← All episodes

MATTHEW LOHMEIER | Race And Diversity Programs Attacking The US Military (Ep. 236)

September 9, 2021 1h 21m Full transcript available
MATTHEW LOHMEIER | Race And Diversity Programs Attacking The US Military (Ep. 236)
0:00 / 1h 21m
In this episode, I sit down with Matthew Lohmeyer, a former Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Space Force, to discuss the alarming rise of Marxist ideologies within our military. We dive deep into his experiences leading up to his dismissal from command and the critical issues surrounding race and diversity programs that threaten the integrity of our armed forces.
Transcript
880 segments
0:00 Hey, Fidelity. How can I remember to invest every month?
0:04 With the Fidelity app, you can choose a schedule and set up recurring investments in stocks and ETFs.
0:11 Oh, that sounds easier than I thought. You got this. Yeah, I do. Now, where did I put my keys?
0:18 You will find them. Where you left them. Investing involves risk, including risk of loss,
0:25 Fidelity brokerage services LLC member NYSE SIPC. The new LinkedIn hiring pro can't clone you,
0:33 but it can streamline your hiring workflow. From posting jobs to shortlisting candidates to
0:38 interviewing, LinkedIn hiring pro is the hiring partner you need. So you can focus on connecting
0:44 with the right talent. In fact, small businesses report saving over six hours per week. So,
0:51 I write the first time with LinkedIn hiring pro. Post a free job today at linkedin.com/quality.
1:18 This is undaunted life. A man's podcast. I'm your host Kyle Thompson. Let's get into it.
1:23 Hi, guys. Today, I've got a special guest on the show, and that is Matthew Lohmeyer. So,
1:26 he is a newly retired Lieutenant Colonel who served in the United States space and air forces,
1:31 and he was transferred to the space force in October of 2020. After previously serving 14 years in
1:36 the Air Force, he graduated from the Air Force Academy back in the day. He was a fighter pilot.
1:40 He was a trainer. He was all those things. But here's why most people know that name now, okay?
1:45 He was removed from his command in the United States space force where he was leading the 11th
1:49 space warning squadron on May 15th of 2021 actually May 14th. But the world knew about it on May the
1:55 15th after he appeared on a podcast to publicize the release of a book that he called irresistible
2:01 revolution Marxism's goal of conquest and the unmasking of the American military. Okay. So,
2:07 this book contained very pointed critiques of the race and diversity centered programs that
2:12 were being instituted inside the United States military on military bases and in the academies.
2:17 Okay. And he categorizes these things as neo-Marxist, which they are.
2:21 But the thing about it is it was such a crazy thing that this guy is blowing the whistle
2:26 on some of the craziest things that you would not even believe United States military members
2:31 are being exposed to. And he was basically given the cold shoulder. I mean, this guy worked his
2:36 chain of command. He tried to figure out a way to get this out there. And then he finally came
2:39 to the conclusion, I just need to write a book about this because it's nefarious. But he wrote
2:43 a very careful book where he didn't, you know, attack the current administration or his chain
2:48 of command or any of those things that could have really gotten him in trouble. But it still ended
2:51 up with him being bounced out of the military losing his command and, you know, deciding to
2:55 retire. So we get into all that here in this particular interview. And just to let you guys know,
2:59 I didn't get to ask half the questions I wanted to in this interview because he gives very,
3:04 very detailed answers, which I can appreciate because his book, irresistible revolution is incredibly
3:10 detailed. And so a lot of times when you're dealing with an author, it's like, you know,
3:13 you want to get into the book, but you want to kind of leave a little bit on the table. So guys
3:15 will go and get it. But even with his answers that were very detailed, you've got to go get this
3:21 book to kind of read through and kind of see some of the things that he's seeing in terms of what
3:25 we need to be looking at in terms of what's happening in the United States military, how we
3:28 even got to this point. And guys, when I talk about being able to push back darkness,
3:33 its concepts, just like what he's talking about, just like what Matthew is talking about in this
3:36 interview is there are hills that are worth dying on, right? And this is one of them because the
3:42 United States of America and who we are, the fabric of who we are as a people is at risk.
3:47 And if you're listening to this in another country, which we really appreciate all of our
3:50 listeners that are outside the United States, this affects you directly as well. You've seen
3:54 this with COVID. You've seen this with other things happening in your government. It's incredibly
3:58 incredibly important. So I'm not going to keep him from you any longer. So without further ado,
4:02 let's get into it. Matthew Lohmeyer, welcome to Undaunted Life, a man's podcast.
4:06 Kyle, thanks for having me. I'm so happy to have you on the show because, you know,
4:09 we talked a few months ago, whenever I became aware of you and your story and all that,
4:13 and we're going to get into a lot of detail into, you know, the space force and the story and kind of
4:17 the whole nine yards, there's a lot to talk about today. But I want to start off generically,
4:21 because anytime I talk to a US military member or even retired on the show, I'm always curious
4:25 as to why you joined the military, because that's for me personally, it's one of my biggest regrets
4:29 that I never actually served this country in that way. It's just not the way the cookie crumbled.
4:33 But for you specifically, why did you join the military? Why did you go the Air Force route and
4:38 then specifically going through the Air Force Academy? I went the Air Force route because they're
4:43 the ones that recruited me to play basketball at the Air Force Academy, in fact, have the best
4:49 games of my life in high school. When the Air Force Academy recruiters came to watch some of the
4:55 worst games in my life when some of the other universities came to watch, but I was hoping to go
5:00 to and it turned out that Air Force Academy had taken great interest early on. And so for the first
5:07 time in my life, I actually considered joining the military. I don't have a military background
5:14 in my family. One uncle who flew C-141s and some other aircraft for the Air Force and this is a
5:22 retired lieutenant colonel. My grandfather served briefly during the Korean War. And besides that,
5:29 I had no impetus to join the military except for the fact that I was recruited to play basketball.
5:35 And so I went there, I could say on a basketball scholarship, but everyone who gets into the
5:40 service academies gets in the same way they get a nomination from a congressman, they get appointed
5:46 by the academy to join. And so I did just that. And it was while I was there that I actually got
5:52 an incentive flight in a T-38. It's the fighter jet trainer aircraft. And it totally changed
5:59 the trajectory of my desires within the service. And so I ended up going to pilot training after I
6:05 graduated flying jets myself. So that answers why I joined, in fact, and why I joined the Air Force.
6:13 It doesn't answer the question of why I stayed or why I became interested. And that's kind of an
6:18 evolving story over time. But I took basketball less and less seriously over time and the military
6:26 very slowly, incrementally, more and more seriously with each passing year.
6:31 Yeah, so that's a very important story because I think most people don't really understand how
6:36 people get into the academies. And so I actually had a friend that got appointed to the Naval Academy
6:40 some at least somewhat familiar, but most people aren't. So that's awesome. And he spent 14 years
6:44 in the Air Force. And that was before you transferred over to the Space Force. Now, the thing is,
6:48 is the Space Force, as you well know, has been the butt of a bunch of jokes. And it was during the
6:52 Trump administration. So people hate Trump. So they think the Space Force is this gigantic joke.
6:57 But it is an actual part of our United States military force. And so I guess give us a little bit
7:02 of an idea as to kind of what the Space Force is, because you were one of those early people to join
7:07 in, you know, kind of explain it to the stupid American public that doesn't really understand.
7:11 I'll say ignorant. So I can't be too mean. And then how did you specifically get involved in
7:16 terms of switching over from Air Force to Space Force? Yeah, a lot of good questions in there.
7:21 I'll say upfront that the Space Force, although Trump would have perhaps in the moment that he
7:26 said it liked the American people to believe otherwise was not his idea. The idea of a separate
7:35 military service that would steward all things space has been around for a few decades,
7:41 a couple of decades at least. There have been early advocates even before that.
7:44 It's not a Republican idea or a Democrat idea. It's in fact had bipartisan support for many years
7:51 before President Trump had taken office. Now to his credit, he grabbed a hold of the idea,
7:57 and as Vice President Mike Pence was a staunch supporter of all things space and took great
8:03 interest in space. And so that presidency was the perfect administration to make Space Force
8:09 a reality. The Air Force traditionally has been responsible for our military space operations.
8:16 Everything we've done from the GPS signal on your phone, the blue dot everyone follows,
8:20 that's a free service that's provided by young 19 and 20 and 21 year old airman
8:28 at Shriever Air Force Base. And so a lot of mission sets like that, my particular specialty
8:34 within space was space based missile warning. Those mission sets were under the purview of
8:43 the major command called Air Force Base Command, but they fell under the Department of the Air Force.
8:47 And when we stood up and who branch to the military in December of 2019 during the Trump
8:52 administration, most of if not nearly all of those operational mission sets just kind of
9:00 naturally transitioned into the new service. It was rather transparent to those military service
9:06 members in uniform who were actually doing the job day in the day out night in and night out.
9:11 And frankly, invisible to some of the American people who largely don't pay attention to this
9:16 kind of thing. Funny story. I've moved to Idaho. I love Idaho. I found a gym that I like to attend
9:25 and I go into this gym. It's kind of grungy. There's chalk nearly every 10 or 15 feet, the kind of
9:31 gym I like to go to. And they've got a wall that has the flags of each of our branches of the
9:37 military hanging on the wall. And I noticed there was no space force flag. So I went up to the front
9:42 and I said, hey, you guys ought to consider getting a space force flag in your gym. And the girl that
9:47 was behind the counter looked at me like that joke because it's not even a funny one. And I said,
9:52 no, it's a real thing. It's been around for nearly two years now. And she thought I was joking. So
9:56 she had to Google it and find out that even, in fact, there is a branch of the military called the
10:00 space force. The only thing people have heard about it is Steven Carell's new space force show
10:06 that I hear is a flop. I've not even watched it. But yeah, I spent, like you said, over 14 years
10:14 in the Air Force, I flew jets. It was a T38 instructor pilot. Then I flew a 15 Cs single seat
10:20 air-to-air fighters. Before I made a transition into the Air Force space community. And when I
10:27 came over into that community, I did space-based missile warning, which we do in Colorado. And after
10:34 that, I had a unique opportunity that'll be of interest to your viewer, I'm sure, to be the ABA
10:39 camp. It's essentially a personal assistant that travels with four star generals. And I was the
10:45 ABA camp for the guy in charge of all of space for the Air Force, General Jay Raymond. And we
10:51 traveled the world together to our various space operating locations. And I got to sit in on many
10:57 conversations in 2018, I guess it was, about the creation of this new branch of the military.
11:06 And here, the naysayers and the proponents of such an idea. And like we mentioned earlier,
11:14 even though the Trump administration suggested it, I think they took some people by surprise,
11:18 it ended up getting congressional bipartisan support. That's why it became a new branch of
11:22 the military. The president has no authority to create a new branch of the military. It has
11:26 to be written into law. It was written into Title 10. And it became law that that's a new
11:31 branch of the military. That's something Congress has to accomplish, which they did.
11:34 Since then, the new branch of the military stood up. And because of my job, I was naturally transferred
11:40 in to the new service, went for a short season to get a master's degree at the Defense Department's
11:47 premier strategy school, and then came back to be in command of a space-based missile warning unit
11:53 in Colorado, which is kind of where perhaps the meat of our conversation will take off from.
11:59 But it was me in Colorado for the past year in command of a missile warning unit.
12:03 Yeah, absolutely. It's funny that how you put it, because obviously this was an idea. This was
12:08 a something that people were talking about before Trump. But as with everything, Trump has his
12:11 own gravitational force. And so if he mentions it, he loves when people focus on him and everyone
12:16 loves to hate him. But yeah, you're right in that. That gives us kind of a good jumping off point,
12:21 because the reason why you're even on anyone's radar and opponent in it is that you were relieved
12:25 of command. So you were in charge of the 11th Space Warning Squadron. But on May the 15th of 2021,
12:31 you were relieved of your command. And that is when, you know, people were like, wait a minute,
12:35 space force is actually a thing. But wait a minute, why did this guy just get kicked out? And then
12:38 it became this whole story. And there's a lot of details to go into and we'll certainly go into
12:42 the book that I'm sure aided in this decision. But from your best recollection and a sparknotes
12:47 version, what happened? Why were you relieved of command? Sparknotes version. That's tough.
12:52 I haven't found any sparknotes version yet. So that's why I like podcasts and long form interviews.
12:57 Let me tell you, Chris notes, I wrote a book called irresistible revolution that talks about
13:06 the Marxist revolutionary impulse that has even unfortunately begun to infect our military
13:15 institutions. I did a podcast to talk about that book. It was actually about a week later and it
13:23 was Friday afternoon, May 14th, that I found out that I was relieved of command. And the following
13:29 morning, the date you mentioned the 15th is when it hit the national press. Not because I shared
13:34 it with the press, but because the, I assume it was space force public affairs decided it was
13:40 important to leak that story to the national press to preempt anything I might share with the press
13:50 about what had happened. And in that press release with, I think it was military.com news,
13:56 the space force indicated that because they had lost their trust and confidence in my ability
14:04 to lead others, they had to relieve me of my command. From that time forward, I was still an
14:10 active duty lieutenant colonel. I just was relocated to another office on the base in which I did very
14:16 little and awaited adjudication for three months of some outcome regarding my potential career
14:25 moving forward. I mean, they didn't communicate anything with me after that point. I was left
14:30 to counsel with my attorney who was a civilian attorney and an air force appointed judge advocate
14:35 general and attorney from the air force about what my steps should be moving forward. So I did a lot
14:40 of podcasts and a lot of TV interviews trying to be as respectful as I could, but simply drawing
14:45 attention to these ideas that I think are undermining the good order and discipline and unit cohesion
14:50 of our forces in the military, which we'll get into. Yeah, we will certainly get into that a little
14:55 bit more. But I even remember, Matthew, when you and I first spoke, this was well before you decided
15:00 to get out and actually retire. And because we were going to actually do this before your retirement
15:04 date and we're like, ah, we'll save. We've got to save it because we want to make sure you can
15:08 say all the juicy stuff. But were you under kind of take us through that whole process of you
15:12 actually deciding to retire? Because you could have stuck it out as it were. You could have just
15:17 tried to figure it out. Maybe you would have been adjudicated and things would have got figured out
15:20 even though we both pretty much know that wasn't really a possibility. But you know, why even have
15:25 those discussions? Why even work your way through that system? And I guess why did you just decide?
15:29 Like, no, I just need to retire and get out. Okay, so I hope we'll get into some of the background.
15:34 We will a little bit later. But there's a lot that happened leading up to my decision to separate
15:42 from the military. And I'll correct one thing you said just for clarity. And my dad says the same
15:49 thing too. He calls me retired Lieutenant Colonel, which I appreciate. But I'm a separated former
15:54 Lieutenant Colonel. I requested from the then acting secretary of the Air Force, John Roth,
16:01 an early retirement package. I'd served over 15 years honorably, had a good record,
16:07 and requested that they would approve, which it seemed to me and my attorney that they had
16:13 in their power to do to approve that early retirement. Well, that was denied. And they agreed to
16:22 separate me and relieve me of my active duty service commitment, which I still had remaining,
16:28 which was another couple of years. And I agreed to voluntarily separate. And the proximate or
16:38 immediate reason I found that that was in my own best interest, and perhaps even in the best
16:44 interests of the military at the moment was because I was really not being used for very much at all.
16:50 I spent three months, like I mentioned, waiting to hear something either from the Air Force Inspector
16:56 General's office about a supposed investigation that was underway or word in phone call or an email
17:05 from my chain of command explaining what they understood about my future. Instead, I had a whole
17:11 bunch of conversations with congressmen in D.C., both senators and congressmen were very helpful.
17:18 They wrote letters on my behalf, advocating that I'd be reinstated in command. And you know, frankly,
17:24 I think the Air Force leadership for the Defense Department was they put themselves in a very
17:29 tough spot. You fire someone hastily alleging that they're a politically partisan hack,
17:36 which I'm not. Now, I am conservative, but I didn't care what people's politics were in the
17:42 military, unlike some of the leaders who against whom I was filing complaints who were political
17:47 activists. They alleged that I'm a politically partisan threat somehow and that I've done something
17:54 wrong. And they start to look into the matter and find out that I've not done anything wrong.
17:58 They read my book, I assume, as a part of their three month investigation and decide,
18:03 well, shoot, there's nothing we can get this guy on. I mean, he didn't share names. He didn't
18:07 criticize his chain of command. He didn't criticize his current administration. How do you punish that?
18:12 Well, you don't. And so they sat there hoping that something in the world perhaps would happen
18:17 that would distract attention from all of this so that they could make a decision about how to
18:21 reintegrate me into the workforce. Meanwhile, my wife and I, the family, lived on a military base
18:29 with the exception of a couple of people during that three month period. I mean, my wife
18:35 essentially lost contact with the military community. People are afraid to talk with
18:41 the family who has been in the national press. They're afraid to get the stain of politics on them.
18:48 They're afraid to get in trouble by being seen with either me or my wife.
18:52 My own Airmen were afraid to talk to me from my former unit that I had led because they were
18:59 counseled not to, frankly. And so I was very uncomfortable positioned for my family. Now,
19:04 we're happy about the decision that we made to separate. It means I lost a pension.
19:09 But I plan to work hard and make a living and do podcasts and go public speaking. And I have
19:16 a lot of public speaking engagements lined up here for the next four months or so. And so
19:20 we're doing okay. And I don't regret my decision at all.
19:23 Well, that's good. I'm glad because most of the people they'll just stick it out. Whether it's a
19:28 military thing or in some sort of law enforcement, they'll stick it out just to kind of get that
19:32 magical pension. But I know it's kind of a leap of faith to take off and do your own thing. And so
19:37 I can mend you for that because you did what you thought was right. And I certainly hope that you
19:41 do make up and far exceed what you would have got with your pension. But you've mentioned it several
19:45 times and I have as well. But let's go ahead and dig into irresistible revolution. So that is the
19:49 name of the book that you released that you saw published earlier this year. So it's an irresistible
19:53 revolution. Marxism's goal of conquest and the unmaking of the American military. And so even
19:59 just that title is going to be very, very important and very, very, you know, I guess it's read me
20:03 for the people that listen to this podcast. But for you specifically, why did you decide to name it
20:08 irresistible revolution? And I guess why write a book tackling the subjects that you do, you know,
20:14 Marxism and its influence in the US military while still in the US military.
20:19 So the first question I'll answer is the title irresistible revolution. Second,
20:24 I'll address is why do that while I'm active duty? That one's going to take a short answer
20:30 and a long answer. That second question. Your irresistible revolution is a phrase that I borrowed
20:37 from one of the founders co-founders of Black Lives Matter, Genia Future Khan. Genia Khan said
20:47 that the role of the artist is to make the revolution the Marxist revolution irresistible.
20:53 The role of the artist is to make the revolution irresistible. Well, one good way to do that is to
20:59 come up with an irresistible slogan like Black Lives Matter because what good American or decent
21:03 human disagrees with that. They don't. And no one disagrees with that despite all the
21:08 finger pointing and accusations flying around in the country at the moment. Admit your racist,
21:14 otherwise you've proven your one. I mean, this kind of nonsense is all over our university
21:20 campuses and unfortunately it's showing up in our military at the moment in our diversity,
21:24 equity and inclusion trainings, which we'll get more into. So that's where the title of the book
21:28 comes from. Now the subtitle, Marxism's goal of conquest and the unmaking of the American
21:34 military is necessarily purposefully provocative. It needed to catch people's attention because,
21:41 as I indicate in my book, this will prove our undoing if we don't get this stuff in check.
21:47 You don't divide your military forces into black and white, into racial identity politics,
21:55 groups and hope that they'll maintain their trust and that you won't undermine
21:59 unit cohesion. You just can't do that. And yet that's what our senior military leaders have been
22:04 doing this past calendar year. It's disgusting. And so that had to be addressed. Now here's why
22:10 I did it. I had studied Marxism a great deal in the in the couple of years leading up to
22:17 my writing of the book. My sense was that there were probably a handful of people
22:25 scattered here and there that perhaps understood both Marxist ideology and Marxist history and
22:30 the history of Marxist revolutions within the military who could then connect it to everything
22:35 that was going on. And who were in the military and saw what was happening at the ground level
22:42 in our diversity, equity and inclusion trainings. I was a commander. I don't expect my young airman
22:47 to step forward and do this. First off, they probably hadn't studied it. You mentioned
22:51 Marxism to them. It might not mean anything. The older generation, I think it means a great
22:56 deal to. They lived through the Cold War, at least the end of the Cold War. So you mentioned
23:02 words like Marxism communism. You start to lose people pretty quickly. Black lives matter. Well,
23:08 that'll get people's attention because it's because of its proximity. We saw a lot of destruction
23:13 in this country in 2020 by Antifa and Black Lives Matter and very little accountability. So the
23:22 reason I wrote it is because I think there's plenty of people outside of the military who have
23:26 the know-how to put this together, but they didn't have the insight on what was going on on the inside.
23:31 And so I thought, boy, there's this perfect confluence of circumstances. Specifically,
23:36 I'm in the military and see what's happening. I've got airman and guardians, what we call ourselves
23:42 in the Space Force, coming to me and complaining about the fact that they're losing trust in one
23:50 another. They're losing trust in the leadership. They're skeptical of one another based on race
23:58 because they're being trained to believe certain people are racist, certain people are oppressors,
24:02 others are oppressed. And so sitting where I said, I thought, well, frankly, there's really no other
24:08 option. Now, if you'll let me and we don't need to move on, I want to expound on that just a minute.
24:16 Go for it, absolutely. Now, a smart person will probably listen to what I just said and think,
24:23 well, dude, use your chain of command and talk to someone about it. File a formal complaint. Well,
24:28 happy to inform you, I did. So beginning in probably June or June is when I showed up
24:37 at my base, July is when I took command in 2020. And in the months of June and July, I received
24:44 probably 19 emails, I think was the number from base leadership, talking about white supremacy,
24:50 white extremism, and systemic racism. Absolutely a distraction from what we should be focused on.
24:57 We started to have down days in which we'd set aside our real world operational training missions,
25:03 and we focus on discussing oppression, racial oppression, and how you have unconscious biases,
25:11 and they were tended to be focused on the white male. You have unconscious implicit biases.
25:17 You might not recognize it, hence the word implicit or unconscious. But you need to
25:23 disabuse yourselves of those and admit your guilt. And if you don't, then you're a big part of the
25:27 problem. And so if you need to center your feelings as a white human, go find another white
25:33 person to talk to. Don't make people of color bury your burden. That's not my words. That's the
25:39 words in one of our training sessions that I participated in. That's absolutely unacceptable
25:45 in our military. And to speak up about it and say, Hey, hey, I disagree with this,
25:50 is to be labeled politically partisan, which should alarm your listeners, your viewers.
25:58 The bottom line is I started to complain about this in conversations with my chain of command.
26:04 I started with my immediate supervisor who's in '06. I then reached out to the general officer
26:10 in charge of the entire space force. We had a conversation about it. And each of them thanked me
26:15 for bringing up these issues. Thank you so much. This is really important. We can't have this.
26:21 We'll see if we can have some change. Well, guess what? President Trump issued an executive order
26:26 on the 22nd of September. And he banned critical race theory and critical race theory jargon
26:32 vocabulary that essentially demonizes the country. As white supremacist, as systemically racist,
26:38 he banned language in our federal agencies that would teach white people that they need to admit
26:44 for their guilt, you know, all this kind of, and it's really helpful. And a bunch of people in the
26:47 military breathe the sigh of relief. At my base, the base leadership illegally pursued diversity
26:54 training programs by pushing it down to a lower level, at the squadron level, asking various
27:02 officers who are interested in being activists, to host reading groups, to continue to read
27:08 authors like Ijoma, Oluo, and others, or Robin DiAngelo, who write all about the terrible white
27:16 person problem we've got in this country. It was very left in its politics too. It tells you
27:20 which left-leaning organizations you're able to donate your monies to, for example, if you're not
27:25 sure where to donate your money to. It tells you which left-leaning politicians you should be
27:28 voting for based on what policies they support. It's politically partisan as the point.
27:33 The politically partisan BS doesn't belong in our military. It's not what we do. We can let
27:40 civilians argue about that kind of stuff. So I file a formal inspector general's office complaint,
27:47 which is fielded by a three-star named Stephen Whiting. And he sat on that complaint through
27:53 November, December, and January until January 6th, Capitol riot happened. And then I received a note
27:59 in the mail the following day on the 7th, essentially dismissing my complaint. Didn't thank me one bit,
28:06 didn't reach out to me and ask what kind of impact this was having on the morale of my unit,
28:11 which is his primary obligation, by the way, just as it is mine. And the same day I received
28:18 that letter dismissing my complaint after sitting on it for three months and not interviewing
28:23 any one of the 24 witnesses I had listed, the base commander was promoted to his first star,
28:28 and he was the primary activist in all of this. Now, the climate of fear that we've created politically
28:38 disincentivizes people from speaking up boldly, and apparently has even disincentivized our
28:44 senior military leaders from holding people responsible or accountable when they get politically
28:50 active if they're leftist, or if they're black, or if they're gay. So we've got a really big problem
28:57 when we apply double standard to our force because it's a great way to undo the trust that our
29:00 military service members have in their leadership. So I wrote a book. I tried my chain of command,
29:07 I tried to file a formal inspector general's complaint to no effect. And if a lieutenant colonel
29:12 who's in command can't get the end of the year of his senior leaders and affect any change,
29:18 no one can, because they're always talking about how important the squadron level is,
29:23 and how our squadron commanders are the ones that actually lead our entire service. If I can't do
29:27 anything about it, guarantee you, Airman Snuffy, who's 20 years old can't do anything about it.
29:31 So that's why I wrote the book. Well, I think that's an important distinction that you're making,
29:35 not only because you're being called a partisan hack whenever it's the partisan hacks, it's the,
29:39 what is it the expression, like the kettle calling pot black or something like that,
29:43 it's like, it's one of those ridiculous situations and scenarios. But then also,
29:47 it's good that you did use your chain of command because you don't seem like this rogue guy,
29:51 that's just like, okay, I'm gonna go to Newsmax or Fox News and try to grow up the military and
29:54 do all this craziness. But there was a quote from the intro of the book that I think is very
29:59 important guys, just as an aside, you're gonna have to go get your resistible revolution yourself,
30:03 you're gonna have to read it because we're gonna be barely scratching the surface on a lot of these
30:06 subject matters. But we do want to kind of give you a good overall glance to just at least get you
30:10 interested in that. But this is a quote from the intro here. This book is my best effort to
30:14 participate in that concerted effort to better educate ourselves and our people about the scope
30:19 of the problem of dangerous ideologies that threaten to undermine our nation, our constitution,
30:24 and our way of life, and to stand up for our young service members whom I lead and serve.
30:29 And so I think that that was a great way to kind of thrust us into the overall book, which we're
30:34 gonna be going through the three different parts of the book. So part one is the greatness of the
30:37 American ideal. Part two is Marxism's goal of conquest. And then the last part is the unmaking
30:43 of America's military. And so specifically, and again, there's there's way too much to go into here.
30:47 But there's another quote that I want to read. That's actually from part one, the greatness of
30:51 the American ideal. And it's this, there's a struggle over the meaning of America presently
30:56 underway that is at the heart of a social and political polarization that threatens to permanently
31:00 fracture American civil society. That struggle is fueled by radical revisions of American history
31:06 that are more ideological than historical. And by the proliferation of false narratives intent on
31:11 breeding contempt for America's heritage and national identity. Now there's a lot in there.
31:16 And in that section, you go into the 1619 project, you go into kind of this crazy dystopian 1984
31:22 style, you know, flushing of history and kind of rewriting of stories and all that. But can you
31:27 give us a good overall view as to why the greatness of the American ideal is being attacked right now?
31:34 Interestingly, I wrote that section of the book last. That's the very beginning of the book. And
31:40 it was to me very important that I get that section right. I knew the problem that I needed to write
31:48 about, which was critical race theory, our diversity, equity and inclusion industry, which was
31:53 essentially dividing our military, dividing us up into race, identity, political groups.
31:58 So I write that stuff. And I'm thinking, what is this all countering? What is this trying to undo?
32:07 Why is it so important that we divide people into groups? It tries to deliberately unmake
32:16 everything about America's founding. And so I decided, and what I mean by that is that we've
32:22 got these founding principles that we believe in, perhaps foremost among them, is the inherent
32:27 worth of every individual. It's a very Christian idea, Judeo-Christian idea. And the founders believed
32:33 in that, and that's what made our country terrifically successful. It's what paved the way for the
32:38 ending of slavery. And there's not been in human history a more successful multiracial nation.
32:47 In fact, most countries haven't been multiracial in human history. The founding principles that we
32:54 believe in are under attack, ironically, while employing the language of justice and fairness
33:02 and equality, now equity, freedom. Again, people who employ that language and change the definitions
33:10 are trying to make the revolution irresistible, because who doesn't agree with those ideals?
33:15 Now, the trouble is people get very confused about these words, and people mean very different
33:21 things by them. So, yeah, getting back to part one of the book, which I wrote last, I thought,
33:28 I need to tee up for the reader, and I had the young service member in mind who perhaps
33:33 half paid attention in high school to their history classes, and then joined the military,
33:39 and they're now 19 years old, 20 years old. I thought in two chapters, I'd like to explain to them
33:43 what it is about the founding of our country, our founding documents, and the founding ideals
33:48 that they need to grab ahold of and cherish, and so that they can begin to understand exactly what
33:54 is being lost with our current ideological push to divide people into racial identity groups.
33:59 That makes sense. So, I begin with the greatness of the American ideal by talking about just
34:05 how it's transformed the world. I talk about how it's come under attack by tracing through the
34:10 New York Times 1619 project, the project's lead essayist, Nicole Hannah Jones, who went to Cuba to
34:17 study their communist education and healthcare systems, then came back and has spent the last
34:21 decade of her life bashing America, and she's the lead essayist on the New York Times project that
34:26 essentially tries to rewrite American history from ideological perspective. Oh, you weren't
34:30 founded in 1776, you're founded in 1619 when slaves came over, and I addressed that stuff in the book.
34:37 And I mean, that too has come under bipartisan ridicule. Didn't matter people's politics,
34:45 scholars on the left and the right have come out and said, that 1619 project isn't history,
34:49 it's false. It's got a lot of ideologically based vignettes that try to recast all of American
34:55 history. And so, I want to address that, and here's the primary reason why I thought it would be a
35:01 hard hitter. I thought first of my own airman at my own base who had been sent two videos
35:08 by the base commander that were very left leaning in their political bent and who are teaching 1619
35:16 project ideology, teaching that our country's foundings were absolutely racist, and that the
35:24 reason we had the American Revolution was to secure white supremacy as the law of the land.
35:28 All the fluff and the declaration of independence, that's just all propaganda,
35:33 according to these videos, and it's a lie. So you've got these young service members who have just
35:38 sworn an oath to defend the Constitution and potentially lay their neck on the chopping block
35:42 forward at some point. They commit their flesh to the country and they're being taught to hate
35:48 the founding, the founding principles, and the very country that they serve. They're taught that
35:52 within their ranks, roam a bunch of secretive white supremacists. They're taught that that's
35:59 our greatest threat to national security at the moment by the current administration,
36:03 white supremacy, and white extremism. And they're taught that our founders weren't decent men,
36:07 they're racists. I mean, now in every one of these accusations lies some kernels of historical
36:17 fact that you're able to weave together into a critical accusation of America's history,
36:22 and so it has some staying power. But these young people are learning American history for the first
36:28 time through a very leftist lens, and in fact it's a Marxist lens, and it's been written in a way to
36:33 undermine our trust and faith in our country so that you can begin to hate it. If you begin to hate
36:37 it, why would you serve your military? Why would you serve in the police force? Why would you,
36:40 why would you serve this country at all? In fact, you might end up joining the revolutionary cause
36:45 that seeks to burn it all down. So as that is injected into our military, I thought it's really
36:52 important for me to begin writing the book by explaining where some of these narratives that
36:57 they're hearing in the military are coming from, they're coming from left-wing ideologues.
37:01 And so that's that's kind of where we start off at the beginning of the book.
37:04 I think it's a very helpful place to start off because in the one story that absolutely sticks
37:09 out in my mind is you talked about a black cadet from West Point that was having some
37:14 consternation about the fact that they're going to be serving this country that West Point has
37:19 taught them is horribly racist. And they're like, wait a minute, like I'm going to be a black army
37:24 officer that is in a white supremacist system. I'm going to be perpetuating this and he was
37:29 kind of having an attack of conscience. And that's what's being created within the military,
37:32 but also this is an nefarious thing, because the 1619 project is being accepted into school
37:37 districts at thousands of school districts now are teaching that to children. And again,
37:42 they're dumb. They're underdeveloped monkeys, essentially, right? So they're seven, eight,
37:45 nine, 10, 15 years old, whatever the situation is. And they're just they're taking this as like,
37:50 okay, I've never heard anything else. So this must be it. And that's their paradigm. And you know,
37:54 just like anybody else, undoing a paradigm is way more difficult than just solidifying one.
38:00 And so I'm glad that you went into all that detail in the first part of the book in terms of the
38:03 greatness of the American ideal. But then in the second part, that's where the rubber really starts
38:07 to meet the road, because you're talking about Marxism's goal of conquest. And I thought it was
38:11 absolutely perfect how you started that section, you start out with a quote from it's one of my
38:16 favorite quotes from Sun Tzu. And it's this, if you know the enemy and know yourself,
38:20 you need not fear the result of 100 battles. If you know yourself, but not the enemy for every
38:25 victory gained, you will also suffer a defeat. If you know, neither the enemy nor yourself,
38:30 you will succumb in every battle. And the reason why I really liked that Matthew is because I talk
38:35 to a lot of people, because you mentioned earlier, you know, you mentioned Marxism or communism and
38:38 people just kind of tune out or they don't understand people that are learned people,
38:42 people that are in the know, you will mention things like postmodernism or Marxism or critical
38:47 race theory. And they know they should probably not like it, but they don't know exactly why.
38:52 And it's this nefarious thing to where it's like, how can you fight back against that,
38:56 specifically in the church, pastors will not talk about this for the most part, right? I mean,
39:00 I find some few and far between that will talk about these things specifically through a Marxist
39:05 lens. But it's like, guys, how are you going to let the flock know who the enemy is? That's,
39:09 we know that we win in the end, which is great. But how do we fight and push back darkness now?
39:14 And so I'm not exactly sure that the best way to do this, so I'll kind of let you,
39:18 you kind of go with it, because I kind of want you to, you know, define postmodernism for us,
39:22 define Marxism, define critical race theory. But then we're going to be here until, you know,
39:27 Saturday, if you really dig into all that, but really just kind of give us an overview of Marxism's
39:32 goal of conquest and how really that's kind of tied in with the postmodernism and how a downstream
39:38 result is critical race theory. I know I thought it was like the worst setup possible, but I know
39:41 you can take it and run with it. Yeah, that's a, that's a lot of lead ins there on ramps. And so
39:48 I'm going to pick a couple and get running. Let me mention a couple things here real quick.
39:52 I'm going to point your listener to a couple different sources that may be helpful and perhaps
40:01 even more helpful than what I can share in a few minutes. Just this morning on my way into work,
40:06 I posted a new video on my Facebook account. I don't know what my Facebook handle even is. Look
40:11 at Matthew Lomaire, you picture me. Something like Matthew Lomaire with a 92 after it, I think.
40:18 Christopher Rufo has done tremendous work in the past year plus explaining carefully,
40:28 methodically, and in a basic way, what it is exactly that critical race theory is. And I just
40:35 posted a video this morning. I think it's 15 to 18 minutes. It is about a succinct. I mean,
40:41 you can spend some time reading my book, which you should do and you can watch an 18 minute video
40:45 and you'll come away with a really good appreciation at a broad sweep what it is that we're looking
40:51 at here with critical race theory and why it is that it's so dangerous to our, I want to say our
40:56 way of life. I know that can be criticized as well, not by your viewer, but by, I'll say to Western
41:01 society, to Judeo-Christian values, it seeks to undermine all of that. And it's Marxist revolution
41:11 repackaged into race identity politics. It's state sanctioned racial divisions and segregation.
41:18 I will get in to answer your question also, just point your viewer to MatthewLomaire.com.
41:26 The website's kind of being rebuilt at the moment, but that was my initial attempt at
41:33 putting some information online, both about the book, as well as some, I've got links to some
41:37 interviews that I've done in the past where I kind of start to talk through these, these very
41:42 ideas. So I want to point your viewer to those things. Since we've got a, perhaps, a somewhat
41:51 biblically inclined audience, let me point out one thing that I don't normally get to on Newsmax
41:56 or Fox News or various shows. And I think it helps anchor our discussion a bit and the kind of
42:03 influence we're dealing with. In the opening pages of the Bible, you've got a story that everyone's
42:12 kind of sort of familiar with, but they need to read again. And it's the story of Cain and the
42:18 slaying of his brother Abel. Okay. I'm not going to spend a lot of time with this, but I want to
42:23 point you to the story. Go look at the context in which the murder occurs. Go take a look at the
42:30 injustice this felt and whispered in his ear by an adversary. He essentially becomes angry. He feels
42:38 like he's been dealt with unjustly because the God of heaven, who he claims to worship but doesn't
42:44 love, is dissatisfied with his sacrifice. And he has this adversary come and whisper in his ear
42:52 that you've been dealt with unjustly. You've been treated unfairly. You can use violence to take
42:57 what rightly belongs to you, which is the flocks of his brother falling into his hands. So he then
43:03 goes and it begins with a conversation with his brother and it ends in the slaying of his brother.
43:10 It was a peaceful protest, they say, and they start to engage in shouting in the streets
43:17 and the shouting always serves its purpose and that's to get the blood boiling so that people
43:21 end up becoming violent. That's what these protests have been about this past year. But look at the
43:27 impulse that you see. See if you can pull that out of the text and you go back and read it. The
43:33 influence that is born of the father of lies is that you are oppressed unjustly by an oppressor.
43:41 I'm using Marxist language now. And if you use violence, you can fix the problem.
43:46 Okay, I'm putting it very simply. Now it doesn't say exactly what I'm saying. But last year as I
43:53 watched people talking about the Black Lives Matter movement, about the protests, about how
43:57 they were justified and even some of our Democrat politicians were trying to justify
44:01 the violence by saying, "But while they're justified, they're justified. They've been wronged."
44:06 That's not a good way to solve your societal problems. It's certainly not a good way to keep
44:12 civil society together. In fact, we learned from the very beginnings of the Bible story,
44:16 it's a great way to disrupt the nuclear family, which is one of Black Lives Matter's stated aims,
44:21 by the way, disruption of the nuclear family. It's a great way to disrupt government.
44:26 And the government got it established in the beginning. That was Satan's first attempt
44:31 to utterly disrupt and destroy what God was doing on the earth.
44:34 So if you look, if you believe like me, that our country's foundings were divinely inspired,
44:39 they were intended to protect the liberty of man. And our belief in this and Western society
44:45 is that the purpose of governments is to secure individuals' liberty and to protect them.
44:50 Everything you see taking place in society at the moment is attempting to undo man's free will,
44:55 disrupt their liberties, destroy the nuclear family, and indoctrinate them into a way of
45:01 thinking that gets them to feel they're justified in using violence against their neighbor.
45:05 So I hope that your viewer will pay attention to that. You go back and look at the entire Bible
45:11 with that lens, and you'll see that the adversary of mankind has been afoot since the beginning,
45:16 trying to plant these ideas. And it's a common thread throughout history. And so that's why,
45:20 now getting to your question in part two of my book, I start with the Bavarian Illuminati
45:29 in the century leading up to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Because I want to show that
45:36 it's not just this guy Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels who wrote the 1848 Communist Manifesto
45:42 that then set the world on fire. It's actually a tradition, a philosophical, ideological
45:51 inheritance that they have that I think is influenced by the same spirit.
45:59 That they are harking back to and attempting to set down in writing in order to generate
46:06 violent revolutions. What I mean by that is I start with the Illuminati who have, as I state
46:10 in my book in part two. And by the way, it's important for your listener, if they've not read
46:15 my book to perhaps I say this in my book as well, suspend their judgment when they hear words like
46:20 Illuminati. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. Okay, this is an actual historical organization
46:25 that existed in modern day Germany in earlier Bavaria. And they had, it was a secret society,
46:31 they had aims to disrupt the governments of the earth. Now that name or title the Illuminati
46:36 has been usurped and reused and abused by many people in many movies, many authors. Nevertheless,
46:41 I start there because there's a common thread that emerges from the 1700s in various people's
46:47 writings and in the revolutionary efforts throughout Europe in Marx and Engels Communist
46:53 Manifesto in 1848, but it's repackaged. And as your viewer is aware, Marx and Engels focus on
47:00 essentially class antagonisms, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. There's a working class
47:05 who is oppressed unjustly and there is a ruling class, the capitalist. And as soon as the proletariat
47:12 is able to appreciate just how oppressed they are, they're going to band together into a little
47:16 coalition and they're going to rise up violently and they're going to overthrow the ruling class
47:21 and establish a new order. And therefore the world will be peaceful after that. You won't have class
47:26 conflict, which is totally false. You'll just have a new oppressive ruling class essentially,
47:31 but or one that has got their way to power by violence, which you can only keep by violence and
47:38 tyranny by the way. And Friedrich Engels admits that in the in the 19th century.
47:42 So what they do in the 19th century with the Communist Manifesto has been redone in the last
47:51 century and the 20th century in the West to pit races against each other. Because in the West,
47:59 the middle class was thriving and Marxists were sure that you wouldn't be able to foment violent
48:06 revolution in the West by getting the working class to rise up against their bosses. It just
48:11 wasn't going to happen. And so you needed a different narrative. Well, so they recraft Marxism
48:16 into what becomes known later on, and I'm skipping way ahead, but this critical race theory.
48:21 Critical race theory insists that we've already covered it essentially, but that the
48:29 founding of this country in particular is racist, it's unjust, and it has kept
48:35 the white in a position of power over the black, even to the present day, and that our society is
48:43 deserving of a violent revolution. And I'm putting it very bluntly because that's essentially what
48:48 the aim is. And it will even go so far as to criticize the aims of Martin Luther King,
48:54 Jr., in his vision. I mean, the idea that we should judge people based on their character,
48:59 at the content of their character and not the color of their skin, that is not a worthy aim
49:05 to the critical race theorist or scholar. And surprisingly, even Martin Luther King Jr.'s
49:12 vision for a colorless society is now under attack in our military of all things. I mean,
49:17 we're unified by the uniform that we wear. We bleed the same color some of our congressmen have
49:24 recently said. When you join up, race goes by the door side, by the wayside. And when there's a
49:31 cobble or Afghanistan crisis unfolding, the last thing on earth, we're going to talk about
49:35 as race politics. Give me this last thing on earth that matters, real lives are on the line.
49:39 And so we've been wasting our breath for the past calendar year at least and talking about
49:44 diversity, equity and inclusion when we should have been preparing to face real world threats.
49:48 And now that's abundantly clear. And the current administration has come under bipartisan scrutiny
49:53 because we've been, we've had misaligned priorities.
49:56 When I think that's an important point that you bring up there at the end because these people
50:01 that were hanging on to the planes in Afghanistan, and I mentioned this in a previous podcast,
50:04 they weren't hanging on to the planes because of systemic, you know, racial oppression. They
50:09 weren't hanging on because of their student loan debt. They weren't hanging on because they couldn't
50:12 say what gender that they felt inside. And the thing is, is that's a byproduct. That's a downstream
50:17 result. What we're living in right now, this milieu that we're living in right now is a downstream
50:20 result of things being really, really, really good. Right. You know, there's that, that quote,
50:24 you know, hard times make strong men, strong men make good times, good times make weak men,
50:28 weak men make hard times. We got a bunch of weak men that are making hard times because we're
50:32 making up crap to be the angry about. You know, we've heard Representative Dan Crenshaw talk about
50:37 this. It's like we need struggle. And so we're just going to create it out of thin air if it
50:41 doesn't actually exist. And another thing that that kind of summarizes a lot of the points that
50:45 you were making is a short quote from that section of the book from part two. It breeds a fearful
50:50 mentality that insists others are out to get them the wealthy, the police institutions of higher
50:55 learning religious groups or certain races. And I mean, you coalesced basically the entire news cycle
51:02 from the end of 2019 until today in that one sentence, because you have these people that are
51:08 bought into this worldview, this Marxist ideology that they can't even define themselves. But yes,
51:13 it's the wealthy. It's the rich. We've got to eat the rich. It's the police. They're hunting me.
51:17 They're hunting me and my friends down institutions of higher learning. They don't want me to go to
51:21 that school because it's going to, you know, impose on their white supremacy religious groups.
51:25 Oh, you don't want me to be able to kill my baby in Texas, you know, which is going to be an
51:28 infringement on my rights as a person. And obviously the race war, when you look at people, when we're
51:33 teaching children to look at their classmate by the color of their skin, by an immutable characteristic,
51:40 something that they did not get to choose, something that they did not, you know, figure out one day,
51:43 I would like this amount of level of melanin, please. But it really has its tendrils that go
51:49 everywhere. And again, guys, you got to get that book almost for that section. That section is
51:53 almost worth the price of admission. But it's the last section where the rubber really, really meets
51:58 the road, even though I've used that expression already. And that's the unmaking of America's military.
52:02 And this drives me absolutely insane, absolutely insane. Because I think our military should be
52:08 concerned with lethality. And that should be the number one priority and the seven priorities after
52:14 that. And then we can get into some other priorities. Because if we're not lethal, we're basically
52:18 just standing here, right? But I guess just overall, take this wherever you want to go.
52:24 Tell us how these ideologies, you mentioned it a little bit prior to how these Marxist ideologies
52:29 and worldviews, how they are directly impacting the United States military today. Go ahead and go
52:34 more into that. Okay, so as a recap, I'll say that, you know, the first part of my book talks
52:41 about the greatness of the American ideal. Second part, but which by the way, isn't politically
52:46 partisan. Unfortunately, everything has become about politics under the influence of the left.
52:57 And I'll say the postmodernist, which we didn't get into. I'm not going to go back into that. I'm
53:00 going to stay on point here. But the postmodernist has politicized everything in this in this world.
53:06 And that's a terrible burden for our military service members to shoulder. They know they're
53:12 supposed to remain apolitical. That's their obligation. So when you politicize everything
53:18 about their belief system and say that to disagree with various aspects of a training
53:26 that are imposed upon you by people who have a different value system than you do is political.
53:33 That's an unfair burden that they shoulder. Oh, don't disagree with that. You get along,
53:37 you shut up and you color. Otherwise, we're going to charge you with political partisanship.
53:41 It's like, well, hold on a second. I'm entitled to my beliefs as a US service member. I don't lose
53:47 that constitutional right when I join the service. Now, I do join a different justice system,
53:53 essentially, the uniform code of military justice. But I do not lose the right to believe as I wish.
53:58 I do not lose the right to free speech. I lose the right to criticize certain people.
54:02 And so I wrote about the greatness of the American ideal. And then I write about, as we've covered,
54:11 the lineage of Marxist ideas that are the roots of what is known as critical race theory,
54:19 the race identity politics that we're seeing today, that shouldn't be politically partisan
54:24 to discuss. I mean, it's essentially academic. Now, this is being pushed by leftists and attacked
54:33 by those on the right. But it's not politically partisan to address these things. I'm pointing
54:38 this out because I was fired for being politically partisan. I don't mention Democrats versus Republicans.
54:43 I mentioned the words a couple times in my book because it was important. But the point is,
54:48 there's nothing politically partisan about exposing Marxism. Marxist ideology is something we committed
54:55 great blood and treasures to during the Cold War. All of our service members, they lay their lives
55:02 on the line to defend our way of life against that ideology. So that's part two of the book.
55:06 Part three is where you're getting into where this unmaking of the American military,
55:10 I trace through very specific examples of what I'm seeing in the service.
55:15 And I start with a conversation I actually had with a chaplain. I don't know. It's an italicized
55:26 vignette at the beginning of chapter five of the book, which is at the end of part two.
55:31 But I mentioned that the chaplain, who was a very friendly black activist and Christian chaplain,
55:40 by the way, wanted to give race in America lectures to my airman. I said, well, I expressed
55:49 some hesitancy at that. So I'd like to understand what it is that you'd like to share with him.
55:53 So he came back another day and we had over an hour conversation. And what it came down to is
56:00 that we need to fix systemic racism. And so he was going to offer ways we could do that. And I
56:03 said, well, what do you mean by systemic racism? He says, uh, him, ha, him, ha, and I pressed him
56:09 on it. And I said, no, I want to know what you think that means. And he says it means that whites
56:14 are racist. Okay. And I told him that view is not welcome in our military and that that to impugn
56:21 guilt to people based on the color of their skin itself is racist. And so that's what really
56:29 started to get me worried. That was very, very early on in my command tour. Okay. That chaplain
56:35 is supported by a base commander who is black and an activist. I share that just for context.
56:41 That's never mattered before last year, by the way. But he was very supportive of and pushing
56:49 that agenda. In fact, I've never shared this publicly before. There are a number of civilians
56:55 at that base who are waiting to share a private witness with the investigators who are supposed
57:01 to come investigate the political activism that was going on at the base. And they never came.
57:06 They were ready to share some of their private interactions with the space commander. Things
57:11 like how he was holding up pictures of the Trump administration and asking his white civilian
57:18 employees what's wrong with this picture. And they'd say, I don't know, you tell us and say,
57:23 there's no black people. That's what's wrong with this picture. They're all white.
57:27 He had a white female in his office who he said, you can't possibly understand what's going on
57:33 in this country because of your white privilege. She pushed back and disagreed with him. He asked
57:39 her to watch some propaganda videos that he had found on YouTube over the weekend, his homework.
57:46 And then he said, no one at this base will disrupt or undermine the Black Lives Matter agenda.
57:53 This is a base commander whose job it is. His job is to care and feeding of the people at his base,
58:00 and he's feeding them political propaganda. And when someone speaks up and says, hey, that guy's
58:06 a political activist, they lose their command. They get fired. That's me. And so people are afraid.
58:14 You can't let people run around the military doing that kind of thing. It'll wreck everything.
58:19 But that's exactly what we're allowing people to do. So starting there, and for probably 60 pages,
58:24 I lay out example after example of things that are happening, conversations I was having both in
58:29 my office and with others at other bases and from other services about why they were losing their
58:36 desire to serve in the US military. It's because everything's becoming political. If they're white,
58:41 they're tired of being told they're racist. If they're black, they're tired of working for a racist.
58:46 Now, I'm going to be careful. I'm getting ahead of myself and I'm actually not being careful. So
58:50 I'm going to restate that. Regardless of race, there are different reasons why people are
58:56 disagreeing with what's being taught. And there are black and white people who are conservative.
59:00 They're black and white people who are not. And so regardless of race, there are people who take
59:06 umption with what they're hearing. But I had a young black female in my office who said she'd
59:12 never learned before. She talked to the chaplain. She'd never learned before growing up that she was
59:17 an outsider in her country and in uniform. And this is the kind of stuff this is doing. So why would
59:23 she want to keep serving for her whole life if she feels like an outsider? That's when you know
59:28 we're off base. Okay. And the fact that I try and draw attention to that in a book and get fired
59:33 for it should tell every American listener that it's time to step up and defend our American troops
59:38 from political activism. That's why Congressman Dan Crenshaw's he's been doing good work with us.
59:43 Senator Tom Cotton was very responsive. I was very grateful for his um advocacy and the number
59:51 of others. There's a number of others that are getting very concerned about when they hear this.
59:57 And here's a problem. Again, as a military person, I never cared what people's politics are.
1:00:04 Not a single Democrat in the Congress was interested in stepping up to bat to root this out of our
1:00:09 military. And I can't for the life of me figure out why that is. They didn't want to touch it
1:00:16 with a 10-foot pole. It's like, fine, we have policy disagreements. This isn't a politically
1:00:21 partisan thing. You're destroying our military. Who's going to defend the American people if our
1:00:27 American troops are divided? That this is that's why that's why it warranted a book. I mean,
1:00:35 this is tear this you get thinking through these problems. This has the potential to wreck everything.
1:00:40 You don't divide your military and your police forces and then hope to maintain a safe society.
1:00:45 Well, the last the last two, I guess, fronts that this war was going to be fought on this war of
1:00:51 wokeness, you could call Marxism's conquest was going to be, in my opinion, in my estimation, was
1:00:57 business and military. Because the business sector, that was always the thing. It's like,
1:01:01 okay, yeah, yeah, you got your purple hair and your nose rings when you're in college,
1:01:04 but then you're going to have to get out and get a job with your degree. And then you're
1:01:08 going to get into the real world. You're going to start paying taxes. And you're not just going
1:01:11 to act this way anymore. But as we've seen over and over, these companies are more than willing
1:01:15 to bend over and take it from these young ideologues. And they're like, oh, Coca-Cola, or
1:01:21 Bank of America, or any of these enormous brands, they are terrified of a few dozen nerds on Twitter
1:01:28 saying something negative about their organization. And a quarter of those might be Russian bots for
1:01:34 all we know, right? I'll get comments on Instagram sometimes. And then I'm like, this is this is
1:01:38 clearly not a real person. Like this is someone that's just trying to stir up the pot, especially
1:01:42 if you talk about abortion or something like that. So that's a business side. But then the
1:01:45 military side, I think this is caught everyone by surprise. Because at the end of the day,
1:01:50 the military is going to be above this because they have to be right. We're in the business of
1:01:55 destroying things and people that are just trying to destroy our things and our people, right?
1:02:00 But we're in this part now to where it's like, we can't even operate with that paradigm because
1:02:05 we have to fight the battle in terms of business. And now the military, which I think is very valuable
1:02:10 Matthew, because at the end of your book, you're not just describing, you do a lot of describing
1:02:14 for a couple hundred pages, plus you describe what's going on. You do it in great detail.
1:02:20 But you give a very, very quick call to action. So in chapter seven, it's called the wrath to come,
1:02:25 you give the reader or the listener these things to do. So avoid anger and violence,
1:02:31 be courageous, get educated, speak up, live not by lies, and pay attention. Okay. So avoiding
1:02:40 anger and violence, there was a quick quote from that book, he said, patiently persuade them
1:02:44 in thoughtful dialogue while remaining content with the idea that others believe differently than you.
1:02:48 That's where I get really, really cynical, because most people that believe this way,
1:02:52 don't want to be challenged. I talk about all the time that, you know, I bring up the abortion
1:02:56 issue or guns or immigration. These people want to be told how right they are. They want likes
1:03:01 and ring tweets. They don't want discussion. And the be courageous point, you said,
1:03:05 let me interrupt you. Yeah, sure. Yeah. Go on to be courageous in just a minute. But let me
1:03:10 interrupt you about this. Don't get angry and patiently persuade people. Right. Okay. So
1:03:16 I agree with everything that I've written by way of recommendation at the end of this book.
1:03:20 I'll say that upfront. However, again, if you look at my recommendations, they are
1:03:28 in part a consequence of the context in which I found myself at the time I wrote the book,
1:03:36 which was an active duty service member in command of a unit. And I wanted to make it abundantly
1:03:41 clear. And I still do. I'm not advocating in any way, shape, or form that people should get
1:03:46 violence solve this problem. Okay. In fact, that's exactly the hope of a Marxist revolutionary,
1:03:53 whose now the moment society becomes violent and start fighting civil conflict, civil war,
1:04:01 that's the Marxist revolution. It's gotten underway. Now, I can have I've had plenty
1:04:08 conversations about this with people. It it is not possible to use logic and rationale
1:04:16 and reason to talk through what you and I are discussing right now with an emotionally
1:04:26 enraged ideologue. It's not possible. In fact, their emotion is so visceral.
1:04:32 Their hate and anger are so manifest that they're not going to be reasoned with. Okay. Now,
1:04:41 there are many good people. And this is why this recommendation, I think still has merit.
1:04:48 There are many good people in our circles who perhaps don't agree with your politics or your
1:04:54 religious views and even sympathize with some of these revolutionary organizations or movements
1:04:59 who simply yet remain uninformed and who are willing to engage in dialogue and who aren't
1:05:05 yet emotionally wrapped up around the axle. And so I think that that piece of advice is
1:05:10 potentially useful to help help some people wake up and and there are conservatives
1:05:17 who recognize that things feel icky. They don't like what's going on, but they can't quite put
1:05:24 the finger on it. You're going to help those people a great deal as you try and educate them and talk
1:05:28 through some of this and persuade them because there are people who pride themselves in being
1:05:32 kind of centrist. Well, I can see both sides. Well, guess what? You see, there are, in fact,
1:05:39 two very polarized sides at the moment. There's no center position in what we're talking about.
1:05:45 So you need to help people understand that. And so I think that's why that piece of advice is
1:05:50 still valuable. Well, I think people, moderates, as they're called, are centrist drive me absolutely
1:05:56 insane because you can't be a centrist on abortion. You're either snuffing out an innocent human life
1:06:01 or you're not. There's no I can see both sides of the issue. That doesn't mean that you have to be
1:06:05 black and white and all of your thinking, but to pretend as if you don't need to kind of stick
1:06:09 your flag in the ground on one side or the other is absolutely foolish. But I think it's very
1:06:13 important kind of you're you're bringing up the don't cast your pearls before swine scripture,
1:06:16 because you have these people that are rabid ideologues. They they don't want to know if they're
1:06:21 wrong and they don't want their opinion to be changed. But there are so many I bring up the
1:06:24 abortion issue again. There's so many people that don't even know what happens in an abortion. But
1:06:28 then there's showed a cartoon rendering by someone like live action. And they're shown this is what
1:06:33 an abortion looks like. They're just on the street. They're like, yeah, I guess I'm pro choice. We
1:06:36 shouldn't be able to tell women what to do with their bodies. And then they see the reality of
1:06:40 what an abortion is. And then they're like, Oh, my goodness gracious, that's a baby in there.
1:06:44 And they're ripping it limb from limb. That's insane. And so that's what I would like to just
1:06:48 like you advocate for people to really have those conversations with people in the middle that are
1:06:52 just flat out ignorant. That doesn't mean they're stupid. It means they're ignorant. They don't quite
1:06:56 understand what's going on. And so again, avoid anger and violence. But you also talked about
1:07:00 be courageous. I love the quote, do not be a cowardly summer soldier or a sunshine, sunshine
1:07:05 patriot. There's a lot of people that are willing to do the sunshine, sunshine patriotism and kind
1:07:10 of go that route. It just becomes a big issue. But I do want to focus in as we kind of bring
1:07:14 this to a close here, the pay attention side. So that's the last thing that you talked about in
1:07:18 terms of the call to action. Because a lot of people I've said this a bunch. They were caught
1:07:22 completely flat footed by COVID. And they were caught completely flat footed. When it became,
1:07:28 they didn't know their mayor's name. They didn't know the names of the people in the school board.
1:07:31 They didn't know the sheriff. They didn't know anybody that could have an impact on whether or not
1:07:36 their business was closed as to whether or not their kid could go to school without a piece of
1:07:40 cloth over their face that doesn't actually do anything for them. And then these people,
1:07:44 they're trying to like scurry and they're trying to figure out when the next election is. And it's
1:07:48 like, you're just being flat footed because you weren't paying attention. But to my audience,
1:07:52 you got a lot of guys that are that are wanting to push back darkness, they're wanting to know
1:07:56 these things, but perhaps they're not readers. Perhaps they don't really like the news cycle,
1:08:00 because it stresses them out. How specifically, because you only give it, you know, short shrift
1:08:04 in your book, but how specifically can we pay attention so that we can turn this into something
1:08:08 actionable? Yeah, great question. So never before this past calendar year have I appreciated just how
1:08:17 important it was to pay attention to local government, local governance, who's elected to office as
1:08:23 you're mentioning. And I think it's important to bend their ear. You know, as I mentioned earlier in
1:08:29 the podcast, we just moved to a new state. It's fairly it's very conservative. And we picked a
1:08:34 conservative town within that state. And all that meant that I paid very close attention to
1:08:41 political demographics of counties when I was picking a place to live. Because what I don't want
1:08:48 to do is be told how to live every jot and to live my life for the rest of my life, right? So
1:08:53 then we then we show up to our new town, excited about the school district and all of this kind of
1:08:59 thing. And we investigate before just dumping our new kindergarten daughter off at the public
1:09:04 school just to find out that even in a small conservative town, the school board administrators
1:09:11 and parents are being bullied by a very small group of people here who are activists. And
1:09:15 this is very problematic to me that you can have the preponderance of parents and administrators,
1:09:23 all of one mind, and choose actually to change their policy based on the voice of a very few.
1:09:30 And they did. So we didn't we didn't we chose to homeschool our child and not put her in public
1:09:39 school. And then I went to the public school and had a conversation with the front office and
1:09:43 the administrators and explained calmly why it was that we were disappointed in the decisions
1:09:50 that the county was making. And I won't get into the details. But the bottom line is
1:09:56 if I hadn't paid attention as a parent, I would have known what was going on. I was
1:10:00 set my my daughter up to school and we would have gone to work and gone about our lives and
1:10:04 been grateful for childcare for a few hours. That's not acceptable right now. And so parents
1:10:10 need to be very involved in. I've been very glad to see that I'm on the education rant at the moment,
1:10:16 but you know, I've been glad to see all these videos showing up in social media during the past
1:10:20 eight nine nine months where school boards are being lit up by upset parents who are finally
1:10:26 they've had enough. So we need more activism. I'll put it that way from conservatives.
1:10:34 From people with traditional values, because they'll be steam, make no mistake about it.
1:10:38 The left is very active. They're much better at that than than decent human beings who simply
1:10:42 don't want to get in other people's faces. Okay. But you can't sit idly by and expect that you're
1:10:51 not going to have your liberties taken from you. The government is actively taking them from you
1:10:55 right now. And it's not going to give them back. Okay. So you need to get active and that involves
1:11:01 local government. It involves speaking up. It involves unfortunately work and good solutions
1:11:07 require work. Meaningful solutions require people to actually take action. It requires letters. And
1:11:12 then it requires phone calls to your local government. They hate getting phone calls all day about
1:11:17 various issues. And then it means using the federal level elected officials as well. And
1:11:23 I can tell you from sitting down in DC this earlier this year, several months ago,
1:11:30 they're getting a lot of letters and phone calls. And it's making a difference. You might not see
1:11:34 on a day to the basis what kind of impact you're making. But I'll tell you, it makes a difference.
1:11:39 And so I'll leave it at that. Otherwise, we'll get wrapped up around this. But I think you need to
1:11:44 start paying attention and get involved by writing and calling your local leaders and the leaders
1:11:50 at the federal level. That's absolutely a great way to look at it. And I tell people this all the
1:11:54 time. So your kids in public school, and they just brought in some sort of like transgender book
1:11:59 into the library that happened to a school that's just stones throw away from where I live. And it's
1:12:04 like, what is your recourse as a parent? So you go in and talk to the teacher, you talk to the
1:12:08 principal, you talk to the superintendent, whose salaries are set regardless of whether or not your
1:12:13 kid is in their classroom. Right. Now, if you're at a private school, right, that's a little bit
1:12:19 different. Because if if that kid and 10 others like them leave, that affects the funding for the
1:12:24 entire operation. So maybe you're going to get a little bit more of an ear that you can bend.
1:12:28 But it's these parents that think that they can just complain and get their way. It's like,
1:12:31 that's not how it goes. But I do like how you're talking about how people need to get involved.
1:12:34 Because a lot of conservatives, which there are a lot of listeners to this that are conservatives,
1:12:37 a lot of Christians, they want to be left alone. Right. It's like, look, this is not my
1:12:42 heel to die on. Just leave me alone. Let me be me. But that's not what the other side wants.
1:12:47 Because then I use this example a lot in the 90s. It was like, Hey, just leave us alone. We're gay.
1:12:51 We want to be in love. Just leave us alone. Now it's you need to cheer us on as we make out in public.
1:12:57 And if you don't, you're a horribly bigoted person. But for all these people, and I say this a lot,
1:13:02 but one day we woke up and we found out that the war was over and we never put on our helmet and
1:13:09 picked up our sword. It was just one of those things where it's like, you never saw a hill that
1:13:13 was worth dying on. And there were no more hills because it's scorched earth at that point. But
1:13:18 now you got me all fired up. But hey, yeah, you invoke this language from Paul about putting on
1:13:25 God's armor. I mean, that's really look through my suggestions that I'll tell your viewer this look
1:13:31 through the suggestions at the end of my book, and then pull up Paul's words about putting on the
1:13:37 full armor of God. And I think you'll see some parallels there. Now I wrote my book in secular
1:13:41 terms. But that's really important. Be salt of the earth. I mean, salt is intended to preserve
1:13:50 the collection of society. Only if it's salty, though, right? If you lose your savor, well,
1:13:57 then you're good to be trod under the foot of man. Yeah, the salt is meant to preserve. And I,
1:14:02 you know, one of the things that we mentioned earlier is that you kind of applauded my decision
1:14:08 to separate and, you know, not get wrapped up around a pension. And that was important and good
1:14:13 for my family. And that was our decision. But we need good people in our military. We need good
1:14:18 people in our police force. And if everyone does what I did, and if that was right for everyone,
1:14:22 well, we're in really big trouble. If they're all the decent people say, I'm not putting up
1:14:25 with this anymore, I'm leaving, I'm leaving the military, I'm leaving the police force.
1:14:30 Boy, think about, think about the consequences that would have if you've got a bunch of aspiring
1:14:36 totalitarian or weak cowards who are left serving in our military. I mean, then when you have
1:14:41 totalitarianism power, they're able to use them for their purposes. And they're not going to stand,
1:14:45 they're not going to stand up, put their foot down. I just read an article two days ago that 27
1:14:50 Air Force pilots have resigned over the force vaccinations, 27 Air Force pilots. Now, I don't
1:14:56 know who they are. I don't know what jets they fly. Some of them are F 22 pilots. We've had a
1:14:59 terrible pilot shortage in this country in our Air Force for a very long time, for like the last
1:15:06 decade. Yeah, like the last decade. And losing 27 pilots, it doesn't just take one-year pilot
1:15:14 training to create combat ready pilots. It takes many more years. You can't afford to be losing
1:15:21 your decent people. And everything we're doing at the moment disincentivizes courageous, decent
1:15:26 people from wanting to stick around because they care a great deal about getting along with their
1:15:30 family, not being tread upon and having liberty. And so I'm grateful to hear when good people are
1:15:38 wanting to stick around, speak up, push back. And for me and our family is the best choice to
1:15:45 to move on out. That's what we say all the time is to be able to push back darkness. And again,
1:15:51 you've got to be in the game. So as a follow up to your calls to action, guys, you've got to be
1:15:56 in the game, you've got to be paying attention. And again, Sun Tzu, if you don't know your enemy,
1:16:00 you can't fight against them. You're going to be fighting on a front that doesn't exist. But
1:16:03 Matthew, I get the sense that that we could keep going, but we're going to go ahead and put a wrap
1:16:07 on this particular interview. I feel like we're going to probably do this again at some point.
1:16:10 But as for now, that is all for me. Is there anything else you want to get off your chest?
1:16:13 First, thanks for having me on. You do a great job.
1:16:18 I do want to say one thing. So you might want to end your podcast with a quick ending like that.
1:16:29 But now I'm going to stumble a bit as I try to remember what you just said at last. And so our
1:16:33 interview will end a little bit clumsily. But oh, okay, I've remembered what it is.
1:16:41 You mentioned, you know, many people might think this isn't my hill to die on. And it is wise to
1:16:49 pick your battles. Okay, you don't want to take up the sword on every issue. I was against forced
1:16:56 vaccinations. That wasn't my hill to die on in the military. It was this, it was this stuff.
1:17:02 But I want your viewer to understand if they have the mentality that this stuff that they see
1:17:08 happening in society is not their hill to die on, they need to understand that our country stands
1:17:14 in peril. And nearly probably most every country in human history has recognized the peril far too
1:17:24 late to do anything about it. There are those that I talk with today who know what they're talking
1:17:31 about as far as all of this stuff goes, who are already concerned that we might be recognizing
1:17:36 too late. And so yeah, this, this hill, the proverbial hill, it's time for you to stand up and start
1:17:42 fighting. And I don't mean violently, per se, what I mean is that you have to be courageous,
1:17:47 you have to do all the things I recommend at the end of the book, and that you Kyle are recommending
1:17:51 to your listeners. So I just want to make that point, your country stands in peril. Be active,
1:17:57 be the salt of the earth. And despite an unwilling left, I'll say, or an unwilling leftist radical
1:18:07 activist, we need to seek for the kind of unity that has made our country commendable. And oh,
1:18:15 I should end on this longer than you wanted. I should end on this. You know, we're approaching
1:18:19 the 20 year anniversary of 9/11. Regardless of whether someone agrees with or disagrees with,
1:18:27 our reasons for entering Afghanistan now in hindsight. There's a big difference between America
1:18:35 in the aftermath of 2001, September 11, 2001, and today. And it's that we were united around
1:18:43 fighting against the common enemy and in a belief about the greatness of the American ideal
1:18:49 in 2001. And we're becoming more and more polarized and divided today. That's a big difference.
1:18:56 And the American people need to recognize that and understand just how dangerous
1:19:00 dangerous and precarious a situation it is that we find ourselves in and find line that we're
1:19:11 walking right now between peace and conflict. It's as if the angels of heaven are holding back
1:19:18 the conflict and allowing us some more time to get it right. So I'd invite your viewer to
1:19:23 try their best to be courageous and stand up. All right. I think that's a great word to leave
1:19:27 it on. Matthew Lomire. Thank you for coming on on Daunted Life, a man's podcast. Thanks.
1:19:32 There you go, guys. I hope you enjoyed my interview with Matthew Lomire. Before we let you go,
1:19:36 we are going to do a quick resilience boost and undaunted life. Our mission is equipping
1:19:40 men to push back darkness. And specifically, we do that by providing you content like this
1:19:43 podcast that helps you for spiritual, mental and physical resilience. So the two links I've got
1:19:47 for you today, I've got his book that is irresistible revolution Marxism's goal of conquest and the
1:19:52 unmaking of the American military. So you can go to the website and check that out. And then also,
1:19:55 he mentioned a YouTube video in there by Christopher Rufo called Critical Race Theory. I've got that
1:19:59 here for you as well. All right, guys. Thanks so much for listening to this. I really do appreciate
1:20:03 it. Wherever you're listening to this, please subscribe, rate and leave us a very positive review.
1:20:07 If you want to come speak live at your event or on your podcast to shoot me an email to info
1:20:11 at undaunted.life, that's I N F O at undaunted.life. You can follow us on Instagram and TikTok and
1:20:16 like us on Facebook, you can check out our website for everything else, including how to donate to
1:20:19 keep more content like this coming your way. Just go to www dot undaunted.life. And we want to thank
1:20:24 the band August Burns read for allowing us to use their music for our content. The entrautto
1:20:28 track on this podcast is our song cutting the ties, which is author 10th anniversary
1:20:32 re recording of their album leveler. The links are in the description. I'm your host, Kyle Thompson.
1:20:37 Remember, keep pushing back darkness. Keep forging spiritual, mental and physical resilience.
1:20:44 Keep seeking the lion of Judah.
1:21:14 (air whooshing)
Key quotes
2
Matthew Lohmeyer
The role of the artist is to make the revolution irresistible.
Kyle Thompson
We need struggle. And so we're just going to create it out of thin air if it doesn't actually exist.
Free Resource
31-Day Resilience Reset
If this episode hit, the next 31 days will be the reset. Free PDF, instant download.
START FREE →
Brotherhood
Apply to Dominion
Six pillars. Application only. The men's program Kyle built around the show.
APPLY NOW →
Dig Deeper
Ask the Archive
"Which episodes cover this topic?" Get answers grounded in all 940+ episodes.
START A CHAT →