0:00
This is Undaunted Life, a man's podcast.
0:21
I'm your host Kyle Thompson.
0:23
Let's get into it.
0:24
Then a demon oppressed man who was blind and mute was brought to him, and he healed
0:28
him so that the man spoke and saw that as Matthew 12, 22, and guys, I just got to tell you,
0:33
if you didn't think demons were real, then you haven't been paying attention to the
0:36
pro abortion crowd in the last week and a half or so.
0:38
You want to talk about a group of people that needs Jesus, we'll get way more to them here
0:41
in a second before we go on.
0:42
Guys, I just want to thank you so much for everybody that left all the five star reviews
0:45
in the last week.
0:46
Keep those coming.
0:47
If you have not done so, we got to counteract some of those one star reviews.
0:50
Oh, I don't like the ads.
0:51
Oh, the music's too aggressive, blah, blah.
0:52
We need you guys.
0:53
Keep making sure that this show gets out to other people.
0:56
Keep those reviews and positive five star reviews, obviously.
0:59
And beyond that, got to remind you that we got new swag in the Undaunted Life Shop.
1:03
Guys, we have a new hat and a new t-shirt in the shop shirts are 30 bucks.
1:06
Hats are 40, but you can get the combo for only 60 bucks, but just remember, this is preorder
1:11
only.
1:12
Okay.
1:13
So we're only doing this for the month of May.
1:14
We're not going to have a running store year round, but we're going to do merch drops throughout
1:17
the year so you can only preorder that combo or one of the other through May the 31st.
1:21
We will not be ordering extra to sell later that it may end up working out that way, but
1:25
I doubt it.
1:26
Guys, go to www.undaunted.life/shop it will be in the show notes and a quick PSA on how
1:32
I do interviews because this came up and we had a lot to cover today, but just wanted
1:35
to do a very, very quick PSA because there are times and I've gotten this feedback from
1:39
friends.
1:40
I've gotten this feedback, you know, via email, Hey, why didn't you ask this question when
1:43
you were talking to so and so?
1:44
Hey, why didn't you press them when whenever you had them, you know, cornered on this issue
1:49
or that issue or why didn't you ask them another follow up just so you guys can know when you're
1:54
listening to one of my interviews interviews, let's say it's an hour long, you're listening
1:57
to an hour long interview and that is your only connection to that to that interview whatsoever,
2:02
right?
2:03
You're not interacting with that person.
2:04
You're not thinking through the questions.
2:06
You also have been spent hours and hours reading that person's books, you know, going over
2:10
some of their other interviews that they've done, putting together a, you know, kind of
2:13
a narrative arc with the questions that you're asking.
2:16
And a lot of times, guys, I don't know how long I'm going to have with these people until
2:19
I get on with them.
2:20
There have been people I thought I was going to have them for an hour and I was like, yeah,
2:23
they're, you know, hey, I can do 20, 25 minutes.
2:25
And then there's other times where it's like, yeah, we can do, you know, two hours.
2:27
It doesn't really matter.
2:29
So as I'm going through the interview, I'm looking at all the questions that I've planned
2:34
for and thinking about how much time we have left.
2:36
And so that even came up with Joby Martin, the interview that we did for earlier this
2:39
week.
2:40
Hey, why didn't you nail them on this and hey, why didn't you push them a little bit further
2:42
on that?
2:43
Well, I'm looking at the clock, buddy.
2:45
And that's mainly the reason.
2:46
But the thing is, I love that you guys are so into the interviews and so into the questions
2:50
that I'm asking because I do have you in mind whenever I'm kind of going through all those
2:53
different things.
2:54
So guys, if you ever have feedback like that, keep sending it my way because it always makes
2:58
me aware that there are those questions out there that you guys want to get to.
3:01
All right.
3:02
Now in the quick hitter segment for today, we're going to discuss wokeness on college
3:05
campuses in Oklahoma, a unanimous scotus decision on religious liberty that no one is
3:09
talking about the baby formula shortage that no one was really talking about until this
3:13
week.
3:14
You know, I did have these show notes ready to go before Ben Shapiro mentioned it before,
3:17
you know, anybody else on the major stage mentioned it.
3:19
We're also going to talk about the FDA restricting.
3:21
And I got to be careful here, the J and J C word V word because of life threatening blood
3:27
clot issues and the CDC tracking US citizens.
3:30
But today we're obviously going to be spending the overwhelming amount of our time talking
3:34
about the Supreme Court opinion leak, which signals that Roe v. Wade and, you know, Planned
3:39
Parenthood versus Casey that they're apparently about to be no mass.
3:43
They are on the ropes just begging that they don't get hit with that knockout blow.
3:46
Now to get my knee jerk response to the breaking news that came last Monday, go back to episode
3:50
305 of this podcast.
3:52
I basically recorded that podcast 30 minutes after I kind of read through everything, read
3:56
through the political article so you can get my knee jerk reactions there.
3:59
And right from the top, I know I release two episodes a week, but this is really, really
4:04
important.
4:05
I usually release one interview on Tuesdays and then a regular episode on Thursdays and
4:08
sometimes we switch it up.
4:09
But to all of you that are listening to this right now, I am imploring you to add a third
4:14
undaunted life of man's podcast episode to your rotation this week.
4:17
And for many of you, it's going to be an episode that you've heard of before and that you've
4:21
actually listened to before.
4:22
But even if you haven't, even if you have, go back to episode 257 of this podcast, okay?
4:26
It's called how to engage pro abortion arguments.
4:29
I'll leave it in the show notes.
4:30
It's easy for you guys.
4:31
But again, just scroll, scroll, scroll until you get to episode 257.
4:34
In that episode, I talked about abortion by the numbers.
4:37
I talked about different abortion procedures to kind of, you know, take the veil off so
4:40
you could actually know what was going on.
4:41
I talked about how to engage, you know, popular pro abortion arguments and some of the objections
4:46
that I equipped you to defeat are we don't know when life begins, my body, my choice.
4:51
What about hard cases like rape and incest?
4:53
You know, what if abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother?
4:56
I equip you guys to deal with all of those.
4:58
That is one of the most important podcasts that we've done.
5:00
We're over 300 episodes now.
5:02
That is like top five most important podcasts that I've done on this entire show.
5:06
So you got to go and check that out.
5:08
So let's get into last week, or I guess the last week and a half's worth of craziness.
5:12
So John Roberts, last week, you know, the useless chief justice of the Supreme Court
5:16
of the United States, he did confirm that the leak occurred with a real written opinion
5:20
draft from Justice Alito.
5:21
He did confirm that last week and many are commenting right off the bat.
5:25
And I think they're right, but this will make the relationship between the justices in a
5:29
lot of ways in terms of trust, almost irreparable because these opinions are circulated around
5:34
by the justices to the other justices with the assumption of trust and confidentiality.
5:39
And I just don't see how that can be repaired at this point.
5:41
It can be, but it's going to be really, really tough because this all leads me to believe,
5:45
of course, 100% that this was leaked by liberal justice and or their staff.
5:49
Okay.
5:50
I doubt there was one rogue person just acting on their own, perhaps that is the case.
5:54
But this is a good time for all of us to really think about how we'd feel if the shoe
5:57
were on the other foot, because I do try to put myself in that in that, you know, circumstance.
6:01
Let's say there was a six, three liberal majority on the court and there was something that
6:06
was circulated that clearly came from one of the, you know, conservative justices.
6:10
How would we be reacting?
6:11
Because if you're going to be able to actually honest, you got to make sure that you react
6:15
the same way in those different circumstances.
6:17
So here's the deal.
6:18
We need to get into the reactions and the responses.
6:20
And there were a ton of them guys.
6:21
It's going to be a lot of great content today.
6:23
So just buckle in.
6:25
If you're wondering which side of the issue is more moral or virtuous, I just need you
6:31
to think about the last week and a half and just look at how the far right and the far
6:37
left on the abortion issue are responding to the leak.
6:40
Now Stephen Crowder on his, on his show last week, he pointed this out, the extreme right,
6:45
and I, and I agree with this, thinks that there should be no abortions for any reason
6:48
whatsoever because the new human life is valuable.
6:51
And that's where I sit.
6:53
Okay.
6:54
But the extreme left of this issue is okay with abortion up until the day of birth.
7:00
And then infanticide thereafter birth, we talked about last week about this law in California
7:05
that will allow the perinatal period.
7:08
So if a child dies during the perinatal period, which can last up to 28 days, you know, according
7:13
to law, after the baby has been born, if that baby dies because the mother did something
7:17
or didn't do something or somebody did something or didn't do something that would allow that
7:21
baby to live, they're not going to be charged with any crimes.
7:23
Okay.
7:24
So that's what the extreme left police, the extreme rights like, yeah, we just shouldn't
7:27
kill people in the womb.
7:28
So you have to really think about that.
7:30
Now we do know this, because this has been released.
7:32
Justice Alito is being hidden in an undisclosed location, and he's not being hidden in an
7:36
undisclosed location because people in the right are so excited to shake his hand, right?
7:41
I mean, he's, he's literally in hiding and I'm sure his family's been placed in different
7:45
places as well because people on the left are, you know, signaling that violence could
7:50
potentially be imminent because there have been people when we saw this over the weekend
7:53
that they're, you know, quote unquote protesting, you know, peacefully outside of the justices
7:57
homes.
7:58
Now, you did have the White House come out and they basically refused to specifically
8:03
condemn protesting outside the justices homes.
8:05
You know, they basically cloaked it with, you know, we should be able to protest and the
8:09
protests haven't been violent and blah, blah, blah, but they're not coming right out and
8:12
saying that this is ridiculous.
8:13
And if you're protesting outside of a justices home in Virginia or something like that, that's
8:17
actually illegal.
8:18
That's private property.
8:19
You can't do that.
8:20
But it is very interesting to me that people are talking about how the protests, you know,
8:24
you've heard a lot of people talk about this on the news.
8:26
They're talking about how these protests outside the justices' houses are overwhelmingly non
8:30
violent.
8:31
Essentially, we haven't seen any violence.
8:34
But the reality guys, and you know this, is that those protests are powder kegs.
8:40
They can literally explode into violence at any moment.
8:44
And you're hanging your hat on the fact that nothing's been violent so far.
8:48
Is that really the best argument?
8:50
And the thing that you have to think about when you're thinking about how the far ride
8:53
is reacting to this news versus the far left, I love something that Mark Driscoll said.
8:57
He gave a sermon.
8:58
I guess every Wednesday night at his church there in Arizona, they do a men's event called
9:01
real men.
9:02
And he had this very, very short quote, but it is very, very poignant.
9:05
He said, we've killed 62 million people.
9:08
Are we there yet?
9:10
That's a great question to think through because apparently people in the far left of this
9:14
issue, even on the squishy left of this issue, they don't think 62 million people is nearly
9:18
enough.
9:19
They wish there were more babies that have been slaughtered, right?
9:22
The new LinkedIn hiring pro can't undo your last hire, the lone wolf.
9:26
Who you thought was a good collaborator because you didn't have the right candidate insights.
9:31
But once you hired them, it was all hoarding info, declining meetings, and howling at
9:35
the full moon?
9:37
But LinkedIn hiring pro can go deeper than just the resume to find you a perfect fit.
9:42
By using insights from the LinkedIn network to give you a short list of best fit candidates.
9:46
You're right the first time with LinkedIn hiring pro, post a free job today at linkedin.com/quality.
9:52
Now, the people of God in the last week and a half, they've been rejoicing.
9:57
We have absolutely been rejoicing.
9:59
Well, most of them anyway, we'll get to that in a second.
10:01
I remember this, this weekend at our church, we were doing baby dedications.
10:04
And so there's a big line of parents and you know, I had James and Elijah there and you
10:08
know, we're, you're dedicating our kids to the Lord and those types of things.
10:11
But before we all went up on stage to do our baby dedications, the pastor just mentioned
10:15
that Roe v. Wade could be overturned and our very conservative, super chilled, not super
10:21
handsy during worship church broke out into applause and whistling and I yelled amen.
10:26
And it was great to see.
10:28
And I found myself in the last week or so getting choked up, just thinking about how many people
10:33
for the last 50 years have been praying that this day would come.
10:37
And here we are perhaps weeks away from it actually coming.
10:41
It is just absolutely overwhelming.
10:42
But my good buddy, John Cooper, he mentioned this as well on his show.
10:46
He talked, maybe on a show or on, on Twitter, I'm pretty sure it was on a show.
10:50
But all of the woke kind of leftist Christians, they seemingly don't have anything to say
10:56
about abortion being overturned potentially.
10:59
They're very mum on this topic.
11:02
But these same people were all too direct about telling you that you were anti-Christian.
11:09
If you didn't support Black Lives Matter, if you didn't post a black square on your
11:12
Instagram, if you said that, you know, George, if you didn't say that George Floyd was
11:17
killed by racist cops, you know, these same people said that you were killing people.
11:21
If you didn't wear a mask and get the jab, the people with Micah six in their Twitter
11:26
bio.
11:27
But all of a sudden they have nothing to say about this, about the sanctity of human life,
11:31
about the Amago day, potentially making it very more difficult in this country to destroy
11:36
that.
11:37
That's very, very interesting and something we should continue to pay attention to.
11:41
But also almost immediately, right leaning states were moving to protect life and left
11:48
leaning states were moving to allow for the most human destruction possible.
11:52
Now, this is federalism, okay?
11:55
This is states rights and this is what the framers wanted.
11:58
So, you know, fundamentally, I'm okay with that.
12:01
But it is interesting that that's the, you know, kind of the two sides that we see.
12:06
That's how we see them reacting.
12:07
But in the reactions that I've seen in the last week and a half or so, from both sides,
12:12
from parole boards and from people that are pro-life, it reveals that neither side, unfortunately,
12:18
really understands what Roe v Wade is.
12:21
They don't understand the decision at all or and they certainly don't understand federalism
12:25
in general, okay?
12:27
Because many Democrats and, you know, left leaning media orgs are quoting the staff that
12:31
the majority of Americans, you know, they've quoted somewhere between 60 and 70 percent
12:35
of Americans don't think that Roe should be overturned.
12:38
But the reality, obviously, is that most Americans have no earthly idea that Roe v Wade isn't
12:44
federal law at all.
12:46
It's a Supreme Court decision that is being applied to the states for their own laws,
12:51
okay?
12:52
Again, the judicial branch does not make the laws, right?
12:57
And so the reality is, is that if Roe is overturned and you guys should know this, but
13:00
if you don't, I'm not, I'm not dogging on you, but I just got to need to educate you
13:03
right here.
13:04
Roe v Wade is overturned in this country, which it looks like it, it might be, right?
13:09
Essentially, the right to abortion goes back to the states.
13:12
It's a state question at that point.
13:15
This idea from the left and the right from people that just don't understand, they think
13:18
if Roe v Wade is overturned, that it outlaws abortion outright in the United States, that's
13:22
obviously not the case.
13:24
The other problem with that stat that people use, you know, 60 to 70 percent is when people
13:29
are actually informed about what goes on during the abortion procedure during several
13:34
of the different types of abortion procedures, they tend to react and horror and change their
13:39
stances on abortion considerably almost immediately right at that moment.
13:44
Live action has kind of done this, you know, man on the street type thing.
13:46
And I know there's some other conservative folks that have gone on the street and they
13:48
ask people about Roe v Wade, they ask people about abortion.
13:51
People are like, yeah, you know, woman's right to choose and it's her body, her choice and
13:54
blah, blah, all that.
13:55
And then they show them, you know, cartoon renderings and what happens during abortion,
13:58
then they're like, Oh, damn.
14:00
It's like, yeah, that's what's happening.
14:03
Or they'll show them, you know, a chart that shows the baby and the different stances and
14:07
kind of what they look like at different points.
14:09
And they just ask them, at what point should we not be able to kill this and just kind
14:13
of put it right there in front of them and they're like, Oh, no.
14:16
So that's that is bogus because people don't understand Roe and people don't understand
14:19
the abortion procedure.
14:20
But guys, let's just say for their sake, the people that are quoting this, even if that
14:25
stat were true, we're 100 percent true that the majority of people in America are pro-abortion,
14:30
which it's not.
14:31
But let's just assume it's true.
14:32
The Supreme Court of the United States was literally set up to not take public opinion
14:37
into account when making decisions.
14:40
It's supposed to be about the Constitution of the United States, which includes the Bill
14:44
of Rights in the, in any amendments, right?
14:46
And that's it.
14:47
Not precedent, not, you know, public opinion, not Twitter sentiment, certainly.
14:52
That is the judicial branch.
14:54
The executive and legislative branches of government are the ones that are to cater to
14:59
the whims of the public, right?
15:01
So this idea that the judicial branch in the highest point of the judicial branch is supposed
15:07
to be worried about what the public thinks is ridiculous.
15:10
It's a ridiculous argument on his face.
15:12
But also the overwhelming thing is that people are freaking out the most, like the people
15:17
that you see freaking out the most on social media or on the news or something like that.
15:21
These people already live in states that will not be affected by Roe v. Wade being overturned.
15:27
If anything, you know, for these people that live in these blue states, the overturning
15:30
of Roe v. Wade will make the state that they live in even more friendly to baby murder in
15:35
general and the people that perform or allow the murders to begin with.
15:40
So like states like Illinois and California and New York, they're already signaling that
15:44
they are going to significantly liberalize their already liberal abortion laws in their
15:48
states.
15:50
And so when someone in New York City, someone in Manhattan's freaking out about Roe v. Wade
15:53
being overturned, it's like, why do you care?
15:56
Part of it is because they don't understand federalism and part of it's just because they're
15:59
evil, right?
16:00
But one thing that we've also seen in the last week and a half is some, let's call them
16:05
squishy pro life Christians and Republicans.
16:09
Now that they're seeing the riding on the wall that this is potentially about to be overturned,
16:12
they're being much louder about their pro lifeness.
16:15
All of a sudden, they really seem to be beating their chest when they see that they're, could
16:20
they could very easily be on the right side of this issue or contrastingly, some of those
16:26
same people are being very, very quiet, okay, very, very quiet.
16:30
It's kind of like what I was talking about earlier with what John Cooper pointed out.
16:33
These very squishy, supposedly pro life Republicans, supposedly pro life Christians, these types
16:38
of people, they're not really saying much, they're either being really, really loud or
16:41
not saying much at all.
16:42
But I need to be very, very clear about something.
16:44
And this might might give me in trouble.
16:45
Perhaps you don't agree with this, but I think it's very, very clear.
16:49
You cannot be truly pro abortion and a Christian, you can't be.
16:57
Those things are completely at odds with one another.
17:01
The sanctity of human life is of the most basic Christian tenant that it's of value, right?
17:08
So this idea that you could be pro life, but not in certain circumstances, you know, I'm
17:14
pro life with exceptions.
17:15
There's no such thing, that is not a category that exists.
17:19
And so I find it very, very hard to believe that you can consider yourself a child of
17:22
God that you are saved by the grace of Christ and say, yeah, but those babies that are in
17:27
the womb that are literally the most helpless people on the planet, right, they're not worth
17:32
anything.
17:33
Oh God, I'll take care of them or something like that.
17:35
Those people aren't worthy of life because perhaps the circumstances of their conception
17:39
weren't exactly perfect, right?
17:41
And this is no more apparent than when Reverend Raphael Warnock, if you don't know who that
17:45
is, that's the Senator now from the state of Georgia who is basically allowed to be Senator
17:50
because Trump can shut his mouth, you know, during the runoff election in that state.
17:54
And then, you know, too, in a very, very red state, two senators are now from the Democratic
17:59
Party.
18:00
But Reverend Raphael Warnock, who is an absolute crazy liberal, he had this to say on Twitter
18:04
right after this thing broke as a pro-choice pastor.
18:09
Now I could literally stop reading from there because you know, if someone says as a pro-choice
18:13
pastor that everything after it is going to be abject garbage, but for the sake of conclusion,
18:18
let me go and read the rest of it.
18:19
As a pro-choice pastor, I've always believed that a patient's room is way too small for
18:23
a woman, her doctor, and the United States government.
18:26
I'll always fight to protect a woman's right to choose and that will never change.
18:30
This is a supposed reverend of the church, a supposed Christian that says he will always
18:35
fight for the right for women to be able to murder their children in the womb.
18:39
Like, is this a shock to anybody?
18:43
Right?
18:44
Anybody paying attention?
18:45
It's certainly not a shock.
18:46
Okay?
18:47
The other thing that we've seen in the last week and a half is that essentially zero, and
18:51
I mean zero, prominent Democrats are coming out condemning the leaker or the leak, okay?
18:56
And the reason is I think there's one person in the Senate, but I can't remember the person's
18:59
name who came out and said, yeah, this is ridiculous, this shouldn't happen.
19:02
But because they, the reason is because they agree with the person that did it.
19:07
They are completely okay with this leak and the leaker doing that because they agree
19:11
with what they were going for.
19:13
The leaker in a lot of ways who, as of right now, it's not been released to the public
19:16
who that person is.
19:17
Supposedly there is a investigation going on, but this, this leaker is going to be seen
19:22
as a hero in these people's eyes.
19:25
So history on the left on the left side of the aisle, they will surely lionize this person
19:30
after we eventually find out who it is.
19:32
And they will, you know, think of them as a hero of the resistance or whatever stupid
19:35
thing like that.
19:37
And there have been many big time publications, including Politico that are saying that this
19:41
leak, which is completely unprecedented, is a good thing.
19:44
It's actually a good thing.
19:46
You know why?
19:47
Because it, it pierces this veil of secrecy of the high court.
19:49
This is the type of ideology you get from people that have never really built anything.
19:54
And so they're completely okay with destroying institutional norms or business norms or any
19:59
type of thing that could be normal.
20:00
It's like, well, it's been done this way for thousands of years or hundreds of years or
20:03
for decades. But what if we just destroyed that and just did it this way?
20:07
Because this way makes me feel better, right?
20:09
That's where you get that ideology.
20:11
Also, this is a good time to remind people that are so-called president in the United
20:16
States, Joe Biden, he's not Catholic and he's perhaps not even a Christian either because
20:21
of his full-throated support for the murder of pre-born babies.
20:24
It's kind of like what I said earlier, this guy cannot get out of his own way.
20:29
Again, he's always the center of the Democratic Party, whatever the center is.
20:32
The fact is, is that the center of the Democratic Party is now wildly to the left.
20:36
And so he has to basically be the guy that is okay for abortion right up to the point
20:40
of birth because that is the Democratic Party platform.
20:44
But this guy seems to actually believe this.
20:47
He actually seems to believe the nonsense that a woman should have a right to be able
20:51
to do that, no matter what the circumstances.
20:54
So you just have to kind of get that as a reminder that that's our president.
20:58
That's the guy that we're going to have to deal with at least for another two years or
21:01
so, two years in change.
21:03
Essentially, this is a good time to mention this as well.
21:06
Prominent Democrats, this was like an immediate reaction.
21:09
Prominent Democrats like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and the squad members and
21:12
people like that, they came out almost immediately saying that the Senate should end the filibuster
21:17
and enshrine abortion rights into federal law, which is a good hint to remind you that
21:20
Roe v. Wade is not a law of the land.
21:23
It's just a Supreme Court decision because they're trying to enshrine something that
21:26
a lot of people already thought was law.
21:28
Now I will say this that nobody that really follows the Senate or follows Congress or
21:32
politics or whatever thinks that this is going to happen, okay?
21:36
They don't think that they're going to get rid of the filibuster.
21:37
They don't think that they're going to be able to enshrine this into federal law before
21:40
this decision comes down.
21:42
You know, as of today, I'm recording this on Wednesday, the day before it comes out, supposedly
21:46
Chuck Schumer said that they are going to put this to a vote in the Senate, but I guess
21:49
today they're going to be doing a procedural vote to see if this will actually be brought
21:53
to the floor of the Senate for a vote.
21:54
So you know, kind of see how that goes, but I just got to be real honest with you.
21:58
I'm a little afraid of what senators Romney, Murkowski and Collins will do if put to a vote.
22:05
I actually am, regardless of what they're signaling in the press, because Murkowski and
22:10
Collins are on the record for being fairly pro choice, even as Republican senators.
22:15
And Romney is just, I just don't know how he's still a senator.
22:19
I there's got to be somebody in the state of Utah that could take that guy out.
22:23
I'm actually concerned about those three people being peeled off, which would make Senator
22:27
Senator's mansion and cinema irrelevant because a lot of people are like, Joe Manchin will
22:31
never go for this and Chris and cinnamon will never go for this, but perhaps not.
22:35
But I'll just kind of go with the generalized consensus, which is that this is likely not
22:38
going to happen.
22:39
But it will go for a vote because, you know, Democrats think that this is a winning issue
22:42
for them.
22:43
And so they want to make sure they get all these Republicans on the record.
22:46
But also, I do think it's very rich that Democrats are talking about women's rights
22:50
all of a sudden, okay?
22:53
Because can they even define what a woman is?
22:56
Because this just came up recently, Cantonji Brown Jackson, who will be a justice on the
23:00
Supreme Court before the year is out.
23:01
She can't define what a woman is.
23:04
And I've been reliably informed by her that she couldn't possibly give an answer to that
23:08
question because she's not a biologist.
23:09
And now all of a sudden, I didn't realize all the Democrats were going to night school.
23:13
They all became biologists within a snap of a finger because most Democrats, even though
23:17
they aren't biologists, so they obviously can't give us this answer, are telling us
23:21
about women's rights all of a sudden.
23:23
Because most of these Democrats think that a biological man can become a woman just by
23:27
thinking it.
23:29
And I thought I've been reliably informed by them that gender was not binary, but there's
23:34
no such thing as the gender binary, right?
23:36
It's a spectrum.
23:37
I also have been informed by them that men could get pregnant.
23:41
So what exactly are they talking about?
23:43
So they put on the LGBTQ hat when it's convenient for them and when they can bludge in the right
23:47
with it.
23:48
And then they take it off whenever and then they put on their women's rights cap whenever
23:51
they feel like they can bludge on the right with it.
23:53
Okay, I guess that's, you know, par for the course for them.
23:56
And also the same Democrats and their mainstream media allies, they're the first ones to lead
24:01
off their arguments.
24:02
Really you've seen this in the last, you know, week to 10 days, you've seen them lead off
24:05
their arguments about how this is egregious because of hard cases, because of rape and
24:11
incest.
24:12
Now, again, go back to my episode 257 where I talk about how to deal with pro abortion
24:15
arguments, specifically the ones about rape and incest.
24:18
But the reason that you've heard so many of these pundits and so many of these politicians
24:22
talk about cases of rape and incest over the last week or so is because Democrats and leftists
24:27
think that that is the only way they can win the argument.
24:31
If they go super duper extreme and pretend as if it's a norm, because you don't do that
24:36
unless you're completely worried about the foundations of your own argumentation.
24:42
Because I think fundamentally they realize that they have a losing position, that their
24:46
position is the crazy one, not the right, not the pro life side of things.
24:50
theirs is a crazy position.
24:51
I think they know that also almost immediately and you could see this coming a mile away.
24:56
Some people immediately linked this to racism and white supremacy and anti women sentiments,
25:00
which is just hilarious because anytime anything bad happens to them, that's obviously the
25:04
immediate response.
25:05
And there are so many farces, you know, being thrown out there by the pro abortion crowd.
25:10
But one of them is that this law being potentially, it's not a law that this decision potentially
25:14
being overturned.
25:15
Again, it's not even a law.
25:17
It will disproportionately affect women of color because apparently women of color can't
25:21
have or get insurance.
25:24
You've actually heard people make that argument in the last week to 10 days.
25:27
Now in addition to that being highly racist, a highly racist statement and paternalistic,
25:34
any woman in the United States of America that is too poor to have insurance will be
25:37
able to get coverage via the federal government via Medicaid.
25:41
What are they talking about?
25:43
Now and that is in addition to the many thousands of pregnancy resource centers, you know, some
25:48
of them used to call them, you know, crisis pregnancy centers, but pregnancy resource
25:51
centers across the country that give pregnancy services and post pregnancy services to women
25:56
for free.
25:58
So what are they talking about?
26:00
In addition to that, abortion is disproportionately performed on black and brown babies.
26:09
Like look at that.
26:10
Look at the numbers, the overwhelming majority, but per capita of babies that are aborted
26:15
in this country are black and brown.
26:17
This was Margaret Sanger's goal from the beginning.
26:20
She's the eugenicists that found in Planned Parenthood, right?
26:24
Why do you think there are so many Planned Parenthood facilities located near poor areas
26:28
of the country where the populace is largely black or brown?
26:32
Do you think that's an accident?
26:35
Or was it part of the plan from the beginning?
26:37
So I would ask these people, how is restricting abortion access and allowing more black and
26:43
brown babies to be born in the United States white supremacy exactly?
26:48
How does that compute?
26:50
Because if we significantly restrict abortion, you would presume that less black and brown
26:55
babies would be slaughtered.
26:57
Isn't that a good thing?
26:59
It should be a good thing, but they don't think that way.
27:02
And you know, this would be a good time to remind you that Roe v. Wade was decided in
27:06
the affirmative by seven white men 50 years ago.
27:11
Now it looks like it's going to be overturned by a group that includes a black man and a
27:15
woman.
27:16
So hooray for diversity losers.
27:17
Let's get on the next point here.
27:19
Democrats and leftists are all of a sudden very, very concerned about precedent.
27:23
This is super interesting.
27:24
It's 50 years of precedent, are we really going to overturn precedent because of these,
27:28
you know, extremist justices and all these different things?
27:30
But they only care about precedent when it's in their favor.
27:34
I don't think that a prominent Democrat has been asked this question in the last week
27:37
to 10 days.
27:38
But if they were so concerned about precedent, were they concerned about it with cases like
27:42
brown versus the board of education, which allowed us to integrate schools, which got
27:46
rid of the standard of separate but equal?
27:48
Because that was precedent for a very, very long time in this country, unfortunately, right?
27:52
It should have never been there, but it was where they really concerned about precedent
27:56
then.
27:57
Well, of course not because they agree with the sentiment, right?
28:00
But here they disagree with certain sentiments.
28:01
So precedent all of a sudden is like this big thing that you can't violate.
28:05
Also, a lot of people are coming out saying things like, you heard whoopi Goldberg and
28:09
other people, you know, talk about this.
28:11
Abortion isn't easy.
28:12
You know, it's, it's not a decision that women take lightly, you know, stuff like that.
28:17
Now what you are required to ask at that point of that person is, why is the decision difficult
28:22
like, why isn't the decision easy?
28:26
Like, could that possibly have something to do with the fact that it's not merely a medical
28:31
procedure?
28:33
Is it possible that it has something to do with the death of a human being?
28:36
I thought Chad Prather did a great job of pointing this out on his show.
28:39
I think it was, you know, yesterday or the day before, but he talked about you can go
28:42
online and literally veg out for hours watching, you know, medical, you know, medical videos
28:47
online.
28:48
People popping zits and people getting surgeries and knee replacements and all this stuff.
28:51
Can you find an abortion anywhere?
28:55
Can you find a video of an abortion of a DNC happening or a DNE or a DNx?
29:00
Can you find that anywhere?
29:01
And the answer is, is you probably can't because they don't want you to see it.
29:05
Why?
29:06
Because it's not just a medical procedure.
29:08
You can literally find video of almost every single other medical procedure on YouTube right
29:12
now.
29:13
Go look for an abortion.
29:14
You're not going to be able to find it.
29:16
Wearing a business can seem like a daunting task, unless you have a partner like Shopify.
29:21
They have the tools you need to start and grow your business.
29:24
From designing a website to marketing to selling and beyond, Shopify can help with everything
29:29
you need.
29:30
There's a reason millions of companies like Mattel, Heinz and Allbirds continue to trust
29:34
and use them.
29:35
With Shopify on your side, turn your big business idea into sign up for your $1 per month trial
29:41
at Shopify dot com slash special offer.
29:45
Also Democrats and leftist media figures are now trying to convince you.
29:49
This is so funny.
29:50
They're trying to convince you that Republicans and the Supreme Court of the United States
29:53
will now be coming after gay marriage and even interracial marriage that, oh, if they can
29:58
just overturn Roe, they're going to overturn everything else.
30:01
You're not going to be able to be married to, you know, you're a guy and you can't be married
30:03
to a guy anymore.
30:04
And all of a sudden, you're not going to be able to do interracial marriage because of
30:06
previous Supreme Court decisions or whatever, which is hilarious because Justice Thomas is
30:10
not married to a black woman, right?
30:12
So he would be literally voting against his own marriage, but again, that's just kind
30:16
of a narrative.
30:17
They're throwing out there as a scare tactic.
30:18
And in addition to that, Democrats and leftists have taken this as an opportunity to redefine
30:23
what pro life means.
30:25
Now they've never missed an opportunity to redefine something that will help them in
30:29
their cause, but they're not calling people on my side of the issue pro lifers anymore.
30:34
They're calling us pro birth, which, okay, yeah, I'm down with that.
30:40
Sure, I'm, I'm definitely pro birth, but they're now saying that you're not pro life.
30:45
You can't actually be pro life if you don't loudly advocate for things that they like.
30:50
So universal health care and universal paid, you know, parental leave and universal pre
30:55
K and free adoption services and fighting climate change and fighting systemic racism,
30:59
whatever that is.
31:00
And you know, universal this and free that or whatever.
31:03
And I think that Ben Shapiro from the daily wire rightly pointed this out.
31:07
It would be like saying, give us all the money and all of our policy prescriptions that we
31:11
want for elder care and, you know, for Medicare and for Social Security and all that, or we're
31:15
going to kill all the old people.
31:17
It's like, how does that make any sense at all, right?
31:21
You can absolutely be pro life and still be concerned about the, the bevy of things that
31:26
I just mentioned, that whole laundry list of things that people that are typically of
31:29
the left like, but they're trying to redefine it and they're just doing a [inaudible] poor job
31:34
up at this point. And really, if we're going to be honest about it, it's such a BS talking
31:38
point to begin with, because even if that side got everything that they wanted, everything
31:44
on their wish list, if every box were checked, those same people would still hold the exact
31:50
same views about abortion.
31:53
They would not adjust their viewpoints on abortion, even one Iota.
31:57
So it's a BS argument to start with.
32:00
In addition to that, Democrats and leftists are now saying that Republicans and pro-lifers
32:04
like me are advocating for what they're calling forced pregnancy or forced birth. Okay? And
32:11
the reality is, is no, we're just anti-you killing people, you idiots. Like that's what
32:16
we're against. We're not for forced pregnancy. That's not even a thing, right? And you know,
32:21
some are talking about it in the, in the term of government mandated pregnancy, okay? And
32:25
I just, I'm curious, do you people know how procreation actually happens? Like, because
32:30
in the overwhelming majority of cases, okay, overwhelming majority, statistically, almost
32:35
100% of cases, the person that gets pregnant, which is a woman, by the way, whoops, they're
32:40
consenting to the act that gets her pregnant. These women are not being held down and impregnated
32:47
against their will by some, you know, government official that, I mean, there's a reason why
32:52
books and TV shows like Handmaid's Tale and stuff like that. There's a reason why those
32:56
things are described in those types of arenas and those types of entertainment because it's
33:01
fiction, because it's false, because it's ridiculous. No one is doing that. The United
33:06
States is not forcing women to become pregnant. These women are choosing to participate in
33:11
acts that lead to their pregnancy, okay? And Matt Walsh pointed this out, which I thought
33:15
that this was perfect and not enough people are actually, you know, pointing stuff like
33:19
this out. There are a lot of people talking about how there's nothing worse that a man
33:23
can do than force women to stay pregnant and give birth. There's nothing worse that a person
33:29
can do a man could do. But the damnable thing about it is that a man can get a woman pregnant
33:36
and that woman could kill that man's child without his consent. And there's no recourse
33:42
for him. His baby can be slaughtered and he has no legal rights to anything that happened
33:48
in that situation. However, if that woman decides on her own, because she's the only
33:53
one that gets a vote, if she decides on her own to give birth to that baby, and that father
33:57
is, he's now at that point, legally liable for that child's financial well being and
34:02
has paid child support. So the father has no rights while the baby is in the womb. But
34:08
then there are perhaps some rights after birth, but you have the duty of payment now.
34:14
How does that work out? How can the father have no rights to the life of his child before
34:20
it's slaughtered? Right? How does that work out? But again, that's the logic of the left.
34:25
Now with this is kind of funny. We're actually now getting reports from leaders, you know,
34:29
from countries outside the United States that say that they're just absolutely appalled
34:33
at the thought that Roe v Wade might get overturned. So a couple of things about that. First thing,
34:38
why in the world would I care what somebody outside of our country thinks about our laws
34:42
inside this country? Why would I give a damn? Why? Oh, Europeans don't really like that.
34:48
Okay. Well, they're in Europe. I'm here, right? Now there are certain laws in all these other
34:54
countries because you've heard me talk about abortion laws in other countries. So it's like
34:56
Kyle, why would you care about those? Because they're killing people. That's why. Also another
35:01
point on this is many of these same people that are, you know, saying how concerned they
35:05
are about this potentially being overturned. They live in countries that have much more
35:09
conservative abortion laws in their countries than we do. They're way more conservative.
35:14
So I saw this in a report. It was a report called US abortion law in comparison with
35:18
the globe, the globe. And in this report, they said, alongside Canada, China, Vietnam,
35:24
and both North and South Korea, the United States is one of only six nations in the world
35:28
whose national law allows abortion at any point through the entire pregnancy. Six were one
35:36
of six nations. And guys, only three European countries. This is where we're getting all
35:40
this guff from. Only three European countries allow abortion after 15 weeks. There are very
35:46
few states, even red states, that have laws on the books right now that keep a baby from
35:50
being murdered after 15 weeks. So what are they talking about? Again, I don't care what
35:55
you think about our loss. I just don't. Now, also the media machine is really trying to
36:00
get companies into the fray. You've seen them kind of pull put this pressure on companies
36:04
to make a statement about this leak when no one should actually really care what a company
36:08
believes. And do you know why? Because the company is not a person. It is a mate. It's
36:13
made up of individual people that can think whatever the hell they want to think. But the
36:17
thing is, is they're using the, you know, such and such company has not released a statement
36:21
on this yet as a way to coerce people into the fray. Because they don't want big brands
36:26
and big companies to be sitting on the sidelines on this issue. They want them to come out full
36:31
throated in opposition to this. Now, we've seen some companies do that and you should pay
36:35
attention to those companies. But I think other companies are learning from all this Disney
36:39
debacle stuff in the state of Florida, whenever they try to get into the fray. And it's just
36:43
like, wait a minute, we need you to be concerned about children's content. That's all we want
36:48
you to do. And making your parks clean and fun for our families. We don't need you getting
36:52
in to the fray on anything that's happening on the legislative level inside the state,
36:57
right? You employ a bunch of people that can vote. However, the heck they want to vote.
37:01
But you're not the one that has to be controlling that. But a lot of people in the mainstream media,
37:06
they want to make sure they get these companies on the record. They just want to bully them,
37:09
essentially. And I guess the last thing we'll get into here when it comes to just reactions
37:12
and responses is all this, you know, keep your hands off our bodies stuff. A lot of these people
37:18
holding up signs outside the Supreme Court and outside the justices homes and all that.
37:21
Keep the government's hands off our bodies. And the interesting thing is that the overwhelming
37:26
majority, I just talked about this a second ago, the overwhelming majority of women that get into
37:29
this predicament, as they would call it, are in that predicament, because they let a man put their
37:35
hands all over their bodies and then do a bunch of other things to them, which resulted in them
37:39
getting pregnant. They're so desperate to make sure the government doesn't touch their bodies,
37:44
but they're okay with some random dude, right? And in a lot of these cases, it's a dude that they
37:50
maybe met that day or had a really kind of a short term relationship with. And then they allow this
37:54
man to impregnate them. And then they're like, Oh, government should keep their hands off my body.
37:58
I want to kill this thing, right? It is just also very interesting to me to hear Democrats
38:02
and leftists make the libertarian argument all of a sudden of less government intervention.
38:07
All of a sudden Democrats and leftists have libertarian tendencies, which is hilarious,
38:11
because their party is literally the party of government intervening in every single area of
38:16
someone's life. They want there to be a mandated C word V word. They want that to be mandated
38:23
across the board. They want the government to be able to jackboot into your neighborhood
38:27
and take care of business, right? That's what they want. Now, before we move off this issue,
38:31
I do have some other random thoughts that I think are important. One of the biggest
38:34
mistakes that we've made a modern society is separating sex from procreation. It's one of
38:39
the biggest mistakes we could possibly have done because people think of pregnancy as if it's some
38:46
sort of invasion or, you know, attack on their personal autonomy and, you know, their sexual
38:51
liberty and freedom, as opposed to this blessed outcome of sexual union between one man and one woman.
38:57
And you could point to the sexual revolution, the sixties, you can point to all those different
39:01
things. But the reality is, is the moment we separated those two things, it became a major problem.
39:05
I think there is a great argument. You get this from a lot of, you know, Catholic theologians,
39:09
that part of this happened because of the, you know, overwhelming use of contraception,
39:13
right? Birth control. And so when you're constantly using birth control, not only does it mess with
39:19
your hormones as a person, but then you're completely separating the sexual act from the
39:25
potential of creating human life. I think it's been a big, big mistake for all of us.
39:29
Struggling with weight loss? Prolon's five day fasting mimicking diet is a clinically developed
39:34
nutrition program designed to promote fat loss while protecting lean body mass.
39:38
Developed at USC's Longevity Institute, it assists the body in entering a fasting like state that
39:43
helps reset metabolism and target visceral fat. In just five days, Prolon offers a science back
39:49
approach to weight loss without extreme restriction or guesswork. Get 15% off plus a $40 bonus gift
39:54
when you subscribe at prolonlife.com/now. Now, another thing I want to kind of get into is that
40:00
this will be the Democrats' excuse for ending the filibuster and for stacking the Supreme Court,
40:05
which they've signaled. You know, I'm not terribly worried about it right now,
40:10
necessarily, but I do have full faith that we will 100% see at some point in my lifetime
40:17
that the Democrats are going to, you know, kill the filibuster and then stack the Supreme Court.
40:22
And what Democrats will do is they will always point back to this moment in time,
40:26
this moment in history, if Roe v. Roe v. Wade is overturned and they will say, that's why.
40:31
So when they're raising money and sending out emails and doing these different things in these
40:36
speeches, that's what they're going to constantly point to. It's like, that's the reason why,
40:39
because look at what those evil Republicans did. So we'll see if that comes to fruition. I
40:44
hope I'm wrong. But we also need to talk about the leak because everyone's talked about how it's
40:47
completely unprecedented and that is true. But the thing that most people aren't really talking
40:51
about in very much further is that the leak was a coordinated attack. And we should know this because
40:58
within minutes of the Politico leak last Monday, there were already dozens. I mean, if not hundreds
41:04
of people outside the Supreme Court with signs that were already made. It's kind of like when,
41:09
you know, during the George Floyd riots, it's like, where did these people get these bricks?
41:13
Well, about, you know, pallets of bricks were being delivered to street corners in all these
41:16
major cities. It's like, do these people just keep sign materials sitting around their homes?
41:21
They might, but they were ready. They were ready for this. And also all the media narratives were
41:26
ready to go as well. Because the media are using terms like, you know, this was released or
41:32
disclosed as opposed to leaked, they're framing it completely improperly. And you know, the leak
41:38
is very, very egregious as well for a reason that many are talking about. And that's that
41:43
the leak gives liberal politicians that currently control the White House in both houses of Congress,
41:48
the ability to try and force through legislation and get their ducks in a row with time to spare.
41:52
So honestly, I agree with some people that are saying this. I think Justice Roberts should release
41:58
the opinion now. Now, we can't assume that all the opinions are fully done and fully formed. But
42:04
if that leak of Alito's opinion is any indication, they're pretty much close. They're on the precipice
42:09
of this being completely finalized. So Roberts needs to just go ahead and release it. Because,
42:14
you know, the crazy, you know, craft storm of stuff that's coming down the pike is going to
42:17
come anyway. So why not just go ahead and release the opinion? Okay. But also we need to talk about
42:22
the leaker. So we again, we don't know who the leaker is right now. I'm going to guess that
42:25
somebody from Sotomayor, Sotomayor's office, but you know, we'll find out in time, I suppose,
42:29
almost 100% chance that the leaker came from one of the three scotest justices.
42:33
Okay, people are floating this idea that, you know, this was done by Justice Roberts,
42:37
one of his clerks. And it was this idea to try and coerce one of the other conservative justices
42:42
to join him in a moderate opinion, which is just absolutely ridiculous. The thing is is,
42:47
there's almost no chance whatsoever that the leaker acted alone.
42:51
Again, it had to have come from one of the three liberal justices. But this idea that they just
42:56
decided as a 20 year old clerk or something like that, that they were just going to go and release
43:00
this thing. I just don't know if I really buy that. Okay, I think this was a coordinated attack
43:04
from the very top. The leaker, again, is also going to be a hero of the left, you know, history
43:08
will is going to lionize this person, you know, and it's just, it sets a bad precedent for the future
43:14
for future clerks. I think that they can do this and somehow get some press out of it because you
43:18
can be guaranteed that the person once they're found out, not only will they not be charged for
43:22
this, they're probably going to get a book deal, right? They're probably going to get a, you know,
43:24
six or seven figure book deal. Another thing that I wanted to point out about this is kind of shifting
43:29
gears just a little bit. Pastor Tim Keller, I guess he's not a pastor anymore, but prominent
43:33
pastor for a long time. Man, did he pick the wrong time to post a tweet thread about Christianity
43:39
and the politics around abortion? Okay, so he posted this thread on Twitter about a week before
43:44
the leak came out. Okay, so I'm going to read this thread. It's going to take me just a second,
43:47
but man, you want to talk about bad timing? So here's this thread. I recently wrote about how
43:51
churches should not destroy unity or fellowship over political differences. The replies show that
43:56
many American evangelicals have no coherent understanding of how to relate to the Bible
44:00
or how to relate the Bible to politics. Here's the original tweet, churches must not maintain
44:05
unity at the expense of the gospel. Churches should not destroy unity or fellowship over
44:09
political differences. Now getting back into his thread. Here are two biblical moral norms.
44:14
One, it is a sin to worship idols and any other God other than the one true God.
44:19
Two, do not murder. If you ask evangelicals, if they should be forbidden by law to worship any
44:24
other God, then the God of the Bible, they'd say, no, we allow that terrible sin to be legal.
44:30
But if you ask them if American should be forbidden by law to abort a baby, they'd say, yes. Now,
44:35
why make the first sin legal and never talk about it in the second sin illegal and and a main moral
44:42
or political talking point? At the very least, it shows a lack of knowing how to apply the Bible
44:47
to politics. Since we can't simply say if the Bible says it's sin, it should be illegal. How do
44:52
we choose which morals to politically champion? Please don't say I just want the 10 commandments
44:57
to be made law and society. That's too simplistic. And we don't do this already. The Bible tells us
45:03
that idolatry abortion and ignoring the poor are all grievous sins, but it doesn't tell us exactly
45:08
how we are to apply these norms to a pluralistic democracy. We are to help the poor, but the Bible
45:14
doesn't tell us which political strategy, high taxes and government services versus low taxes
45:18
and private charity to use. The Bible binds my conscience to love the immigrant, but it does not
45:24
tell me how many illegal immigrants to admit to the United States. And this is kind of where the
45:28
rubber meets the road. I know abortion is a sin, but the Bible doesn't tell me the best political
45:33
policy to decrease or end abortion in this country, nor which political or legal policies are most
45:39
effective to that end. The current political parties will say that their policy most aligns
45:44
morally with the Bible, but are allowed to debate that. And so our churches should not have disunity
45:49
over debatable political differences. It is also why I've never publicly or privately told Christians
45:54
who they should vote for. I have also never told anyone they should vote Democrat or Republican.
45:59
Depending on the policy, we can find more or less alignment with biblical morals.
46:03
I believe all Christians should be active in politics, but it is unwise to identify Christianity
46:08
with inner any particular party. Okay. And then he blinked to some other article that he wrote.
46:13
So some of those sentiments, I would say I agree with, but he's got a major problem and it smacked
46:19
him right in the face a week later when this happened. Because of Republican politics and
46:24
Republican talking points, the murder of the unborn in this country, which as he admitted in his tweet
46:30
thread as a sin, could now be unlawful in many states. It might almost be immediately unlawful
46:37
in about half of the states in this country. So is he really honestly going to tell me that
46:43
he has no idea what party to point people to when it comes to the issue of abortion?
46:48
Because again, the Democratic party platform is that of abortion for any reason up to the day of
46:53
birth and thereafter. That's a party platform. So no, and there's no giving on that. That is
47:00
what they say. Whereas the Republicans at least say that they are for life. They are for the
47:06
protection of unborn human life. So here's Timothy Keller, you know, trying to, you know,
47:11
literally split the baby here so that he comes off his interest and all those things. And that's
47:15
why I have such a big problem with centrists, especially these Christians, because they're just
47:18
like, they're just like, Oh, yeah, I don't really know what we should do. And we shouldn't really
47:21
align with political parties and different things like that. Yeah, you should, especially on issues
47:25
like this. Because how are you going to take care of the unborn otherwise? You cannot vote for the
47:31
Democratic party and expect them to operate operate in a way that protects human life.
47:37
Because that's just not what they do. Now getting on to another issue, there is a massive difference
47:42
because you've heard a lot of people using euphemisms in the last, you know, 10 days.
47:45
There is a massive difference between potential human life and human life with potential.
47:49
So Ben Shapiro pointed this out as the, as a distinction that it is, and it's absolutely
47:54
perfect because potential human life is a very, very important thing that people think about,
48:01
but they're, they're, they're dehumanizing what's going on inside the womb, because that is alive
48:06
and that is human. But when you say human life with potential, it kind of frames it properly for
48:10
people as they're thinking through this issue. Now, I just agreed with something that Ben Shapiro
48:14
said. Now I'm going to kind of disagree with him somewhat on something. And I'm going to disagree
48:18
with, you know, many other conservative commentators as well. They do not think that Democrats are
48:24
making. Okay, so they think that Democrats trying to campaign on this issue in the midterms is a
48:29
loser for the Democrats. Okay. Now I think that it might be whistling past the graveyard a little
48:34
bit for conservatives and Republicans to think that people will not vote mainly on this issue in
48:39
November that they will vote on issues of inflation or jobs or whatever. Now they might be, it might
48:46
end up being right. These conservative commentators might end up being right. But I don't think that
48:50
we've seen anything yet in reference to the backlash that we will see if the official decision comes
48:54
down the way that it's being signaled. Okay. Because a lot of people vote with their hearts,
49:00
not with their heads. Okay. Now with the price of gas and inflation at the grocery store and all
49:05
these different things, that might be enough to get you distracted from some of the heart things.
49:09
And you know, we've kind of seen this with people moving to other states and I've talked about this
49:15
a lot on this podcast. Like, you know, people in Texas are like, Hey, don't California, my Texas,
49:19
or you know, Hey, don't New York, my Florida or something like that. The problem is a lot of these
49:23
people are leaving states because of democratic policies, but they still are Democrats. They're
49:27
socially liberal people. And so when it comes down to, you know, abortion or LGBTQ issues or
49:33
immigration or any of these, you know, heartfelt issues, these people aren't all of a sudden going
49:36
to be clicking into, well, what about tax policy or fiscal policy? Part of it, because they don't
49:40
understand and part of it too, is because it's not as emotional for them. It feels bad whenever
49:45
they're spending twice as much at the pump or at the grocery store that they used to,
49:48
but they don't know how that directly applies to something. And guess what? That doesn't make
49:51
it into the campaign emails, even for the people that they end up voting for. Okay. Now,
49:56
so far, the generic congressional ballots that people are talking about have not moved
50:00
almost at all in the last week and a half, but it might actually, if this goes through.
50:04
So just remember, guys, just go back a couple of years to how easy it was for the world
50:09
and the democratic party and the mainstream media and Black Lives Matter to get everyone
50:14
on the planet riled up after George Floyd died and while he was in police custody.
50:18
It was super easy. It's like they just turned on a spigot. So never mind the facts of the case,
50:25
but you're telling me that that same group of people can't all of a sudden do that again,
50:28
if Roe v. Wade is overturned. So again, I tend to agree with some of these conservative commentators
50:34
that it's not going to be able to overturn this potential red wave that's happening in
50:37
November, but I don't think we should be taking it lightly either. Now, also more than ever,
50:42
this is going to make conservatives and Christians that live in blue states really. And I mean,
50:47
really rethink whether they want to live their long term to live in these states long term.
50:53
So maybe the lockdowns didn't bother you. You know, maybe that didn't do it for you.
50:56
Maybe the woke ideology and the schools didn't do it for you. You know, maybe the LGBTQ stuff
51:01
and public schools didn't do it for you. Will baby murder do it for you? Is that going to be enough
51:06
to knock you off? So that's going to be a big question that a lot of conservatives and
51:11
Christians that live in these blue states are going to have to ask themselves pretty soon
51:15
because their state tax dollars are going to directly go to potentially funding women
51:19
to be flown into their state to kill their babies. Are they going to be down with that?
51:22
We'll have to see. So another thought here is that if Roe is overturned, the fight is just beginning.
51:28
This is very, very important. If Roe's overturned, the next fight is the fight for full criminalization
51:35
of abortion in all 50 states. Okay. So these disturbances that we saw at church services and,
51:40
you know, protests outside of justices homes and vandalism that we saw over the weekend,
51:44
you know, these vandalism and pro-life facilities, I think there's one in Wisconsin.
51:47
It's going to be nothing compared to what we'll see if this gets overturned.
51:51
So this idea that it's overturned and it's done with don't be so naive. Okay. Now, for me personally,
51:56
I'm okay with Republicans fighting for a federal ban on abortion, but I don't see that actually
52:00
happening. I don't think Republicans will even push for that. I mean, go back to 2016. You had
52:04
Trump in the White House and both houses of Congress and they didn't really pass any pro-life
52:08
legislation whatsoever. Right. And if this actually does go through this overturning of Roe v. Wade,
52:13
all the people that are focusing on abortion or all the people that I guess have been focusing
52:18
on abortion at the state level as opposed to the federal level, they're going to come out looking
52:21
like geniuses. There are some organizations like in abortion now and things like that,
52:25
they never really looked at advocating it for it on a federal level. They weren't advocating
52:28
in Washington. They were advocating in the individual state houses because some of these,
52:32
you know, pro-life states, they're going to be caught flat-footed if this gets overturned
52:36
because the laws on the books in their states are still going to allow for a bunch of baby murder.
52:40
So the people that have been focusing on the states, man, they're going to come off looking
52:43
amazing. But here's the thing, at the end of the day, some women, this is just kind of what we
52:48
have to think about. If this gets overturned, some women in the United States will now just be
52:51
slightly inconvenienced in the process of using baby murder as their birth control,
52:55
which you might be like, Oh, that's crazy. What about rape and incest? What about all these hard
52:58
cases? That is not most cases. It's almost zero cases. It's not zero. So those, those situations do
53:05
matter. But again, go back to episode 257 on this podcast. I go through all this. The overwhelming
53:09
majority of abortions in this country take place because of convenience. Oh, it's not a good time
53:14
right now or I already have too many kids, or I don't know who the dad is. Or, you know, I just
53:17
want to finish school and all that. It's for convenience has nothing to do with these hard cases.
53:21
So now a woman in Texas, you know, who can't go to Louisiana and can't go to Oklahoma and maybe
53:27
can't go to this state or that state, she'll just fly over those states to go to Colorado or, you know,
53:32
Illinois or something like that in order to kill her baby. But this is the big thought as we kind
53:36
of wrap up this discussion. You know, we spent almost an hour talking about this discussion
53:39
on, you know, the pro-abortion and pro-life issue. And I think that's very, very important.
53:44
More than ever, you should understand that this is true. Elections have consequences.
53:48
My goodness, do elections have consequences? Because guys, if Hillary Clinton were elected
53:56
president in 2016, none of this would be happening. We wouldn't be discussing this.
54:00
If Trump didn't get into office and then get three picks for the high court,
54:06
none of this would be happening. We wouldn't be talking about this.
54:09
Roberts would matter a whole lot. Okay. And also if Donald Trump didn't nominate people,
54:15
that would be solid votes against Roe, none of this would be happening.
54:19
And again, I've got my issues with Donald Trump. And as we get closer to the midterms,
54:24
I'm going to make a lot of you mad out there because of the bad things I say about your boy.
54:26
But this, I remember I said this when you get mad later. This almost assuredly
54:33
makes Donald Trump, and I think I said this in episode 305. Believe it or not,
54:37
one of the greatest presidents ever and the most pro-life president in American history,
54:42
more than Reagan. Okay. And I talk about this every time I talk about the pro-life issue
54:47
with Donald Trump. Personally, I do not see the evidence that he is pro-life in his personal
54:53
ideology and philosophy. I don't see that. This is a guy that was a Democrat,
54:58
a leftist for much of his life until he decided he wanted to run for president and then all of a
55:02
sudden he's pro-life. Now, because of that, I think it's important for you to realize
55:07
that you should care way more about legislation than heartfelt conviction.
55:12
Because if he went with his heart, he wouldn't have put the justices on the Supreme Court that
55:17
he did. He wouldn't have nominated them rather, right? And his legislation wouldn't have reflected
55:23
his heartfelt convictions either. So the same thing could be true because you hear a lot of Democrats
55:27
and they try to split the baby this way, all pun intended that, hey, I'm pro-life in my personal
55:32
life, but I'm not going to legislate that way because I don't think that that's right to push
55:36
my morals on other people. They're ignoring the fact that all legislation is certain people's
55:40
moralities being pushed onto other people, right? But think of a guy like Joe Biden who
55:45
pretends to be pro-life, but he legislates in a very, very pro-baby murder type of a way.
55:49
So I don't care if you actually feel pro-life in your heart. I care how you legislate.
55:53
I mean, go back to the first four books at Nehemiah. This was a guy that acted very, very much so
55:57
politically in order to, you know, rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. Again, go back and read the
56:01
first four chapters. It's absolutely incredible. And so last thought on this, I promise, I promise,
56:05
last thought on this. And this is going to be nice to say. I really like this. To all the pro-abortion
56:11
people that would snicker at pro-life people in our outrage over the Roe v. Wade decision
56:17
in all of our outrage over the last 50 years. How does it taste? How does that taste?
56:24
I mean, this deal isn't done yet. So we can't spike the ball quite yet. But how does that
56:30
vitriol taste in your mouth? Now, just know, leftists that are mad about all this, that now
56:36
you get the chance to freak out, that your vitriol is based on an immoral worldview,
56:42
whereas ours is based in a moral, Christian ethic. You are on the wrong side of this.
56:48
In history, we'll find you out. All right, guys, let's go to the quick hitter segment here.
56:53
So we're going to be shifting gears to a lot of other things. And we'll try to go through this
56:57
since we've already gone a little bit long today. They won't be typically this long.
57:00
Woke this on college campuses in Oklahoma. Okay, so I'm going to talk about three different
57:04
college campuses and some stuff that's happening here. So I'm going to start with one that I have
57:07
not been able to completely, completely corroborate, but I'm just going to throw it out there to you.
57:11
So this is at the University of Oklahoma in Norman. So at the University of Oklahoma,
57:15
my understanding, and again, I'm able to corroborate this. I'm trying to get this to bedrock, but I
57:19
wasn't able to do it before the podcast show today, that in order to get certain parts of federal
57:24
funding, the University of Oklahoma, OU, had to do DEI training. Okay, so that's diversity, equity,
57:31
and inclusion, training for their faculty and staff. And they made it non mandatory.
57:35
But since they made it non mandatory, basically, nobody signed up for it. And they were, you know,
57:39
having trouble getting their funding. So they made it mandatory. Okay, now again, I'm only going to
57:45
talk about that a little bit because I've not been able to corroborate that. So if I've said
57:48
something incorrect here, I do want to go back later and correct the record. But that is my
57:51
understanding of something that's happening at the University of Oklahoma is mandatory DEI training
57:56
in order for people to get funding. And that could also affect people being able to get raises or
58:00
not. Then we need to move over to Oklahoma State University OSU in Stillwater. And this is according
58:04
to Adam Sabes over at Fox News. Oklahoma State University hosted a drag queen story hour for kids
58:10
as young as two years old earlier in April. The event drag queen story hour, which took place on
58:15
April the 9th was part of Oklahoma State University's Pride 2022 month. A description for the event
58:21
stated that Ami Redo and Olivia Lykin to drag performers would read books that highlight inclusion
58:26
and acceptance. The books featured will be read a crayon story by Michael Hall and speak up by Miranda
58:32
Paul, the description stated. The activities during the drag queen story hour were geared towards
58:37
children aged two again, two to eight, but said all ages are welcome to join in on the fun. So
58:43
presumably that means below the age of two, the Oklahoma State University Museum of Art and the
58:48
Oklahoma State University OSU Office of Multicultural Affairs hosted the event. Okay, so those things
58:54
happen quite a bit. So that happens on the state at Oklahoma State University in a very, very,
58:59
you know, red part of the country, this, you know, cowboy country and farmer country, it happened on
59:03
that campus. But not to be outdone. The University of Central Oklahoma, which is in Edmond, Oklahoma,
59:08
which is my alma mater. I got something that from a person that was affiliated with the university,
59:13
they forwarded me a survey that was meant for UCO students, faculty and staff, current students,
59:18
faculty and staff. The survey was called research study about memory laws. Okay, so I'll read the
59:23
description of the study here. You are invited to participate in a research study about memory
59:27
laws, which have been described as government actions designed to guide public interpretation
59:31
of the past. Such measures work by asserting a mandatory view of historical events by forbidding
59:36
the discussion of historical facts or interpretations or by providing vague guidelines that lead to
59:41
self censorship. The focus of this survey will be on the intellectual and academic freedom on
59:46
university campuses, specifically on critical race theory and the banning of books. We focus
59:50
on UCO where we will ask questions regarding these areas to all staff, students and faculty. So,
59:56
I guess this is being headed up by a political science professor named John Wood. So a polyside
1:00:01
professor at UCO named John Wood. Now, here were some of the questions that were asked and I took
1:00:05
screenshots of this so I can, you know, I got the receipts. But have you ever heard about critical,
1:00:09
have you ever learned about critical race theory in the classroom? How familiar are you with critical
1:00:14
race theory? Do you agree or disagree with the principles of critical race theory? Please describe
1:00:18
critical race theory in your own words. How familiar are you with the controversy about critical race
1:00:23
theory? And then from what you know is critical race theory taught in public schools, that is
1:00:28
elementary schools and high schools. Okay, if yes, what makes you think so? So I actually
1:00:32
filled out this survey. Now, to be honest, I'm not a current student faculty or our staff member
1:00:37
of the University of Central Oklahoma. But I did find it as a great opportunity to go and have
1:00:41
my voice heard. So whenever they asked is critical race theory taught in public schools, this was
1:00:45
my response. It is certainly taught in the public school system, but the left is adept enough to
1:00:50
not call it intro to critical race theory or CRT 101. That's how hosts on CNN and MSNBC or
1:00:56
journalists at Vox or the New York Times can claim, see, there's nothing in the curriculum that even
1:01:01
says critical race theory. It's a complete obfuscation of reality by being incredibly liberal
1:01:06
with their definitions. Children are being taught to see the world through a racial lens.
1:01:11
The reality is that school age children are being taught that if they are white, that they are
1:01:15
automatically an oppressor and that if they are a minority of any kind that they are the oppressed.
1:01:20
This leads to Maoist style struggle sessions where children are being asked or forced
1:01:25
to apologize for their immutable characteristics or to ask forgiveness for the wrongs that they
1:01:30
themselves and likely no one in their family tree has perpetrated. This line that opponents of CRT
1:01:36
just don't want slavery to be taught in schools is absolute hogwash. I've literally never talked
1:01:42
to or seen a single person that thinks CRT is evil and wrong, which it is, and also thinks that we
1:01:47
shouldn't teach our children about the evils of slavery in the United States, literally not one.
1:01:52
Children should be taught about slavery 100%. The entire truth about slavery, i.e. how involuntary
1:01:58
labor was part of every culture in the world history and as part of many cultures today,
1:02:04
how almost every single type of person or people group was once enslaved, how black
1:02:08
Africans participated in and profited off of the slave trade, how there were many black slave owners
1:02:13
in the United States, how the biggest uniqueness of American slavery was not that we had it,
1:02:17
but that we were one of the first countries to abolish it, etc. Critical race theory is downstream
1:02:22
of critical legal studies, which is downstream from post modernism, which is downstream from
1:02:26
critical theory, which is downstream from the Frankfurt School, which is downstream from culture
1:02:31
of hegemony, which is downstream from conflict theory, which is downstream from Marxism.
1:02:35
I think that was hegemony. I said hegemony, but it's hegemony. So that was my response to that
1:02:40
question. But even after that point, the questions got pretty interesting. So we got to a section
1:02:45
where you had to answer either strongly support, somewhat of support, somewhat oppose, strongly
1:02:49
oppose to several of these statements. Now, many of the statements were pointed, but they were fine,
1:02:53
you know, like teaching public school students or university students about racism and its impact.
1:02:58
You know, what do you, would you say you agree or disagree with that? You know, public school
1:03:01
or university programs to encourage greater diversity, you know, you can agree or disagree
1:03:04
with that. But there were two statements that were just dripping, and I mean dripping with BS,
1:03:09
and they just had to make me laugh. So one of the statements was removing public schools,
1:03:14
or removing public school or university library books that make white people uncomfortable.
1:03:19
And then the next question was removing public school or university library books
1:03:24
that make heterosexual people uncomfortable. So you were supposed to answer whether or not you
1:03:28
strongly agreed or somewhat agreed or disagreed with those two questions. I mean, could you
1:03:34
frame those in any more in an appropriate way that somehow it's this homogenous group of white
1:03:40
people or heterosexual people that are doing these supposedly terrible things? So I thought
1:03:45
that that was that was really, really funny. But what's not funny is the fact that I needed to talk
1:03:48
about this. And the reason why I'm talking about this with OU OSU and UCO is because Oklahoma is
1:03:54
one of the reddest states in America right now. I think since since George W. Bush, every single
1:04:02
county has voted red in every single general election. But college campuses are safe havens
1:04:10
for liberals and leftists and the woke. Okay, they're not safe havens for free thought and freedom
1:04:15
of expression. They're just not. And so for you, for any of you people that live in Oklahoma,
1:04:19
I know there's a lot of people in Oklahoma that listen to the show. Don't just trust
1:04:23
that the school you're sending your kids to, or that you're attending yourself thinks the way that
1:04:28
you do, or even allows thinking the way that you do. We've got to be very, very careful about where
1:04:34
we send our kids. That's why I think I've talked about this on the show. We're not going to be
1:04:37
encouraging our boys to go to college. We're not going to be discouraging them either. But we're
1:04:41
not going to be presenting that as the only option for when they turn 18. Because why would we save
1:04:45
a bunch of money or why would they work to make a bunch of money to pay for an indoctrination in a
1:04:50
very, very specific type of ideology? Because just sending them to college in a red state isn't
1:04:54
going to solve the issue. All right. Next quick hitter here, a unanimous scotest decision on
1:04:59
religious liberty that no one is talking about. So this is according to john element in gallantan
1:05:03
at the Boston Globe, a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled Monday that the city of Boston violated
1:05:09
the First Amendment rights of a Christian group by refusing to fly a flag bearing a cross outside
1:05:14
of city hall in 2017. In a ruling written by retiring Justice Stephen Breyer, the High Court
1:05:20
said that Boston was wrong to deny camp constitution run by West Roxbury resident Harold shirt lift,
1:05:26
I guess a permit to raise a white banner with a red Christian cross in connection with Constitution
1:05:31
Day on September the 17th, the date the United States Constitution was signed in Philadelphia in
1:05:35
1787. We conclude that on balance, Boston did not make the raising of flying,
1:05:40
raising and flying of private groups flags a form of government speech, Breyer wrote.
1:05:45
That means in turn that Boston's refusal to let shirt lift and camp constitution raise their
1:05:49
flag based on its religious viewpoint, a bridge their freedom of speech. It was the only time
1:05:55
the city refused to fly a flag, having approved 284 requests from various countries, causes
1:06:00
businesses and organizations between 2005 and 2017. The court said the American Civil Liberties Union
1:06:06
and the Biden administration have filed briefs supporting camp constitution in this case.
1:06:11
So here's why this case is interesting. The Supreme Court voted unanimously nine to zero
1:06:16
against the city of Boston. Okay, so actually to be honest, unanimous decisions aren't that rare
1:06:20
when it comes to scotish decisions. But ones dealing with religion are they typically are a
1:06:25
little bit more rare to be nine nothing, especially when three of the liberal justices act more like
1:06:29
activists than justices. Also, the city of Boston thought that they could get away with this. That's
1:06:35
the only reason why they did it. So they tried to say that they thought they were doing the right
1:06:39
thing because they didn't want it to look like religious speech was, you know, endorsed by the
1:06:43
government, but that's total BS. That's not the way they thought about it. And also of note with the
1:06:47
story, right after the decision was announced by the Supreme Court, Salem's satanic temple,
1:06:52
they're going to apply to fly their flag above Boston City Hall. So there's that. All right,
1:06:57
let's get into the next quick hitter here. The baby formula shortage that until this week,
1:07:02
no one was talking about. So this is according to gosh, these names are going to be hard.
1:07:06
Parisia, Kavalins and Ramasha Marouf at CNN business. Okay, we made it through here we go.
1:07:12
For months, stores nationwide have been struggling to stock enough baby formula.
1:07:15
Manufacturers say they're producing at full capacity and making as much formula as they can,
1:07:20
but it's not enough to meet current demand. The out of stock rate for baby formula
1:07:23
hovered between two and eight percent in the first half of 2021, but began rising sharply last
1:07:28
July between November the 20 November 2021 and early April 2022. The out of stock rate jumped to
1:07:34
31 percent data from dates assembly showed that rate increase. Another 9 percentage points in
1:07:41
just three weeks in April and now stands at 40 percent. The statistics, the statistics show that
1:07:46
in six states, Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota, Missouri, Texas and Tennessee, that more than half
1:07:51
a baby formula was completely sold out during the week starting April the 24th data assembly set.
1:07:56
And all those seven states had between 40 and 50 percent of baby formula products out of stock
1:08:01
as of early April 26. States are now struggling with supply. This issue has been compounded by
1:08:06
supply chain issues. Product recalls and historic inflation data, simply CEO Ben Reich said.
1:08:11
Unfortunately, given the unprecedented amount of volatility in the category,
1:08:14
we anticipate baby formula to continue to be one of the most affected products in the market.
1:08:18
The shortage has been exacerbated by the Food and Drug Administration shutdown of an Abbott
1:08:23
nutrition facility in Sturgis, Michigan. Abbott is a major producer, a baby formula. In February,
1:08:28
the United States Food and Drug Administration recalled three brands of powdered baby formula
1:08:33
made by the company due to potential bacterial infections, including salmonella. The agency
1:08:38
advised parents not to buy or use certain batches of similiac, aluminum and Ella care,
1:08:44
powdered infant formulas, all Abbott brands. So here's the thing about this.
1:08:49
There's a lot of confusion going on the country. There's a lot of things to be outraged about.
1:08:53
There are a lot of people that are outraged about a lot of things in this country.
1:08:56
How many times have you heard people talk about the baby formula shortage?
1:09:00
Because if you've got people in your real life that don't even pay attention to the news,
1:09:05
don't listen to podcasts, but they have a baby. They're worried about this and people automatically
1:09:09
came out and said, Oh, this isn't that big a deal. You know, you can just make baby formula at home
1:09:14
and it's no, it's really not the big thing. Have you ever tried breastfeeding? These are
1:09:17
clearly people that have never breastfed. These are clearly people that have never been married
1:09:21
to somebody that breastfeeds. This is clearly someone that has never dealt with the fact that
1:09:25
they can breastfeed, but they need to supplement with formula or their baby has some sort of an
1:09:29
allergy and they have this very, very specific type of a formula typically expensive that they
1:09:33
have to get for their baby in order their baby to eat. And so now we have CVS's and Walmart's
1:09:38
across the country that are only allowing you to buy two or three deals of your of your powder
1:09:42
formula. We've heard reports of women driving all over states that they live in trying to find
1:09:47
baby formula, but just think about this. They're trying to find food for their child.
1:09:51
I can't feed Elijah Thompson, who's two months old. I can't feed him a steak.
1:09:57
I can't, you know, feed him a pouch, you know, a fruit pouch or something like that. I can't even
1:10:02
give the baby water at this point. That baby has to be fed either by his mother's breast milk or
1:10:07
by formula. Those are the only two options or he dies. This isn't a massive, massive deal. And
1:10:13
just recently we sent $40 billion more over to Ukraine for assistance over there, which
1:10:18
you can debate whether that was a good thing or not. That would have bought a lot of baby formula.
1:10:21
That would have been able to buy a lot of, you know, uptick in production in some of these areas.
1:10:26
But I guess we're just not worried about babies potentially starving in this country. So before
1:10:31
we get off this issue, I do do just want to let you know, put this out on your Facebook, put it out
1:10:35
on your Twitter or something like that. Ask around if there are women in your area that need help
1:10:40
finding baby formula, because the next time you go to CVS or Walgreens or Walmart or something like
1:10:45
that, if you can find the baby formula that a woman in your area needs, buy it and just give
1:10:50
it to her. Don't make her pay you back. Just bless her in that way. I bet you'll be shocked.
1:10:56
If you put that out there on your social media, the amount of people that you'll get to respond.
1:10:59
That's a great easy way to bless people. All right. Next quick hitter here. The FDA is restricting
1:11:04
the J and J C word V word because of life threatening blood clot issues. And I'm just going to ditch
1:11:09
it. I'm going to talk about the COVID vaccine because I can't, you know, talk and code the entire time.
1:11:13
So this is according to CBS News. US regulators on Thursday, that's May 6th, strictly limited
1:11:18
who can receive Johnson and Johnson's COVID-19 vaccine due to the ongoing risk of rare but serious
1:11:23
blood clots. The Food and Drug Administration said the shot should be only given to adults who
1:11:28
cannot receive a different vaccine or specifically request J and J's vaccine. US authorities for
1:11:34
months have recommended that Americans start their COVID-19 vaccination use to use the Pfizer
1:11:38
or Moderna shots instead. FDA officials in the statement said that they decided to restrict J
1:11:43
and J's vaccine after taking another look at the data on the risk of life threatening blood clots
1:11:48
within two weeks of vaccination. J and J's vaccine was initially considered an important
1:11:52
tool in fighting the pandemic because it required only one shot. But the single dose option proved
1:11:57
less effective than two doses of Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. In December, the Centers for Disease
1:12:02
Control and Prevention recommended prioritizing Moderna and Pfizer shots over J and J's because
1:12:06
of its safety issues. Previously, US officials had treated all three vaccines similarly because
1:12:11
they'd each been shown to offer strong protection. So this should be a shock to nobody because this
1:12:17
was a vaccine cycle that was rushed started with the Trump administration and right into the Biden
1:12:22
administration. We shouldn't be shocked that this is happening. The shocking part is that we're
1:12:26
not really finding out about this until now. How many people have died because of vaccines?
1:12:32
How many people have had major, major health issues caused by the vaccine? And these are other
1:12:38
people that would have otherwise been just fine having gotten COVID and gotten over it and gotten
1:12:42
natural immunity. It's a big issue. And right now, there are so many things to distract us from
1:12:47
other stories. You know, we've got the Roe v. Wade stuff. We've got Elon Musk buying Twitter.
1:12:52
We've got the stuff going on Ukraine. All of a sudden, people aren't talking about this anymore.
1:12:55
Dr. Fauci isn't on TV every day talking about this anymore. But it's still a big deal. And
1:13:01
hopefully, it's probably going to take a complete change of Congress and the White House that we
1:13:04
get some invest investigations into what the CDC did during this time. But again, most of these
1:13:09
companies are really all the companies that created this, you know, Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson,
1:13:12
and Johnson, they've been given immunity. And they're not even going to have to post a lot of their
1:13:16
numbers. So in some cases, for decades, but it's something that we do need to keep paying attention
1:13:20
to. All right, we got the last quick hitter here. The CDC has been tracking US citizens,
1:13:24
right? So here's a shock of all shocks. So this is according to Theo Waite at the New York Post.
1:13:28
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention use location data from tens of millions of
1:13:32
Americans phones to track compliance with lockdown orders and vaccination efforts,
1:13:36
according to newly revealed documents. The CDC specifically monitored Americans visits to
1:13:41
churches and schools as well as detailed counts of visits to participating pharmacies for vaccine
1:13:46
monitoring internal documents from the federal agency obtained by vice show. The CDC also reported
1:13:51
tracked people's movements during curfews and visits between neighbors. A controversial data
1:13:57
broker called safe graph initially provided the data to the CDC for free during the outbreak of
1:14:01
the pandemic, the documents show. Then in 2021, the CDC reportedly hatched a deal to pay the company
1:14:07
$420,000 for continued access. The CDC argued that the documents are in the documents that data
1:14:13
from safe graph, which is backed by tech billionaire Peter Teal and Xsadi intelligence chief Turkey
1:14:18
been facile outside among other investors helped the agency deeper and get deeper insights into
1:14:25
the pandemic as it pertains to human behavior. So a lot of people like to talk about privacy and
1:14:31
all those different things. And I think I've been on record before by saying if the government is
1:14:34
spying on me, they're just going to be super bored most of the time. There's not going to be anything
1:14:37
there. But I do think a general idea of privacy and the general lack of privacy is a bad thing.
1:14:42
But the idea of privacy is a good thing. But this should make all of us pretty angry because the CDC
1:14:47
obviously had no authority to do this. It is not their business, whether or not we go to our neighbor's
1:14:53
house, whether or not we go to church, whether or not we defy lockdown orders, that is not their
1:14:58
business. But again, under the Biden administration, it became their business. It became big business
1:15:04
for them. I mean, just think about the amount of palms that got greased from the CDC from these
1:15:10
companies that created the vaccines. And we're in control. Think about all the politicians that
1:15:14
created these lockdowns. Think about the rich people that got way, way, way richer, because all
1:15:19
of a sudden all their mom and pop competition died on the vine because of all these restrictions
1:15:23
and these backouts. It's the same thing that I talked about with the previous quick hitter.
1:15:27
We've got to make sure that there is a full accounting what happened between 2020 and really
1:15:32
until today. And it may not happen very soon. But eventually there's got to be an accounting
1:15:37
of things that have happened because the egregious evils and wrongs that were done to the American
1:15:41
populace and really populations around the globe is horrific. And hopefully we get to the bottom
1:15:45
of it at some point. Now, to wrap up from the top of my podcast, I gave you Matthew 1222,
1:15:51
then a demon-oppressed man who was blind and mute was brought to him brought to Jesus and he
1:15:56
healed him so that the man spoke and saw. So here's the thing. There's a 100% chance that demons
1:16:02
are operating amongst us. Okay, scripture tells us as much. So if you believe in scripture,
1:16:06
you have to believe that. And they are certainly working in this Roe v. Wade issue. And this is
1:16:11
a good time to remind you that we're not alone in this fight. That God is in total and complete
1:16:16
control that his angels are part of that total and complete control. So things are going to get
1:16:23
dark probably this summer, especially if this goes the way that left us hope it doesn't, right?
1:16:28
But we can rest in the fact that God is ultimately in control. Remember that. Do not
1:16:34
forget it. Constantly dwell on it. All right, guys, before we let you go, we are going to do
1:16:37
a quick resilience boost on undaunted life or mission is equipping men to push back darkness
1:16:41
with content that for just spiritual, mental and physical resilience. So I've got a bunch of links
1:16:44
for you today. I've got a link to the undaunted life website where you can go to our shop and
1:16:48
get some of our gear. I've got a link to episode 257 of this podcast called how to engage pro-abortion
1:16:53
arguments. And then I mentioned that article from the Family Research Center, the US abortion law
1:16:57
in comparison to the globe. I've got that here. I've got a link to the Tim Keller tweet thread.
1:17:01
And then I've also got a link to all the stories that I talked about in the quick hitter segment.
1:17:04
All right, guys. Thanks so much for listening to the show. We do appreciate it wherever you're
1:17:07
listening to this. Please subscribe, rate and leave us a positive five star view. If you want to
1:17:11
come speak live at your event or on your podcast, just shoot me an email to info@undaunted.life.
1:17:16
That's I N F O at undaunted.life. You can follow us on Instagram and like us on Facebook and
1:17:20
check out our website for everything else, including how to donate to keep more content like this
1:17:23
coming your way. Just go to www.undaunted.life. And also we want to thank the band August Brins
1:17:28
Red for allowing us to use their music for our content. The music on this podcast is
1:17:32
our song "Cutting the Ties," which is off their 10th anniversary re-recording of their album
1:17:36
leveler. The links are in the description. I'm your host Kyle Thompson. Remember, keep pushing back
1:17:41
darkness, keep forging spiritual, mental and physical resilience, keep seeking the lion of Judah.
1:17:58
The sight you've made yet is a virtue. You are buried void.