them about going into a trade or literally taking a year off to

43:27 figure out what they want to do, going and getting a job first, you know, working and trying to see

43:31 if they can find something that they like to do as opposed to just like, you know, just brain

43:35 dead, go to a university. Well, what's your major? I have no idea. I don't have to declare one and

43:39 tell them a junior party. Like, sorry, like, that's not a great idea for most people. So for you,

43:45 if you're going to be a well-meaning, you know, Christian leader of a parent as a father for

43:49 most of you listening to this, you've really got to take a lot of these things into account.

43:53 Because this isn't nothing. And again, I've got a two year old and a five month old.

43:57 So I've got a lot of years to really look at the landscape. For some of you, you got kids that are

44:02 knocking on the door going to university somewhere. So got to keep all this in mind.

44:05 All right. Next quick hitter here, Boston Children's Hospital takes heat for castrating

44:11 and mutilating children. So this is according to the federalist, Boston Children's Hospital is

44:15 promoting the mutilization of healthy kids who claim to be transgender via gender affirming

44:20 hysterectomies, sterilization and chemical castration, despite the irreversible mental

44:24 and physical damage those procedures cause. For years now, BCH has mutilated children's sexual

44:30 organs under the guise of inclusive reproductive health care for people of all gender identities

44:34 and anatomies. This includes prescribing hormones that suppress administration in underage girls

44:40 and block the increase of testosterone and minor boys, phaloplasties and metodioplasties

44:46 for 18 year old girls who want penises, vaginal plastic for 17 year old boys who want vaginas,

44:51 chest reconstruction and breast augmentation for children as young as 15, and even medically

44:55 unnecessary hysterectomies for girls whom the hospital deems eligible for surgery. Just this

45:00 week, this was actually last week, BCH scrubbed a video titled what happens during a gender

45:04 affirming hysterectomy after facing backlash for promoting the surgery for minors who can't

45:09 consent and do not have the mental capacity to make such a life altering decision. An archived

45:14 version of the footage shows Dr. Francis Grimstad, an obstetrician gynecologist describing the process

45:19 of rendering teen women infertile by removing key female reproductive organs in the name of

45:24 affirmation. A gender affirming hysterectomy is very similar to most hysterectomies that occur

45:29 Grimstad happily explains. A hysterectomy itself is the removal of the uterus, the cervix,

45:34 which is the opening of the uterus, and the fallopian tubes which are attached to the sides of the

45:38 uterus. Okay, so there's more there. I'm sure a lot of you guys, if you follow most people in the

45:43 conservative space, they've really been talking a lot about this has actually happened a couple of

45:46 weeks ago. I think I said it happened a week ago. But I think it's very interesting kind of watching

45:51 how people have reacted to the story, how the right the political right is reporting the story

45:55 versus how the left is. So when I was looking at this, obviously, you know, the federalist is very

46:00 conservative. So obviously the stuff that I just read was very tinged in that idea. And you could

46:04 even just say tinged with the idea of truth. But how the right is handling this story is they are

46:09 rightfully no pun intended. They're aghast and worried about this hospital, this this huge like

46:16 top tier hospital going out of their way to normal normalize the mutilation and chemical

46:21 castration of children. But the left on the other hand, they're worried about all the quote

46:27 unquote violent threats coming their way and coming the hospital's ray after right-wing people

46:33 online began targeting them. Okay, now here's the thing about that. So we're getting all these

46:39 reports of all these people you making violent threats towards the hospital or anything like that.

46:43 Can someone show me a receipt? Can you show me the DM? Can you post the email or the voicemail

46:52 that was left with the violent threat on it? Because I'm just about tired of everyone in the

46:58 general public just taking as as truth, taking it as gospel that when people say I've been getting

47:04 death threats that they're actually getting them. Okay, now I'm I'm in no way shape or form saying

47:10 that death threats are a good thing. If you disagree with what Boston Children's Hospital is doing

47:14 and you're calling them saying I'm in and threatening to kill their staff, that's a really,

47:17 really horrific thing to do. That's a really, really stupid thing to do. But a good thing to do

47:22 might be to go outside their facility and hold up a sign that says please stop castrating children.

47:26 Like it's your wealth in your rights to call them to email them to show up and to say,

47:33 hey, I'm really concerned about what you guys are doing. Can you stop it? There's no threat there.

47:38 It's not stopping her else. Right? Right? It's just don't do this anymore.

47:41 Like you can't castrate these children. So I'm very happy that there are a lot of conservative

47:47 commentators that have taken up the mantle on this. Matt Walsh of the Daily Wire, obviously on

47:51 the hills of what is a woman, he's really going out of his way on this one. And he's getting a lot

47:55 of support from people to where it's like, we can't be silent on this issue anymore.

47:59 We can't know that there are children's hospitals in the United States that are getting funding

48:03 from the federal government that are literally destroying the lives of children before we have

48:08 any idea, right? You know, according to data as to what the long term effects are going to be.

48:13 Now, anyone with a functioning brain would know what the long term effects are because

48:18 suicidality for people that go through a quote unquote full transition is just as high if not

48:23 higher after they've gone through the transition as was before. So as a cohort of the population,

48:28 people that have gendered dysphoria have a much higher rate of suicide or at least trying for

48:33 suicide, but then people that go through all the hormones and all the surgery and all those things,

48:37 they still commit suicides at a high, high, high rate. Why? Because there is a meaning shaped

48:44 hole in their life that they think if they get a fake penis sewed on top of their vagina is somehow

48:49 going to fix it. That if their breasts are bothering them as a 14 year old girl, that if they get those

48:55 chopped off, that that's somehow going to make them whole. It is a God shaped hole inside these

49:00 people and they're finding their meaning in how they present themselves in terms of their gender

49:06 identity. So the big takeaway on this one is the left cannot handle when you simply point to what

49:14 they're doing or saying and critique it. They simply cannot fathom why you aren't giving them

49:21 your full-throated support. Pick an issue, whether it's transgenderism with kids,

49:26 anything that comes out of the array of the LGBTQ+ issues on abortion, on health care,

49:32 on taxation, on immigration, they have no idea why you can't just say, yeah, I agree with you.

49:39 You're so smart and awesome. Thank you for being my handler. They don't get it. It's just astonishing

49:46 to me that they can't handle it. They become such a whiny crying little measly milli-a-mouth

49:53 babies when you critique what they're doing. And when all you're doing is holding up a platter

49:59 with what they're doing on it and saying, I don't like this because typically, not all of them,

50:05 typically people on the right are going to lie about what you've said or what you're doing.

50:09 They just don't have that in them because they typically want truth to be known. This is typical,

50:16 not across the board, but this is typical. And so when somebody wants truth to be known and they

50:22 just show an accurate depiction within context of what you think and what you're doing and you're

50:27 like, oh, that's crazy. It's like, here, let me distract you with my reaction to your reaction

50:32 as opposed to us having to reckon with the fact that you're cutting off the penises of boys

50:38 and removing the sexual organs of girls, castrating them, giving them chemicals that we used to give

50:46 to rapists and pedophiles to castrate them. We're giving them to children that can't consent to

50:52 a sexual relationship that can somehow consent to their sexual organs being removed or fake ones

50:58 being added to them. So as this continues to move forward, I will continue to bring this to you.

51:05 I will continue to report on it. And if there are things that you can do to fight against this,

51:09 and I don't mean fight with your fists or with multiple cocktails or bricks through windows,

51:14 I mean, fight this ideology to try to get this to stop. You absolutely should do so.

51:18 All right. Next quick hitter here, Minneapolis public schools targets white teachers for

51:24 termination. So this is according to daily caller, a contract between a Minneapolis public school

51:29 district and teachers unions calls for white teachers to be fired before minority teachers,

51:33 according to the contract obtained by the daily caller. On March the 25th, the Minneapolis

51:38 Federation of Teachers and the Minneapolis public schools struck a deal to end a 14 day union strike

51:44 that deal included a bargaining agreement for various proposals, including one that fires

51:48 educators based on their race, according to alpha news, starting with the spring 2023 budget tie-out

51:54 cycle. If accessing a teacher that's firing a teacher who is a member of a population underrepresented

51:59 among licensed teachers in the site, the district shall access the latest or they shall access the

52:06 next least senior teacher who is not a member of an underrepresented population. The contract reads

52:12 minority teachers may also be exempted from district wide layoffs outside seniority order

52:17 and given priority reinstatement according to the contract. The contract attempts to protect teachers

52:22 at 15 racially isolated schools from layoffs. These schools house the greatest concentration

52:27 of poverty within the district. The race based firing process is intended to make up for past

52:32 discrimination by the district disproportionately impacting the hiring of underrepresented teachers

52:36 in the district as compared to the relevant labor market and the community. This disparity

52:41 resulted in a lack of diversity of teachers according to the contract. So a few random thoughts here.

52:46 The first thought is that this is obviously mega racist. If you're hiring or firing based on race,

52:53 that is super duper racist, right? So you don't have to go back to the civil rights era into all

53:00 the agreements that happened therein with our federal government to realize, yeah, this is pretty

53:04 speaking racist, but racism apparently is 100% okay as long as it's targeted to white people. And again,

53:12 here I am as a Christian white straight, you know, cisgendered male. So I'm like the worst version

53:17 of Satan walking the earth and I have red hair. So I have no soul. So it's the worst thing possible.

53:22 But racism should not happen to any race for any reason whatsoever. And here's the other thing.

53:29 Other school districts in this country will use this what we're seeing right now in

53:34 Minneapolis, Minnesota here in the United States as a model for their own policies in their school

53:39 district. This is obviously what's going to come next. So they're not the first school district to

53:43 do some nonsense like this, but they're not going to be the last and they're just basically showing

53:47 you here's how you can get it done. Here's how you can make it happen. Now this also gets into a

53:51 point someone, anyone, feel free to email me info out on non to dot life. Tell me how teachers unions

53:59 are making anything better. And I mean, like anything, because per capita per student,

54:06 we give more funding to education in this country per student than most of the rest of the world

54:15 does. And yet our educational outcomes are paltry compared to countries all over the planet,

54:22 whether it's reading, writing, mathematics, science, engineering, anything else. We suck at all those

54:30 things. And all we get told by these teacher unions is we need more money. Oh, do we? To the

54:37 people you real heroes that were advocating that we don't need to have children in school for two

54:42 years so that you could teach zoom school in your underwear. Sorry. Again, I'm not going to get off

54:48 on another tangent about teachers, but it's like they're not a homogenous group of heroes.

54:52 And teachers unions are not here for the public health of the students education. They're simply

54:57 not. They're a political group that overwhelmingly we're talking like 90 95 votes one way with Democrats

55:06 that always want more funding for something that sucks, which is our education system here in this

55:11 country. So how are these teachers unions helping? Seriously, if I'm ignorant on this issue, I want

55:17 to know. But my big takeaway on this one is racism today does not fix racism from yesterday,

55:24 which is duh to anybody that knows anything about words and how they're supposed to hit your brain

55:30 and make sense. You can't do something that's racist today to take care of something that's

55:36 racist that happened back in the day, even if it's you. So me doing something racist today

55:42 doesn't fix racism that happened yesterday, but it certainly doesn't fix fix racism that happened

55:46 decades and decades ago to people that weren't even related to you. Okay. So for Christians,

55:52 I want to remind you about something from James two. Okay. So the sin of partiality. So let's talk

55:57 about James two. I'm going to read verses one through 13 here. My brothers, show no partiality

56:03 as you hold the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory for if a man wearing a gold ring

56:08 and fine clothing comes into your assembly and a poor man and shabby clothing also comes in.

56:12 And if you pay attention to the one who wears the fine clothing and say, you sit here in a good

56:16 place, while you say to the poor man, you stand over there or sit down at my feet. Have you not

56:21 then made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?

56:25 Listen, my beloved brothers has not God chosen that you that who that those who are poor in the world

56:31 to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom, which he has promised to those who love him,

56:35 but you have dishonored the poor man are not rich the ones who oppress you and the ones who drag

56:41 into the court. Are they not the ones who blaspheme the honorable name by which you were called?

56:46 If you really fulfill the royal law according to the scripture, you shall love your neighbor

56:50 as yourself, you are doing well. But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted

56:56 by the law as transgressors for whoever keeps the whole law, but fails to in one point has become

57:02 guilty of all of it. For he who said do not commit adultery also said do not murder. If you do not

57:06 commit adultery, but do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. So speak and so act

57:12 as those who are to be judged under the law of liberty for judgment is without mercy to one who

57:17 has shown no mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment. Okay, so that is a good word for any of you out

57:26 there. Christians that maybe have a little bit of racial animus in your heart, maybe it comes from

57:30 your upbringing, comes from your background. You look at people in certain ways. If they look a

57:35 certain way, you treat people differently and act differently around people. What we're hearing

57:39 here from the half brother of Jesus is that that is the sin of partiality that you should not do

57:44 that with individuals. And that's also a good explanation of the gospel there that there's

57:48 total depravity here, right? If you break any law, which all of us break tons of laws every

57:52 single day, God's laws, that that's not a good thing. And that you are going to be judged by the

57:56 law of the transgressors and you need a way out of that, hence the gospel, the blood of Christ.

58:01 But again, this kind of goes back to, you know, Thomas old book, you know, talking about the quest

58:05 for cosmic justice on this planet. If you don't have a Judeo Christian ethic and you don't think

58:12 that at some point every tear that's ever been shed will be picked back up that every horrible

58:18 thing that's ever been done will be as blotted out as if it never happened. If you don't believe

58:21 that then you demand that there be justice on this planet and you get that through reparations,

58:27 you get that by being racist towards people today. And you pretend as if that's going to affect

58:33 racism that was enacted decades, if not centuries, behind that time period. Okay. But again, guys,

58:39 racism today does not fix racism from yesterday. We must avoid the sin of partiality.

58:45 All right, next quick hitter here flash mobs in California trade in dancing for looting,

58:50 because every time I hear flash mob, I think people are going to just start dancing in the

58:53 food court at the mall. But apparently not anymore. So this is according to NBC Los Angeles video

58:58 from security cameras inside a 7 11 captured a chaotic scene when a crowd of people ransacked

59:02 the store during a street takeover in Los Angeles's Harbor Gateway area. The large crowd gathered

59:07 for the street takeover on Monday night in the Harbor Gateway area swarmed the store at the corner

59:11 of Figaroa street and El Segundo Boulevard in a frenzy of looting and vandalism. Security camera

59:16 video showed the large crowd gathering outside the store inside the situation quickly turned into

59:20 mayhem. When dozens of people emptied shelves through snacks and beverages and left the merchandise

59:25 and left with merchandise rather, police described the scene as flash mob looting. At least two people

59:30 jumped over the front counter and threw items and two others in the crowd. A store employee

59:34 decisively outnumbered hid in the back room of the store fearing for his life police set.

59:39 The suspects are facing multiple charges to include grand theft looting and vandalism.

59:43 The LAPD said in a statement, we are seeking the public's health and identifying persons observed

59:47 in the video committing these acts. No arrests were reported early Thursday. This was Thursday

59:51 of last week. So guys, you know, in the video, if you watch these videos, which you'll be able to

59:54 check it out in the show notes, these people look like animals. Like this looks like some,

59:58 some crazy, like feeding frenzy thing like it just they don't even look like people. It's just

1:00:02 nonsense. I mean, people have all shapes and sizes and colors just acting in an absolute

1:00:06 fool inside of this 7 11. But here's the thing. The LAPD and I've read some of their responses.

1:00:12 They're pretending to be outraged about this. But we all know that they're not going to do

1:00:18 anything about it. And you know why? Because even if they did, the people that they would

1:00:24 arrest would likely never go to jail for it. Because you have DAs in this community that,

1:00:30 you know, they've bought in this idea that, you know, our prisons are overflowing with people that

1:00:33 just were accidentally doing crimes. And now they're serving a 20 year sentence, which is just not

1:00:37 the case in almost every single one of these scenarios. But they know, like, why if you're

1:00:41 an LAPD officer, why would you have, even if you came upon this situation, are you going to walk

1:00:46 in there and do anything about that situation? No, because you know, potentially your entire life

1:00:51 is on the line. Because other people pointed this out. But let's say you go in there and you try to

1:00:55 stop this. And in the process of doing so, you have to rub up rough up somebody in order to

1:01:00 arrest them and subdue them. But that person happens to be part of a protected class.

1:01:04 Maybe it's a black man, or maybe it's an LGBTQ person or some non binary widget or something like

1:01:09 that that you're arresting. Now, all of a sudden, you could be brought up on charges or something

1:01:14 like that, or you could lose your livelihood or get docked by people on Twitter or something like

1:01:18 that, just for doing your job. So most of these people are gonna be like, eh, they're just gonna

1:01:22 turn a blind eye to it. So a big takeaway from this one is criminals will continue to perform

1:01:27 criminal acts if they do not believe they're gonna be punished. Because punishment is a deterrent.

1:01:31 I keep hearing that, you know, ah, you know, the death penalty is not a deterrent. We should

1:01:35 get rid of it. Oh, these these long, you know, mandatory sentences are not a deterrent. We should

1:01:39 get rid of it. But then they cite no data whatsoever to prove that. Because it's a non falsifiable

1:01:44 claim like what I was talking about with Joe Biden, they're like, Oh, you know, good thing he's got,

1:01:48 you know, a very mild case of the C word, you know, good thing he got for these V words.

1:01:53 It's like, uh, well, that's not falsifiable. You can't falsify that. You can't go back in time

1:01:58 and not give him the V words for the C word and then compare it to where he is today. Like you

1:02:02 can't do that. Same thing here. You're saying these things aren't a deterrent, but we can't go back

1:02:06 in time and say that and say that there would be more or less of a particular crime. But there was

1:02:11 something in a debate that I did recently when I was talking about gun violence and different

1:02:14 things like that, which I didn't really get to get into. But I gathered some scriptures about

1:02:17 stiff penal sanctions. Okay. So I'm not going to be able to get the context of all these verses,

1:02:22 but let me read these here to you. Ecclesiastes 8, 11, because the sentence against an evil deed

1:02:27 is not executed speedily. The heart of the children of man is fully set to do evil.

1:02:32 Then we have Proverbs 28, five evil men do not understand justice, but those who seek the Lord

1:02:37 understand it completely. And then, you know, one chapter later, Proverbs 29, four by justice,

1:02:42 a king builds up the land, but he who exacts gifts tears it down. And then we have Hebrews

1:02:47 22. For since the message declared by angels proved to be reliable, and every transgression

1:02:52 or disobedience received a just retribution. Okay, but I really want to focus on the Ecclesiastes

1:02:58 8 11. Because the sentence against an evil deed is not executed speedily, the heart of the children

1:03:03 of man is fully set to do evil. I think this applies with a lot of things. So if you think

1:03:08 about I brought up the death penalty, so you have somebody they are clearly guilty of this particular

1:03:12 crime. You give them the the processes to appeal just in case there was an issue with that initial

1:03:18 trial. But then we have these people that will sit on death row for decades and decades living

1:03:23 on the government dime, the taxpayer dime. And then they get there at the very last minute,

1:03:29 the governor will commute their sentence and a lot of these cases. And now they're going to be living

1:03:32 for decades and decades and decades more, even though the just penalty for their actions was a

1:03:38 speedy death. But we don't do that anymore. So I would argue that if somebody were to commit a

1:03:45 murder and they're arrested for that, they get a quick trial, right, where it proves their guilt

1:03:49 or innocence. They get one, they get one chance to go and do another trial. They get they get one

1:03:57 time to do that. And then afterwards, they need to be put to death immediately. And that's not to

1:04:03 say we shouldn't share the gospel with these people because I can already hear people saying

1:04:06 that. Well, what do you mean? You need to give them more time to accept Christ, even though, you

1:04:09 know, Calvinists wouldn't even say that. It's like, ah, they're either elected or they're not. So good

1:04:11 luck. Like, but beyond that, it's like, why do we, we have these processes where it's like,

1:04:17 they get to go back to court and back to court and back to court and nothing changes. And then

1:04:21 they stay on death row for years and years and years longer. And then they just get commuted anyway.

1:04:26 Like, if you have stiffer penal sanctions, again, I know death penalty is kind of in its entire

1:04:31 different thing. But if these people that are doing felonious acts or something like that,

1:04:36 if they are stiffly penalized for these things, that will have an effect on people that know them.

1:04:41 Knuckleheads that are around them, guys are in the gang with them or doing the organized crime

1:04:44 with them, right? It's a big deal. So again, we can't expect for crimes to start going down

1:04:50 in all these typically blue cities across the country, unless we can get the DAs out of there

1:04:54 that aren't punishing them. It seems pretty simple for my view. All right, last quick

1:04:59 at her here. Serena Williams thinks it's unfair that she's a woman. Okay. So Serena Williams is

1:05:06 genuinely one of the greatest sports success stories that we've ever seen in mainstream sports.

1:05:12 So obviously you should know the story like her and her sister Venus, you know, they're from

1:05:16 Compton and you know, trying to get into a sport that was dominated by people that didn't look like

1:05:20 them. Tennis was very, very rough. But Serena Williams, especially literally made it and has turned

1:05:28 herself into a mega millionaire, an international superstar because of how gifted from God she is,

1:05:35 how hard she worked, how resilient she was, and how well she performed under pressure.

1:05:41 I mean, let's just let's just run the stats here. So this is all women's tennis. Obviously,

1:05:46 23 singles, grand slam titles, 14 doubles, grand slam titles, two mixed doubles, grand slam titles,

1:05:53 one Olympic gold medal and singles, three Olympic gold medals and doubles, and her career earnings

1:05:58 just from the women's tennis association, the WTA, 94,588,910 dollars. That's just from playing

1:06:08 tennis. Okay, that doesn't get into the Gatorade sponsorships. That doesn't get into Nike doesn't

1:06:13 get into anything else, just from WTA, almost $95 million. Okay. So she is easily and without

1:06:18 debate, the greatest of all time women's tennis player. Now, you can go and miss me with all this

1:06:24 goat of tennis overall nonsense. I literally saw that. I forget where I was, but you know, I was

1:06:28 think it was at lunch. And in the background, they were debating on ESPN, of course, on ESPN,

1:06:32 which is the MSNBC of sports, they were debating whether or not she was the goat of tennis just

1:06:37 overall, right? Even though she admitted before that if she had to play against men that she would

1:06:44 get destroyed because in practice, she would constantly get absolutely destroyed in straight

1:06:49 sets to kids that were college tennis players, male tennis players that weren't even that good,

1:06:56 not highly ranked, not highly touted. No one in the tennis world even knows their name and she

1:07:00 would get destroyed by them. Okay. So we need to put that to the side. But apparently,

1:07:04 even after all that, all that money, you know, all the titles, all the awards, all the accolades,

1:07:10 you might be shocked to find out that Serena Williams is in fact a victim.

1:07:14 So let's go to this by the daily wire. Superstar Serena Williams announced her retirement from

1:07:19 tennis and said that nothing is a sacrifice for her as she explained that she's choosing building

1:07:24 her family rather than her tennis resume. In a lengthy article written by the 40 year old

1:07:29 tennis superstar for Vogue, Serena talked about how much she will miss the part of her that played

1:07:33 tennis, but that she's come to a moment in her life when she wants to grow her family. It doesn't

1:07:37 want to be pregnant again as an athlete. Williams and husband Alexis Oh, Hanian. Don't, don't

1:07:43 say that. I'm sorry, share a daughter Alexis Olympia who turns five this month. Now, this is a quote

1:07:48 from her and this is where everybody's kind of, you know, kind of getting all these, these thoughts

1:07:51 and ideas on what she's saying. So believe me, I never wanted to have to choose between tennis

1:07:56 and a family. The tennis star wrote, I don't think it's fair. If I were a guy, I wouldn't be riding

1:08:01 this because I'd be out there playing in winning while my wife was doing the physical labor of

1:08:06 expanding our family. Maybe I'd be more of a Tom Brady. If I had the opportunity, she added,

1:08:11 don't get me wrong. I love being a woman and I love every second of being pregnant with Olympia.

1:08:16 I was one of those annoying women who adored being pregnant and working until the day that I had

1:08:20 to report to the hospital. Although things got super complicated on the other side. And she

1:08:24 shared that if if I have to choose between building my tennis resume and building my family, I choose

1:08:29 the latter. As she explained that, when it comes to her daughter, nothing is a sacrifice for her.

1:08:34 It all just makes sense, she said. Okay. So obviously, I agree with that. You know,

1:08:39 if it's between building your your resume for your job versus, you know, building your family,

1:08:43 the latter always makes sense there. You know, her kind of wanting to, you know, be there for

1:08:49 a family and how that's a great idea. Like obviously, obviously, that's a great thing.

1:08:52 But she's literally lamenting her biggest superpower as a human being and as a woman,

1:08:58 which it's highly transphobic of her to talk about the fact that she loves being a woman,

1:09:03 because you know, what is that? But she's lamenting her ability to grow and care for a child and her

1:09:10 family. Again, go back to her own words here. I don't think it's fair. If I were a guy, I wouldn't

1:09:16 be writing this because I'd be out there playing and winning while my wife was doing the physical

1:09:20 labor of expanding our family. So the big takeaway on this one is guys, no matter how privileged you

1:09:26 are in life, as long as you check at least one intersectional box, you too can be a massive victim.

1:09:33 Isn't that great? Isn't that great news that you can literally be one of the most privileged

1:09:37 human beings on the planet, one of the most tremendous success stories and one of the greatest

1:09:42 athletes, a tremendous example to young girls everywhere and all that stuff. But gosh darn it,

1:09:48 she just weren't a woman. She just wishes that her husband could carry that baby and deal with

1:09:54 a physical labor of expanding our family. But that's where we are now. That's where we are now in

1:10:00 culture. That's where we are now in society. We're lamenting the good things that God gave to us

1:10:04 as a gift. God gave women the ability to carry children as a gift. God gave men the ability to

1:10:11 protect and provide for a family as a gift. And we look at it as if, gosh, if I were to do it,

1:10:19 I would do it this way. And we're going to keep seeing that drift in culture. So we'll be here

1:10:24 for all of it guys. So keep coming back. We'll keep talking about it. All right, guys,

1:10:27 for we let you go. We are going to do a quick resilience boost add a dot to life. Our mission

1:10:30 is equipping men to push back darkness with content that for just spiritual mental and physical

1:10:34 resilience. So guys, don't forget to support the sponsor of today's show. Casey cattle company,

1:10:38 go to kc cattle company.com. That's kc cattle company.com use the promo Kyle to get 15% off your order.

1:10:44 Again, that promo code is just my first name Kyle. That's kyle for 15% off of your order at kc cattle

1:10:49 company.com. Also, I've got a link here in the show notes for the donation page. So

1:10:53 undaunted at lifeback slash donate. We need you guys to do all the stuff that we have coming up.

1:10:58 A lot of money needs to be spent. So we need your resources. Also, I've got the sign up link for

1:11:02 those of you that plan to need childcare for the September the 18th speech that I'm delivering

1:11:05 at Faith Bible Church in Edmond, Oklahoma. I've got a link to Joby Martin sermon from week seven of

1:11:10 his Psalm series. And then I've got a link to everything else that I talked about in the show,

1:11:14 including the JRE episode where he talks to Seth Dillon and then everything else from the quick

1:11:18 hitters. All right, guys. Thanks so much for listening to show. We do appreciate it. Where have you

1:11:21 listened to this? Please subscribe rate and leave us a positive five star view. If you want me to

1:11:24 come speak live at your event or on your podcast, just shoot me an email to info at undaunted.life.

1:11:29 That's I N F O at undaunted.life. Follow us on Instagram and like us on Facebook and check out

1:11:34 our website for everything else, including how to donate to keep more content like this coming

1:11:36 your way. Just go to www.undaunted.life. And also, we want to thank the band August Burns Red for

1:11:41 allowing us to use their music for our content. The music on this podcast is on cutting the ties,

1:11:45 which is off their 10th anniversary re recording of their album leveler. The links are in the

1:11:49 description. I'm your host, Kyle Thompson. Remember, keep pushing back darkness. Keep forging spiritual,

1:11:56 mental and physical resilience. Keep seeking the lion of Judah.

1:12:19 Bye!