0:00
struggling with weight loss, Prolon's five-day fasting mimicking diet is a clinically developed
0:04
nutrition program designed to promote fat loss while protecting lean body mass.
0:08
Developed at USC's Longevity Institute, it assists the body in entering a fasting-like state that
0:14
helps reset metabolism and target visceral fat. In just five days, Prolon offers a science-backed
0:19
approach to weight loss without extreme restriction or guesswork. Get 15% off plus a $40 bonus gift
0:25
when you subscribe at prolonlife.com/now.
0:39
This is Undaunted Life of Man's Podcast. I'm your host Kyle Thompson, let's get into it.
0:51
Our guys, today's episode is called Normalizing Pedophilia LGBTQ+P, and guys, we will get into
0:58
why that is called that here in just a second. But if you go back to episode 87 of this podcast,
1:04
it was called Normalizing Pedophilia. Now, the thing is, is I don't really do, you know,
1:09
multi-part series on this show, right? I've done a two-part series on toxic masculinity and I just
1:16
wrapped, well, I hopefully wrapped the Race in America series, which ended up being four parts,
1:20
but I don't really do things thinking I'm going to have to come back to it because, you know,
1:23
I'll talk about things that are happening currently in the culture. I'll talk about current events.
1:27
I'll talk about some sort of big news happening and that's kind of pertinent to the timing,
1:31
but then there's also these larger topics, which it's like, okay, well, you hit on that topic
1:35
unless something fundamentally changes about it. You don't really need to go back and talk
1:38
more about it like I've done episodes on guns and how to engage abortion arguments and things
1:43
like that. And it's just like, those are kind of evergreen. They can be accessed anytime and you
1:47
could go to them and refer to them anytime, but I don't normally think that I'm going to have to
1:50
revisit a subject, but I guess I'm going to have to revisit pedophilia because there's more and more
1:57
things happening. Here we are in September of 2020 that makes us think that pedophilia
2:04
is going to be the next thing that we're going to have to deal with that we're going to have to
2:08
reckon with as a people, as men, as the church. And there's two things that have come up recently
2:12
that have kind of put this top of mind for a lot of people. And I'll talk about both of those now.
2:16
The first thing I'm going to talk about is the cuties movie that is coming out on Netflix. So
2:21
it's going to be released this week, but you guys might have thought it was already released
2:25
because all the hubbub about this being released. But here's the current description. So if you
2:29
go to Netflix right now, whether you're you're what if you're listening to this on time, I believe
2:33
that this movie is now going to be officially released. This is the current description of cuties
2:38
on Netflix. 11 year old Amy starts to rebel against her conservative family's traditions
2:44
when she becomes fascinated with a free spirited dance crew. So if you're just kind of flipping
2:50
through trying to figure out what to watch, maybe watch it with your family, you're thinking to
2:53
yourself, well, well, this is probably just some sort of coming of age tale. You know, this girl,
2:59
this poor girl is under the repressive authoritarian nature of our conservative family values. And we
3:05
just, man, this is going to be her busting out. This is going to be some sort of young feminist
3:10
that's blossoming before our eyes. That's what you would actually think. However, if we go back to the
3:15
original description of this, we get a slightly different story as to what we think the movie
3:21
cuties is supposed to be about. So here's the original description. Amy 11 becomes fascinated
3:28
with a twerking dance crew, hoping to join them. She starts to explore her femininity,
3:35
defying her family's traditions. Now, that's very different because this is a movie about a
3:42
twerking dance crew. But you have to go back to the beginning where it says she's 11.
3:48
And she's going to be exploring her femininity, which when people normally say explore their
3:55
femininity, they're talking about sex. That's what they're typically doing. They're talking
4:00
about sexualizing themselves and understanding what that feels like even in a young age. So when
4:06
you hear people say that, they just know what they're actually saying. But it wasn't the description
4:11
that really got people all up in arms about this film. It was the image that was used in the
4:17
marketing material for this film. So most of you guys have already seen this. So, you know,
4:23
you can look it up if you want to, I'm not going to provide it for you here. But essentially,
4:26
there are four young ladies. So probably in and around that age of 11 years old, and they're in
4:33
varying seductive dance poses, right? But here's the thing. If you were to blur the image or maybe
4:41
just look at it from the corner of your eye where you can't actually identify that these are young
4:44
ladies, you would have thought that this was a picture with four strippers on it. Because there's
4:50
one girl that's in a twerking motion. There's a couple of other girls in a seductive pose. One
4:54
girl's kind of all in all fours looking seductively at the camera. And the thing was, is that really
5:01
led to this tremendous outcry from people because in terms of the reception of the film, there were
5:07
a lot of defenders that, you know, saying, Hey, this is providing critical commentary on the
5:11
sexualization of children, you know, apparently by sexualizing the children. But there was pretty
5:16
much universal backlash in an era in a time in the world, especially in America, where there's
5:22
not universality on anything, almost any topic whatsoever. There's been universal backlash. I saw
5:28
conservatives, liberals, righties, lefties, Democrats, Republicans, I saw people going after
5:33
this saying, whoa, Netflix, you have absolutely crossed the line. What in the world is this movie?
5:39
How in the world are you going to put this on your platform? There was a huge petition that
5:43
went around online. It got tens of thousands of signatures, not just to change out the picture
5:48
or change out the description, but to actually get the film off of Netflix. So after all this
5:54
hubbub and all this stuff going on, Netflix issues a statement via Twitter. And this is what they
5:59
said, quote, we're deeply sorry for the inappropriate artwork that we used for cuties. It was not okay,
6:05
nor was it representative of this French film, which won an award at Sundance. We've now updated
6:10
the pictures and description, end quote. So couple things about that statement by Netflix,
6:15
because it's a really quick statement. It's just a couple of sentences, few sentences. So you may
6:19
have missed some things here. The first thing, they admit that the artwork that they used in the film
6:24
wasn't appropriate, but they say that it wasn't representative of this film.
6:30
So you have to ask yourself, in what way was it not representative of this film?
6:38
So here's the thing. Let's just run through a kind of a thought experiment. Did the pictures
6:43
show the characters from the film? Well, yes, the picture did. Were the characters wearing the
6:50
same clothing that they wore in the film? Yes. Were the characters striking poses like the ones
6:58
that they performed in the film? Yes. So if we go back to their statement saying that the image
7:06
was not representative of this film, in what way was it not? I mean, it made people very uncomfortable
7:14
and for good reason, but that that was your argument. It just wasn't representative of the film that
7:19
it clearly was representing. And the other thing is there's a subtle dig in their statement. Okay,
7:24
so it's you know, dot, dot, dot, which won an award at Sundance. So they just kind of sneak that in there.
7:31
The translation of that is obviously, well, if only you borish rubes understood art, maybe you
7:37
would understand that this film was about something more. Because the thing is, is people that have
7:42
actually seen the film, people that have spent their time and, you know, energy to spend two
7:46
hours with this ridiculous film, they said, well, it's not really about what the image portrays and
7:51
blah, blah, it's about so many other things. And it's not really what you would think. It's more of a,
7:56
it's more of a social commentary. It's more that that's what people are saying online. That's what
8:00
these critics are saying. But that's not the image that was used. Right. And we've all gone to movies
8:06
where the trailer, you know, thought it was going to be some shoot them up thing. And we thought it
8:09
was going to be awesome when we go in and it's just not really what we, what we think is kind of a
8:12
bait and switch. This is pretty different. This is pretty different. This is a description and a
8:17
picture showing the sexualization of 11 year old girls, right, to the pleasure of whom exactly.
8:24
We'll certainly get to that here in a second. But then the next thing that came up and these,
8:28
these both, both of these stories really came up in the same week or two. But Senate bill 145,
8:34
SB 145 passed in California. So this is what I'm going to do because there's a lot of confusion
8:40
out there about what this Senate bill is going to do and what it's not going to do. So I'm just
8:44
going to read most of this local news publication about Senate bill 145. So this is from Fox 11
8:50
in Los Angeles. So this is a local, uh, local publication, local news stores from there. So I'm
8:54
just going to read this. Okay. A new bill headed to governor Gavin, Gavin Newsom's desk with lower
8:59
penalties for adults who have consensual sex with a minor. If the offender is within 10 years of age
9:06
of the victim. Oh, and one thing real quick, that was just the opening, but the name of the article,
9:09
let me get the name of the article for you. It's new California bill with lower penalties
9:14
for adults who have sexual relations with a minor. Yeah. So let's go and jump back in here.
9:20
Senate bill 145 passed in both houses of the state legislature late Monday evening, which was
9:25
August 31st of 2020. If signed into law, a 24 year old could have sexual relations with a 15
9:31
year old child without being required to register as a sex offender. State Senator Shannon Grove wrote
9:36
in a tweet under current law while it is illegal for an adult to have consensual sex with a teenager
9:41
between 14 and 17 years old who cannot legally give consent. Vaginal intercourse between the two
9:47
does not require the offender to be listed on the state's sex offender registry as long as the
9:52
offender is within 10 years of age of the minor. Instead, the judge has the discretion to decide
9:59
based on the facts of the case, whether the sex offender registration is warranted. Other forms of
10:04
intercourse, such as oral and anal intercourse require sex offender registration. State Senator
10:09
Scott Wiener. No, that is not parody. That is actually the dude's name. State Senator Scott Wiener,
10:14
who presented the bill said the existing law quote, disproportionately targets LGBT young people for
10:20
mandatory sex offender registration. Since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse,
10:26
unquote, I feel like my brain's going to explode, but I'll keep going. California sex offender
10:31
registry comes continues to draw that distinction and antiquated outdated leftover distinction that
10:36
somehow oral sex is worse than vaginal sex Wiener said. Yes, that's exactly what his name is,
10:41
but I'll keep going. According to the bill's language, the goal of SB 145 is to quote exempt
10:48
from mandatory registration under the act a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if
10:54
the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor. And if that offense is the only one
10:59
requiring the person to register, unquote, critics of the bill argue that rather than amending existing
11:04
law to include vaginal intercourse with a minor as an act that requires mandatory sex offender
11:10
registration, the bill aims to make all criminal sex acts with a minor over 14 equal to equal by
11:17
providing offenders with an opportunity to evade mandatory registration. Any sex is sex argued
11:24
assembly woman Lorenzo Gonzalez. I don't care who it is between or what sex act it is. That being
11:29
said, I cannot in my mind as a mother understand how sex between a 24 year old and a 14 year old
11:35
could ever be consensual. And how it could ever not be a registrable offense. We should never give
11:41
up on this idea that children should be in no way subject to a predator. According to Wiener,
11:46
the bill would not change the potential sentence for having sex with an underage minor. Instead,
11:51
the bill would give judges the ability to evaluate whether the accused be required to register as a
11:56
sex offender. So if you got confused in the milieu of that article, believe me guys, I had to read
12:01
it over and over and over to really understand the nuance of what's happening with this Senate bill.
12:05
But this is what it essentially is a pedophile that performs the vaginal rape. And yes, I'm saying
12:11
rape, the vaginal rape of a child doesn't always become automatically registered as a sex offender
12:18
in the great state of California. So out of an overwhelming desire for equality, we need to make
12:24
it to where a pedophile that ainally or orally rapes a kid, which is typical of a pedophile that
12:31
has a same sex attraction, that they won't automatically be registered as a sex defender either.
12:38
Because we're progressive. And we think of the next thing that we need to look for. And gosh,
12:45
darn it, we need to, you know, if these people are being charged in this way, we just need to spread
12:49
it out as opposed to focusing on the difference in figuring out how we can stop this from happening
12:58
in any way, shape or form, ever, regardless of the sex act, regardless of the person.
13:03
Perhaps that would be a good thing to spend our time thinking about because they're sitting here
13:09
trying to figure out, well, you know, this, you know, 24 year old was banging this 14 year old,
13:14
which really couldn't consent to this. And as opposed to taking that person outside of town
13:18
and shooting them, we decide that we, well, let's leave it up to a liberal judge to figure out whether
13:24
or not this person should have to register as a sex offender, which is going to mean for any of
13:28
you listening to this in California, that person doesn't have to register, right? So this is someone
13:33
that had a, what they're calling a consensual sexual relationship with a child. They're not going
13:40
to have to register so they won't pop up on the website that shows you in your neighborhood
13:44
who has a sex crime against them against a child. Just think about that. The reality of trying to
13:52
live in a neighborhood because not everybody can live in a perfect neighborhood. And it's not as if
13:56
all the people in those perfect neighborhoods are perfect by any stretch of the imagination.
13:59
But can you imagine having a next door neighbor and you've got, you know, young kids in this person's
14:04
a pedophile and you checked because you're a dutiful, you know, person and a parent and you want to know
14:10
kind of what's around you and understand the potential harms that could befall your children
14:15
and your family. And that person's not registered because a judge didn't find it necessary regardless
14:21
of if it's same sex or opposite sex or whatever the attraction is for these people. It's depraved.
14:26
And again, I think we treat so many pedophiles in this country with kid gloves. But, you know,
14:32
before I get too far off into that, those are the two things. Cuties and Senate bill 145 in the
14:36
state of California. So, so why are we talking about these things? Well, the reason we're talking
14:40
about this is there's a question that we need to reckon with, right? And guys are, oh my gosh,
14:46
this is so crazy. How could you even ask such a thing? Like, that's a bridge too far. Kyle,
14:49
why would you say that? But here's the question, guys. How long until pedophilia is considered
14:54
normal in the modern West? Let me just let that sit in the air for a little bit. How long
15:02
until pedophilia is considered normal in the modern West in the United States?
15:07
And you got guys again, some of you are just God, this is so stupid. I mean, you know, Kyle,
15:13
did you run out of things to talk to your or talk about? It's like, this is what we're going to be
15:17
having to deal with. This is what we're going to have to listen to. But guys, I want you to go back
15:21
to the Overton window conversation that I have with you. I think it was episode
15:24
of 116 of this podcast, 116 117, whatever. It was called shifting the Overton window.
15:30
So the Overton window is that those are the things that are able to be in the common discourse of a
15:37
society, right? And there's always a shifting of that window where things are inside and outside
15:44
of that window. There's things that you can talk about and there's just things that you just can't
15:47
talk about things that just seem so incredibly crazy. But right now, and again, go back to that
15:52
normalizing pedophilia episode that I did a while back, this is the next frontier for progressives.
16:00
Because it has to be. Because back in the day, the argument was, well, you know what, hey,
16:05
if you want to be, you know, some people are just gay, and then that's just the way that is,
16:09
and you shouldn't treat them any differently. Okay. Well, you know what, you know, don't treat
16:13
them any differently. And but allow them to have civil unions. It's only right, you know, they're
16:17
not going to be able to visit their dying partner in the hospital because they're not technically
16:21
family, blah, blah, blah, let's let them have civil unions. And then it became, okay, well,
16:24
then, you know, they should be able to get married because, you know, the institution of marriage isn't
16:28
just for, you know, men and women to be in a single relationship with one another. You know,
16:33
there's got to be a new definition of marriage that lies outside of the confines of this patriarchal
16:38
society or this Anglo-Saxon or this, you know, Judeo-Christian society or whatever the situation
16:43
is there. But this is the next thing. And people think that that's insane. But go back to that first
16:50
episode when I talked about normalizing pedophilia 80 something or other. There were two TED talks
16:55
that have happened those that were years ago that happened years ago, where they're basically
17:00
talking about pedophilia as if it's a sexual orientation. As if it's like, Oh, these people
17:06
just can't help it. It's a compulsion. You know, we shouldn't be punishing these people. We should,
17:10
we should be helping them with these people shouldn't go to jail. You know, they shouldn't be punished
17:15
for raping children. Come on. Now it's just their sexual orientation. Because what you may not know
17:22
about homosexuality is if you go back to the American Psychological Association, they used to say that
17:26
that was an actual mental issue, right? Homosexuality. And again, I'm sure someone will clip this audio
17:31
and use it later to, you know, blast me on Twitter or something like that. I didn't make that up.
17:35
That's what it was. And then it just changed. Similar to how the American Psychological Association
17:41
changed without any changes to the science, mind you, changed the fact that a child can, you know,
17:46
just all of a sudden be transgender that a little boy can actually be a little girl, which kind of
17:52
leads me into the next point. What progressives are trying to do is they're trying to sneak the P
17:56
onto the end of LGBTQ, right? So lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual, queer, questioning,
18:03
they're trying to put the P on the end. Now they won't say that upfront because there's very
18:07
few progressives that are going to say that out loud because currently this conversation is still
18:12
outside of the overton window for most people. But if you're using the arguments for transgenderism
18:20
and children, you can very easily carbon copy and apply those same arguments to pedophilia.
18:26
Because here's the thing, there are sexual consent laws in every state, which basically prohibit
18:32
children of a certain age to be able to consent to a consensual sexual relationship. And the reason
18:38
that those laws are on the books are because children don't have the mental or physical ability or
18:43
maturity to consent to a consensual sexual relationship, nor do they have the power to prevent or stop
18:50
it on, you know, in most cases, right? But at the same time that we're reckoning with that,
18:56
we're being told that children of any age can choose their gender and that the parents are to
19:03
honor, encourage, and affirm that. So your five year old boy says, I'm actually a girl and you're
19:09
supposed to say, you know what, you're right. Let's go ahead and put you on puberty blockers.
19:13
Let's go ahead and cut off your junk. Let's go on. Let's go ahead. Let's go full board, right?
19:17
Let's pick your new name. Okay, you want to be married. All right, you can be married. That's
19:21
what we're supposed to be doing. But if we use that as our argumentation for transgenderism,
19:26
which is now inside the overton window, remember like five years ago, if someone had told you that
19:31
a five year old could choose their gender, you would have looked at them that like they were insane
19:34
because they are. But they're using that conversation now, a lot of progressives believe that they
19:39
believe that, you know, gender is a social construct. And there's no biology really attached to it.
19:43
There's biological sex, but then there's gender and they're somehow separate, even though they
19:46
can't explain how. But the same thing is true with transgenderism and with pedophilia.
19:51
Because if I were a pedophile, which I am not, but let's say I was a 34 year old man and I was
19:59
into 12 year olds, I could use the argument that wait a minute, wait a minute, while that 12 year
20:05
old can choose their gender at the age of 12, they can also choose whether or not to consent to
20:10
having sex with me. Now that's a horrible thing to even think, right? And I'm sure someone will
20:16
clip that audio later and try to use it out of context. But that can certainly happen.
20:20
We have already seen people go, go look it up guys. We've already seen examples of pedophiles
20:25
that raped children that parted their defense in court was that they were trans aged.
20:30
No, no, no, sir, judge, you know, you're on or I'm not 45. I'm 15.
20:36
So the relationship I was having with this 10 year old boy is completely consensual. I'm 15.
20:43
And people are like, well, that's insane. How much more insane is it than someone saying that
20:49
they're transgender? You know, trans age or trans race or whatever those things. How is that any
20:57
different? I mean, those things categorically are the exact same thing. And guys, we need to be on
21:04
top of this. Because again, everything the church in America is now downstream from culture. Most
21:10
churches, maybe not your church, maybe you'll defend your church to the death. But most most
21:14
churches are downstream from culture. We're already seeing some of the same LGBT plus LGBTQ plus things
21:20
trumpeted from pulpits. Now, 10 years ago, they weren't being trumpeted from very many pulpits.
21:26
Now they've got pulpits. They've got them all over the place now. But I just want you to think of this
21:33
podcast as a time machine or sorry, not a machine, but more of a time capsule. So I want you to
21:40
remember this. And if you stuck with us for the last 20 minutes, you're going to be, you know,
21:43
thinking to yourself, I will, you know, I'll just log that in the back of my brain. Let's wait some
21:48
years. And let's see when this starts to be a normal conversation. Well, guys, guys, guys, guys,
21:52
you know, I know this guy's 20 and this this girl's 12. But gosh, she's so mature for her age.
21:58
I mean, man, she just, I think she knows what she's doing. Or let let's go back to cuties.
22:05
This is an 11 year old. She's exploring her femininity by twerking and doing these dances
22:12
in the skimpy clothes to the the pleasuring of the eyeballs of God knows who in the audience. But
22:19
yet she's just exploring her femininity. So why wouldn't we let an adult helper with that? I mean,
22:23
the adult surely knows a way to kind of allow some of that to be revealed and to blossom into
22:30
this beautiful butterfly of sexuality. Why wouldn't we let her do that? Guys, if that sounds crazy,
22:36
think about the transgender argument and think about what it's done just in the last few years.
22:42
The pace of these things for a lot of progressives isn't getting any slower. It's been slow going
22:48
for a long time. And we have fallen off a cliff. Need I remind you that when Barack Obama took office
22:52
in 2008, he was against gay marriage. He was fundamentally against gay marriage. The only
22:58
president that was pro gay marriage or at least neutral and gay marriage when they entered the
23:03
White House is Donald Trump, which doesn't say a whole lot just because it was a manner of the
23:06
times. It was a losing issue to talk about. So why talk about it in 2016 when you're going up
23:11
against Hillary Clinton, right? But just think about that 2008 was not that long ago. And look
23:16
at where we are as a culture now. I mean, this is very, very different. I think about like people
23:21
that are my grandparents age, like in their 80s and 90s. And what they've seen happened to their
23:25
country in the last five or 10 years, the conversations that are being had by a multitude of people.
23:31
It's got to be absolutely insane. So again, put a pin in this one. Just remember, this is a
23:35
shorter podcast. This might seem insane to you, but we're going to have more movies like cuties
23:40
coming out. There's already been different cartoons that Netflix has put out that are, you know,
23:44
normalizing sex acts for kids and different things like that. These things are just around,
23:49
but they're nipping around the edges. And this isn't some QAnon, you know, conspiracy theory
23:53
nonsense. This is just happening. Like I didn't create cuties. I'm not going to watch it. I'm not
23:59
going to support it. But then you've got these laws like what are happening in California.
24:03
And a lot of laws are kind of downstream of what happens in some of the bigger states and cities.
24:09
Now in the great state of Oklahoma where I live, I don't think we'll ever have something like this
24:12
on the books. But guys, what is the world going to look like in 2030? And that's not some sort of
24:18
dystopian warning to everybody. That's just reality. In the last few years, we've gone from a kid can't
24:24
choose a gender to they can. And then we've got some huge Supreme Court decisions coming up when
24:30
it comes to religious freedom and the rights of parents. I mean, guys, you got to pay attention.
24:36
You got to pay attention to the right news sources. Because again, did you hear about these stories
24:40
on CNN? Did you hear about these stories in the New York Times? If you did, they were buried on
24:45
the back page or in the very, very bottom of the website, whatever the situation is. But guys,
24:49
you've got to be paying attention. But I've got one little sidebar that I want to hit before we
24:53
let you guys go for the day and it's this. It is so interesting to me to note the number of men
25:01
that were just completely outraged by, by especially the movie cuties, right? Oh man,
25:08
they were outraged by it and they couldn't believe it. And they're posting it on Facebook. And can
25:11
you believe this on Twitter? And they're sharing it around and doing all those things. But the same
25:16
men have no problem with their daughters on dance teams or palm squads. And before your head explodes,
25:27
it's like, Oh, Kyle's anti dancing or whatever the situation is. I want you to look at a lot of the
25:33
the dances and the dance moves and the routines that are being performed by dance teams and palm
25:38
squads of all aged girls below the age of 18 girls in elementary school junior high and high school.
25:44
It is astonishing what you guys will allow your daughters to wear and do in front of a bunch of men.
25:54
Even in my own church, I see guys and their their moms that are posting pictures of their daughters,
26:00
their young daughters wearing an unbelievable amount of makeup, wearing ridiculously skimpy
26:08
clothes and doing dance moves that you might expect to see at a strip club. But it's just innocent,
26:15
right? It's just dancing, right? It's just them hanging out with their friends and all their
26:22
friends are on the dance squad. And yeah, you know, the teachers a little bit older. And you know,
26:27
maybe they come from a different background and maybe some of these hip hop moves that they picked
26:30
up off music videos. Maybe they don't understand what that looks like. But you should. And you do.
26:37
So guess what, dad? If you've got little girls that are into dancing and you want to encourage
26:44
that, I'm all for it. There's plenty of ways that these girls can dance where it can be good for
26:49
exercise and for their friendships and for their even their athletic development for work. All that
26:54
I get it. But if you sit there and you're at a basketball game, because maybe they go out and
27:00
they dance with the the Thunder girls at halftime at a at a Thunder game or whatever basketball team
27:06
that you go to, and you're there at halftime. And you're watching your daughter's dance seductively.
27:11
That better be the last time that that happens. Because what you should do to try and honor and
27:18
protect your daughter, you should have a nice chat with the people that run the dance team and say,
27:23
Hey, I watched this last thing. And some of these dance moves were especially seductive.
27:28
And if you're going to continue having our girls do that, you won't have a dance team.
27:33
You won't make any money. There will be no one to pay you for lessons to teach these girls
27:39
basically how to be strippers. But then guys, a lot of you already know what your kid is going to be
27:44
wearing before they go out there. And you're seemingly okay with it. Because guess what stories
27:51
like Senate Bill 145 in California, and this cutie's documentary, and all the the TED talks
27:57
I've talked about about pedophilia should let you know that in that crowd, again, I'm thinking
28:02
specifically about these little dance crews that go out and dance with the Thunder girls at halftime.
28:05
There's 15,000 20,000 people in there. How many pedophiles do you think are in there?
28:10
And your little girl is just sitting there dancing right in front of them.
28:14
And it is your job as a sheep dog to protect her.
28:17
And I don't care. Well, you know, my wife just says it's good for all that. You are the man of the
28:22
house. You control that. You're going to have to stand before God someday and describe to him
28:28
and defend how you've protected the flock within your house. You're going to have to do that.
28:33
So if it seems like I'm getting fired up, it's because I am because I don't have a daughter.
28:37
But I look at these men with daughters and I'm just astonished because your outrage means
28:43
nothing to me if you allow it within your own house. You're you're ready to go outside and,
28:48
you know, yell at the sky because of some documentary on Netflix that you're not going to watch or
28:52
some film on Netflix that you're not going to watch. But then you're allowing it in your own homes.
28:55
So guys, maybe this is your wake up call because most of you are ready to throw down in a moment's
29:02
notice if someone were to hurt your kids. But what if you're feeding their appetite? That one's on
29:07
you. All right, guys, before we let you go, we are going to do a quick resilience boost. As you know,
29:11
by now we are a men's ministry and our mission is cultivating mainly resilience. Specifically,
29:15
we do that by providing you content that helps you for spiritual mental and physical toughness.
29:19
So for today, I've got two things for you. One, I've got the link to the story that I read today.
29:22
So that was from Fox 11, Los Angeles is called a new California bill with lower penalties for
29:27
adults who have sexual relations with a minor. And then I actually have the actual link to California
29:32
Senate bill 145. So if you think I have mischaracterized anything, and if you got any gotcha statements
29:38
in that, you know, little soliloquy that I did there, go ahead. There it is. It's right there in
29:43
black and white. You can read it for yourself. Guys, thanks too much for listening to podcasts
29:47
who really do appreciate it. If you would, please subscribe on Apple podcast, iTunes, Spotify,
29:50
Google podcast or Stitcher and refer your friends to listen and share this on social media. Guys,
29:55
if we deserve a five star view, that is how this content is going to continue to get out to more
29:58
guys. So please help us out with those reviews. I'm currently booking speaking engagements for the
30:02
remainder of 2020 and the beginning of 2021. So if you want to come speak on your podcast at your
30:07
men's event at your church, whatever, hit me up info at undaunted.life. That's I N F O at undaunted.life.
30:13
The website is www dot undaunted.life. You can follow us on Instagram and Twitter at undaunted life
30:18
or Facebook.com backslash undaunted life. Check out our free devotionals on the U version Bible
30:23
app just search undaunted life under plans. And as always, we want to thank the band August
30:26
Prince read for allowing us to use their entire music library for our content. The intro out to a
30:31
track on this podcast is our song defender, which is off their latest record entitled guardians.
30:35
The links are in the description. I'm your host, Kyle Thompson. Remember, keep cultivating manly
30:41
resilience, keep forging spiritual, mental and physical toughness. Keep seeking the lion of Judah.
31:06
Peace.