0:00
Flowing ad bunted on metrics that look great till the CFO sees them, that's bullspend.
0:05
And marketers are calling it out in dashboard confessions.
0:09
I remember telling my boss, it'll be good for the brand when leads were slow.
0:15
Yeah, it wasn't.
0:17
Cut the bullspend.
0:18
LinkedIn lets you target by company, job title, and more.
0:22
Advertise on LinkedIn.
0:23
Spend $250 on your first campaign and get a $250 credit go to linkedin.com/campaign
0:27
in terms of condition supply.
0:34
This is a Daunton life man's podcast.
0:51
I'm your host Kyle Thompson.
0:52
Let's get into it.
0:53
Special episode because we have special breaking news, judge Amy Coney Barrett is now justice
0:59
Amy Coney Barrett of the United States Supreme Court.
1:02
So this is big news.
1:03
She was confirmed tonight by 52 to 48 vote inside the United States Senate.
1:08
Justice Clarence Thomas just swore her in a couple of hours ago in front of Donald Trump
1:13
and a crowd outside of the White House.
1:16
And it was while I was getting my notes together for this and guys, I've been thinking about
1:19
this for a while because I knew that this was going to be big news.
1:22
I knew that this was going to be important for conservatives at this day would come again
1:26
before Kavanaugh was even elected or nominated for the Supreme Court of the United States
1:30
by Donald Trump.
1:31
I was hoping it would be judge Amy Coney Barrett.
1:33
So I'm glad she is now officially a member.
1:36
This now gives Republicans six scotus picks technically because six Republican presidents
1:42
have six of the nine have come from Republican presidents, whereas the other three came from
1:46
Democratic presidents.
1:48
So this is big news.
1:49
I mean, there haven't been that many people.
1:51
I think it's just over a hundred people have been Supreme Court justices of the United States
1:54
before.
1:55
So this is obviously big news, but this has large ramifications for a lot of us, right?
2:00
And for a lot of people that actually listen to this podcast and are of the ilk that kind
2:04
of come from a worldview that we like to espouse and to defend and we'll get into that.
2:08
But I guess the biggest news leading up to this evening and the festivities that was the
2:13
vote and then her speech and everything was that there wasn't really that much news.
2:18
I mean, just think about what happened after the nomination of Kavanaugh versus Amy Coney
2:26
Barrett.
2:27
I mean, absolutely stunning.
2:29
So again, especially with, you know, this being Ruth Bader Ginsburg seat, or at least
2:33
that's what Democrats were thinking it was, even though it's just an open seat there.
2:37
This is Ruth Bader Ginsburg seat.
2:38
It's such a symbolic seat for a lot of people.
2:42
I was thinking that they were going to pull out all the stops.
2:44
I was thinking that they were going to try to burn the Senate to the ground to stop the
2:47
vote.
2:48
Just something like that was going to happen.
2:50
And there was relatively quiet, right?
2:52
There were some things that will go over here in a second about some of the, the noise
2:55
that was being made by Democrats, but you know, they weren't accusing ACB of being a gang
3:00
rapist.
3:01
They weren't accusing her of any of these horrific things.
3:03
It's like, ah, look at her with all our kids and education and whatever, like it was just,
3:08
they were really grasping at straws for a lot of things.
3:11
But that was kind of the big news.
3:13
And I guess the main point as to why there wasn't that much news is cause she's supremely
3:18
qualified.
3:19
I mean, any way you slice it, she is supremely qualified.
3:23
When you saw what she was doing there at these hearings, again, the biggest mic drop moment
3:28
of her confirmation hearings was when I believe it was a Senator from Texas, not Ted Cruz.
3:33
I'm trying to remember the guy's name.
3:34
I can't think of his name.
3:35
I have to top my head, but he was looking at her and she's answering all these questions
3:39
for hours and hours.
3:40
Guys, we're talking like seven, eight hours a day was what these hearings in terms of
3:43
what she needed to be up and ready for.
3:45
And the Senator remarked that, hey, we've got all these binders in front of us.
3:48
We've got all these things that we're referring to to ask you your questions and your follow
3:52
up questions.
3:53
Would you mind showing us what it is that you're looking at as you're answering our
3:56
questions?
3:57
And she held up a blank notepad, right?
4:00
And the guys like, wait, wait, does it say anything on the notepad?
4:03
And she just kind of like tongue and cheek said, yeah, it says United States Senate across
4:06
the top.
4:07
She's supremely qualified, she understands what what she what her philosophy is.
4:12
She understands jurisprudence, she understands textualism and originalism and those types
4:17
of things.
4:18
She's not someone that has to look up her philosophy when something comes up because
4:22
she has this philosophical underpinning and things that are undergirding her points of
4:26
you on a lot of different issues.
4:28
So again, I'm I'm incredibly excited that Amy Coney Barrett is now a justice, the United
4:33
States Supreme Court.
4:34
That is very exciting, but we do need to kind of talk about why this is important.
4:37
But before we can talk about why this is so important, we really need to talk about what
4:40
the biggest arguments against ACB were, right?
4:44
Because you knew Democrats were going to try to, even if something wasn't there, they were
4:47
going to try to make something there.
4:49
And so when to go over some of the main arguments and most of them were pretty silly, but one
4:53
of the big arguments at the beginning was that there was no precedent, right?
4:56
For the Senate confirming a Supreme Court justice during a general election year, like these
5:00
hearings are a sham.
5:01
This shouldn't be happening.
5:02
But guys, let's just be real, 19 times previously, a Supreme Court spot became vacant in an election
5:10
year and both the presidency and the Senate were controlled by the same party.
5:16
And of those 19 times, 17 judicial confirmations came.
5:21
So almost 100% of the time, if there is a vacancy in an election year and the Senate
5:26
and the presidency are from the same party, they're confirmed.
5:29
So there was absolutely precedent for it, do not let the mainstream media tell you otherwise
5:33
because they're lying to you.
5:34
The next biggest argument that they were making about her or against ACB was that there was
5:39
no precedent for confirming a Supreme Court justice this quickly, right?
5:42
This is tyranny.
5:43
Trump's trying to force her through because he's trying to work some nefarious thing about
5:46
the election or whatever.
5:48
But actually, because we know the time periods now, I think there were three people total
5:53
that were confirmed faster than Amy Coney Barrett.
5:56
And I believe Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed for 42 days after her nomination by Bill Clinton,
6:01
which I think is similar to Amy Coney Barrett's timeline.
6:03
It might be just a day or two different, but Sandra Day O'Connor was nominated and confirmed
6:08
in 33 days and John Paul Stevens back in the 70s was confirmed in 19 days, right?
6:14
So people thinking that this is tyrannical that she would be forced through this quickly.
6:19
There's just no legs for them to stand on because it's happened other times.
6:22
Another big thing they were doing against Amy Coney Barrett was that this was the real
6:26
court packing, which doesn't really have anything to do with Amy Coney Barrett.
6:29
Yes, she's conservative.
6:30
Yes, she's coming from a Republican president, but this is the real court packing.
6:34
Don't pay attention to that guy, Joe Barr by an over there, that daughtering old fool.
6:37
You don't need to pay attention to him whenever he's asked a question directly about whether
6:40
or not he's going to pack the Supreme Court.
6:42
This is the real court packing.
6:44
They're packing the Supreme Court with people that we don't like again.
6:47
That was, that was not really anything to do with Amy Coney Barrett.
6:50
That was more to do with Trump, which again, most of these lines of questioning or lines
6:54
of debate are coming because they hate Trump.
6:58
And then beyond that, they hate, you know, religious people, they hate conservatives,
7:01
they hate Republicans, they hate white people, whatever the situation is.
7:04
But ultimately they're, they're coming for their hatred of Trump and the fact that everything
7:07
is so emotionally charged right now because we're close to an election, right?
7:11
Which flows into the next thing here is another reason why they were against ACB and one of
7:15
the reasons that the arguments they were making is that that she would potentially allow her
7:18
religious faith to affect the decisions that she makes, right?
7:22
Which depending upon your religious face, you would probably want that again.
7:26
I go back to a time during the Republican, a general, not the general election, but the
7:30
Republican nomination nomination for president back in 2016, I was supporting Senator Rubio
7:35
at the time.
7:36
And Senator Rubio was at this town hall type thing and this guy got up and he said, you
7:39
know, hey, Rubio, you're, you're a Christian and I'm an atheist and, you know, what would
7:44
you say to someone like me who doesn't share the same beliefs as you do because I'm scared
7:47
about the things that you're going to do to this country because of your religious belief
7:51
in Rubio, just very matter of factly said, you better hope that I govern as a Christian
7:55
because if I govern as a Christian, that means that everybody is valuable.
7:59
Every individual person, regardless of their background, but regardless of what their believes
8:02
you, but a hope that I operate that way.
8:04
So I don't know why that would be something that would take out someone from consideration
8:08
for a Supreme Court nomination or from a Supreme Court seat.
8:12
But you know, really, they just hate those types of people.
8:15
Even the ranking Senate judiciary member, Diane Feinstein of California, she was caught on
8:19
a hot mic saying this in reference to Amy Coney Barrett's pro life stance, quote, I suspect
8:24
with her, it is deeply personal and comes with her religion.
8:28
Unquote.
8:29
Now, to be a fair, that would seem fairly innocuous, except for her comments previously
8:34
towards ACB at a at her hearing for the appeals court confirmation in 2017, where she said,
8:39
the dogma lives loudly within you.
8:42
She said that right to her face, right in front of everybody.
8:44
It was great.
8:45
It was great for her bumper stickers and great for her local campaigning, but it kind of
8:48
gave us an idea of the animus that she held towards people of faith, specifically ACB's
8:53
faith.
8:54
The next argument you've heard against Amy Coney Barrett is that she's going to steal
8:57
your health insurance, right?
8:59
She's going to be the dividing deciding vote that takes away the Affordable Care Act,
9:02
otherwise known as Obamacare.
9:04
But the reality here, this one's kind of easy to dispel.
9:06
There's no legislation anywhere right now that would take the legs out from underneath
9:11
the horrific Obamacare decision and the Obamacare that is available in the United States.
9:16
So you know, it's good for ads though.
9:18
It's good for political ads.
9:19
You know, Donald Trump's going to ram this Supreme Court justice through so that they
9:23
can steal your health insurance in the middle of a pandemic.
9:26
You know, it's really dramatic, but it doesn't really have any grounding in anything.
9:30
The next thing, and this is what was probably the most important to a lot of people, is
9:33
that she's just not woke.
9:34
It's not that she's not woke enough.
9:36
It's that she's not woke at all.
9:38
And this, this couldn't have been more on full display than with this faux outrage over
9:43
the fact that she used the phrase sexual preference.
9:46
So Amy Coney Barrett was talking about LGBTQ, you know, I double A TTYL plus people.
9:52
And she was saying she used the phrase sexual preference in reference to people that have
9:56
a different than normal sexual preference, right?
9:59
So you've heard sexual preference before, because that's common vernacular.
10:04
When he talked about somebody that's gay or bisexual or lesbian or something like that,
10:08
that's their sexual preference.
10:09
I mean, you can put yourself in that category like I am heterosexual, so I prefer women.
10:14
It's a sexual preference, but Senator Maisie Hirono of Hawaii, which guys, wow, this woman,
10:21
anyway, she made a huge deal out of this, right?
10:25
And this is her exact quote.
10:27
It's astounding.
10:28
It's almost as astounding as the fact that there was some sort of like way left wing blue
10:32
check mark person on Twitter that basically said this exact thing in a tweet a few hours
10:37
before Maisie Hirono on the Senate floor for the confirmation hearings got out there and
10:42
was trotting this nonsense out.
10:43
It was on the Senate floor, but it was there at the Capitol.
10:46
She said this, let me make clear sexual preference is an offensive and outdated term.
10:52
It is used by the anti LGBTQ activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice.
10:59
It is not sexual orientation is a key part of a person's identity.
11:03
So if it is your view that sexual orientation is merely a preference, as you noted, then
11:08
the LGBTQ community should be rightly concerned whether you will uphold their constitutional
11:12
right to marry unquote guys.
11:16
This was nonsense.
11:17
This was crazy.
11:18
And the only thing I really didn't like from the hearings is that ACB automatically came
11:22
out with an apology.
11:23
Oh, I didn't mean to offend anybody.
11:24
No, no, no.
11:25
When people are changing with what words mean while you're using them, you don't owe them
11:31
apology for a damn thing, not at all.
11:34
Because if we're all in agreement as to what things mean and whether things are offensive
11:38
or not.
11:39
And in the middle of that game, you change your opinion.
11:40
I'm sorry.
11:41
I owe you nothing.
11:42
But the interesting thing, well, it's way more scary than it is interesting is before
11:46
the sun went down that night, before the sun went down that night, Miriam Webster's dictionary
11:52
actually changed the definition of the word preference, declaring that it is offensive.
11:59
I think it was five lines down, one of the acceptable definitions, literally, like almost
12:04
instantaneously when you use it as sexual preference, it is offensive.
12:09
That is a declarative statement from Webster's dictionary.
12:14
And this is not a podcast about what it means when we can't agree on terms and what it means
12:19
whenever words are being changed and meanings are being changed and truth is being altered.
12:25
But that should be terrifying to you.
12:28
It should be absolutely terrifying to you.
12:30
That Webster's dictionary came in and just because Maisie Herono said it during a confirmation
12:34
hearing, it's like, Oh, no, no, we're going to go ahead and change that because morons
12:38
are going to wake up the next day and hear all this hubbub about the fact that Amy Coney
12:42
Barrett said sexual preference and they're going to go look it up and they're going to
12:45
be like, Oh my gosh, I guess it is offensive.
12:46
I'm God, man, I'm so glad I didn't tweet anything about it because I look like a fool.
12:51
But the other part of this faux outrage is that they're ignoring the fact that Joe Biden
12:55
this year and Ruth Bader Ginsburg in recent years and basically everyone on the planet
13:00
has used the phrase sexual preference before.
13:03
Even a lot of these LGBT activists and these blogs and these channels.
13:08
This year they've had commentaries and documents and news stories and videos that they put out
13:14
using the phraseology sexual preference.
13:17
So they tried to manufacture this outrage.
13:19
It worked on a few idiots, but it didn't work overall.
13:22
And then the last thing they really just kind of went for is that, well, we just don't
13:24
like her.
13:25
She seems like a supremely likeable person, but we just don't like her.
13:29
The Senate Democrats, the ones that were on the Senate Judiciary Committee, they actually
13:32
decided to boycott the committee vote, which was last Thursday.
13:36
And that was the committee vote where she was basically passed through 12 to nothing to
13:40
go to the Senate for for an actual confirmation vote.
13:43
Now, I thought that Texas Representative Dan Crenshaw had the best tweet about this.
13:48
He actually said this quote, we can't vote for her because our radical base will get mad.
13:53
We can't vote against her because she's immensely qualified and Americans actually like her.
13:57
So we will just be dramatic juveniles and not show up.
14:00
That's Senate Demons for you, Senate Democrats for you.
14:02
So the thing about it is, is they didn't like her because she was nominated by Trump.
14:06
They didn't like her because she wasn't Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
14:09
She wasn't that type of woman.
14:11
She was a different type of woman.
14:12
She's very traditional in a lot of ways.
14:14
I think at one point she even admitted that she does the laundry when she's at home, which
14:17
is insane, right?
14:19
Because you know, she's supposed to be, you know, all women hear me roar that type of
14:23
thing because she's a very powerful woman, but no, she's a very traditional woman.
14:27
She seems to love her family.
14:28
She seems to love her husband and we just can't be down for that.
14:31
But as we transition here and as we wrap up this episode, I want to kind of go into why
14:35
the confirmation of ACB is a big deal.
14:37
There's a lot of reasons why this confirmation of the ninth Supreme Court justice to basically
14:43
make it a full Supreme Court at this moment is a big deal.
14:46
The first reason it's a big deal is it's the third nominee of Donald Trump to make it
14:51
on Supreme Court.
14:52
And I think conservatives may only end up liking one of his three nominations.
14:57
And I think it's going to be Amy Coney Barrett.
14:59
Now, I have high hopes for Gorsuch.
15:02
I think he's done some things even in this recent term that I've agreed with, but he's
15:06
gone really off the rails on some things even recently.
15:10
And guys, I just got to be honest with you.
15:12
I think a lot of Republicans are very, very concerned about Justice Roberts as we continue
15:16
to go on.
15:18
And for good reason, I think Kavanaugh is going to be very similar to that.
15:21
I think Brett Kavanaugh is going to be very similar to Roberts, not very similar to Scalia
15:25
or to Thomas or any of those other people that we look at as bastions of conservatism,
15:30
those types of things.
15:31
So the fact that Donald Trump got three shots at this, I think he took a good shot with
15:35
Gorsuch.
15:36
I think he took a great shot with Amy Coney Barrett, but I don't think he took a great
15:39
shot for with Justice Kavanaugh and has nothing to do with all of the circus that went on
15:43
during his confirmation hearings.
15:45
The next reason why this confirmation of ACB is a big deal is it's the third nomination
15:50
of Trump and not the third nomination of Hillary Clinton.
15:54
Now, the most hilarious justice of all of this is today as I'm recording this.
15:59
This is Hillary Clinton's birthday, right?
16:01
She's supposed to be serving her fourth year as president of the United States.
16:05
She should have gotten three picks for the United States Supreme Court, but nope, Donald
16:09
Trump did.
16:10
But guys, on a serious note, can you imagine if Hillary Clinton had got three nominations
16:15
there would be a super majority of liberal justices on the Supreme Court.
16:20
I remember I gave a lot of people crap for holding their nose and voting for Donald Trump
16:25
back in 2016 because of the Supreme Court and how important it was.
16:28
And now looking back, those people were right, not about things across the board, but they
16:32
were certainly right about that because if he got in the earth, Hillary Clinton got in
16:37
there and replaced these justices with liberal justices, these were not going to be people
16:40
that were centrist.
16:42
These were going to be people on the way far left.
16:44
She wasn't going to miss shoot with someone like Kavanaugh, in my opinion.
16:48
She was going to get three hard left justices.
16:50
It was going to be another side of my or another Kagan.
16:52
It was going to be someone like that, another Ruth Bader Ginsburg, right?
16:55
So I think it's incredible that we got three nominees from Trump.
16:59
Say what you say about him.
17:00
All the things you don't like about him.
17:01
We got three justices from him.
17:03
That's a good thing.
17:04
The next thing that is a big deal about this confirmation is ACB will likely stand upon
17:10
the platform created by Antonin Scalia, okay?
17:13
So a lot was made about the fact that she actually clerked for Antonin Scalia.
17:18
She actually said this before.
17:19
She says, if I am confirmed, you would not be getting Justice Scalia, you would be getting
17:23
Justice Barrett.
17:24
But at the same time, she also said, you know, in reference to Justice Scalia that his judicial
17:29
philosophy is mine to the thing about it is I think she will create her own.
17:34
She's not going to just be a mini me of Justice Scalia.
17:37
She will create her own pathway for a lot of folks.
17:40
She's going to create her own ideals in her own career.
17:44
But the fact that she does align so closely with Antonin Scalia should make people that
17:48
are textualists very, very excited, which goes right into the next reason why this is
17:52
a big deal is that textualism, originalism, constitutional conservatism is preserved
17:59
on the Supreme Court of the United States for now, right?
18:02
Again, we were a couple of hundred thousand votes in some very key states from Hillary
18:08
Clinton getting these three picks.
18:10
And then it was going to take potentially a generation to flip the Supreme Court back
18:15
to a conservative leaning, if ever, right, if ever, we already have a lot of Democrats
18:20
talking about if Joe Biden's elected and if Democrats take over the Senate that they're
18:24
going to stack the Supreme Court, they're going to add four more seats.
18:26
They're going to add, you know, Guam and Puerto Rico and Washington DC as states and then
18:31
add six senators at least four senators with DC and with Puerto Rico.
18:35
There's a lot of things in the offing that are that's really terrifying that a lot of
18:38
people are threatening.
18:40
But can you imagine what that would have been like if the executive and the legislative
18:47
bodies match the judicial, like that would be pretty terrifying, especially considering
18:52
what some of those people are saying right now, right?
18:55
And then another reason here, and I guess this is the last reason we'll go over and let
18:59
you guys get out of here, is now you can at least see a pathway to overturning Roe v.
19:05
Wade.
19:06
A pathway.
19:07
Now, again, I don't think this gets it done.
19:10
I talked about this back in episode 155 when I talked about the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
19:15
But as of right now, they're the conservative justices.
19:18
I'm using quotes here are Roberts Thomas, Alito Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett,
19:23
right?
19:24
Roberts, Thomas, Alito Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, the liberal justices are
19:28
Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan, okay, the people that won't vote to overturn Roe v. Wade are
19:34
obviously Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan, all three of the liberal justices, but also Roberts,
19:39
Kavanaugh and Alito.
19:41
I see nothing that would make me believe that those three quote unquote conservative justices
19:46
was vote to overturn Roe.
19:47
So that's six of the nine.
19:48
You don't have the majority there.
19:50
The people who would likely overturn Roe v. Wade, I think Thomas obviously Barrett, obviously
19:55
and maybe Gorsuch.
19:57
So it's six or three, you know, it doesn't pass.
20:00
But the next president of the United States, right, whether it's Biden slash Harris or
20:06
Trump, they might get three picks because Breyer, who is a liberal justice is 82 years
20:13
old, Thomas, who's a conservative justice is 72 and Alito is a conservative justice who
20:19
is 70, right?
20:20
So the next president might get between one and three picks, right?
20:24
Let's say Trump wins the election and gets all three of those.
20:27
That would mean you would have Barrett, the other three justices, and maybe Gorsuch as
20:33
the swing vote for Roe v. Wade for overturning Roe v. Wade.
20:38
You will never get sod on my or you will never get Kagan.
20:40
In my opinion, you will never get Roberts.
20:42
Every time there's a for for decision, Roberts is siding with the liberal seemingly on these
20:47
large issues, right?
20:48
These, these seminal issues.
20:50
So I can at least see a pathway to it, right?
20:53
And if that's your reason to vote for Trump in 2020, I guess go for it.
20:56
But for me, she is a staunch advocate for the pro life cause, right?
21:02
And she's using the text of the constitution because again, there's no guarantee of the
21:07
right to an abortion in the United States Constitution.
21:10
That is why even liberal people that understand law and understand jurisprudence, understand
21:15
that Roe v. Wade is one of the worst decided cases in the history of the Supreme Court.
21:19
And there are some bad ones, but that one is one of the worst, right?
21:22
Just from a strictly judicial point of view, not a conservative or liberal point of view
21:26
just strictly judicial point of view.
21:28
There is nothing in the language of the constitution that says you should be able to kill the baby
21:32
inside of you because of some inconvenience in your life or some perceived inconvenience.
21:37
So that's why it's a big deal.
21:38
So there's a lot of reasons why that's a big deal.
21:41
Again, just to sum all this up, I'm super excited that Amy Coney Barrett is now on Supreme
21:45
Court.
21:46
And guys, this news cycle, which should be an enormous news cycle with a new Supreme
21:50
Court justice, it's going to disappear almost immediately, right?
21:53
That's going to be a blip on the radar on this Monday night.
21:56
And by tomorrow, Trump will have tweeted something.
21:58
Biden will have spilled something on himself and forgotten where he was.
22:01
And then we'll be right back to where we are now, which is basically holding our breath
22:04
for another seven days until November 3.
22:06
And so here we go.
22:08
Guys, before I let you go, we are going to do a quick resilience boost.
22:10
As you know, by now, we are a men's ministry and our mission is cultivating mainly resilience.
22:14
Specifically, we do that by providing you content that helps you forward spiritual, mental
22:17
and physical toughness.
22:18
So for today, I've got an article for you called the six top moments from the second day of
22:23
the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation hearings.
22:25
So the first day, it was just kind of introductory, it was pretty basic.
22:28
But the second day, she eviscerated some people with her questions.
22:32
That's when she had her mic drop moment of holding up the empty notepad.
22:35
I really want you to check out those videos because each one of these six top moments
22:39
has a video accompanying it.
22:40
It'll be definitely exciting for you to check that out.
22:42
Thanks so much for listening.
22:43
This episode, guys, you really do appreciate it.
22:45
If you would, please subscribe on Apple podcast, iTunes, Spotify, Google podcast or Stitcher
22:49
and refer your friends to listen and share this on social media.
22:52
Guys, if we deserve a five star review, please leave us one and let us know why you like
22:56
the content.
22:57
I'm currently booking speaking engagements for the remainder of 2020 and the beginning
23:00
of 2021.
23:01
So if you want to come speak on your podcast at your men's event, at your team, whatever
23:04
hit me up info at undaunted.life, that's I N F O at undaunted.life.
23:09
The website is www dot undaunted.life.
23:11
You can follow us on Instagram and Twitter at undaunted life or Facebook.com backslash
23:15
undaunted life.
23:16
Check out our free devotionals on the U version Bible app.
23:18
Just search undaunted life under plans.
23:20
And as always, we want to thank the band August Burns Red for allowing us to use their entire
23:24
music library for our content.
23:26
The intro outro track on this podcast is our song to fender, which is off their latest
23:29
record entitled guardians, the links are in the description.
23:32
I'm your host Kyle Thompson.
23:34
Remember, keep cultivating mainly resilience, keep forging spiritual, mental and physical
23:39
toughness.
23:40
Keep seeking the lion of Judah.
24:10
Thank you.