← All episodes

DAVID McCLOSKEY | CIA Spycraft and Fixing Plot Holes (Ep. 573)

February 29, 2024 1h 17m Full transcript available
DAVID McCLOSKEY | CIA Spycraft and Fixing Plot Holes (Ep. 573)
0:00 / 1h 17m
In this episode, Kyle Thompson sits down with former CIA analyst David McCloskey to discuss his transition from intelligence work to novel writing. They dive into the realities of CIA operations, the misconceptions surrounding espionage, and the challenges of crafting compelling narratives in his latest book, 'Moscow X.'
Transcript
1168 segments
0:00 Flowing ad bunted on metrics that look great till the CFO sees them, that's bullspend.
0:05 And marketers are calling it out in dashboard confessions.
0:09 I remember telling my boss, it'll be good for the brand when leads were slow.
0:15 Yeah, it wasn't.
0:17 Cut the bullspend.
0:18 LinkedIn lets you target by company, job title, and more.
0:21 Advertise on LinkedIn.
0:23 Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit go to linkedin.com/campaign
0:27 terms and conditions apply.
0:50 This is Undaunted Life Man's podcast.
0:53 I'm your host Kyle Thompson.
0:55 Let's get into it.
0:56 All right, guys, we've got a special guest on the podcast today.
0:58 His name is David McCloskey.
1:00 So he is a former CIA analyst and while at the CIA, he worked in field stations across
1:05 the Middle East and he even briefed senior White House officials and Arab royalty.
1:09 But then he transitioned at 1.2 become a novelist, which is what he does now.
1:13 So he's the author of two novels and he has a third one coming out later this year, but
1:16 his novels are Damascus station and his new book that I have right here called Moscow
1:20 X.
1:21 And so the fun thing about this conversation is it reminded me a lot of the conversations
1:25 I've had with Greg Hurwitz who was on a few weeks ago.
1:29 And it's because of Greg Hurwitz that David and I even know each other because Greg was
1:33 doing a book tour last year.
1:35 So this would have been 2023 and one of the stops was in Dallas.
1:38 I went down there to hang out with Greg Hurwitz, but then, you know, a group of us went out
1:41 to dinner afterwards and David was one of the guys that was at dinner.
1:45 And so he and I kind of struck up a nice conversation about him and his family and the stuff that
1:48 he used to do and that he's a writer and he's like, yeah, whenever I have a new book coming
1:52 out, my second novel is coming out.
1:53 We should talk about it.
1:54 That's what this conversation is today.
1:56 And so we talk about his background, his education, kind of what led him to the CIA, some common
2:01 misreceptions about what it looks like to actually work for the CIA.
2:04 But I did ask him about, you know, black ops, things that happened that happened clandestinely
2:11 that maybe we aren't aware of like how much of that is true.
2:13 We talked about kind of the deep state, whether or not the CIA is actually spying on Americans.
2:17 I asked him a question about what's going on at the southern border and whether or not
2:20 we as a federal government or as, you know, federal law enforcement agencies, if we have
2:23 any idea what's coming over the border and kind of what their intentions are, but then
2:27 we talk about his transition into being a novelist, like what happens whenever he kind
2:31 of like had to burn the ships and say, no, I need to treat this job of writing as my
2:36 full time gig.
2:37 If I'm going to be successful doing this and the amount of research that goes in the amount
2:40 of editing, we talk about some misperceptions about the whole publishing world.
2:43 And then we talk about Moscow X and kind of where the interest came from Russia, but he
2:47 was just very open and honest about some of his failings as a writer, some of the things
2:51 that he did where it's like, no, we got to scrap this entire thing and start over, but
2:55 then also just his entire approach to the whole thing.
2:57 But we weaved in and out of a bunch of different topics.
2:59 I really, really enjoyed my time with them.
3:01 So I'm not going to keep him from you any longer.
3:02 So without further ado, let's get into it.
3:05 David McCloskey.
3:06 Welcome to the life of man's podcast.
3:08 Hey, thanks, Kyle, great to be here.
3:11 Now the last time you and I were together, we were having a delicious meal in the Dallas
3:15 area.
3:16 We were both there because Greg Hurwitz is a mutual buddy of ours.
3:19 And so we were at a table, we were kind of chit chatting.
3:21 Now do you remember the main takeaway I gave you from our conversation?
3:26 I said, hey, David, you need to start doing this one thing.
3:30 Do you remember what that one thing was?
3:32 I do.
3:33 I do remember.
3:34 And I will tell you that when I woke up this morning, I knew not only was this going to
3:41 be the first question that my answer was going to be deeply disappointing to you.
3:46 Well, how about you give everyone the background?
3:48 I've prepared for it.
3:50 Okay.
3:51 We, Greg Hurwitz, you know, exceptional writer, slightly above average human being, came
3:59 through Dallas, Texas for his book tour last year.
4:03 You and I had not met.
4:04 We're sitting at a table at dinner talking.
4:07 And at some point it comes up that I am considering taking my then seven year old to jujitsu.
4:14 Yeah.
4:15 Okay. Or actually, you know what, I think the conversation started broader than that.
4:20 It was just kind of like we were, I don't know if we're talking about just kind of self-defense
4:23 or what, but we got to, you were like, you know, a real sort of evangelist for taking
4:31 him to jujitsu lessons.
4:33 Yeah.
4:34 And, and I left that dinner pretty fired up about it.
4:38 And it, it literally did not happen.
4:41 There's a better, there's a good news story with my son and his athleticism and getting
4:47 involved using his body this year, but it's not, it's not jujitsu.
4:52 So I, when I literally, when I woke up this morning thinking about this talk that we were
4:55 going to have, I was like, man, Kyle's going to be, he's going to look like he does right
4:59 now.
5:00 He's going to be shaking.
5:01 Well, well, this could be the shortest interview in the history of undaunted life in this podcast.
5:05 Because I am furious from the beginning, but I will just say, since I am an evangelist
5:11 for all the benefits of jujitsu, not just with self-defense, but bodily, you know, mentally,
5:17 all those different things, that is an open invitation to you to any time you want to,
5:23 but not just for your son, but also for you.
5:26 Because you know, we were sitting there, we're looking around the restaurant.
5:28 It's like, Hey man, how many of these people do you think know how to fight?
5:31 And the answer is like, if they don't train, the answer is freaking none of them.
5:34 None of these losers know how to fight.
5:36 And so that's the thing.
5:37 We will move past that.
5:38 I will move beyond my disappointment.
5:39 And I will be the bigger man, obviously, David.
5:43 And I appreciate that.
5:44 I do need that.
5:45 I need you to be the bigger man here in this case.
5:47 So where you live, you've got a lot of good schools there.
5:50 It's going to be good for you.
5:51 I will keep bringing that up, but we need to get into what we're going to be talking
5:54 about today.
5:55 But before we get into the new book, we kind of have to set up your background because
5:58 that really leads into what we're going to be talking about.
6:01 So you worked for the CIA.
6:03 Now here's the thing.
6:04 When somebody works for the CIA, two things automatically come up.
6:07 They're like, oh, that job sounds really, really awesome, or oh, that job sounds really,
6:10 really boring.
6:11 It just depends on what your background is.
6:13 But what I want to know is what in your background, David, or what in your education
6:18 led you to the CIA because I don't remember the CIA being at the job fair in my high school.
6:23 Well, you know what, it was actually, it wasn't a full-on job fair, but the guy who
6:31 ran what was then the Middle East, like kind of analytic division at CIA showed up on my
6:37 college campus when I was 19.
6:39 He was an alum, and he was coming through the Chicago land area to do recruiting at
6:45 so much bigger schools, but he came by campus because, you know, he'd gone to my little
6:49 school.
6:50 It's called Wheaton College outside of Chicago.
6:53 And you know, it was one of those things where at the time, right, I'm 19, I had literally
7:01 just finished like my previous, you know, employment experience was I had been digging
7:06 holes for a sprinkler system company the prior summer, and I'm like, I'm at the same time,
7:13 and I'm studying international relations.
7:15 My mom's horrified by this because, you know, she's like, you're never going to get a job,
7:18 you know.
7:19 So I'm thinking at this time, like, because of the whole digging on the resume, I probably
7:25 won't get in, but, you know, I'll apply and kind of see what happens.
7:31 So it was this very organic, like, I hadn't planned on this.
7:35 I hadn't put myself in this situation, but this guy came, spoke to our class, they took
7:39 resumes, I put mine in, and I ended up getting, you know, an offer to become an undergraduate
7:48 intern at the Central Intelligence Agency.
7:50 So that's how that's how I got in.
7:52 Okay.
7:53 So you became an intern, but then you eventually became an analyst, correct?
7:59 That's right.
8:00 Yeah.
8:01 Okay.
8:02 So I was an analyst.
8:03 So what in the world does a CIA analyst actually do?
8:06 All right, so here's, I think, the best way to think about it, because so much of what,
8:13 so much of the lens for the CIA, as you're suggesting right up front, is like Hollywood
8:19 crazy stuff, or, you know, leaks to a newspaper, conspiracy theories, most of which are not
8:27 true, but some are.
8:29 You know, so everyone ends up with this pretty, like, distorted view of, like, the actual
8:34 day-to-day work of the agency, right?
8:36 The best way I could describe the job to you is it was like clandestine journalism.
8:42 Okay.
8:43 So it's like, I am a, imagine me as a reporter, and I've got a whole bunch of different sources.
8:51 I've got a question I'm trying to answer, right?
8:53 And I'm writing an article for somebody who needs to make a decision, right?
9:00 I'm not making a decision about foreign or defense policy, but I'm writing something
9:03 for the president who ostensibly will.
9:07 And there's an important topic, you know, I worked on Syria.
9:10 So let's say, like, we're writing about what's going to happen in the Syrian civil war, right?
9:15 Broad questions, but really important.
9:17 I'm using a whole bunch of different sources to answer that question.
9:21 I'm using human sources, some of whom have, you know, literally provided us with stolen
9:24 secrets from the Syrian government.
9:26 I'm using satellite imagery.
9:27 I'm using signals intercepts, you know, phone calls, text messages, emails, faxes, whatever.
9:33 I'm using anything available in the open source.
9:35 I'm using reporting from our embassy.
9:38 And I'm writing the answer to that question.
9:41 And I'm backing that up with verifiable facts to explain why I'm saying what I'm saying.
9:48 And so it's very, it's very similar to the way a journalist would write a story and then
9:52 put it out in a paper you're thinking about, you know, how do I, how do I know what I know?
9:57 How do I articulate the argument that I'm trying to articulate?
10:01 And how do you do it in a really clear, ideally, you know, apolitical, non-value-laden, fact-based
10:07 way so someone gets the best possible information?
10:10 That was the job.
10:11 Hey, guys.
10:12 Real quick.
10:13 If you're anything like me, you are constantly on the lookout for high quality products that
10:16 are actually made here in America by American hands.
10:19 The problem is that a lot of American companies have outsourced their labor overseas, so it's
10:24 an American company, but it's supporting people that don't live here.
10:27 So I've always went to partner with an American company that prioritizes America, American
10:31 workers, and making all of their materials here in this country.
10:35 That's why I want to remind you that we are partnered with Origin.
10:38 Origin is an apparel company based in Maine, and they are focused on getting as much manufacturing
10:43 back to the United States as they can possibly do.
10:46 What do they make?
10:47 They make the best Jiu-Jitsu geese on the planet, and these are the only Jiu-Jitsu geese that
10:51 are made completely in America.
10:53 They also make jeans, yes, they're stretchy and awesome.
10:56 They also make amazing hunting gear, and I know you guys love your kuyu and your sicca,
11:00 but those companies use overseas labor, and they don't do that to help you guys out.
11:04 They do that to increase their profit margins.
11:07 Origin also makes boots and work boots, and yes, that does include steel toe boots, and
11:11 in the fall of last year, they launched a line of everyday clothing, their Versa pants
11:14 or their everyday pants, and they are just especially phenomenal.
11:17 They also make other outdoor clothes and workout clothes, and they're launching new apparel
11:21 stuff all the time.
11:22 If you haven't already, you need to check them out and support a company that supports
11:26 America and America's workers.
11:29 Try Origin out today by going to www.originusa.com.
11:34 That's originusa.com.
11:36 Use the promo code undaunted to get 10% off of your order.
11:39 Okay, so just even in your answer there, David, you were able to dispel some of the common
11:51 misperceptions about the job within the CIA, but obviously you've had a discussion with
11:55 a lot of people before about the fact that you did work with the CIA.
11:58 It's obviously not a secret, but what are some of the most common misperceptions that
12:03 you hear about people that just work at the CIA in general and any one of the different
12:08 branches or divisions?
12:09 Yeah, well, I mean, there would be a whole bunch of misconceptions that I might group
12:18 underneath this category of superhero spies, right?
12:22 So there would be ideas that there's a lot of car chases, that there's a lot of action,
12:29 that there's a lot of shooting, that most of what a CIA officer and typically in the sort
12:35 of superhero land, they would call them agents, which is totally incorrect.
12:38 The agent is the foreigner who's providing the information.
12:42 The CIA officer is the one, you know, typically the American who works for the CIA who's collecting
12:47 the information.
12:48 You know, there'd be this view that, yeah, there's a lot of, that it feels, the day to
12:54 day feels a lot more kind of like an action movie.
12:56 I mean, I think everyone would sort of understand that movies and movies, so that's not really
12:59 how it is.
13:00 Because that's the lens, you'd have this sense of, oh, the CIA is operating and doing
13:06 this kind of work inside the United States of America, right?
13:09 That'd be another one, not true.
13:13 So that would be a big category as well.
13:16 I think, you know, related to that one would be this idea that the CIA is like super efficient
13:24 and that it's not a massive, you know, that like, you know, it's, there's a lot of high
13:29 tech stuff and that the headquarters is slick and communications, you know, pretty simple
13:36 and the tech always works and the CIA is really kind of omniscient in this telling when,
13:42 you know, the flip side of the agency, which does do a lot of really interesting, very
13:45 cool work and really exceptional work, you know, is that it's a massive government bureaucracy.
13:50 And so you think about any big bureaucracy, like they sort of, they have similar dysfunction,
13:56 right?
13:57 That would be another kind of, I think, theme of misperception about the agency is that
14:03 it doesn't really behave like a big bloated organization when, in fact, like anyone, anyone
14:08 listed to this who works at a big, you know, inside a big organization or who has worked
14:12 with a big organization would be able to immediately understand some of the problems with, you
14:18 know, too many layers of people, confusion around roles, lots of meetings and emails,
14:25 people sitting in front of desks, like all that's happening to.
14:29 What's funny about that is every time I see a depiction of like the CIA or the FBI on the
14:33 television show, we're in a movie and they have like super modern open floor plan offices
14:40 and all these like really sexy looking things is like, guys, this isn't happening like in
14:44 Silicon Valley, like this is, this is in Langley or this is somewhere like that, like these
14:48 are, have you ever been to an old government building?
14:51 It probably looks a lot like that, but you mentioned something kind of earlier about how,
14:55 you know, a lot of these things we think are happening here on our soil aren't, but you
14:59 know, a lot has been made about the quote unquote deep state.
15:02 Now that is kind of using a political parlance about the deep state being, you know, against
15:07 Trump or against this person or creating all of these, you know, false flag operations,
15:12 but then obviously we see agencies like the CIA saying, yeah, we're not spying on Americans
15:17 only to find out later, it's like, oh yeah, of course they are like, they're spying literally
15:21 on just about everybody at all times.
15:23 So give me your perspective on that because obviously you got to see it from the inside
15:27 and some of us are just taking, you know, our cues from our favorite, you know, conservative
15:30 podcasts or something like that.
15:32 But it does seem like there are, there are certainly operations going on in America involving
15:38 American citizens that that don't seem to be on the up and up in terms of what we hear
15:43 at a press conference, if it's fair to say it that way.
15:47 Well, I think, I think getting down a couple levels deeper into what's really happening
15:56 would probably be helpful because the CIA, there's, there's a series of executive orders.
16:04 So you rewind the CIA is created in 1947, right?
16:08 It is essentially sort of the president's black bag outfit for the first few decades
16:13 of its of its existence.
16:15 It is not a well bureaucratized institutionalized thing.
16:20 There really isn't a lot of congressional oversight.
16:23 There isn't a great sense of its actual budget, right, which which is still sort of a problem
16:28 but is much more of a problem in the 50s and 60s.
16:31 It's a new organization fighting the Cold War and trying to figure out the rules of the
16:38 road and in many respects, I think, doing a very poor job, right?
16:42 So that that age, that world of that agency, I think, colors a lot of the way we think
16:49 about it today, even, right?
16:51 Because a lot of the kind of more conspiratorial stuff comes out of that period and in fact
16:56 was true, right?
16:57 So I just offer that as some general context.
16:59 I think you zoom forward, the CIA is being, and in particular, its relationship with American
17:08 citizens is being governed by a series of executive orders that prohibit the CIA.
17:17 And these go back to like the 70s and 80s, early 80s.
17:22 And the most important one is executive order 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, which prohibits the CIA from
17:33 spying on Americans and from using Americans in intelligence operations unwittingly, right?
17:45 So the agency maintains bases and stations across the United States under what's called
17:52 NR division, national resources division.
17:55 So the agency has a presence throughout the United States outside of Langley.
18:01 Now what those bases and stations are focused on doing, for the most part, is actually foreign
18:08 intelligence collection on non-American, you know, on foreigners who are here in the United
18:14 States who might have some kind of value in terms of the knowledge that they have.
18:20 The CIA does use Americans in intelligence operations, but that is pretty much always
18:28 exclusively done with that person having actually volunteered to participate.
18:34 So a great example would be like a business, like someone who is a scene, you know, at
18:39 a high level of, and I'm making this up, of an international oil and gas firm that's
18:44 based in the United States that does business in, you know, the Persian Gulf, they might
18:49 return from having met individuals in that area and actually agree to be debriefed, you
18:56 know, by CIA.
18:58 But the kind of broad, you know, the concept of the CIA working to collect information
19:04 on Americans or to influence American sort of public opinion, thought, elections, whatever
19:10 it might be, you know, is just simply not true.
19:14 Like any time we're trying to put together a covert influence campaign to sway the hearts
19:20 and minds of foreign citizens, right, there's a tremendous amount of obstacles to putting
19:27 that kind of thing together from a legal standpoint, because you have to demonstrate that whatever
19:31 you're doing isn't going to get back into the sort of media atmosphere in the United
19:36 States, as you can imagine, is, you know, really, really challenging to do.
19:42 So I just, I'm going to shut up there, but I think the idea that the agency is spying
19:47 on you, you know, is pretty much patently false and is highly illegal in pretty much all its
19:54 forms here in the United States.
19:55 Well, you don't need to shut up.
19:57 I have more questions.
19:58 We're going to dig even deeper.
19:59 Okay.
20:00 Yeah, no, it's funny because you mentioned, you know, the first part, but what was it
20:03 called before the CIA?
20:04 It was like the OSS or something like that.
20:06 OSS.
20:07 Yeah.
20:08 Yeah.
20:09 The war time espionage outfit.
20:10 Yeah.
20:11 Yeah.
20:12 I remember Greg Hurwitz mentioning that because he's like whenever they were trying to recruit
20:13 for that, it's like, hey, we need someone with the PhD that can win a bar fight.
20:15 And so that was kind of like what it was there at the beginning.
20:17 And then, you know, the bar fighters and the PhDers kind of started to split off there
20:21 at some point, but there, there, there have to be, because I do know some people personally
20:26 that we're kind of in this field, there are kind of black ops groups.
20:30 There are kind of books that are, or groups that are, you know, somewhat off the books,
20:34 I guess you could say, to do those clandestine operations typically in other countries.
20:40 Again, it's kind of a hard question, David, because it's like, there's what you were
20:45 exposed to.
20:46 There's what, there's what's hearsay, then there's what's depicted in popular culture.
20:50 And it's everybody thinks Jason Bourne, right?
20:52 So Jason Bourne had to shoot this nameless, faceless person, and then he was in the program.
20:56 And then you have something like Orphan X, right?
20:58 From Greg Hurwitz, and it's like that type of thing.
21:01 We just, it's like we want that to be true, because it seems awesome, except for the fact
21:06 that that's a movie, guys, like that's exciting.
21:09 Do we really want people shooting random strangers to become a part of a, of an off-the-books
21:13 black ops type of program within the government?
21:16 I don't know that you actually want that, but talk to me a little bit about that, about
21:19 the fact that it's kind of like, it's the ugly truth that we need people doing nasty
21:24 things around the globe to protect us here on the homeland.
21:27 Where's that just, you know, a bumper sticker slogan that I bought into?
21:30 No, I think, you know, look, for my description of the CIA's clandestine journalism, which
21:36 is the bread and butter work of the CIA is, you know, stealing secrets from foreign governments
21:43 and entities, and then, you know, basically producing a classified, you know, newspaper
21:50 that goes to the president and other people around them that, that enables them to make
21:54 the best possible decisions, like, that is the, the primary function of the CIA.
21:58 However, the CIA has in the most common piece of this, it's, it used to be called the Special
22:04 Activities Division.
22:05 It's now called the Special Activities Center.
22:07 It sits inside, at least, I think, you know, as the last time I saw an org chart, it sits
22:13 inside the director of operations.
22:15 That group has, you know, ground branch, air branch, maritime branch.
22:20 These are, you know, officers who are typically kind of pulled from the military, you know,
22:26 tier one groups, like, to essentially conduct covert, I mean, to implement, I guess, what
22:35 would typically be, you know, an element of a covert action finding that would require
22:41 the use of something resembling military force, but that is being done under the auspices
22:48 of the Central Intelligence Agency, right, because we want the ability, as a government,
22:53 to deny that we did such a thing or to mask our role in that operation, right?
23:02 The CIA does that, right?
23:04 I mean, and that was a, that was a big part of our work throughout the war on terror in
23:10 war zones, like in Iraq and Afghanistan throughout the broader, you know, sort of Middle East,
23:14 like, that is definitely a piece of what the CIA does, but that kind of covert action sliver,
23:21 which tends to get a lot of attention, right, because it is fundamentally interesting.
23:26 I mean, it's why it's the subject of all these, you know, novels and films.
23:31 It's not, you know, you think about the market share of sort of, you know, the espionage
23:35 business, it's a smaller sliver of the work.
23:40 Okay, let's talk about something before we move on to kind of how you transitioned out
23:43 of that type of work.
23:44 Obviously, there's a lot being made about what's going on at the southern border here
23:48 in the United States.
23:49 For all intents and purposes, it's porous.
23:51 We literally have thousands of people streaming across the southern border every single day.
23:55 And now people that don't pay any attention, they just assume it's Mexican nationals that
23:59 are coming across the border, which there certainly is that.
24:01 But there are people coming from all over Central America, all over South America.
24:05 And then as my senator here in state of Oklahoma, James Langford pointed out to Congress last
24:09 year in a calendar year, we encountered at the border, just the people that we encountered
24:14 that we knew came across the border from every single country in the world, including ones
24:20 that are, you know, spoken enemies of us, that would be Iran or Syria or Eritrea or
24:25 North Korea or China or Russia or any of these types of places.
24:29 We encountered these people at the southern border.
24:31 Now here recently, I forget the guy's name, but there was a known terrorist who actually
24:34 went to prison somewhere in the world for terrorist operations for like a decade.
24:40 And there was video of him on the Texas side of the southern border.
24:44 And people are asking like, Hey, who are you?
24:46 And he's like, you're all going to know who I am soon.
24:49 And so as an American, as an American with a wife and children and, you know, willing
24:53 to fight and die and kill for to protect them and the people that I love, there is this worry
24:59 about people coming across the southern border and us as Americans having no freaking idea
25:04 who they are and what they want to do while they're here.
25:06 And then you hear these grumblings about Islamist from fundamentalist terrorists coming over
25:11 here and they come over here individually, but then there are parts of what are called
25:15 sleeper cells.
25:16 So these are groups of people that are here in this country for the most part illegally
25:21 that want to do damage to American people, American infrastructure, the government, just
25:26 the overall piece of the country.
25:28 So from your experience within the CIA or this may be the FBI as well or who the heck
25:34 knows what other organizations, how can we rest easy knowing that, Hey, the federal government
25:39 knows these people are here.
25:41 We're watching them.
25:42 We got eyes on them.
25:43 Right.
25:44 Like we know what they're doing.
25:45 Like I think about the TV show, Homeland, one of the best TV shows maybe ever made, but
25:49 like there were different sleeper cell options to where it's like, look, these these groups
25:53 weren't completely unknown to the federal government.
25:57 They were just being watched before they tried to carry out whatever attack they're doing.
26:01 So there's a question in there somewhere, David, you're smart enough to find it.
26:04 So ready to go.
26:05 Well, let me, so let me say, make a couple of statements.
26:10 I think both of these things are, both these things are true, right?
26:14 It is, it is true that we can and should be doing far more to actually make that border
26:20 less porous.
26:21 Right.
26:22 It make it impermeable, but you can do a heck of a lot more than we're doing now.
26:28 And we are a country with borders, with sovereignty.
26:33 Like this should not be tangled up in our political dysfunction to make it harder to
26:40 come across illegally full stop.
26:42 We should be doing more.
26:43 We can be doing more, right?
26:46 It is also true that having a very porous border makes it easier for people who wish
26:54 to do us harm to get into this country, although they are an infinite, hasfully small number
26:59 of the people who adventure across the damage that they could potentially do is significant.
27:06 And we should be doing a far better job of preventing it, you know, making it harder
27:12 to come in illegally.
27:14 The third point I would make is just that I think from a, the standpoint of thinking
27:19 about the risk that terrorism poses to us, you know, terrorism is, it's a very interesting
27:28 psychological thing because you were far more likely to die on a motorcycle, you were far
27:36 more likely to die in a car accident, you were, I think, far more likely to die like
27:41 in your own bathtub than you are to be the subject or the victim of any kind of terrorist
27:47 violence, particularly inside the United States.
27:51 So I think that's just, you know, just encourage everyone listening to this to kind of, let's
27:54 frame this appropriately, like this isn't, there are plenty of instances of people coming
28:01 into this country who wish to do us harm, they tend to get a tremendously outsized viewing
28:07 in the media because it is like terrifying, right?
28:12 And because it's sensational, it's sensational, like the greatest impact of these kind of
28:20 attacks tends to be in the reaction to them, not even just in the, it's a tragedy of course
28:25 when it happens, but not even just in the body count of what occurs in the attack.
28:32 But you know, there are enough examples of these things where you say like, yeah, it
28:36 is just returning to that second point, like this is a risk, you know, I mean the Iranians
28:42 have attempted to use drug cartels to bring people into the country to conduct hits, you
28:49 know, on like Saudis here.
28:51 So this isn't a figment of the imagination or a sort of theoretical concept, like, you
29:00 know, it makes sense if you are an adversary who wishes us harm or wishes to conduct operations
29:07 here that having having a border that's crossable with relative ease makes makes those operations
29:14 easier.
29:15 Yeah, certainly believe that and you know, I even heard a briefing here recently saying
29:20 that, you know, a lot of people in Congress are being briefed about an imminent threat
29:23 to the homeland.
29:24 And one of my more macabre predictions for 2024 is, you know, obviously it's going to
29:28 be crazy with the election, but I was like, unfortunately, I think that there will be
29:31 a major terrorist attack on American soil.
29:33 And so you can't ever actually predict these things like we don't know if it's going to
29:36 be a 9/11 style or what type of thing, but it's like, it wouldn't be a crazy thing at
29:41 this point to assume something like that will happen.
29:45 But for you, David, at some point you decided, Hey, I don't want to be Jason Bourne anymore.
29:49 I don't want to be going around the country killing all these people and you know, leaving
29:52 a leaving a trail of bodies and nothing else, you decided you didn't want to be that guy
29:56 anymore.
29:57 It's tiring.
29:58 Yeah.
29:59 It's too much.
30:00 It's too much.
30:01 Too many weapons.
30:02 Too much fun.
30:03 So you decide that you want to transition out.
30:05 So how did you come to that decision and what did you move towards?
30:08 Yeah.
30:09 So I got into a point where I wanted, you know, I had been doing, I've been working at the
30:21 agency really my entire real professional life after the whole digging summer at that point.
30:27 And I thought I would like to see something else.
30:32 I had gotten to a point where I was kind of on this cusp of like feeling as though if
30:38 I keep going, I'm going to be here forever.
30:42 And I just felt something inside me like I got to see what else is out there.
30:48 And my wife and I also sort of corresponded with us really wanting to get out of the
30:54 DC area and frankly go somewhere that's more normal and we threw now, you know, your listeners
31:01 can debate whether Dallas, Texas meets those criteria.
31:04 I would argue that it is more normal than the Washington, DC matter.
31:08 It's kind of like Texas.
31:10 It's sort of Texas.
31:12 It's sort of Texas, yes, and we're doing a very poor job convincing anyone here that
31:17 we're Texans to begin with, but we, you know, so those two things kind of smashed together.
31:23 And I thought, you know, let's just, let's, let's go try something else.
31:27 So I, I left and we moved to Dallas.
31:31 I took a job, you know, God help me and don't hold it against me working for a consulting
31:37 firm here in, here in Dallas and did that for a number of years and sort of as I was considering,
31:47 well, I'll rewind actually there were, there was a three month period in between leaving
31:51 the CIA and joining this consulting firm, where I sat down and just kind of started
31:55 to write.
31:56 And it was very unstructured.
31:58 It was like I'm just kind of writing my experiences of working on and living in Syria, which is
32:02 primarily what I did when I was at the agency.
32:05 I mean, you know, that the civil war that was going on there was, was, had shattered the
32:10 place.
32:11 And I was really kind of just working through what I had worked on and seen and lived through.
32:17 And then I started this job right and I kind of put all that stuff aside and just became
32:22 a, became a consultant for a number of years, which was both good and bad and then had the
32:27 opportunity about five years ago to dust off those pages and to get back to the writing.
32:34 And so that just kind of started this process of, you know, writing, writing these books,
32:40 which is what I do now.
32:42 And so what kind of consulting were you doing?
32:45 So I was a, what's called a management consultant, okay, which, you know, in the kind of, I
32:52 mean, the, the, the dark view is just doing layoffs and stuff, which is actually very little
32:57 of what I did.
32:58 Mostly it was trying to working with clients who are basically like, Hey, I have a, I have
33:01 a particular business problem, like I'm thinking about launching this new product, or I want
33:04 to move into this market, like helping them think about that decision and putting facts
33:12 the behind, you know, behind that decisions that they can make the best possible ones.
33:16 It was actually very similar in many respects to what I was doing at the CI, just for business.
33:20 Okay.
33:21 So as you mentioned, you're, you're now a writer full time, but at some point with something
33:25 like that, that's not a traditional job.
33:27 It's not your normal nine to five, you know, wear your suit and don't make any trouble type
33:30 of job.
33:31 At some point, you have to burn the ships.
33:33 You have to say, this is what I do now.
33:35 I am a writer.
33:37 And for most people that have a career in writing, they're not giving a whole bunch of money
33:41 up front to ensure that they stick with it.
33:43 You know what I mean?
33:44 At some point there's a burn the ships at risk.
33:45 So can you take us through what that was like?
33:48 Yeah.
33:49 So it felt that way, you know, I talked about if you bring the ships jumping off the dock,
33:55 like whatever analogy you want to use, but you know, it's how it felt to me.
34:00 So I, I had written the first book, De Massa Station, and it was four or five months from
34:10 coming out.
34:12 And I was starting to tinker around with a second one.
34:16 And I was doing the consulting work too, and seeing these two things in collision with one
34:23 another for the first time of like, if I want to do this, if I want to write another book,
34:28 if I want to go out and promote my writing so that it could, I can sell more books and
34:34 keep the thing going, I can't do this 70, 80 hour a week consulting job.
34:40 Like they hit this point where they became mutually exclusive to one another.
34:45 And I felt like, I felt like when I sat down, talked about it with my wife, prayed about
34:55 it.
34:56 Like it was, if I didn't move forward with the writing, I was going to look back in five
35:03 or 10 years with just deep, deep regret that I hadn't pursued it.
35:09 Because at that point, you know, there's sort of, there's a first book coming out.
35:11 It feels like, hey, there's a wave I'm catching here.
35:15 And if I just sort of don't get on that and ride that wave, I don't, is it going to come
35:23 again?
35:24 I don't know.
35:25 Like be like, and I just sort of felt called pushed, you know, to do it.
35:31 And, and I felt like, you know, if I leave this job and the writing stuff just crashes
35:36 and burns.
35:37 I can, I can, I can come back, maybe I could go find something else to do, but this writing
35:43 wave felt pretty unique.
35:44 And so it, but it did it was, you know, it was scary.
35:47 I mean, you're going from a job where, you know, there's, there's pretty good pay and
35:52 like, you know, health insurance and all this kind of stuff and like going into this world
35:58 of writing, which, which also is sort of bizarre because your day to day is kind of unstructured,
36:04 right?
36:05 Like, you might feel a sort of like, you know, it's not like all of a sudden there's five
36:09 or six hours of like phone calls and zooms and like structure to it.
36:13 It's like the whole calendar is blank.
36:15 It's kind of like what you make of it.
36:17 Like, do you get your words done that day?
36:19 Right.
36:20 It's not someone else.
36:21 It's not someone else's fault.
36:22 If you don't get them done, like you've got to get them done.
36:23 Like how do you set up the whole architecture for your business?
36:25 Like no one's, no one's pushing you to do that stuff.
36:28 Like you got to do it.
36:29 You know, so that's, that's been really fun, but it's also, you know, terrifying too.
36:33 Well, it's, it's an eat what you kill environment.
36:35 And I mean, my first job out of college was a hundred percent commissioned job.
36:39 And so I've just kind of been living in that.
36:41 And because people love the idea of freedom, the idea of waking up and doing whatever they
36:45 want to do, the idea of, Oh, my kid doesn't feel well today.
36:48 I don't need to move my entire life and ask somebody's permission to take care of my kid
36:53 or ask someone's permission to go and do this thing.
36:55 But the level of responsibility that you have just goes through the roof.
36:59 It goes absolutely through the roof because you can't basically stop, stop the train once
37:03 you get on it.
37:04 And again, if, if you don't work that day, you don't make money.
37:07 And so, um, so let's, let's talk about you and let's talk about the, the writing process.
37:13 Because whenever you do a book like Damascus station or the new book Moscow X, there seems
37:18 to be a lot of research that has to go into it while you're writing.
37:22 Now I, I know at least somewhat about some people's process.
37:26 There are people that are basically, uh, I guess they're writing processors.
37:30 So as they're writing, they are processing what needs to happen to the character or to
37:35 the scene or to the narrative.
37:37 And then that's the direction their research goes.
37:39 Then you have other people that do just months and months and months of research before
37:44 they put the first word of, you know, the prologue down.
37:48 Um, so what, what's kind of your process or I guess what was your process with Damascus
37:53 station?
37:54 Was it, hey, I've already kind of written this stuff and now I just need to make characters
37:57 that are, you know, vaguely interesting or what does that look like?
38:02 So I'm a, um, I'm kind of in that former camp right of people who need to figure out the
38:11 story as they write it.
38:13 So I don't, and I've experimented with outlines, but I've not found them to be useful for me.
38:18 And I don't, I don't use them.
38:20 And I eventually abandoned, I put together an outline for Damascus station, abandoned it.
38:25 I put together an outline for Moscow X, abandoned it like within days of starting to write.
38:30 So I'm like, I'm like, why am I doing this?
38:31 This is, you know, this is a complete waste of my time.
38:34 I just need to get into it.
38:36 And I have felt, um, you know, it's, it's interesting.
38:39 The way I'm wired, there's a tent, I'll have a tendency to think about like, okay, maybe
38:45 it'd be better, I sit down at eight 30 instead of actually having to get into the scene and
38:51 write it.
38:53 Maybe I'll, I'll try to read a book or read a set of articles that help me do research
38:57 for the scene.
38:58 Or maybe I'll want to go talk to somebody who knows something about like, I wrote a scene
39:04 a couple of days ago for book that involves safe cracking.
39:06 And I've got a contact who's a safe cracker and I'm like, well, maybe I should call him
39:12 to kind of talk through the mechanics of how this, how this would work in reality to get
39:17 through this type of lock.
39:19 That kind of stuff, it's all necessary.
39:21 But for me, I actually find there's a little voice in my head as I'm thinking about doing
39:25 any of that stuff.
39:26 It's like, you're putting off the words, like you're putting off the hard work of actually
39:30 sitting down with a blank page and coming up with or manufacturing or being open to the
39:36 story presenting itself, depending on how you sort of see things.
39:40 And so what I have tended to try to do is for the first draft, very little research,
39:48 only what's absolutely necessary.
39:51 And I just try to write every day between two and three thousand words, get the thing
39:55 down on paper.
39:57 And then I sort of look at that when it's all done.
39:59 And that first draft is typically 150, 160,000 words, way longer than an actual book.
40:06 And it's hard to overstate this, it sucks, it really is bad.
40:13 But that is the, it's not even a story, it's like all the different, if you were cooking
40:21 a meal, it's not even like me cooking a bad meal, it's like me putting all the ingredients
40:27 out on the counter and being like, okay, what am I going to do?
40:30 What are we really going to make tonight?
40:33 And that is an emotionally exhausting part of the process, at least for me, because you're
40:40 from whole cloth, finding characters and storylines and trying to figure out how you, you know,
40:47 sort of the emotional spine of the book.
40:50 But then once you have that, then it's like, all right, I've got to go and have the conversation
40:55 with the safe cracker because I don't want to write a scene where, you know, like where
41:01 I sprinkle pixie dust over it to show how they get into the safe.
41:05 Like there's an actual reality to safe cracking.
41:08 So then I go and have the conversation with, with Charlie and, or, you know, I read over
41:12 here in my shelf, like, you know, I read my next book is focused on Israel, Iran, like
41:17 I'll, you know, read 10 books on Iran, right?
41:19 So there's, there's a process, but I try to put that off to actually, you know, as long
41:24 as I can to get the story down on paper burst.
41:27 And that's a very intuitive process.
41:29 I don't, I don't outline it.
41:32 I just write what feels like it needs to come out.
41:34 I really appreciate how you put that because you, you basically took any semblance of sexy
41:38 out of that process.
41:39 Cause like one of my good buddies, Joe B. Martin, he says his dad gave him the wisdom.
41:43 Like at one point in his life, he said, look, you don't wake up and go to fun.
41:46 You go to work.
41:47 And so if you have one of these sexier jobs, like you do actually have to do the work because
41:51 a lot of guys in my audience are Jack Carr fans.
41:53 And so they see Jack Carr on Instagram to see all the cool stuff he does.
41:56 So he's going on Joe Rogan, it's like, you guys realize he had to sit down every single
42:00 day for months on end and put pen to paper to create that narrative that you just listened
42:05 to in 12 hours at two times speed to get this entire narrative.
42:09 Like that came from somewhere.
42:11 It's the same thing.
42:12 Like when I see people, they will binge watch season one of a television show that just came
42:16 out two days ago.
42:17 And then they're like, well, when season two coming out, it's like your Jack wagon.
42:22 It took like a thousand people three years to get you that 10 hours worth of entertainment.
42:27 Can you chill out for a little bit?
42:29 But I guess my next question, David would be at what point, and I guess this could get
42:33 into misperceptions of the publishing world.
42:36 So maybe combine these two at what point do you let the writing go?
42:41 So you've written it, you've rewritten it, you've edited it, you've connected a point
42:46 from chapter three with a point from chapter 14.
42:49 And you just feel like I'm done.
42:52 I'm going to send this off.
42:53 And frankly, people don't even understand the publishing world.
42:56 They don't understand what that looks like.
42:57 They think you write the world's perfect novel.
43:00 You give it to an editor who corrects comma splices and verb tensing.
43:04 And then, you know, it just comes out a few months later.
43:07 So kind of move all that together to give us an idea what that looks like for you.
43:11 So I'll give you the bottom line up front is that for me, that is somewhere around 10
43:21 graphs, typically.
43:24 And what that looks like is the first draft, big honking thing, plot holes you could drive
43:33 a train through, terrible pros, you know, weird, like, you know, the chronology of it
43:41 doesn't make sense.
43:43 But there's bits and pieces that really work and the beginnings of the kind of story.
43:48 So that's like draft one.
43:50 And I typically try to get there from the moment I started, I try to get there within
43:56 four to six months.
43:58 Okay.
43:59 And then you put that down for a little bit.
44:03 You might actually pause you real quick.
44:05 I got to ask this before I forget because I know you're smart enough to pick right back
44:08 up.
44:09 So you mentioned plot holes.
44:10 Okay.
44:11 So I feel like a moron when I go to IMDB and I look up, you know, the stuff, because if
44:18 you go to IMDB internet movie database and you plug in your favorite movie, and then
44:22 there are, there's like a section that says like problems or mistakes or something like
44:26 that.
44:27 And so it could be like, you know, a period piece that said a thousand years ago.
44:30 And yet there's a Starbucks cup that's like in one scene on accident kind of a thing.
44:35 But there's a section where it talks about all the plot holes.
44:39 And I don't know if I'm, if I'm just too dumb to be breathing, but there will be these massive
44:44 plot holes in, in shows or movies.
44:48 And I didn't even notice until I read somebody just pointed out and then it's like, Oh my
44:53 gosh, of course, like we've all had movies where we're like, that didn't make sense.
44:57 I didn't really like the ending.
44:58 But for you as you're writing, David, how do you know that this is a plot hole?
45:04 How do you know that this doesn't go anywhere?
45:06 How do you know that this isn't a satisfactory way for this character or this thing to move?
45:10 Yeah.
45:11 That's a good question.
45:14 And I guess it makes me think that the word plot hole is a little bit too precise because
45:20 the holes could be matters of care.
45:24 I mean, so character and plot are just like plot is character in motion, right?
45:27 It's all character.
45:28 But like you could have a characterization issue and I absolutely do with, because of
45:35 the way I write where like I'm writing and as I go, I'm finding the character and stuff
45:41 that I've written toward the end tends to be closer to that character's true voice than
45:46 the stuff I've written at the beginning.
45:48 And so if I've got chapter three written from the viewpoint of, you know, Billy Bob, and
45:54 then I get to chapter 65 and I'm writing another Billy Bob chapter, you know, I have
46:01 spent literally, you know, six months sitting in front of a computer getting to know Billy
46:07 Bob over the course of writing the book and so I got to go back to chapter three in my
46:12 editing and be like, would he say this?
46:16 Is this actually what he's like?
46:17 Is this his interior thoughts?
46:19 So there's, there's holes of characterization that appear naturally over the writing process.
46:25 There's also holes of characterization that can appear if you're trying to force a character
46:30 to do something that actually doesn't make sense for them for the purposes of plot or
46:34 story and oftentimes I will skip over those over the course of that first draft because
46:40 I just want to get to the end as fast as possible so I can begin the work of kind of refining,
46:45 but I know it's there and I have to go back and sort of wrestle with it later on.
46:51 And then there are holes of plot where it's like, you know, okay, how well, here's what
46:57 I was working with just a few days ago, how does I needed, I needed the Iranian intelligence
47:03 services to get access to a list of Mossad officers?
47:06 Okay, how does that happen?
47:08 Well, up until yesterday, I didn't have that problem solved and it was just this like massive
47:12 plot hole.
47:13 So you'd be, you could be what, you know, in, if you'd been reading the book, you'd get
47:16 to this point and you're like, what?
47:18 Like where did this come from?
47:21 That's never explained.
47:23 And all the way on down to little things, which actually in Damascus station, my first
47:27 book, there was an editing snafu and so the type of car someone's driving changes between
47:32 like pages six and seven, right?
47:34 So it's like, oh wait, yeah, and that's a minor, that's a minor thing, but readers always
47:40 love to kind of do the like, ah, got you.
47:42 Yeah, they're like, you screwed up.
47:46 So there's, there's all manner of inconsistencies that, that appear and over the course of it's
47:52 like solving a Rubik's cube that's like working against you at the same time.
47:56 Right.
47:57 Because you, you start to solve bigger problems and as you kind of like turn the wheel or
48:02 you think about it as like tying something like, you know, another like problem pops
48:06 out somewhere that you then have to have to go and solve.
48:09 So you really do have to kind of be an artist and an engineer, like an engineer to make sure
48:14 that this world behaves as it should and that there aren't insane things that happen.
48:22 Uh, inside the minds of characters or very technically.
48:26 And then an artist in order to actually get the emotional residents of the book, right?
48:32 And the characterization.
48:33 Right.
48:34 Well, yeah, I think artists and engineers, the perfect way to say it because I even do
48:36 that here on my show.
48:38 So when I'm doing a solo episode, let's say I'm talking about a very complicated topic.
48:41 So recently I did something on the Enneagram, I went way down the rabbit hole in that personality
48:46 test and went all the way back to like core level stuff.
48:49 And I was like, okay.
48:50 So as I'm creating it, I'm creating it as thoughts are popping up.
48:54 I've got my thoughts that I've kind of jotted down along the way, but then like I'm going
48:58 back and forth and I'm editing the first part and it's all about cogency.
49:03 It's all about narrative.
49:04 It's like, okay, if somebody listens to this straight through, there needs to be a narrative
49:08 that carries them.
49:09 And frankly, I do the same thing when it comes to preparing interviews.
49:12 And so I prepare an interview as if the person is only going to answer the questions that
49:17 I asked them and I'm not interested in any follow up.
49:21 And because if that happens, then I can guarantee that there's a narrative arc to the conversation
49:26 that ends with, hey, I really like that guy.
49:28 I'm going to go buy his book or hey, that's really interesting.
49:31 I'm going to go study this topic a little bit further, but also that's the engineer part,
49:34 right?
49:35 But there's also the artist part, which the first interview I did with Greg was, you know,
49:39 last year, which is really goes to this.
49:42 I prepared like I prepare normally and then I go back and look at the questions I prepared
49:46 and I didn't ask a quarter of them because the conversation just weaved into a more philosophical
49:52 world.
49:53 I was like, eff it.
49:54 Let's go.
49:55 Let's burn what I was going to do.
49:57 And so you have to kind of keep that tension of artists and engineer, but I blew up you
50:01 kind of explaining like the publishing process, what it looks like for your editing.
50:05 And then maybe misperceptions about what what happens during the editing process or just
50:09 the process of getting the book in the hands of the reader.
50:12 Well, I mean, honestly, let me take the misperceptions part first.
50:15 You talked about this with, with, uh, Jack, Karen, you know, his writing and you kind
50:19 of see, I think we as a society and it might just be in general humans kind of, there's
50:25 sort of this mystique or lionization of writers, right, and writing and it is seen as this
50:31 highly like, uh, I don't know, maybe it's even a kind of a sexy job to have, right?
50:37 And the reality of it.
50:41 Is that in some ways it is much more satisfying to have written than to be writing.
50:49 Because you, you know, like having written, we can have this fun conversation about my
50:57 life, the books, like I got, you know, there's a book behind me here that I've written that
51:02 I'm immensely proud of.
51:04 That's really fun.
51:06 This book behind me, Moscow acts like it absolutely sucked to write this thing.
51:12 It was miserable.
51:14 Yeah.
51:15 My, the first, the first draft I completed of it, my wife, who's my first reader, read
51:19 it, had made comments, showed up at the coffee shop where I was writing, sat down and was
51:24 like, this isn't very good.
51:26 Oh no.
51:27 Makes a big changes.
51:28 That is a terrible feeling.
51:31 It's a terrible feeling, as any of us, you know, who, who do any kind of work, right?
51:37 And not necessarily writing, but anything.
51:39 The, when you open up the equivalent of a blank document, right, and, and that could
51:47 also be, you know, if you were doing something in the real world with your hands, where you
51:52 were having to start the really kind of thankless, gritty process of getting something actually
52:00 done, right?
52:02 It typically, like it is not, it is typically not fun to get started in my experience.
52:09 It's not fun to get started going like, if you're out of shape and you have to get into
52:14 a gym and start doing work, it is really not fun.
52:18 If you were trying to learn a new skill and you were in the beginner stages of it, like
52:23 that typically sucks because you, you kind of know that you suck and it's hard in your
52:29 body and your mind don't want to work together to get it done.
52:33 And the blank page in writing is very much like that.
52:35 It's like behind all of the writing or like the finished book is like me sitting, you
52:43 know, in my pajamas at a coffee shop, staring off into space, wondering what should be written
52:49 down on this piece of paper, and that is like, that's the work.
52:55 But if, and if you don't, if you don't do that work, if you wait around for inspiration,
53:02 or you wait around to go and like clean out the garage, or you wait around to, you know,
53:08 take the jujitsu classes, or you, you know, you wait around to go to the gym, like it
53:13 just doesn't, it's just not going to happen.
53:16 Like my experience with most things in life has been that success or victory isn't some,
53:24 it's not taken in a gigantic leap.
53:27 It's literally just small decisions over and over and over again that get you to this
53:35 big thing being done, or that gets you into like that point in your life, that point in
53:41 your marriage, that point in your relationship with your kids, like whatever it could be.
53:44 It's like, it's all of these very small things that kind of build up to that.
53:48 And I think writing is very similar, where it's like, honestly, success every day is
53:53 just putting words down on the paper.
53:55 And then eventually you look up after doing that for six months, and you're like, Oh,
54:00 there's a book here, you know, yeah, well, we get to choose every day.
54:03 That's every day that's hard, you know, you don't want something in you fights it.
54:08 Well, you're, you're choosing to wade into that discomfort, because we do get to choose
54:11 our level of discomfort, I was having a conversation with one of my best friends here recently
54:15 that's thinking about getting into gi jiu jitsu, like actually training on a regular basis.
54:20 And he's kind of asking me questions like, what's it going to be like and when do I feel
54:22 like I can get better?
54:23 And I was like, well, I've been training for seven years.
54:26 And there are times when I leave class feeling like God, I'm dangerous, like man, but better,
54:33 nobody better mess with me on my way from the door to the to my truck, because I'm just
54:37 going to smash them.
54:38 And then I also have these classes where I'm like, have I ever trained jiu jitsu before,
54:43 because I just rolled with a bunch of gorillas, like there are times when you look around,
54:47 and you know, you're looking for the the nails, because you think you're the hammer and all
54:51 you see are other hammers, and just like, Oh, this is going to hurt for the next hour or
54:56 so.
54:57 But it's like, look, yeah, I trained for seven years before I got to the point where it's
55:00 like, yeah, I can, I can handle myself against just about anybody.
55:04 And if I go against someone that's significantly better, I can at least do things to frustrate
55:08 them on their, on their, you know, journey to killing me.
55:11 But then also, you know, people think about, yeah, you know, being a writer must be fun,
55:16 being a podcast, or must be fun.
55:17 But the funny thing about it is when people ask me, Kyle, like I'm thinking about starting
55:20 a podcast, what advice would you give me?
55:22 My advice is always don't do it.
55:24 Don't don't start a podcast.
55:25 I was like, if you can't stare at a screen, a blank screen, once a week for three years
55:32 and turn that blank screen into 60 minutes worth of content that people actually want
55:35 to listen to, and it's three years before you have more than 15 listeners that aren't
55:40 your family members and friends.
55:42 It's like, then don't do it.
55:43 It's way too hard.
55:44 Like the payoff is not going to be worth it.
55:47 And so I don't know if that's just my pessimism coming out, but I'm sure you have a lot of
55:50 people reach out to you because, you know, you're a successful published author.
55:53 But what do you tell people that are like, Hey, David, I want to be like you.
55:56 I want to be like Jack Carr.
55:57 I want to be like Greg Hurwitz.
55:58 I want to be like Stephen Pressfield.
56:00 I want to be like Brad Thor.
56:01 Just tell me how to do it.
56:02 Well, I think, you know, I mean, what you're saying about the podcasting resonates with
56:06 me because what I'm getting from you from this conversation and from our conversation,
56:11 you know, at dinner last year is like, you like what you're doing right now, like the
56:19 inputs to it is something that while it, while it frequently is frustrating, hard, you have
56:27 to, there's probably a lot of times where you're like, I've got to force myself to do
56:30 this work.
56:31 But there's, there's enough flow that can get generated from just the act of doing the
56:39 thing that we're doing right now that my guess is that you're like, I like this.
56:45 And so you're just sort of doing this.
56:47 And then, you know, you create that success that kind of gets created around you is a
56:53 byproduct of your desire to just do the thing as opposed to the reason you're doing this
56:59 thing to begin with.
57:01 And I think that the, what I typically tell people with respect to writing is like, you
57:08 have to, if you are, if you are getting into this, because you want to have written, that
57:16 is going to not work, because you are going to eventually have one, you might get 30,000
57:25 words down, and then you're going to run into two weeks of crappy writing, and you're going
57:33 to get frustrated and stop.
57:37 But if you are doing this because the act of sitting down in front of a screen, put aside
57:43 publishing, put aside books being out there, put aside talking about the books, if you're
57:47 sitting down because you like to create and find stories and put them down in words, and
57:55 enough of the time you show up, you can eventually, for some piece of that day, get into a flow
58:01 where time disappears, then you're good because the source of energy that you're going for
58:08 and that's powering everything is actually the input to the whole process to begin with,
58:14 which is putting words down, getting words down on paper.
58:17 You have to, like, if that doesn't energize you at some point in time for some piece of
58:23 the process, then don't bother, because it's just going to end poorly for you and all of
58:31 your loved ones.
58:33 But yeah, and I think that's, I don't know, man, I think that's true with a lot of stuff
58:37 in life of the smaller, I don't know, articulating it effectively, but if you can get yourself
58:45 to a point where you are comfortable with the level of pain required by the thing itself,
58:53 writing jujitsu as opposed to having one jujitsu competitions, you can get writing the books
58:59 as opposed to having written books, you can get yourself comfortable with the pain of
59:03 the inputs, and also on the other side, the joy and the high of the inputs, you're walking
59:10 out of the gym and you're like, "Aed out," because that hour passed like that because
59:16 you were just in the zone, you can get yourself comfortable with that sort of give and take.
59:21 You've probably found something that you'll eventually likelihood end up being successful
59:26 at and probably making a decent living from because you're aligning your energy, your
59:33 passion with stuff that other people value too, and that's beautiful.
59:39 I think that's a very good word because I tell people all the time, there are people that
59:42 are passionate about something, but they suck at it.
59:44 So look at the first week of any American Idol season, right?
59:47 So it's these people that are very passionate about singing, but they suck at it.
59:51 But then you have people that are passionate about something, they're actually good at
59:54 it, but the marketplace doesn't need it, right?
59:57 And so there always has to be this kind of overlap of the market needs this, plus you're
1:00:01 good at it, plus you like doing it, because there are people that have podcasts that
1:00:07 just shouldn't, they shouldn't be talking, they've had nothing to the conversation, they
1:00:13 had nothing to the marketplace, but it's because they want the sexy outcome, right?
1:00:16 They want to have written, they want to have created.
1:00:19 They want to be the person up in front of everybody talking, and everybody like hanging
1:00:23 on every word, but they forget that there has to be something on the front end of that.
1:00:27 And that's just that's just too much for a lot of people to overcome.
1:00:30 But let's specifically talk about the new book now.
1:00:32 So the new book is called Moscow X. So it was just, you know, you gave me the audio version
1:00:39 of it because I explained to you how hard it is for me to read fiction because my brain
1:00:43 doesn't fire all the time and it's hard for me to keep everybody straight.
1:00:46 But whereas Damascus station was obviously set in, you know, kind of Syria in that whole
1:00:51 area, this is more Moscow, Russia, right?
1:00:54 So that's kind of the main place where this takes place.
1:00:56 So I guess for you, where did you get the idea from Moscow X?
1:01:00 And this does seem like a hard left turn from the stuff that you were doing in the Middle
1:01:04 East, right?
1:01:05 So I guess where did your interest in trying to set something in Russia come from?
1:01:09 Well, so Ben, this was kind of a crazy story.
1:01:15 So I started this book, Moscow X, the first draft-ish of it was set entirely in Texas.
1:01:25 And I had come up with this idea which at the time seemed interesting and cool and I now
1:01:32 realized was insane to set a spy novel entirely in Texas who was going to be a chase between
1:01:40 Dallas and Big Bend area.
1:01:44 And there were Russians in that book, but it was like all here.
1:01:49 And I had like Russian defectors in Plano and I had Russian assassins like this hit team
1:01:58 operating under the cover of like a turbanex van and I had gone down to Big Bend and done
1:02:03 a whole bunch of research down there to kind of get the vibes right, which that was, that's
1:02:08 a beautiful part of the country by the way, I'd highly recommend that anyone spend time
1:02:12 down there.
1:02:13 It's incredible.
1:02:14 But I wrote this thing and I kind of had this like nagging feeling as I was writing it,
1:02:18 which I is now a feeling I've come to recognize I think quicker in my writing process of like
1:02:24 something's wrong.
1:02:25 There's just like these alarms going off as I was writing this thing that this wasn't
1:02:31 the right story and I just kept pushing through, pushing through, pushing through.
1:02:35 And I wrote 60, 70,000 words, something like that, it's like a decent chunk of it, sent
1:02:39 it off to my editor.
1:02:42 He calls me back a couple weeks later and he's like, this sucks.
1:02:46 Oh no.
1:02:47 And you shouldn't write this book and here's why, and he kind of gives some reasons and
1:02:52 he's of course right on all of this stuff.
1:02:54 So I'm sitting there, this is like a dark, this is sort of a dark period, right?
1:02:58 Because I've just spent all this time and energy getting this thing going and he's basically
1:03:04 saying like, this isn't a let's modify this things by 20% here.
1:03:08 This is, yeah, erase it and then start again and I listened to him, but I took a couple
1:03:17 Russian characters from that book and I thought they worked and I put them in Moscow and St.
1:03:25 Petersburg and just started to play around with some new ideas.
1:03:30 And then I quickly realized that now I have got to like learn a whole bunch of stuff about
1:03:35 Russia because I'm going to have to set the book there.
1:03:38 And honestly, I'm glad that I didn't fully think through the ramifications of that decision
1:03:42 because it was a ton of work and that's why the book was so, one of the reasons why it
1:03:47 was so hard to write them and there were other reasons, you know, the invasion happened like
1:03:50 halfway through writing the thing, which was a big problem.
1:03:54 But I, it was honestly that simple.
1:03:57 It was like, I've got these characters I like and then I think can carry a story.
1:04:01 They're Russian.
1:04:02 I need to move them to Russia and then all of a sudden I'm just off running.
1:04:08 I don't, I don't typically think about anything commercial as I'm writing really and I don't
1:04:15 think about the reader while I'm writing.
1:04:18 So for me, this was like, I like these characters.
1:04:20 I want to explore this.
1:04:21 I did not think it might be a bad idea for me to, you know, I've got this whole thing
1:04:27 in Russia because it's going to be a whole bunch of work.
1:04:29 I just kind of pushed through with the characters and then because I feel like they were speaking
1:04:33 to me and there was a story there.
1:04:35 So I rolled with it and, you know, a Russia focused book is what came out of it.
1:04:40 It's interesting.
1:04:41 You said you don't think about the reader because people are shocked sometimes whenever
1:04:45 I talk about the show and I say, well, yeah, I'm, I am thinking about the, the final audience,
1:04:49 but I'm working for an audience of one.
1:04:51 And so I'm like, whenever I had tens of listeners, it's like I'm working as under the Lord and
1:04:56 I'm going to create something that I can be proud of that I could say before God someday
1:04:59 and say, yeah, that podcast that I did, I put my full effort into it because I acted
1:05:03 like you were my boss.
1:05:04 And so it's, it's different whenever you have different ideas as to kind of who you're going
1:05:07 to.
1:05:08 Now with, with this book, so people that pick up Moscow X, it'll be in the show notes guys.
1:05:12 You should definitely check it out.
1:05:13 So this isn't like a fast paced thriller, like what you would expect from, you know, guys
1:05:19 that we had talked about Greg Herwicks with the Orphan X series or the Jack Carr novels
1:05:23 with James Reese's character.
1:05:25 It's a novel that focuses more on, I guess you could say the cerebral and not the kinetic
1:05:32 aspects of espionage, at least that's how I would would say it.
1:05:36 Yeah.
1:05:37 Yeah, that's right.
1:05:38 Okay.
1:05:39 So, so I guess give a pitch to my audience because there's, you know, there's something
1:05:42 about just turning your brain off and watching the expendables, right?
1:05:46 Because those movies are ridiculous.
1:05:48 All the first blood movies are absolutely ridiculous except for the first one.
1:05:51 But it's just like there's something to be said about that.
1:05:54 And then there's something to be said for one of my favorite movies of all time, Zero
1:05:57 Dark Thirty, because it's a three hour long movie that I went to the movie theater thinking
1:06:01 it was going to be, you know, two hours and 45 minutes about the raid on, you know, where
1:06:06 Bin Laden was hiding, and it ended up being two hours and 45 minutes of setup for 10 minutes
1:06:12 of the raid.
1:06:13 And I loved it.
1:06:14 I thought it was great, but it was way more cerebral than it was kinetic.
1:06:18 So why approach it that way?
1:06:19 Why not just do the low hanging fruit of guns, blazing and, you know, chicks being saved
1:06:23 from, you know, certain death?
1:06:25 Well, so I'll tell you, I, I, I've typically tried to write stories that have some grime
1:06:36 surrounding and kind of the real world of the espionage business and the kind of bread
1:06:41 and butter espionage business that I was talking about earlier in this conversation, which
1:06:44 is not stuff blowing up.
1:06:47 It's more this kind of dance around recruiting people who have information we want and then
1:06:54 doing stuff with that information.
1:06:56 And it tends to be the case that that stuff is far less about things blowing up and far
1:07:01 more about, frankly, kind of a psychological dance, which is some parts, you know, just
1:07:08 friendship and some parts manipulation.
1:07:11 And you're dealing with different kind of, you know, angles on deception and identity.
1:07:19 And it's much more about that, right, than it is about guns blazing.
1:07:25 Now, I will say that the arc of my books and I've, my third one's coming out in October
1:07:32 and it's done.
1:07:33 So the arc of this one is also the same as like I like and I think this is, you know,
1:07:38 talking about, you know, working for an audience of one, right?
1:07:42 I write primarily for my nightstand, like that is what I'm thinking about as I'm writing
1:07:47 is like, do I like this?
1:07:48 Like, is this a book that I would be proud of that I would want to read that I would
1:07:52 put that I, you know, if I saw this book and I hadn't written it, would I go and check
1:07:56 this thing out of the library, go buy it and put it on my nightstand to read, right?
1:08:01 That is literally, for me, that is the goal.
1:08:04 And so when I'm thinking about the story, I'm not thinking about like, well, is there
1:08:12 enough action here to draw someone in?
1:08:14 I'm honestly just thinking about if I'm interested in the story.
1:08:16 And the way that my stories have typically gone is like, I want to build, I want to build
1:08:22 up the characters to a point where you as the reader really are interested in all of
1:08:30 them, care about some of them.
1:08:33 And then it typically hockey sticks about two thirds of the way through generally where
1:08:40 the stakes become so high, all of these different threads collide.
1:08:45 And then stuff starts to go kind of crazy.
1:08:48 So in some respects, like, I'm not comparing myself to him at all, but I think like, you
1:08:52 know, Tarantino movies do this kind of good job of like, there's a lot of, there's a lot
1:08:56 of building, right?
1:08:57 There's kind of building and then at some point things just kind of go completely haywire.
1:09:02 I like stories like that, where by the time they go haywire, I start to feel invested.
1:09:09 You know, so my books, like, they don't typically start with some bunch of random people getting
1:09:14 killed because I feel like as when I'm reading those books, I'm like, I don't really care
1:09:18 about them, these people.
1:09:19 So like the action could be good, but like, you know, it's not doing anything for me emotionally.
1:09:23 Like, I want, you know, my characters to be, you know, killing family members and doing
1:09:29 all this kind of crazy stuff later in the book when you're like, Oh my gosh, like it's
1:09:33 much more, you know, impactful because you care about them as people.
1:09:37 So I don't know, that's, you know, that's how I've tended to approach it.
1:09:41 Every book's a little bit different, but that's just kind of my style.
1:09:44 And that's the character development piece that you get from these long running series,
1:09:48 like television series.
1:09:49 So it's like, you know, uh, you know, whatever you would be into.
1:09:53 So if it's breaking bad, you're like really into what's going on with Walter White.
1:09:56 And he's an anti-hero that you're actually rooting for.
1:09:59 And maybe it's Tony Soprano.
1:10:01 And so you've, you know, sat there and you've invested all this time in this character.
1:10:03 And then at the very end, when they kind of leave you hanging as to whether or not he
1:10:06 was actually, you know, killed or something like that, you know, you're super invested
1:10:10 in it.
1:10:11 But David, I really appreciate all the time we spend on all this.
1:10:13 I'll make this the last question of the day because I'm just curious for you as a writer.
1:10:16 So with Damascus station or with Moscow X, you know, how much of the stuff that's in
1:10:22 those books are at least, you know, tangentially related to the stuff that you actually did
1:10:27 or saw when you were in the CIA versus how much of it is straight fiction.
1:10:31 So like what percentage of it is like, yeah, this is like real world stuff that actually
1:10:35 happened versus, yeah, like this is just stuff that I thought would sound cool and, you know,
1:10:39 would be good if it was all in my nightstand.
1:10:41 Well, I so I think, look, I have generally tried where I can to make, you know, whether
1:10:51 whether it's an operation, whether it's a piece of trade craft, whether it's like a
1:10:54 little fact about the CIA tried to make that stuff true when and where I can, right?
1:11:02 So there's a lot of stuff in these books that that's real, a lot of almost all the trade
1:11:08 craft is real, almost all the tech is real, you know, the way the sort of even down to
1:11:17 kind of like the ethos, the culture of the CIA, like I've tried to make, I've tried
1:11:22 to build that kind of framework or foundation of authenticity across the books, because
1:11:28 I like, I like reading books where you feel like you're led into this world, right?
1:11:34 You're led into a world that the author has engineered to be to feel real and in many
1:11:40 respects to be real.
1:11:42 So like I generally try to start from that standpoint.
1:11:44 Now what I will say is like, there are points where the story demands that you break those
1:11:51 rules, the rules of, you know, reality or the real CIA, and I try to be judicious about
1:11:59 that.
1:12:00 So like I never want, because the last thing you want, I think we've all had this experience
1:12:04 in movies or with books where you read something, it instantly pulls you out of the story because
1:12:09 the author screwed up, they screwed up a basic fact, or they did something with a character
1:12:14 or a plot where you're like, that actually doesn't make any sense.
1:12:16 And you're just kind of done, like it's hard to go back to the story after that, because
1:12:20 you fundamentally have like the bubbles popped on that world.
1:12:24 So I try to be really judicious about when I do that in the story.
1:12:28 And I try, honestly, if I break rules, I try to actually explain that they're being broken
1:12:34 so that, and then sort of explain why, so that the reader understands like, okay, you
1:12:42 know, this case officer in Damascus station made this tremendous mistake.
1:12:46 How is he coming back for another piece of the op?
1:12:49 Two months later, like in reality, you sort of you get sidelined or fired, but I kind
1:12:54 of explained the way the process went enough, and then throw you a little bit of a hook
1:12:59 at the end to explain how he got involved, where I think you as the reader might be more
1:13:04 willing to go along with it.
1:13:05 So it's a balance, but I always try to keep it grounded as much as I can in reality.
1:13:13 Okay, very good.
1:13:14 Well, hey, we weaved in and out of a lot of different subject matters today.
1:13:17 I'm really appreciative of your time and like this feels like a continuation of our first
1:13:21 conversation we had last year over dinner, but as for now, that's all for me.
1:13:25 Is there anything else you want to get off your chest?
1:13:27 Well, you know, I will hopefully have some time now to actually follow through on the
1:13:32 jujitsu.
1:13:33 So we can we can do another another check in here at some point in the coming months or
1:13:39 a year.
1:13:40 And hopefully I'll have a better answer for you, because I want I want to do it.
1:13:44 And my son's gotten into swimming this year, which has been like competitive swimming,
1:13:48 which has been really good for him and awesome to just be out there using your body.
1:13:52 But I think jujitsu would also be a wonderful, a wonderful answer.
1:13:56 So this is just what I'm going to do.
1:13:59 The next time I see you, I'm not even going to ask, I'm just going to grab you.
1:14:03 I'm just going to grab you with both hands and I'm just going to see what you do.
1:14:07 Because at this point, like if everyone knows about the five love languages, physical touch
1:14:10 used to be pretty high for me.
1:14:12 But now it's way low because if someone's touching me, I'm assuming they're trying to
1:14:16 kill me with my own clothing.
1:14:18 And so it's like, you know, that's one of those things I'm just going to grab you and
1:14:21 just see what happens.
1:14:22 Does that sound like a good plan?
1:14:23 That sounds good.
1:14:24 And instead of touching you next time, I will just bring you a gift, which might be another
1:14:28 one of your love languages and more safe for everyone.
1:14:32 So cigars, whiskey or jerky, you're you're pretty much a safe bet within one of those.
1:14:37 So David McCloskey, thank you for coming on on Don't To Life of Man's podcast.
1:14:41 Thanks Kyle.
1:14:42 This was a ton of fun.
1:14:43 There you go guys.
1:14:44 It's time with David McCloskey, but before we let you go, we are going to do a quick
1:14:47 resilience boost at undaunted life.
1:14:49 Our mission is equipping men to push back darkness with content that forges spiritual
1:14:52 mental and physical resilience and the links here in the show notes are where you can go
1:14:55 and buy his books.
1:14:56 You should definitely do so.
1:14:57 Thank you guys so much for listening to this episode.
1:14:59 Wherever you're listening to this, please subscribe, rate and leave us a positive five
1:15:02 star review.
1:15:03 If you want to come speak alive at your event or on your podcast, just shoot me an email
1:15:06 to info@undonton.life.
1:15:09 That's I N F O at undonton.life.
1:15:11 Follow us on Instagram and like us on Facebook and check out our website for everything else,
1:15:15 including how to donate to keep more content like this coming your way.
1:15:18 Just go to www.undonton.life and also we want to thank the band Holy Name for allowing us
1:15:23 to use their music for our content.
1:15:25 The music on this podcast is our song Perpetua, which is off their self-titled debut album
1:15:29 on Face Down Records.
1:15:31 The links are in the description.
1:15:33 I'm your host Kyle Thompson.
1:15:34 Remember keep pushing back darkness, keep forging spiritual, mental and physical resilience.
1:15:40 Keep seeking the lion of Judah.
Key quotes
2
David McCloskey
If I want to write another book, if I want to go out and promote my writing so that it could, I can sell more books and keep the thing going, I can't do this 70, 80 hour a week consulting job.
Kyle Thompson
You have to get yourself comfortable with the pain of the inputs, and also on the other side, the joy and the high of the inputs.
Free Resource
31-Day Resilience Reset
If this episode hit, the next 31 days will be the reset. Free PDF, instant download.
START FREE →
Brotherhood
Apply to Dominion
Six pillars. Application only. The men's program Kyle built around the show.
APPLY NOW →
Dig Deeper
Ask the Archive
"Which episodes cover this topic?" Get answers grounded in all 940+ episodes.
START A CHAT →