← All episodes
From the Senate with Mark Wayne Mullen

From the Senate with MARKWAYNE MULLIN | January 2023 (Ep. 420)

January 26, 2023 39m 04s Full transcript available
From the Senate with MARKWAYNE MULLIN | January 2023 (Ep. 420)
0:00 / 39m 04s
In this episode, Kyle Thompson sits down with Senator Mark Wayne Mullen to discuss the political landscape following the recent elections, the challenges facing the GOP, and the importance of energy independence. They dive deep into the reasons behind the disappointing election results and Mullen's legislative efforts to restore America's energy dominance.
Transcript
458 segments
0:00 [MUSIC PLAYING]
0:18 This is Undaunted Life of Man's podcast.
0:21 I'm your host Kyle Thompson.
0:23 Let's get into it.
0:24 All right, guys, I've got to introduce a new segment--
0:26 I guess you can call it a segment or a new type of episode
0:29 that we're going to be doing here on the podcast feed.
0:31 It's going to be called From the Senate with Mark Wayne Mullen.
0:34 And so a lot of you guys became familiar with Mark Wayne
0:36 Mullen last year, because we had him on several times
0:37 to talk about the runoff.
0:39 He was going on against TW Shannon
0:41 for the last Senate seat here in the United States
0:43 for the state of Oklahoma.
0:45 But then we went all the way through the general election.
0:47 And so in November of last year, he
0:48 was elected to the United States Senate,
0:50 representing the state of Oklahoma.
0:52 And then I pitched him on this idea like, OK, well,
0:54 that's cool.
0:54 We had you on a few times to talk about why you should be
0:56 elected and all that type of stuff.
0:58 But when we actually start getting down
1:00 and actually getting to brass tacks and working
1:01 through stuff, I think the people in our audience
1:03 would want to make sure that they're on top of that as well.
1:06 Because in this podcast, we cover faith, culture, and politics.
1:09 And so we don't always do those in perfect symmetry
1:12 or any of those types of things.
1:13 But there's a lot of things that are going on politically
1:16 that are affecting us on a day in and day out basis.
1:18 And I want us to stay in on that.
1:19 So what would you think about coming on once a month,
1:21 20, 30 minutes, and just talk about what's going on legislatively
1:24 and how that's going down?
1:25 He's like, absolutely.
1:26 Before I could even finish the sentence, he's like, absolutely,
1:28 let's do that.
1:28 So that's what we're shooting for.
1:30 So we're essentially going to try to have him on at least once
1:32 a month for a short interview to talk about what's going on,
1:35 currently in the country, what's going on in the Senate,
1:38 and to give us a view from his seat up there-- hey,
1:40 there's only 100 of y'all.
1:41 Like, what exactly is going on in the Senate?
1:43 Now, in this particular episode today,
1:45 we talk about how we were promised a red wave,
1:48 and then we got the red whimper.
1:50 And he gives us his ideas as to kind of why that happened
1:53 and why it went down that way.
1:55 We talk a little bit about the drama that
1:56 went on in his old chamber, the United States House of Representatives,
1:59 with the speaker vote around Kevin McCarthy
2:01 and all the things around that.
2:02 But then we got into some legislation that he's introducing.
2:05 So he's introduced this legislative package.
2:07 That's talking a lot about energy independence
2:09 and us here in the United States,
2:11 and how during the Obama administration,
2:13 some of the things that were done that hurt our energy independence.
2:16 Then in the Trump administration,
2:17 how for the first time ever we became energy independent,
2:20 and a net exporter of energy, and then with Joe Biden,
2:22 we're basically going back to the Obama years.
2:24 But a lot worse.
2:25 And so we dig into all that in this.
2:27 And so guys, you know, if you're a policy wonk,
2:29 or if you're really into the politics stuff,
2:30 you're going to like these monthly sit downs with Mark Wayne Mullen.
2:32 So without further ado, let's get into it.
2:35 Mark Wayne Mullen, welcome back to Undaunted Life of Man's podcast.
2:38 Thanks, brother. You look a little swollen.
2:40 I'm looking at that shirt.
2:40 Either you've got schmetiums, or you've been looking a little bit.
2:43 I both, okay, it is a large.
2:46 All right, I've got X cells in the back as well.
2:47 But yeah, you know, I've been getting after it a little bit.
2:49 But hey, I don't want you to divert away from my initial question,
2:52 which is, do you expect me to call you Senator Mullen now?
2:55 Is that what's happening?
2:56 Or can I just call it an owner?
2:58 This your honor.
2:59 Okay. Okay.
3:02 Mr. All-powerful who is in charge of everything.
3:04 Well, we're going to get right into it because it's been a couple of months
3:07 since we talked.
3:07 I was so glad to see that you made it into the United States.
3:10 And obviously we talked a lot about that at the end of last year.
3:13 But it didn't seem like there were a whole lot of people that came along with you
3:17 because we were promised, you know, this red tsunami.
3:19 And then it was like, okay, maybe a red wave.
3:21 Okay, maybe a red, you know, trickle.
3:23 And then I called it the red whimper.
3:25 So obviously the Democrats kept control of the Senate.
3:28 They actually have a one seat majority.
3:29 They don't even need the tiebreaker vote.
3:31 The Republicans took the United States House representatives by the slimmest of margins.
3:36 And then obviously we still have supposedly a Democrat that is alive and running the White House.
3:41 So let's just talk about what went down because, I mean, I got you to give us a prediction.
3:45 I think you said we were going to end up with about 53 seats for the GOP in the Senate.
3:49 It didn't go that way at all.
3:50 A lot of people have a lot of reasons for it.
3:52 They're like, oh, you know, bad candidate quality or everything was stolen and everything in between.
3:56 So take me through a went down last November.
3:58 And why do you think it shook out the way that it did?
4:00 Well, you know, when we were talking about, I said we had to win the independence.
4:03 And I was very confident we were winning the independence.
4:06 Our polling was showing us that we were in it winning the independence right now.
4:09 Independence for the majority makers.
4:10 And we only have traditionally carried around 26%, 27% of the independent vote since Ross Pro
4:19 was on the ticket.
4:21 And so we had saw the trend break.
4:26 We saw the trend that we were trending well over 50% with independence.
4:30 And in fact, some polls had a society of 70.
4:33 That's where we were looking at that red wave.
4:35 But the independence are a lot of times issue based voters.
4:39 We're Democratic Republican.
4:42 They can deal with some issues they don't like on because they're voting for the party.
4:46 And so it's more on a person that they're voting for.
4:49 So it's kind of finicky there.
4:51 What happened was is a Roe v. Wave abortion pro-life pro-choice
4:56 topic was like number 10, highest poll had it number six, but had it as a very low issue
5:06 because of the court's decision, nothing that Congress did because the court's decision
5:10 basically kicking Roe v. Wave back to the states.
5:13 Well, the Democrats did a very good job of painting us as extremists.
5:17 And we didn't pay them as extremists.
5:19 They came after us, painted us as extremists.
5:21 And the moderate independence and independence left us.
5:30 I mean, when I say moderate independence, the ones in the middle,
5:33 they could go Republican or Democrat and to the left of moderate.
5:37 They left and they didn't come back and vote for Republicans.
5:40 And instead of us getting 50%, which we had to have that to get the percentages up,
5:45 we were tracking back down to where we were at about 27% of the independent vote.
5:50 And we just we lost them literally the week up.
5:53 And there just wasn't was any way to bring them over.
5:55 So I remember saying last summer, whenever Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey
6:01 went the way of the trash bin that that was going to have huge implications for November.
6:05 But then just about every other conservative pundit out there said,
6:08 no, no, no, this isn't a topic. She everyone's worried about inflation and gas and eggs and,
6:12 you know, all these different things.
6:13 And I was like, ah, I would like to think that most people vote with their brains.
6:17 But I know better, like, I know that people vote with their hearts.
6:20 And when you saw the amount of money, the millions and tens of millions of dollars,
6:24 the Democratic Party and the, you know, pro baby murder machine was pouring into ads in these places.
6:29 I mean, again, we saw the writing on the wall on Kansas when it's like,
6:32 even Kansas were convinced that if a woman had an ectopic pregnancy that she wasn't going to be
6:36 able to get treatment because Roe v. Wade was overturned, which is complete hogwash and has no,
6:41 you know, bearing in reality. So I knew that that would be an issue. But obviously,
6:45 I think candidate quality did come have an issue as well because when you had certain candidates,
6:50 and we'll leave some of them nameless, but there were some prominent candidates that was like,
6:53 is this the best your state come up with on the GOP side? I think that had an impact as well,
6:58 don't you think? Well, not well, in most cases, maybe, but member Federman got elected in Pennsylvania.
7:05 Because Democrats will vote for anybody. So candidate quality doesn't make any difference.
7:10 Republicans will vote for Republican. A Democrat will vote for a Democrat.
7:14 Independence are where the swings are. And at the end of the day, you still got to run your own
7:18 election. It's kind of like a primary at that point, right? A primary, you're all trying to
7:23 get the same voter. And you just got to say your message differently. And you got to be more
7:27 likable. You got to have a great smile or something. I don't know. I would have lost if I had to
7:32 worry about the great smile. But I'm just I'm just saying that it's it really comes down to the
7:36 candidate and be able to articulate the message. We always are going to get out spent. You know,
7:42 we're never going to build a deal with and match dollars for George Soros or or Bloomberg or the
7:50 super PACs that'll put in millions and millions of dollars into a race. We're just we're just we
7:55 don't have that kind of money on the Republican side. But it's up to us to get the message out.
8:01 It's up to us to run our effective campaign. So anybody can talk about whatever they want to
8:05 about candidate, but that candidate won the primary. And so at that point, they are the Republican
8:14 candidate. And then it is that candidates responsibility to go speak the message to bring
8:20 over those moderates or those or those independents. And and we just didn't sell that. I'll tell you
8:28 in in in in in in Georgia with Herschel Walker, you know, I spent a lot of time down there campaigning
8:35 with him. I was down there four different times. And and we just we just got beat on the campaign.
8:45 Quite frankly, money wasn't the issue down there. There was more money thrown at that race and
8:49 there are then there used to be presidential races in one state. So money was complete absolute
8:55 saturation, but they ran a better campaign than Herschel Walker's team ran. And and I was there
9:03 two weeks out. And then I was there the week of the election. And I came back and told my wife,
9:10 I said, I don't think we're gonna win it. His commercials weren't very good. He wasn't coming
9:14 across right. He wasn't responding the way you need to. Now Herschel is a great guy, great candidate.
9:18 It was his campaign that was running the team, but ultimately Herschel's the CEO of the campaign
9:23 just like I'm the CEO of the campaign. But I don't think he had he had the right people around him
9:29 and and he got out spent. You start looking at what happened in Pennsylvania. I mean, Oz,
9:34 if you sit on top of that guy, he's phenomenal. He's a he's a great guy. But the message that he
9:43 needed to get out didn't get out. And what is that message? I don't know. That's up to the
9:48 candidate knowing his state, knowing what message he has to give to bring over those
9:53 individuals. I know this. There's a big difference between running a primary race, Kyle, and running
9:58 a general race. Your message to some degree has to change. And if you alienate everybody and you're
10:05 you're casting an us in them projection or mentality, it is not an us or them. You got to get them to
10:14 come over and vote for you. And so if you're chastising the individuals that you want to come
10:18 vote for you all the time and tell them how bad they are, then that's probably not going to work.
10:22 But if you're able to kill a vision of what you're going to do for them, regardless they're a
10:26 Democrat, because this is what we're going to do for our country, then that's a different message
10:31 that needs to be told. And sometimes in these general elections, we got a we got an us and them
10:36 mentality, which doesn't work in generals. When you need to build up your team to handle the
10:40 growing chaos at work, use Indeed sponsored jobs. It gives your job posts the boost it needs to be
10:46 seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications, and more. Spend less time searching
10:51 and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show
10:56 will get a $75 sponsor job credit at indeed.com/podcast. That's indeed.com/podcast terms and
11:03 conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed sponsored jobs.
11:08 Well, and you use the word message a lot there. And so I think that was the other thing. So
11:12 right now, you're in the United States Senate and you're in the minority, but the how or the
11:16 chamber that you left, the United States House of Representatives is now in the majority for the GOP.
11:21 What some people are looking at, some Republicans or conservatives are looking at is they're wondering
11:25 what exactly is the message of the Republican Party? What exactly are the things that we can
11:31 all coalesce around and come around because that is going to affect how you will operate in the
11:36 minority in the Senate and how you're brethren over in the House is going to mean operate in the
11:41 majority. So I guess what would you say in general? Because we thought it was going to be easy enough
11:45 to be like, well, the message is just like everything that Biden's doing, we want to do the opposite of
11:49 that, which with how bad things were going, you know, for the first two years of his presidency,
11:53 that's not a bad message. But then whenever the red wave didn't happen and we're kind of sitting
11:58 in the position we are now, it's like, okay, well, what is that message? Because we got to have
12:02 something clear before we get to 2024, regardless of who's representing the party.
12:06 Well, you hit the nail on the head. Everything that he's done has been bad.
12:11 And let's talk about good. So let's talk a river opposite of that. But first of all,
12:15 before you start giving the message, you got to quit fighting with yourselves.
12:18 And inside the Republican Party, we had this term called a rhino. And I sit there and I look
12:26 at it and, you know, a Republican in disguise, essentially, is that what you're saying? And I
12:31 get that some of these individuals, I mean, Liz Cheney, she wasn't a Republican. She wasn't even
12:36 a rhino. She had no choice of being cut. She shouldn't be called a rhino even. And I'd say the same
12:41 thing about Kinzinger. But you start looking at some of these more moderate Republicans, because
12:45 understand not every Republican comes from Oklahoma. Some come from California, New York,
12:52 and those individuals are much different than what we are. That's why our representatives have
12:56 individuals that represent our backyard. I don't care what Republican you are,
13:02 mind you, minus Liz Cheney and Kinzinger, you, Adam Kinzinger, you have to pull that out and say
13:09 they're better than the Democrats. So what our message right now is unification. We got to unify
13:14 our party. We got to quit fighting with each other. And there are some people on the Senate side
13:20 and on the House side that that's how they get their message out by showing contrast,
13:25 regardless of his contrast with a Republican or contrast with a Democrat. Our fight isn't with
13:33 ourselves. Our fight is against the Democrats that's trying to move us to a socialist country.
13:39 And we have to realize that and understand that we need to set our differences aside. We've already
13:44 had our conversation around the table. Our table was during primaries. We had our conversation
13:51 during the primary. Whoever won, we need to come out. Our second time around the table was over
13:56 leadership. I get that people have their feelings about McConnell. I have my feelings. Everybody
14:02 has their feelings about McCarthy. I have my feelings about McCarthy too. But they're the leaders
14:09 right now. And they're the coach. They're making the play calls. And they won an election. And so
14:16 we have to quit fighting with each other and understand, okay, where's our fight? Our fight is
14:21 defend against Biden and this left takeover of the United States and trying to move us to a
14:28 socialist country. That has to be our message. Our message is about freedom. Our message is about
14:35 independence. Our message is about economy. And those things have to be brought to the forefront
14:42 every single day and quit fighting with each other. So let's talk about the infighting a little bit
14:46 because I remember texting you whenever we were on the 84th vote for who was ever going to be the
14:51 speaker of the House of Representatives, all this craziness I was going on with Kevin McCarthy.
14:55 And I just got to be honest, as someone who likes this stuff that likes the political stuff and
15:00 I've been caught, you know, watching C span from time to time, even I was bored with it. I was like,
15:04 this is ridiculous. Like literally, I just paid $6 for carton of eggs. And here we are like fighting
15:10 about this and the other thing. I didn't really understand it. And I know that you've gone on
15:14 the record, but I don't know if everyone in my audience knows. But if you were still in the House
15:17 of Representatives, what would you have done? So I guess, you know, what did you think about all
15:21 the drama around who's going to be elected speaker? And then if you had still been there, where would
15:24 you have voted? I would 100% have been with Kevin every step of the way. But everyone that every
15:30 one that opposed him knew he was going to end up being speaker. Why? Because no one else was
15:34 challenging him. And that was evident on the second ballot when everybody pulled away from Andy Biggs.
15:40 Andy Biggs had no chance of winning. And then they went to Byron Donaldson. Byron had no chance
15:46 of winning. And then they just went all over the place. They went to Donald Trump. They went to
15:49 Kevin Hearn. They went to Jim Jordan. They went to Donaldson. They went, I mean, they voted for
15:56 everybody but Newt Gingrich. I mean, it was just, it was so absurd. And they all knew the only
16:02 person that there was going to be leader, be speaker of the Republican Party and at the House
16:08 was going to be Kevin McCarthy. So it was mainly, it was for show. Now they'll go out and they'll
16:13 tell they got rules changes. Okay, they got rules changes. Let's talk about one of them. One of them
16:17 was okay. I agree with one of them, but we could have easily done that anyways with a debt-silling
16:22 increase, a debt-silling increase. Before you have a debt-silling increase, you got to have a minimum
16:26 of a 2% cut across the board. Okay, that could have easily been accepted because the old cut was
16:32 10%. So they actually went backwards from what it was because we're used to having, we couldn't
16:38 have a budget and we couldn't have a debt-silling that immediately 10% cut across the board would
16:42 go into effect. So they negotiated 2%. Now, let's talk about the speaker being able to vacate to
16:53 chair. Why was that removed to begin with? Because they call this the Jefferson rule. Why was it
16:59 removed to begin with? Because it did exist for 200 plus years, but then the Democrats started
17:05 abusing that when Boehner was in office and they were trying to vacate the chair because remember,
17:10 it's not a Republican that can do it. It's a Democrat that can do it too. And so they can
17:15 keep us fighting every day if they wanted to because any Democrat can walk in there,
17:19 file a privilege resolution to vacate the chair and require Kevin McCarthy to get 218
17:26 more people on the floor to vote for him. And it throws the whole, the whole thing into disarray.
17:32 We had never done that. We didn't do that. But they did that to us. That's why that rule was
17:38 taken out. And it was taken out not by the Republican conference. It was taken out by Pelosi because
17:44 Pelosi didn't want that happening to her. And then they talk about the amendment process.
17:48 It has an open amendment there once again. The reason why we pulled that away because when Paul
17:54 Ryan was speaker, what was going on is every time we had tried to bring a bill to the floor,
18:00 the Democrats would come there because it's an open rule amendment. They would come to the floor
18:04 and they would file 160 amendments. And they would have anything to do with the bill. They would just,
18:11 they would just jam the floor where we couldn't do anything because they were trying to keep
18:15 Trump from getting anything accomplished. So what we did is we said, okay, it's got to go
18:20 through rules now. And it's got to be made germane to the bill. If it's made germane to the bill,
18:24 then it can come to the floor. But if it's not too, if it's not specific for the bill,
18:29 then it's not going to be this open rule process. So we can get out of this. We still had hundreds
18:33 and hundreds and hundreds of amendment votes. But we, we kept it from where they flooded the floor
18:39 at the minute they walked onto the to it. So it was an orderly process. Well, they tout their
18:43 head that they got the, they opened the bills back up. I told my assessor, the guy who took my spot,
18:49 I told him, I said, these two big changes that you're touting about the open amendment process
18:55 and the speaker, I will, I will be willing to say by the time this Congress is done,
19:00 those rules are going to be changed. And so you fought for all these votes, you, you drug the
19:05 Republican Party through the mud, knowing when you first cast your no vote that you're going to
19:10 eventually vote for Kevin McCarthy anyways, for nothing. It was just for show. And I remind people
19:16 up here all the time, Kyle, that people in this business will hurt you a lot to gain themselves
19:24 a little. And that was an opportunity for them to get a little notoriety. That was all that was.
19:29 Yeah. I mean, to be honest with you, if, if I had watched that situation and seen something
19:35 substantive change, I would have been like, okay, that was worth it. But it seemed like drama for
19:39 the sake of drama. It seemed like they were trying to steal t shirts and trying to raise money,
19:42 which, you know, it was dubious. I didn't really like it. Well, Matt Gaetz, Matt Gaetz is the,
19:47 Matt Gaetz is who Matt Gaetz is. But he's the absolute worst showman. He his portray of what he
19:54 is and what he really is, is two totally different people. I mean, he, he brags all the time on the
19:58 floor that he's going to sell catheters every time he goes on TV. He doesn't believe what he says.
20:02 It's just he's a showman. And he's an actor. And that's what he does. There's a reason why no one
20:07 came out and defended Matt Gaetz when he was accused of sleeping with underage people because
20:12 all of us were like, yeah, we could seem doing that. I'm not saying he did it. I'm just saying
20:16 that there's a reason why someone accused me of that or accused McCarthy of that or Jason Smith of
20:21 that or Dan Crenshaw that we'd all be like, heck no, that didn't happen. Why? Because we know him.
20:27 We know that wouldn't take that wouldn't take place. You didn't see anybody out there defending Matt.
20:31 But let's talk about Matt. Matt went out there and threw a fit for no other reason other than
20:35 he wanted to have the last word. He wanted to become the central of the story. He wanted to be
20:41 known because every since this whole thing about this underage girl came out about him,
20:46 he wasn't getting the same publicity that he used to have. And let me tell you, Matt's a great
20:51 he's great at articulating his message. He can actually deliver a message. Well,
20:56 but the great example of this is when they were calling row call votes and he just sat there.
21:02 Why did he sat there? Because he wanted to be the last person to come in for Kevin. He wanted it to
21:10 be all about Kevin. That's why they all ran over to him and he knew the TVs were going to be on him
21:15 because Matt Gaetz has been called early on. He sat there when they called his name and didn't
21:20 answer. So purposely the clerk would have to come back to him at the end of it knowing that it would
21:27 be his vote because he knew how close it was. He knew it was going to be one vote. One decision
21:32 would have to be overturned. He knew that going into it. So what did he do? He sat there. Made
21:38 everybody come over there, made the conversation all to be about him knowing at one o'clock in the
21:42 morning, all every new station around is going to be covering Kevin McCarthy talking to Matt Gaetz.
21:48 And then when he turned around and Kevin did one more, he finally did exactly what Matt Gaetz
21:55 knew he was going to do. And he was going to be the person that was going to be all over new. So he
22:01 could be asked the question, why did you change your vote? And it was nothing but for sure.
22:07 When I could tell that he wasn't serious about the process, whenever he
22:11 whenever he suggested that Donald Trump be nominated for Speaker of the House, it was like,
22:15 okay, that's cute. If you're running a TikTok account, but not if you're representing, you know,
22:20 a district in the United States House representative. So, you know, it was just crazy process and
22:24 ridiculous. I don't know. I don't know how many different people that Matt Gaetz voted for. But I,
22:29 but I would go back and find it. I've been he voted for at least four different people.
22:35 And then he voted present at the end. That just shows that they had no real challenge. That's
22:38 why I said it was never a real challenge. Everybody there knew that Kevin McCarthy was going to be
22:45 speaker. It was just a matter of time. It was just a matter of time. How many votes this was going to
22:50 go through before that took place. But we knew he was going to be speaker. Yeah. And it's kind of
22:55 one of those things. It's at the very least, if you take him seriously, it's like, wait, did
22:58 your mind change four times with all these different people that you voted for? It wouldn't make me
23:02 feel very good if I were in his district. But I do want to talk a little bit about actual
23:06 legislation because again, you will be legislating from the minority. But one thing that is very
23:10 important to you and also to your constituents here in Oklahoma is energy independence because
23:15 during the Trump administration, we were energy independent. We were a net exporter of energy.
23:20 And there's things that that you are ramping up to do from from your seat to where you're
23:24 introducing these legislative packages to really protect American energy. So I just want to tee
23:28 you up to talk a little bit more about that. Sure. So first of all, you can't talk about the economy
23:33 and you can't talk about inflation and it's serious about bringing it under control, bringing the economy
23:37 back under control and bringing inflation down unless you're talking about energy. Energy is the
23:41 backbone of every economy without reliable and affordable energy. You can have a reliable and
23:46 affordable economy. You can't make a product and you can't deliver a product without energy.
23:51 And a lot of times that product itself is made out of energy, meaning like petroleum,
23:56 like the shirt t-shirt you have on right now probably has a petroleum based product in it.
24:01 That Mike you're speaking through is a plastic. It's a petroleum based product. So you can't talk
24:07 about anything when it concerns goods, products, or the economy without talking about energy.
24:16 So when you start doing, when you start talking about that, what brought us to this point? Well,
24:20 let's look at the federal lands alone. Federal lands alone, just federal production that's these
24:27 are acres of land that was deemed drillable. That this has been drillable since, I mean,
24:33 you can go back to Obama or you can go back to Clinton or you can go back to Jimmy Carter.
24:37 Some of this land has been open for drilling for that long. They have cut just under the
24:42 Biden administration in the last two years has cut a million barrels per day production
24:49 from being produced out of public lands. Now, contrast that with what Trump is doing,
24:57 we were exporting almost that amount per day. When Trump was in office, when we had low energy
25:04 cost. So why is it that energy now is being a political ploy? It's because AOC and the environmental
25:11 ist movement has made it that. So we need to take it out of hands of Washington DC. Washington DC
25:16 is good at one thing and it's plain politics. And politics is speaking to your base, regardless
25:22 of what the truth is, it's going to speak to your base. We have not curved one bit of appetite for
25:28 petroleum products since Biden has been in. In fact, our appetite has increased for petroleum
25:32 products since Biden's been in office. And we're making it up by still importing to this day
25:37 Russian petroleum products and crude oil. We're still importing at record numbers now
25:45 at the highest levels we've had in years importing oil from the OPEC cartel and asking Venezuela
25:52 to help us out too when we don't have to. But it's because of politics because day one,
25:57 what did Biden do? Biden canceled the Keystone pipeline. If he went and canceled the Keystone
26:02 pipeline today, we would be refining 800,000 barrels per day coming from Canada and North Dakota
26:10 products, refining it today, probably down in Houston. That alone would eliminate our need
26:16 for Russian oil and gas. Gas meaning petroleum gas, not natural gas. So we're saying the first
26:24 of all, the first bill is the cross border act, where we take the federal permitting process
26:30 of the cross border, which is a presidential permit, we take it out of the president's hands.
26:35 We say since you're going to play politics in it, which by the way, what investor would now invest
26:40 on on infrastructure, be it a gas or pipeline or a petroleum or crude oil pipeline or even
26:48 our power lines coming across. Why would they apply for that permit knowing that one president
26:55 could reverse that the next day after billions of dollars have been invested in it. And they went
27:00 through all the processing of getting us of doing all the studies that needed to be done,
27:05 and they come back good and you go through all the litigation, which is what happened to Keystone
27:08 pipeline. These are dollars invested in it. And with a stroke of a pin, Biden canceled it
27:14 for no other reason. So we're saying sit you're playing politics with it, take it out of your hands.
27:18 Let's put it in DOE Department of Energy. And let's put it into FERC's hands who handles that
27:24 and allowed them to do the process of the permitting process. That doesn't that doesn't mean the
27:29 government's not involved in it. That is saying that we're not going to allow one person to make
27:33 that decision who's who's who's getting elected. And he's speaking to the to one party rather than
27:39 the well of the country. So we're going to we're going to put that in those in the proper agencies
27:45 hands to handle that. And then we start talking about FERC or not fracking. I mean, fracking
27:50 was a renaissance that put us as being allowing us to be net exporters underneath Trump. We became
27:57 energy independent for the first time ever because of fracking. Fracking wasn't discovered by some
28:04 federal program. Fracking was discovered on the way they do it. I mean, fracking has been taking
28:09 place for a long time, but I'm talking about vertical or horizontal fracking, not the vertical
28:14 fracking. That has been put in place because of the the ingenuity and the engineers for independent
28:24 oil producers, mainly continental resources, who really brought it to the forefront. Harold
28:28 Hamm, who developed this into the technology it is today, he dealt with the states for permitting
28:34 for fracking. Well, today, the federal government is trying to say we need to control all permitting
28:38 for fracking, which is absolutely ridiculous. They shouldn't. It's always been in the hands of the
28:44 state and these are staying the hands of the state. And if California doesn't want for what they don't
28:49 want to go after the resources underneath their feet, then fine. Then you had the rolling black
28:53 outs and you had the highest gas prices in the nation, you deal with that. But that shouldn't
28:59 affect Oklahoma because Oklahoma is going to do it. So we're going to say, Oklahoma, allow the states
29:04 to make that decisions for themselves set up some faceless bureaucrat in Washington, D.C.
29:09 when you got to remember 96% of the individuals walking around in Washington, D.C. that work
29:14 of these agencies voted for Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton. That doesn't represent the rest of the
29:20 United States. So we're saying put it back in the states. And then the other thing is the federal
29:24 lands. As I spoke when I first started, the federal lands act, which the Biden administration
29:30 has attacked and we're producing, they have literally eliminated over a million acres that,
29:38 I'm sorry, it's 100 million acres. Thanks 113 million acres. They have eliminated out of production,
29:42 which is a million barrels per day, which they have eliminated. And we're saying, if you're not
29:48 going to manage it correctly, then once again, that land actually is part of the state that
29:53 that resides in. So that state should make that decision for themselves. No one wants cleaner parks,
30:01 no one wants a cleaner stream of water than those that live by it and right when in it.
30:06 So who would be best to make that decision for the environment? Who would be best to make that
30:12 decision for that public land? It's the people using that. And that's typically the people in
30:17 that state. So they once again should be putting in that we're not saying don't don't have oversight,
30:22 we're just saying put it, take it out of the hands of Washington DC and put it closer to the people,
30:26 which is what we're doing here with these three bills. So we don't have very much time left here.
30:31 Obviously, being in the minority, you've got an uphill battle here, but kind of give us an idea
30:36 of what are the realistic chances of any of these going through and becoming law? Well, keep in mind,
30:41 call the Senate is the is a voice of the minority. So in the Senate, you have a lot of ability to work
30:48 and keep in mind too. In the Senate, you take like or in the house, you take AOC or Jerry Nadler,
30:54 Jerry Nadler represents a subway stop and AOC represents like four blocks. When I was in the
31:01 house representative, I represented a third of the state. When you're in the Senate, you represent
31:06 the entire state. So you're not dealing with just a small snap picture of just this one group of
31:13 blocks of apartments. You're dealing with the whole state. So New York City is quite different
31:17 than upper New York and the politics is different. So when you start talking about energy and these
31:23 individuals that they don't agree with what's happening in New York City, they vote for a Republican
31:30 congressman up in the upper part of the state. You take the congressman from there and they have
31:34 to or a senator from there and they have to take that into consideration. And so it's a much broader
31:41 look at the where they're at and what they're supporting. So when you when we're having conversations
31:48 about inflation and we're having conversations about the economy, there's a better chance that I
31:54 can get something like this past in the Senate than I ever could in the house. Okay, well, do you
31:59 have an idea in terms of timeline, like when when this is going to be officially introduced,
32:03 when it could potentially be voted on and we introduced it already this week.
32:06 But unfortunately, Chuck Schumer hasn't gave us the ratios of the committees and without the
32:11 ratio of the committees, the committees can't be formed. And so until we can get into the committee
32:16 and start working it, we we don't know. I would I would this is going to this could be something
32:20 that can move fast about it will because it'll be debated forever. But it this is going to be a
32:26 process that we're going to try to get accomplished, you know, hopefully within a year. But who knows?
32:32 Well, it's good to see that you're not just sitting on your laurels now that you're all
32:36 important and excited. You're in like the most exclusive fraternity on the planet.
32:39 There are less senators than our people with Heisman's, you know what I mean? So that's a very,
32:43 very cool thing. But man, we're happy to have you on happy to have you on in this regular thing,
32:47 because we'll be able to check back in on some of these pieces of legislation. But that's all for
32:51 me. Is there anything else you want to get off your chest? No, I'm good, Kyle. Thanks for having me
32:54 on. Mark Wayne Mullen. Thank you for coming back on the Don to Life Man's podcast.
32:57 There you go, guys. I hope you enjoyed my time with Mark Wayne Mullen. But before we let you go,
33:00 we are going to do a quick resilience boost. Adam Don to life, our mission is equipping men to
33:04 push back darkness with content that forges spiritual mental and physical resilience. So I've
33:07 got a link to Mark Wayne Mullen's website, but I've also got a link to the exclusive Fox news story
33:12 where he talks about his energy policies that we talked about on this interview.
33:15 Thank you guys for listening to this episode. Wherever you're listening to this, please subscribe,
33:19 rate and leave us a positive five star review. If you want to come speak live at your event or on
33:23 your podcast, you shoot me an email to info@andontin.life. That's i-n-f-o@andontin.life. Follow us on Instagram and
33:30 like us on Facebook and check out our website for everything else, including how to donate to
33:33 keep more content like this coming your way. Just go to www.andontin.life. And as always,
33:38 we want to thank the band August Burns Red for allowing us to use their music for our content.
33:42 The music on this podcast is our song, Cutting the Tides, which is off their 10th anniversary
33:45 re-recording of their album Leveler. The links are in the description.
33:48 I'm your host Kyle Thompson. Remember, keep pushing back darkness,
33:54 keep forging spiritual, mental and physical resilience, keep seeking the Lion of Judah.
34:24 [Music]
Key quotes
2
Mark Wayne Mullen
Our fight is against the Democrats that's trying to move us to a socialist country.
Mark Wayne Mullen
You can't talk about the economy and you can't talk about inflation and it's serious about bringing it under control, bringing the economy back under control and bringing inflation down unless you're talking about energy.
Free Resource
31-Day Resilience Reset
If this episode hit, the next 31 days will be the reset. Free PDF, instant download.
START FREE →
Brotherhood
Apply to Dominion
Six pillars. Application only. The men's program Kyle built around the show.
APPLY NOW →
Dig Deeper
Ask the Archive
"Which episodes cover this topic?" Get answers grounded in all 940+ episodes.
START A CHAT →