← All episodes

From the Senate with MARKWAYNE MULLIN | September 2023 (Ep. 503)

September 22, 2023 22m 18s Full transcript available
From the Senate with MARKWAYNE MULLIN | September 2023 (Ep. 503)
0:00 / 22m 18s
In this episode, Kyle Thompson sits down with Senator Markwayne Mullin to discuss the absurdity of the Senate's dress code changes and the implications of the impeachment inquiry into President Biden. They tackle the importance of respect in leadership and the need for accountability in government.
Transcript
246 segments
0:00 When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed! sponsor
0:05 jobs. It gives your job posts the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with
0:10 the right skills, certifications, and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually
0:15 interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a $75
0:19 sponsor job credit at indeed.com/podcast. That's indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions
0:25 apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed! sponsor jobs.
0:50 This is on Daunted Life. A man's podcast. I'm your host Kyle Thompson. Let's get into
0:57 it. Alright, welcome back to From the Senate with Mark Wayne Mullen. Now Mark Wayne, I
1:00 was going to make fun of you for how you've been threatening me that you've been trying
1:04 to wear my uniform. You were going to wear my uniform on one of these interviews. Did
1:09 you just freeze up? You just froze up. Is that me or is that? I got you. I still got
1:14 you. Are you in the Senate basement? I know you don't have the best Wi-Fi. No, I actually
1:18 have a full Wi-Fi, but you're cutting out. You keep freezing up on me. Well, you were
1:21 in the middle of trying to give me crap, I think? Yeah, well, I was. I was giving you
1:25 crap about your uniform. I was going to steal it from you because you stole the beard. But
1:30 I actually have a V-neck black T-shirt that if I wasn't stuck in my office here in DC,
1:39 I have it literally laying on my bed at my house about three blocks away, but were in
1:44 the middle of a vote series and I couldn't change. Otherwise, I was going to put that
1:46 sucker on. You know what? That sounds like an excuse. I'm not a big guy for excuses,
1:51 but you know what? I will forgive it this one time because that sir is a fantastic full
1:55 Windsor knot. Guys, if you're not watching this on YouTube or Rumble, this guy knows
1:58 how to tie a tie tie. It's not a clip on, is it? No, heck no. It's not a clip on. Come
2:02 on, man. Very good. Okay. All right. So speaking address code, how's that for a segue? So
2:08 apparently, lurch from the Adams family gets special treatment in the United States Senate.
2:14 Now this is John Federman, Democrat from the state of Pennsylvania. So that's kind of been
2:19 making the rounds. There's all these problems going on in America right now, but every news
2:23 story is about the United States Senate changing its dress code because a guy wants to dress
2:27 like a homeless person. Can you please tell me what in the world's going on? That's true.
2:32 Everything you're saying is accurate. Federman, listen, first of all, I'm not a big formal
2:36 person at all. I didn't even own a tie until I knew I was going to win my election for the
2:43 House back in 2013. It just wasn't something I did. I didn't know how to tie a tie. I had
2:49 to learn how to tie this tie. So I did not want to wear a suit. I'm the most casual dresser
2:54 you'll ever find. But you do have to, you do have to have respect for the position. And
2:59 I'll just share this with you. I was complaining one time up here with a group of people. I
3:03 was a guest speaker as early 2013. And it's like complaining of the fact that I had to
3:07 wear a tie. I said, you know, this thing does nothing but, but choke the oxygen off the
3:11 brain to, and that could be part of the problem here in DC. And, and he, he, he let me hear,
3:18 he let me rant for a little bit. And the guy stopped me as an older guy. And he was down
3:22 there. And he said, sir, and I said, just Mark Wayne, he says, no, I, I call you sir
3:26 out of respect for the position and the office you hold. He said, I wore this suit out of
3:31 respect for you today. Not because I like it, because out of respect. And I said there
3:37 and I thought, yeah, that's kicking the pants. And so you, one, you were not a respect for
3:45 the position. Two, no one asked Federman or made Federman run for this position. He chose
3:52 to run for this position. If he doesn't want, there's a thing called he can resign. Because
3:57 there is a certain amount of respect you should hold. I mean, people respect certain things.
4:01 You wouldn't want your surgeon to be walking into the, to the surgical room. We're in, we're
4:07 in hoodies dirty t, dirty dirty t shirt underneath it. And, and, and baggy shorts with, with running
4:15 shoes on saying, Hey, we're about ready to do, you know, open art surgery on you. You
4:20 don't, you don't, you want them to look professional. You want those that individual to be to, to
4:24 represent them well, because they're about to hold their life in your hand. And, and, and
4:29 so there is a, they're in that saying still number three, is that saying, dress the part.
4:34 Yeah. You, you need to dress the part beat. If you want to show up for a, for a desk job,
4:42 on a high rise building, you probably should dress professional like that. And by the way,
4:46 if you have tattoos on your neck, you might want to cover those things up. And, and not
4:51 that I'm against tattoos. I'm not, I'm not exactly tattoo free, but I don't go around
4:56 flauntin them all the time. Um, you know, a guy that tattoos his face and tattoos his
5:01 head, ah, his career path is probably a little bit more narrow. That's his choice. That's
5:06 what he chose to do. But Federman chose to serve up here. And for us to change the policy
5:11 just because of him, because he doesn't feel comfortable wearing a, wearing a hoodie and
5:18 a, and, and, or he doesn't work comfortable wearing a suit. He wants to wear a hoodie
5:22 and, and, and gym shorts. Fine. Guess what you don't have to do. You don't have to come
5:26 to the floor. You can still vote because there's days that I'm flying in. If you ever catch
5:32 me flying, I'm not wearing a suit. I usually have a t-shirt on and during the winter, I
5:36 have a t-shirt with a jacket on. Um, sometimes I have a ball cap on and sometimes your flights
5:42 get delayed. Any of us has flown lately. We understand flights are getting delayed all
5:45 the time now. And so, um, I may have to come straight from the airport straight to that,
5:50 to the, to the chamber to vote. And when I do that, I just simply stand at the door.
5:54 I never walk onto the floor. I just stand at the door and I'll do a thumbs up or a thumbs
5:59 down on my vote. And so nothing prevents him from, from voting. It just prevents him from
6:05 coming to the house floor. And, and for Schumer to do this, I can tell you that even Democrats
6:12 are up in arms by it. I mean, absolutely up in arms by it. Well, I mean, it's a, it's
6:18 kind of an eye roll moment, but you did give me an idea for a tattoo for you. What about
6:23 like a ball, the eagle right on your throat? Like, can you imagine like going into a debate
6:28 or something like that or like a Senate hearing? Yes. And then when I, when I get like, when
6:31 I get mad and I'll do like this, like, you know, the wing spread or maybe the talents
6:36 go out like they can pop out like this. That'd be right. Yeah. Cause like if people don't,
6:41 the people in public don't see your ears, they're going to think maybe I can get over
6:44 one on this guy, but nobody fights. Nobody fights somebody with a throat tattoo. That's
6:49 just somebody that you don't mess with. But let's, let's get into something a little bit.
6:53 I'll probably agree with you because man, that's tender when I shave down there, much
6:56 less getting the tattoo. Yeah. I've got about 50 hours of tattoo work, but it's not coming
7:01 anywhere near my throat. I'm with you on that. So I want to transition to something that's
7:05 less fun to talk about, but still at least newsworthy. So house majority leader, Kevin
7:10 McCarthy has come out and officially announced an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden. You
7:15 would not think that he would announce this inquiry without knowing, kind of having an
7:20 idea where the house would vote on such a thing. Obviously you used to be in that chamber.
7:24 Now you're in the United States Senate, which will have kind of the finals say on this,
7:28 but just give me your read on the inquiry. The evidence that has been seen up to this
7:31 point. Again, the odds of him being convicted in the Senate are essentially zero, even regardless
7:37 of what evidence they find, but what's your read on it right now? Well, let me give you
7:44 the read on it and then tell you what led up to it and then tell you the procedures for
7:47 your listeners what actually takes place. Right. And so the impeachment inquiry, which
7:53 your pronounceant right, because most people say impeachment inquiry, but impeachment
7:57 inquiry is would never have taken place. It would have never taken place yet. If simply
8:03 the Biden family and administration will be transparent with the, with the committees
8:09 that have oversight of this, for instance, ways and means because the IRS with the blurs
8:14 just came through that raised serious questions that we need answers to. We have oversight
8:20 committee that's doing the oversight of it. And we have judiciary, which is looking into
8:24 why these charges were being held up inside the DOJ. And there's, there's a lot of information
8:31 that the Biden family, because the personal bank records so far, there's nine, nine different
8:37 family members that were benefiting from shell companies that were getting money sent
8:42 to him from foreign companies that a lot of times Biden had just left there when he was
8:47 vice president. And so there's a, there's a lot of questions. What was happening was
8:53 is that they were coming through redacted, meaning they would sometimes just give a cover
8:57 sheet and then everything else would be redacted, for instance, financial records, or they just
9:03 pleaded privilege motion where they wouldn't bring it in. What the impeachment inquiry
9:07 does is it prevents them from mowing to it because if they do do that, we'll simply take
9:12 it to a judge and say, Hey, there is an official impeachment inquiry into this individual.
9:19 And we, we're doing our constitutional duties, remember, meaning that we're well within our
9:25 authority. Therefore, they have to release it. And the judge cannot, even if he was appointed
9:30 by Biden, cannot obstruct that because we have the right to do it. So it keeps that
9:37 information flowing. If they can get the information right, then they can move in, then they go
9:42 from the impeachment inquiry into the impeachment process to which they'll move that direction.
9:48 The question is, is what he has done is it impeachable? Remember that threshold is very
9:52 high. It has to be a treason, high crime, misdemeanor, or bribery. Those are the four
10:00 things that they can be impeached from. The other question that you have to ask yourself,
10:05 is it impeachable to be impeached from a current position he's holding if the crime or the situation
10:11 took place, why he was in a different position? I actually, I actually believe that the for
10:19 it order for him to be impeached in the current position he's in as President of the United
10:23 States, that the offense has to take place in his current position. Now, the Constitution
10:30 isn't really sound on that. So we have, we're bringing in counsel to kind of give us a reading.
10:37 So it's my opinion right now though, is things that happen, why he was vice president, things
10:41 that happened while he was out of the office, isn't necessarily impeachable. Now, that doesn't
10:46 mean that what he did as a vice president, and then in the private sector, didn't lead
10:53 to something that he's done as president. So there could be decision making that he made
10:59 that led to this, that there's an email that traces all the way through it. Remember there's
11:03 54, 54 different, there's 50, let me see, there's 54, let me get this right. I'm thinking I may
11:15 be wrong on this, but I think there is, there's a lot of emails I can't remember the number
11:20 route they had, but there was 54 different suit names that he used to identify himself
11:27 in different emails why he was vice president, that the National Archives have already, has
11:32 already identified out of, I forget how many thousands of emails it was, which means he
11:36 obviously was trying to hide something. So, so let's just get all, get past that high
11:41 threshold, very high threshold. One thing that I have told my colleagues on the other
11:46 side, or on the other side of the Capitol and the House still, which are good friends
11:50 of mine, is whatever you do, don't play politics with impeachment, make sure we follow the
11:55 Constitution and whatever you send over, then make sure it's impeachable. Make the Democrats
12:02 played politics with it. And that's why Trump could never get impeached in the Senate. That's
12:07 why they actually didn't hardly even send any time. I mean, the, the, the, the impeachment
12:12 ended about the same time the trial began. I mean, or the hearing ended about the same
12:16 time again, it was just thrown out because that a very weak case. Because once they send
12:20 over the articles on impeachment to the Senate, what immediately takes place is that we as
12:25 senators become the jurors. So now we're just setting listening and the House has to present
12:31 their case. So they basically become the prosecuting attorney. And then the, the president will
12:38 have to have his defense team together. And they, and then we, all hundred of us are the
12:44 jurors. And it's two thirds to convict. So it takes 67 of us to convicting. If they send
12:51 over strong, clear evidence, it's going to be very hard for some of these senators not
13:00 to vote on it. It'll be very, very hard because your mind, remember, this whole thing will
13:04 be televised. And, uh, in the information that I have seen that the House already has,
13:10 it's, it's, um, it's definitely, if he would have been vice president, we would have got
13:17 this information. We could have probably removed him from office. And so now it's just a matter
13:24 of, like I said, what he did as vice president, unless it follows him to the White House,
13:30 uh, I don't know if that's actually mutual. Well, and it seems like there are multiple
13:35 potential constitutional crises on the horizon because this could be happening certainly before
13:41 the general election in 2024. Donald Trump could potentially be convicted and sentenced
13:47 to prison before the election in 2024. And so it's kind of hard to really spit ball about
13:52 that now because these things still have to play out. They have their, they're both going
13:56 to get their days in court as it were. Yeah. Yeah. And so it's fun to play the what ifs.
14:00 I just appreciate you explaining that process in such detail because most people don't even
14:04 know we have a house and a Senate and that they're different, much less knowing the processes
14:08 that happen from one to the other. But speaking, I have teachers all the time that tell me
14:12 they're going to come to the Capitol, Oklahoma City and come see me. Yeah. It literally happened
14:17 this weekend. Someone announced they're running for state Senate and, uh, and I got a, I got
14:22 an email from a teacher saying, is this person running against you? Hey, literally yesterday,
14:30 a good, we'll call him a good friend of mine. They literally mentioned, Hey, I know somebody
14:34 that's running for the US Senate in Oklahoma. And I'm like, I'm pretty sure one guy just
14:39 got elected. And I think the other guys pretty well entrenched like who's running for US Senate.
14:44 Are they, are they trying to primary James Langford? And what it ended up being is this
14:47 person is running for city council, the city that they live in. And I was like, guys, guys,
14:53 you've got to pay attention to the thread. Okay. Yeah. Like I can help you through this,
14:58 but not if you keep acting dumb. But, uh, speaking of Trump and speaking to some of the
15:02 things, obviously he's on the campaign trail. We don't necessarily need to talk about that
15:05 aspect. But there was something that came up on an interview that he did with Meet the
15:09 Press over the weekend where he was pressed on the interview about his ideas on a federal
15:14 abortion ban. So the actual quote was this. Trump said this to Sanctus is willing to sign
15:19 a five week or six week ban. And the interviewer said, would you support that? Do you think
15:24 that goes too far? And Trump said something that, that I believe is egregious. He said,
15:28 I think what he did is a terrible thing and a terrible mistake. So Trump people, I kind
15:34 of his spin team has come out and said, no, no, no, he's saying that that's, that's not
15:38 good for the national electorate. Like what's working in Florida can't work across the country.
15:42 It's different. But again, he said, it's a terrible thing and a terrible mistake. Now
15:46 you were one of his first most prominent people to come out and endorse him before anyone
15:51 else had even gotten into the race. Maybe just him and Nikki Haley. So when you hear him
15:55 say something like that on the campaign trail, uh, I guess what are your thoughts on that?
16:00 Like what do you think he meant? And how do you think the public should respond? I don't,
16:04 I haven't heard anything about it. Uh, so as first I've heard about it, so it's obviously
16:08 not a big deal up here. Uh, I, uh, I have a hard time actually understanding what he
16:14 was meaning, but maybe he was talking specifically about the States as belongs in the States
16:19 hands. There's a whole lot of maybe he didn't think it was maybe he doesn't think there should
16:24 be a, um, a time length on the ban that it should be banned completely. I don't know. There's
16:29 a whole lot of outcomes of that. So I would just say that he would have to clarify that
16:33 himself. But if I were to guess, I would probably say he would, he would lean towards the fact
16:40 that this belongs in the States right now. Okay. So let, let's put Donald Trump aside
16:44 for a second. So just for you individually. So obviously in the state of Oklahoma, we
16:48 have some of the most conservative pro life laws that are on the books in any state in
16:52 the union. So, but from a, a federal point of view, obviously being a federal United States
16:58 representative of the state of Oklahoma. Is there any pro life legislation that you wouldn't
17:04 support or wouldn't get behind? Is there, is there any conceivable thing on the federal
17:07 level? I guess just tell me on the federal level, what you have a stomach for. Well,
17:12 I listen, my fight is a safer baby. I can, um, you know, I tell people everybody, every
17:17 child has a right, uh, to be loved by somebody. And you know, my family history, we have, you
17:23 know, three biological kids and, and, uh, and three adopted kids. Uh, and I truly love
17:30 those kids all the same. There is no difference between any of them. The, and, and I honestly,
17:35 I think God that the, that the biological mothers gave me an opportunity to love these
17:40 kids. They could have easily boarded them, but they, they chose to take the harder path
17:44 probably and, and had the child and then, and then Chris and I get this opportunity. So
17:50 I'll be fighting for life always. I mean, babies and thank God we live in Oklahoma and
17:56 we're saving babies every single day in Oklahoma, but a baby in California and a baby in Massachusetts
18:03 is just as important to me to fight for them. The same. Okay. Very good. Well, I know you
18:09 got a busy schedule today because you're wearing your fancy suit. Now I got one more
18:13 question. Okay. How exactly is it possible that the United States military lost an F 35?
18:21 Now before you answer that, obviously people saw pilot had to eject. It was on autopilot.
18:26 So what the hell was he doing before he ejected to where he had to, you know, go all go crazy
18:31 and ended up in some trees somewhere. But this plane, right over the lifetime of this plane,
18:37 it costs the American taxpayer $1.2 trillion. And for a couple of days, the United States
18:43 military is asking the public, Hey, have y'all seen a fighter jet laying around anywhere?
18:47 Has it landed in your shed? Has it hit your cattle? Like, how exactly does this happen?
18:54 We're asking that question to actually, I'm on seminar services. Right. That's why I asked
19:01 and we are about to go into a briefing on this. That'll be that'll be a briefing I'll
19:07 have. I have to this evening. It'll be classified because that's been a huge topic of us when
19:17 we have our allies that are wanting to buy the F 35. It's the recovery of the F 35 is
19:25 the biggest sticking point because the sensitive technology that we have the most it is absolutely
19:32 the most advanced fighter out there. And the technology cannot fall in the hands of our
19:38 adversaries. We the thing that prevents us from selling it to some of our true allies
19:45 is the fact that they don't have the ability to recover it when it goes down or destroy
19:50 it. Right. I mean, just because it crashes doesn't mean it's destroyed completely, just
19:55 either recover or destroy, meaning that we got to get guys down there ASAP and blow the
20:01 thing up or get it out. And the fact that we lost one, we lost it is inexcusable. So we
20:11 will have that. I don't know if I ever get a share with you what happened, but we have
20:16 already started the oversight of it. Well, don't worry. I'll cut this part out, but you
20:21 can just text me. You know, I know it's classified. It's just kind of like, you know, but that's
20:24 just details like obviously that's just paper. Yeah, I'm sure my phone isn't act. Yeah, that's
20:30 okay. Like it's just paper anyway. Like no one's going to know. Just let me know what
20:33 happened if I accidentally talk about it on the show? It's not your fault. How did I get
20:37 this information? No one knows. But hey, I know you got a busy day ahead of you. I appreciate
20:41 you coming back on. We'll talk to you again here soon. All right. See you brother. Take
20:45 care. Thank you guys so much for listening to this episode. Wherever you're listening
20:48 to this, please subscribe, rate and leave us a positive five star review. If you want
20:52 to come speak alive at your event or on your podcast, shoot me an email to info@undonton.life.
20:57 That's I N F O at undonton.life. Follow us on Instagram and like us on Facebook and check
21:02 out our website for everything else, including how to donate to keep more content like this
21:05 coming your way. Just go to www dot undaunted dot life. And also we want to thank the band
21:10 Holy Name for allowing us to use their music for our content. The music on this podcast
21:15 is our song Perpetua, which is off their self titled debut album on Face Down Records.
21:19 The links are in the description. I'm your host Kyle Thompson. Remember, keep pushing
21:24 back darkness, keep forging spiritual mental and physical resilience. Keep seeking the
21:30 lion of Judah.
Key quotes
2
Markwayne Mullin
You do have to have respect for the position.
Markwayne Mullin
If he doesn't want, there's a thing called he can resign.
Free Resource
31-Day Resilience Reset
If this episode hit, the next 31 days will be the reset. Free PDF, instant download.
START FREE →
Brotherhood
Apply to Dominion
Six pillars. Application only. The men's program Kyle built around the show.
APPLY NOW →
Dig Deeper
Ask the Archive
"Which episodes cover this topic?" Get answers grounded in all 940+ episodes.
START A CHAT →