← All episodes

034 - Q&A Vol. 5

August 2, 2018 1h 15m Full transcript available
034 - Q&A Vol. 5
0:00 / 1h 15m
In this Q&A episode, Kyle tackles pressing questions from listeners, including the implications of Oklahoma's medical marijuana legislation and the complexities of accountability among men. He shares his personal views on various topics, emphasizing a biblical perspective and the importance of discernment in today's culture.
Transcript
931 segments
0:00 When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed! sponsored
0:05 jobs. It gives your job posts the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right
0:10 skills, certifications, and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing
0:15 candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsor job credit at
0:20 indeed.com/podcast. That's indeed.com/podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero?
0:27 This is a job for Indeed! sponsored jobs.
0:30 This is a Daunted Life of Man's Podcast. I'm your host Kyle Thompson. Let's get into it.
0:45 All right, guys. We got Q&A this week. It's been a little bit since we've done an episode with Q&A.
0:49 Questions have been piling up, so let's launch in. Question number one. In Oklahoma, state
0:53 question 788 recently passed in favor of medical marijuana opening the door for recreational marijuana.
0:59 Is this good for your state and the people? So I appreciate this question. Thanks a lot. This
1:04 is like the first question. So let's get started off of the bang, I guess. So just so everyone knows,
1:09 I am in Edmond, Oklahoma and the state of Oklahoma. Yes, there was the medical marijuana
1:13 legislation initiative. That's basically what this was. And so that was on the ballot here in my
1:18 home state on June 26th of this year. And so essentially a yes vote on state question 788,
1:25 well, that supported the measure to legalize the licensed cultivation, use and possession of
1:30 marijuana for medicinal purposes. So that is what a yes vote got. So this passed, which was very
1:36 surprising to a lot of Oklahomans and a lot of pundits really around the country that this pass.
1:40 And it passed with a pretty big majority. So as a 57%, around 57% majority, there were over 500,000
1:48 votes for yes on this. So before I get into really the question that was asked here, and I appreciate
1:53 the listener for sending this in before I really get into that, I'll just kind of get into like
1:57 my personal views on marijuana use just in general before we get into all the technical side.
2:02 So for me, that is not a substance that I have ever used. I've never smoked marijuana. I've never
2:06 had any edibles. I've never done anything like that. And frankly, it's never appealed to me.
2:11 So it was kind of the same thing. Like when I first started watching people abuse marijuana,
2:17 it was whenever around the same time I was watching people abuse alcohol. And so when I saw these
2:22 people using these substances, I was just like, God, y'all are losers. Like you're 15 years old,
2:27 16 years old, you're so high, you don't know what's going on, or you're paranoid, or you're just
2:32 completely worthless, or you're getting high all the time, and you're not taking care of your grades
2:36 or the people in your life. Like you're so drunk, you have to like walk on all fours to the bathroom,
2:41 so you can go throw up. So I mean, really, it's just kind of one of those things where it just
2:45 never appealed to me. Because when people were using it, it was just like, they weren't using
2:49 it for medicinal purposes. They were just using it to get high, right? And so it's just kind of
2:53 one of those things that never really appealed to me. Like same thing, like I was saying with
2:56 alcohol, I had my first drink when I was 20. And I was in Europe, so it was legal at the time. So
3:01 it was just not something it wasn't like some sort of like prudish thing. Like, Oh, I'm just going to
3:06 be super conservative and not doing anything bad. It was just like, I saw people doing it,
3:10 and I just didn't see the utility of doing it myself. And so you fast forward to June 26 of this
3:16 year when the state question comes up, I voted no on state question 788. And you would think,
3:20 well, yeah, of course, because you've never done it. And you ignored all the positives and all those
3:25 different things. But but here's the thing is whenever I do any type of voting, so especially
3:29 on state questions, where it's going not just to elect a person that might change a law,
3:34 but electing or basically making a decision about something that will become law. I make sure that
3:40 I'm that I'm up on my information, that I'm not just kind of pulling information on my butt or
3:45 using oversimplified arguments. And so here's kind of the reasons why I voted no. And I really,
3:50 I kind of go all over the place, I'll try to keep all my thoughts straight here. But the first thing
3:53 was is that people in favor of legalizing medical marijuana in Oklahoma said that it would kill the
3:59 black market, right? That was one of the things that they said is like, you know, if it's legal,
4:03 then we don't have the black market. And this is not true at all. It's literally not true at all.
4:08 If anything and not really if anything, this definitely has happened. The black market goes up.
4:14 It explodes. I mean, it certainly has in Colorado, right? That was the first state
4:18 to legalize recreational marijuana use the black market skyrockets. Because here's the thing,
4:23 these Mexican drug cartels, they make, you know, like some people assume these are like random
4:29 reports and things like that. But 15 to 25% of their revenue is from marijuana, right?
4:34 So the rest of it comes from like, you know, extortion or kidnapping or human trafficking,
4:39 other drugs, stuff like that. And so the thing is, is these cartels, they are helped by the legal,
4:46 legalization of marijuana, because more people will become addicted or more people will just want
4:51 to smoke it without being addicted, right? They're not actually addicted. They just want to smoke it.
4:55 And there's going to be a lot of people that are like, well, why in the world now that I smoke
4:59 marijuana, why would I want to go and pay extra pay a premium and do it through the government and
5:04 them know my purchasing habits with the substances and things like that? Why wouldn't I just go to
5:09 the dude around the corner, right? So that that was one of the things that was out there is it was
5:12 just like a really stupid view that people are like, Oh, the black market's just going to disappear.
5:16 That was really ridiculous. The other thing that people said that were in favor of legalization,
5:20 they said that this would defeat the opioid epidemic. And it won't that there's there's really no
5:27 tangible non anecdotal arguments that show that the opioid epidemic is stemmed whenever there's
5:33 recreational or medicinal marijuana that's been introduced into that populace. It's just not there.
5:38 So I understand why people would say that. Like, you know, why not smoke a joint as opposed to
5:42 getting a prescription for oxycodone? Like I get the argument. The argument is just a dumb one.
5:46 There's also people that were in favor of this that said it would decrease the number of people
5:50 that were incarcerated for, you know, marijuana, marijuana related arrests. And this isn't true
5:55 at all. So here's the thing is, yes, a law like this and similar ones around the country,
6:00 it kind of decriminalizes marijuana possession for personal use. But but there's a reality here
6:05 that I don't think people realize. And that is that that most people are not in jail just because
6:10 they had personal amounts of marijuana. And actually, I looked this up, it constitutes 0.3%.
6:16 So 0.3% of state inmates are incarcerated for marijuana possession. I just think about that.
6:26 Think about the things that you heard about, you know, the decriminalization. It's like,
6:29 it's ridiculous. Almost 100% of the people incarcerated are incarcerated for trafficking,
6:35 not possession. So you always hear that and it's just like, no, that's completely,
6:40 completely wrong. And here's the other thing that's kind of on the no side of this question,
6:44 is there are, there will be large increases in marijuana, marijuana related DUIs.
6:49 It just has to be that way, right? Now, some people quote those stats incorrectly,
6:52 because obviously, if there was no medicinal marijuana and then all of a sudden it comes in,
6:56 of course, you're going to have, you know, there's going to be a more ubiquitous nature of use of
6:59 this particular drug. But marijuana related DUIs skyrocket, right? And again, the black market
7:05 doesn't go away. So it's not, I mean, we're not really going to have those same issues. And so,
7:09 these these guys that are trafficking in marijuana now are not going to just stop trafficking once
7:14 it's become legal. They're still going to get arrested. And there are also people that were in
7:17 favor of this that said, you know, it would solve specifically for my state that it would solve
7:22 the state funding issues for education and education overall. Because here's the thing,
7:26 is there is an education epidemic in the state of Oklahoma. Even if you're not from my state,
7:30 you probably saw some of the highlights and, and you know, the overhead shots outside the state
7:35 capital, all these teachers and people and supportive teachers for these pay raises and things like
7:40 that, just trying to get us up to the national average. And here's the thing I get it. But the
7:44 thing is, is we've been sold this bill of goods as Oaky's a lot. We've been sold all these different
7:50 things that was going to fix education in our state. So we were told that these tax increases
7:55 that we're about to have that that's supposed to fix education, right? It's going to keep our best
7:59 teachers here and get our kids over the hump. That, and that's not true. We were told, you know,
8:03 that paying these teachers more is going to is going to all of a sudden make these kids
8:07 be better and these teachers will be better. That doesn't necessarily mean that's going to happen
8:12 just because you pay them more doesn't automatically make them better at their jobs. You know, we were
8:16 told that casinos when we brought in the tribal casinos that that was supposed to help us fix
8:21 the educational problem. And we still have it. We were the lottery when they brought the lottery
8:26 to the state of Oklahoma, that was supposed to fix the budget crisis with funding for education.
8:31 That didn't do it. You know, there was like back in the day, there was like a per class liquor tax
8:35 that was supposed to fix everything and that hasn't fixed it either. So these people that are going
8:39 out there basically saying, Hey, let's legalize weed. And then all of a sudden our kids will be
8:43 able to have brand new textbooks every year. It's just it's fallacious. It doesn't make any
8:48 sense whatsoever. Like none whatsoever. So like just stop selling that line. And here's the thing
8:53 is a lot of people, especially the people that were on the pro side here, the yes side,
8:57 they look at Colorado as kind of that shining example of how this is quote unquote working.
9:02 Now here's the thing is Colorado is making money. It's not like an ungodly amount of money like,
9:08 but they are making good, good money at this. But you also have to look at what's happening
9:12 in these other places or what's happening because of what's being done in these areas. So here's the
9:19 thing. Teen use of marijuana in the state of Colorado is 50% higher than anywhere else in the
9:26 United States. Teen use. Now remember, you're you're supposed to not be under the age of 18
9:31 and using using medical marijuana for anything, right? But magically, it's 50% higher than it is
9:39 anywhere else. And it doesn't take a genius to figure out why. And here's the other thing we kind
9:42 of talked about this on the DUI side. But there's been a huge increase in fatal car crashes where
9:47 drivers were under the influence of marijuana, right? And it's also creating issues for cops
9:52 because it's a whole lot harder to determine that somebody is high than it is to determine that
9:56 they're, you know, that they're drunk, right? They just do a breathalyzer test. So you're basically
10:01 having all these cops go out there and they're having to, you know, probably like prove that you're
10:05 high on marijuana using the smell test, you know what I mean? Which is not really a great test.
10:09 Like you could just smell bad. It doesn't necessarily mean you've been smoking weed.
10:12 And some of the other reasons why I really wasn't in support of this was the original wording
10:18 of the state question state question 788 was it was unbelievably liberal and broad. It was
10:22 unbelievably broad. There were there were essentially no qualifying medical conditions listed. So,
10:28 you know, literally, and this is not me being hyperbolic, you could stub your toe and be like,
10:32 ouch, I need a marijuana card. And if you go to a doctor that's open to that, then boom,
10:36 you've got your card, right? There the other thing is in a lot of these areas that have medical
10:43 marijuana or that have recreational now, it all started with medical. So no one just says medical
10:49 marijuana is good enough. It always leads to recreational. And I have my serious misgivings
10:54 and issues with recreational marijuana use. Also, there were no zoning laws as any part of this
11:00 question. So literally, you could be a business owner in a strip center of some sort. And then
11:06 all of a sudden on either side of you, you could have a weed shop, right? And again, it's just kind
11:11 of one of those things where, you know, that's not a reflection of your business, but it may stop
11:15 patrons from coming to you if they're going to be so close to one of those areas. That doesn't
11:19 mean it's right or wrong for those patrons to do that, but it is a reality. And, you know,
11:23 the thing is with any substance, right? So the more readily available a substance is, I mean,
11:29 think alcohol, think cigarettes or whatever, the higher percentage of adolescents are going to
11:32 abuse it. Like we've got statistics and we've got research like out the wazoo on this that whenever
11:37 these things are more available, that teens end up using adolescents end up using it. And here's
11:42 the thing, a lot of people, you know, there's different studies that people try to refute this,
11:48 but all in all, when you look at basically adolescents that are abusing marijuana,
11:53 marijuana contributes to psychosis and schizophrenia and adolescents. There's direct linkages with
11:59 it reducing IQ and adolescents. And here's the other thing that people like try and fight against
12:04 it, but there's really no medical evidence for the contrary about one in six adolescents about
12:09 one in six, they become addicted even after a single use of marijuana. So that doesn't mean
12:14 they're addicted for life. It doesn't mean they can't get out of that hole. But one in six becomes
12:18 addicted after a single use, right? It's like their brains can't possibly turn off the dopamine
12:23 receptors once they took in that that substance, right? So those are just the practical reason. So
12:28 that that's just on my side of things. There was way too much on the no side. And you know, that kind
12:34 of get went against, you know, the libertarian in me, I'm conservative and libertarian on certain
12:38 things. It kind of went against that. But it just didn't make a lot of sense for us to do that. I
12:42 thought I was going to be too much of a public health hazard. I thought it was going to be too
12:46 much of an issue. Because for every one kid that, you know, needs CBD oil in order to take care of
12:53 their seizures or something like that, there's going to be a thousand or 10,000 people that are
12:57 using marijuana just to get high. And so it's just kind of one of those things that I just don't
13:01 know a way that it can be regulated by a highly inefficient government to where it doesn't become
13:05 a detrimental issue. But but again, this is a Christian men's podcast. So what's kind of the
13:10 Christian view on marijuana use? Because here's the thing is the Bible is a lamp unto our feet.
13:16 And the Bible is a guide for a lot of things that we say, but the Bible doesn't explicitly talk
13:20 about everything, right? The Bible doesn't talk about guns. The Bible doesn't talk about,
13:24 you know, nuclear weapons and it doesn't mention marijuana, like by name, right? So how do we kind
13:30 of get into this? So the thing that I did notice with a lot of Christians is that they tend to
13:36 oversimplify the arguments against marijuana. They make it overly simple, which thus makes it
13:42 pretty easy to debunk. And so one thing that I thought was good, I found an article on Christianity
13:48 today. And the article was called when pot is legal, what do we say? When pot is legal,
13:53 what do we say? So this was a pastor that was basically like, look, we know where the culture is
13:57 going, we know where the law is going. So this is going to eventually be legal across the country
14:02 for recreational use. There's almost nothing to stop it, right? And so I would just want to read
14:08 a couple of different things here from this portion of the article, because I thought it was really
14:12 important how he worded it that if you go too much into oversimplified land, it's going to get you
14:17 into trouble. So this is kind of a, a back and forth that he had had with a few people at different
14:21 times. So this is what he would say, pot is bad for you. And our bodies are temples that we need to
14:26 take care of. And this was the response. So is alcohol, tobacco, coffee, and sugar? What is this
14:31 world? What in this world is not bad for you? Bus exhaust causes cancer. And according to California,
14:36 so does everything else. My missionary friends in Nepal constantly fall seriously ill due to
14:41 contaminated water, bacteria, chemicals, etc. Should they abandon their post? Super smog in
14:46 China is killing thousands of people daily. Is it immoral to choose to live in a Chinese city?
14:52 Should I avoid tap water to stay free from the chlorine and fluoride? And then there was another
14:56 argument this guy made is pot is worse than alcohol. You can't use it in moderation. And then here's
15:02 the response. We're specifically how? Certainly not according to any study or basic cursory
15:07 glance at the impact of either substances on our society abroad or individual levels.
15:12 And what about using THC in a way that does not require smoking, such as vapor brownies or pills?
15:18 What about using THC in small doses equivalent to an IPA or a glass of wine? Who measures intoxication?
15:25 Is it a certain percentage? Is there a particular hindrance on one's capacity to function? Is it
15:29 okay to drink two beers? Three? Is tolerance different for different people? And then here's kind of
15:34 the other side that if you're going to make some oversimplified arguments, here's another one.
15:38 Pot is never mentioned in the Bible, but wine is. And then the response to that could be something
15:43 like t-shirts and coffee or not in the Bible either. Take off your shirt and throw away your mug.
15:47 And another argument made here, pot is legal now, which means it is okay for Christians to use.
15:52 So here's the response to that. Is it okay to use the Christian measure of goodness?
15:57 I could be an alcoholic, adulterous, deceitful, prescription abusing, manipulative,
16:02 hate-filled connoisseur of grotesque pornography and still be okay legally and socially.
16:07 Does the government stamp of approval mean I should partake or even can partake with
16:12 with moral uprightness? What about dope smoking is truly profitable for you more importantly for
16:17 your neighbor? What would Jesus smoke? Right? So I thought that was very interesting. The thing is,
16:21 is you find yourself in a trap on either side of the argument when you oversimplify it,
16:26 you're basically just opening up a bear trap that you're going to trip in trip into and it's going
16:29 to get you, right? And then there was another article I found that I thought was particularly
16:33 helpful for Christians that are trying to think through this issue. And it was written by Joe
16:37 Carter who was writing for the gospel coalition and it was called is recreational marijuana use
16:42 a sin. So I just want to read through some of the things that he wrote because this is kind of an
16:46 argumentation breakdown. And I thought it was incredibly helpful. So it's somewhat complicated,
16:51 but just, you know, if you're listening to it at two times speed, bump it down to one and a half
16:54 or something like that, just so you can get it. But I'll try to read it so we can all nail it. Okay,
16:57 so here's Joe Carter. To provide an answer rooted in scripture in Christian ethics, we must use
17:02 analogical reasoning. In his essay, the place of scripture in Christian ethics, James Gustafson
17:08 states the commonly accepted method of scriptural analogy. Those actions of persons and groups are
17:14 to be judged morally wrong, which are similar to actions that are judged to be wrong or against
17:18 God's will under similar circumstances in scripture, or are discordant with actions judged to be right
17:24 or in accord with God's will in scripture. While this may seem rather obvious, it raises the question
17:30 of how we determine whether an action or circumstance is similar to an action judged to be wrong in
17:35 scripture. Legal scholar case Sustine explains how we apply analogical reasoning. This kind of
17:42 thinking has a simple structure. One, a has characteristic x. Okay, number one, a has characteristic x.
17:49 Number two, b shares that characteristic. Number three, a also has characteristic y.
17:56 Number four, because a and b share characteristic x, we conclude what is not yet known that b shares
18:03 characteristic y as well. Is there an analogical action that is judged to be wrong or against God's
18:10 will that's similar to the recreational use of marijuana? Indeed, there is a clear example
18:15 that is mentioned frequently in the Bible drunkenness. At the end of this article are several scriptural
18:20 references to drunkenness and sobriety drunkenness in the Bible is the state of being intoxicated
18:25 by alcohol. A, intoxication by alcohol ingestion has characteristic x produces a psychoactive effect,
18:34 that is, affects brain function, resulting in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness,
18:39 cognition, and behavior. B, intoxication by marijuana ingestion shares that characteristic.
18:45 Because a and b share characteristic x, we conclude what is not yet known that b shares characteristic
18:52 y, which is an action that is judged to be against God's will, i.e., is sinful reasoning by analogy,
19:00 we can we can determine that since it is sinful to become intoxicated by alcohol,
19:05 it is sinful to become intoxicated by marijuana. So if you didn't get all that, guys, I got to be
19:10 honest, I had to read it a couple times through my brain just doesn't work that efficiently,
19:13 but I finally got it. Go back and just rewind like just, you know, you got 15 second rewind,
19:17 boom, boom, boom, just go back and hear that again, because that's incredibly important. Again,
19:22 when we look at things that are explicitly talked about in the Bible, and then we're trying to
19:25 look at things that are not explicitly talked about in the Bible, we have to use the Bible as
19:28 our guideline. It's just, it's what's make the most sense to us, right? But as we kind of wrap up
19:33 this question, the best argument that I heard for the use of or against the use of marijuana
19:40 was by pastor Jeff Lacey. And I think it's how he says last name. And he wrote this for desiring
19:44 God. And the article is called marijuana to the glory of God question mark, right? Marijuana
19:48 to the glory of God kind of thing. And so this was a pastor up in Portland, because of course you
19:52 would be up in Portland. But this guy used to smoke marijuana every day. That was like in the first
19:56 sentence, I believe of the articles that he used to smoke all the time. But as you kind of get
20:00 down through his arguments, and I'll post the link so you can look at it later, here was a couple
20:04 of paragraphs that he wrote that I thought was incredibly efficient in terms of his explanation
20:09 of why we should or shouldn't use marijuana. Here we go. Even though cannabis is never directly
20:14 mentioned in scripture, we do have God revealed principles to guide and direct our thinking about
20:19 its recreational use. We often get help on specific questions when we keep our eyes on the big picture.
20:25 What is the end game for the Christian life? What should we be aiming at and all things?
20:29 As Christians, our goal is knowing and experiencing the full and undistorted reality of the glory
20:35 of God in our resurrected physical bodies. In your references, 1 Corinthians 15, 12 through 49,
20:41 Philippians 3, 20 through 21, and 1 Corinthians 13 verse 12. This is our trajectory as Christians.
20:48 This is our aim. God is glorious beyond measure and Christians seek to experience the reality of
20:53 his glory for the sake of his glory. Sin has distorted our vision and corrupted our world.
20:59 Ever since sin first entered the world, all of us have been born spiritually dead, unable to discern
21:04 the true glory of God. He references Ephesians 2 verses 1 through 5, Colossians 2 verses verse 13,
21:10 and 2 Corinthians 4, 4. When we experience the redemptive work of Christ through the Holy Spirit,
21:15 we are awakened to the reality and beauty of God, 2 Corinthians 4, 6. But until we see him face to face,
21:21 we still see his glory as through a glass dimly 1 Corinthians 13, 12. As redeem believers,
21:27 we are on a journey to knowing him without obstruction. Therefore, we do not want to distort reality.
21:33 Rather, we aim to know him as he really is. We want to see things as they really are.
21:39 The Christian use of any kind of psychoactive substance should always align with the gospel goal
21:44 of looking to see things clearer. We do not want our vision of reality distorted.
21:49 Okay, so with all that being said, and I know that that's a lot there. I know about once every
21:54 Q&A podcast, I kind of go really far into one subject. But back to the original question,
21:59 is this good for my state and my people? No, I think unequivocally, the answer to that is no.
22:04 Now I can say when this passed, it wasn't like, you know, there wasn't whaling and
22:07 gnashing of teeth in my household. I wasn't throwing things in the art. Okay. But I really
22:11 do think there are some serious misgivings. I don't think that people that make the crazy
22:16 arguments about it being a gateway drug. And that's like non founded in any type of research. I think
22:21 that's that's increasingly unhelpful when you say things like that. But I have, I have very,
22:26 very serious misgivings about our legalization of this in our state. And this is regardless of
22:31 what happens. You know, Mary Fallon and the Oklahoma legislature, they have this tendency
22:35 to kind of change laws, even after the state questions have been approved by the populace.
22:39 It's not really a thing that I appreciate, even if it goes in my favor, got to be honest about that.
22:43 But so regardless of how that happens, it's going to come eventually, like it's just going to happen
22:49 eventually. But I think for us as Christians and as Christian men, I think that the dictates that
22:53 are put forth in the Bible and the hints that we get about things that are mind altering to the
22:59 point of excess, I think are really, really important for us to consider. When we ourselves
23:04 are considering partaking in a particular thing, and also when it comes up in the public square.
23:08 All right, guys, I know that took a while, but let's launch into the next question here.
23:13 If you were an MMA fighter, what would your walkout song be? Okay, that's kind of a cool question.
23:18 Let me think. I feel like I can't narrow it down to one because I don't have any MMA fights
23:26 coming up soon. So surprise, surprise, the cats out of the bag there. But there are three songs
23:30 that kind of come to mind, like whenever you think through when you're watching, because, you know,
23:33 I have thought about that quite a bit, like if you were walking in the cage, like, what would
23:36 you want coming out? So the first one that comes to mind is the song The Finisher by Osleeper.
23:41 And surprise, surprise, these are probably all going to be metal songs. But the song The Finisher
23:45 by Osleeper, it's off their album, some of the morning. And the thing about this song that's so
23:49 awesome, it's kind of a concept album, the very first song of the album, it's like Satan talking
23:55 to God, basically talking smack to God. And then, you know, the other eight tracks there in the
24:00 middle kind of follow along that same trajectory. But then the final song is God's response to Satan.
24:07 And it is vicious. And the end of this song, I remember the first time I heard this, it was just
24:12 like whole Lee balls. Like, how does somebody say something like that? But here's, here's the
24:16 quote from the end of the song. And then it goes into the final breakdown. It says, from the armories,
24:20 the angels sing, you will see them in the suffering. From the armories, the angels sing,
24:26 you will fear them when they lift their wings. They will sing to a world reborn. They will sing
24:31 as I cut off your horns. And so that's an incredible, incredible song. Actually,
24:36 I've got a big tattoo on my right arm and shoulder. That's kind of like this part of the song played
24:42 out. It's kind of a different take on a statue that I saw in Florence. But basically, it's,
24:47 it's God cutting off Satan's horns. And so that's a really, really cool song. And the thing is,
24:52 it's called the finisher. And if you're going to be an MMA fighter, you hope to be finishing people.
24:56 But if I didn't go with that one, the other two that kind of come to mind is the song
24:59 whitewashed by August Burns Red. So August Burns Red, obviously they gave us permission to use. I
25:04 say this every episode, they gave us permission to use their entire music library for anything
25:08 that we want. So the song whitewashed was actually in a video, one of our excursion videos that's on
25:12 our website. So that song will be familiar, but that's off their constellations album. And that's
25:17 probably my favorite metal intro ever. I mean, it's just such a heavy introduction to that song.
25:22 So I really like that. And then the other song would probably be Devastator by For Today. So For
25:28 Today is a band that's no longer together. But this is this author, one of their early albums,
25:32 it's called Breaker. But you might recognize this hashtag that I put on Instagram, but it's
25:38 let my name be feared at the gates of hell. The thing with For Today and a lot of their lyrical
25:42 content, to be honest, the lyrical content of the three bands that I just mentioned,
25:45 it's incredibly aggressive towards Satan. So so that's the thing is like, as I've said before,
25:51 I'm not a huge worship music fan. I feel like, you know, it's kind of worshiping Jesus as if he's
25:55 your boyfriend. I don't really like that very much because he's the Lion of Judah, not our QT
25:59 bootsy little bunny bunny. And so like these these lyrics speak to me differently. And so it's,
26:05 you know, whenever I suggested you listen to the impending doom album, their new album, a few,
26:09 a few podcasts episodes ago, it's kind of that thing. It's like, you should get pumped up when
26:14 singing about Jesus. Like you shouldn't, I mean, in my opinion, I mean, there are times, I guess
26:18 when you could be overcome with emotion and maybe crying or something like that. But like,
26:22 whenever I'm really worshiping God using music, it's songs like these like that that I just suggested
26:27 to you, it just really gets me going. So those would probably be the three, but the finisher by
26:31 O sleeper would probably be the top one if I had to pick one. Next question. When was the last time
26:36 you forgave someone who wronged you? Okay, so that's a good question. And to be honest with you,
26:42 I would like to say I would like to be able to pull out an exact example. But but again, you know,
26:47 my wife and I, we have a lot of interactions with one another. And so we forgive people back and forth
26:50 for, you know, oh, I shouldn't have said that or I shouldn't have done that or shouldn't have given
26:54 down to and all that. But to be honest with you guys, and this is, you know, full transparency here,
26:58 I struggle quite a bit in this area of forgiveness. But it's, it's maybe not in the way that you think
27:05 by hearing me say it like that. So what I mean by that is there are seven billion people on this
27:11 planet, right? And not all of them are going to like you. Even if you have one of the most
27:17 amenable personalities and you're just so great to be around and you're super altruistic,
27:21 there's still going to be people that are going to find something about you they don't like.
27:24 Maybe it's your facial features. Maybe it's your clothes. Maybe it's your accent. Maybe it's
27:27 whatever. They're going to find something to do that with with you. And so for me, I'm like,
27:32 if someone doesn't like me, fine. There are literally seven billion other people on this planet.
27:36 One person not liking me is not going to bother me. Like if my wife didn't like me, that'd be a
27:41 problem. If my teammates at my gym didn't like me, that'd probably be a problem. But you know,
27:44 for the most part, I could really give a crap whether or not you like me. But on the other side
27:48 of things as well is I'm a very loyal guy. I'm an incredibly loyal guy until you cross me.
27:55 Until you give me reason to not trust you, right? And so this is probably where my struggle comes in
28:03 is when someone crosses me, I'm like, all right, I take the other side out that argument. I go,
28:08 there are seven billion other people on this planet. I don't need to have you close to me so that
28:12 you can hurt me and disappoint me like that. So that you could, you know, basically not live up
28:18 to the standard that I put forth for you or not to jump over that hurdle. I said incredibly low
28:22 for you to jump over, right? And so again, just to be honest, I know that's not the most Christian
28:27 thing in the world. Obviously, we we have an entire setup with with God and the triune God that is
28:34 based on forgiveness and salvation and really the story of the gospel. But I will just say for me
28:39 personally, it really comes down to that to where it's just like, man, there's way too many people in
28:43 this planet for me to worry about someone that doesn't like me or worry about somebody that's
28:48 going to cross me like that. And so I remember even my wife saying that to somebody, because
28:52 there was an event that we set up and this guy, you know, he just blatantly lied to my face about
28:56 not showing up. And it's kind of one of those things where it's like, I just don't have time for
28:59 liars. I just don't really have the energy for it. And you know, my wife was talking to another buddy
29:04 of mine. And my buddy was like, Hey, it's Kyle mad about about that. And Kelsey, you know, she just
29:08 kind of said it offhand. She was just kind of like, look, Kyle's pretty straightforward. Like he will
29:13 be the most loyal guy in the world to you until you mess with him. And then he just he's done with
29:17 you. And he's not going to feel sad about it either. So that is something that I guess if I would ask
29:22 for prayer, that would be something that I feel like is is something that needs to be adjusted
29:26 on my side of things. So good question. Thanks a lot for making for challenging me on my own
29:30 podcast. Thanks a lot, jerk. So let's move on to the next question. All right, my pastor has a
29:35 $7 million mansion is his wealth, a fruit of the spirit, or is he going to hell? Guys, are y'all
29:41 trying to get me in trouble? We got weed, we got, you know, forgiveness. Now we got the the prosperity
29:45 gospel stuff. So I guess here's the thing. The easy answer to this is he's he's going to hell if
29:52 he hasn't accepted the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross. I mean, is that like the most PC answer I
29:57 could have given to this? Like, yeah, you know, he's he's not going to be in the afterlife with God
30:02 if he hasn't accepted, you know, the gospel message, right? That's pretty easy. But I guess on the
30:07 other side, the hard answer is there might be a heart problem with your pastor. And I put the
30:12 emphasis big time on might, there might be a heart problem with your pastor. I don't know that to be
30:18 true. Okay. But I do know that Jesus talked about money. And he talked about money a lot, like more
30:27 than anything else in the Bible, you've probably heard that before, he talks about money. And it's
30:31 probably has a lot to do with the fact that, you know, how humans in the human heart is attracted to
30:35 it and what wealth does for us, right? And it, you know, normally tells us that we don't need God,
30:39 we just need our security and our wealth. But, you know, back in Matthew 19, we see Jesus talk
30:44 about this. And this was in verses 23 and 24, he said, and Jesus said to his disciples, truly I
30:49 say to you only with difficulty will a rich person enter the kingdom of heaven. Again, I tell you,
30:53 it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the
30:58 kingdom of God. And so, so here's the deal is, I don't think having money is sinful, obviously,
31:04 like I don't think if you're successful, that that's not a blessing from God. But when you look at
31:09 these examples, so you got guys like Joel Osteen. So Joel Osteen, you know, you've probably seen,
31:13 you know, aerial photos of his mansion, it's a 10 million dollar plus house, right? Then you have
31:18 guys like Steven Firdick, he's got a house that's almost $2 million. And he got busted kind of by a
31:23 local, I guess he tried to, you know, make it kind of a quiet thing. And he kind of got busted by
31:28 local news. And he kind of had a weird apology, I guess that's just his thing. The dude just doesn't
31:32 know how to apologize. But he talked about it at a sermon. And he basically said, I'm sorry that you
31:37 had to have those conversations this week talking to his patrons. And he said that the house was a
31:42 gift from God. And you know, the thing was, is he kind of changed his tone. At the beginning,
31:46 he said it was an attack like people were attacking him and attacking the gift God gave him. But then,
31:50 you know, he kind of changed his tone after he probably talked to his lawyer and his PR people
31:54 or something like that. But kind of in my opinion, with with pastors like that, pastors of any kind,
31:59 even if you're you're not on the mega church side of things, if you're in a tax exempt situation,
32:03 why not share all of your financials? Like all of them. Like if your pastor shouldn't your flock
32:09 know if you have a housing allowance, shouldn't they know what your salary is? Like the money that
32:14 you make off your books that you're writing while on the clock at the church, you know, what your
32:18 speaker fees are. Do you man do you demand that you fly private or fly first class or all those
32:23 things? Like that's not so that we can judge you. But it's like, Hey, bro, like we're paying your
32:27 salary here. Like if you work for the state, like right now I could go on and look at every salary
32:33 for state employees in the state of Oklahoma. Because like my tax dollars directly paid for
32:38 them to have their jobs, right? You know, I used to work at a university and it's like, you know,
32:42 you look at what other people are making. There's there's no secrets there. So I don't really
32:45 understand why a pastor would have that. But but here's the other thing that I think is the big
32:50 overarching thing about this question is a one big reason why certain believers don't listen to
32:56 preachers is because of money, right? Either you know, maybe they have a lot of it or they're always
33:01 asking for it. That's that's a lot of reasons why believers don't listen. But on the other side of
33:06 things is a lot of people that are unbelievers, they look at these pastors, they look at these
33:12 houses and they look at these jets and these Bentley's and all these things. And it just doesn't
33:15 seem right. It doesn't feel right. And so your pastor might not be Benny Hinn. He might not be
33:20 ripping people off. But that's how he's viewed. He's lumped into that category. And it just gives
33:25 unbelievers and atheists, uh, and you know, moral relativists, it gives them even more
33:29 ammunition to be like, well, look at that guy. So again, don't don't mistake me and hear me say
33:33 that if your pastor has a big house that he's going to hell, I think I mean, none of us can make
33:36 that call. But here's the big warning, I guess that I would give to you is that if your pastor is
33:42 preaching prosperity gospel messages, right? And has a mansion and is living a lavish life,
33:50 you really need to be where in that situation, beware, because there's something funky going on
33:56 there, because I don't know a whole lot of prosperity gospel pastors that aren't rolling in it, right?
34:02 So it's like, you know, if God, you know, just open up the sky and, you know, and then these,
34:06 these positive vibes are going to rain down dollar bills on you and all those different
34:10 things, all these prosperity gospel people, they got money. They got a lot of it. So, so again,
34:15 I think it is completely inappropriate for us to take the judgment seat of, well, this guy's
34:19 clearly going to hell just kind of to go back to the original question. But at the end of the day,
34:23 I think you should really be aware of anyone that's, you know, sporting a message like that.
34:28 All right, next question. Should collegiate athletes be paid? Okay. So here's the thing is,
34:34 I've had a pretty well formulated opinion on this for a long time, and it has not shifted in any
34:39 way, shape or form. No, college athletes should not be paid. So here's the deal is, I know that
34:45 not every college athlete is on scholarship, but a lot of college athletes are on scholarships. So,
34:50 they're already being paid by the school. So let's let's just for the sake of this. Let's talk about
34:55 people that are on full scholarship. So if you have a basketball scholarship to Duke,
34:59 or football scholarships, Texas A&M or something like that, your school, and for a lot of these
35:03 kids, it's out of state or private or something like that, it's paid for, right? It's taken care
35:09 of. And so at the end of the day, it is your choice if you want to play a college sport, right?
35:16 No one's making you play a college sport. So you're a, you're a stud athlete. You're a great football
35:22 player in high school, and you get offered a scholarship or an invitation to walk on a football
35:27 program at a college. You get to choose whether or not to do that. No one is forcing you. And people
35:32 be like, Oh, well, some of these kids don't have options and blah, that's not what we're talking
35:35 about. We're talking about whether or not we should pay these kids, right? But it's their choice.
35:39 They don't have to play sports at all. They don't have to go to that school. They could go to a
35:42 different school. They don't have to play that particular sport. They could play a different sport.
35:46 So the thing is, it's all about choice here. So if you go to college, you know what the setup is.
35:51 Like nothing drives me more insane than when people sign a contract like in the NFL, they sign a
35:56 contract and they put their name down to it and then they have a good season or two and then they
36:00 want to hold out. It's like you sign the contract. Like there's just as many people that sign
36:05 contracts and it's bad for the team. You just so happen to sign a contract that's good for the
36:09 team. So what's your job? Get up and do your job. But the thing about it that I don't feel like many
36:13 people, you know, a lot of people that say that college athletes should be paid. These are people
36:17 that, you know, have only worked in the public sector or maybe they've just been pundits for
36:20 forever. They've never really had to do like a real private sector job before. But you just have
36:25 to ask questions like this because most people don't don't really have a clue. So let's look at
36:30 probably let's look at Tim Tebow. Okay, Tim Tebow is probably the most famous collegiate athlete of
36:37 all time of any sport. I think that's a that's pretty easy. Even he's not the top one. He's in the top
36:40 10. So let's just use Tim Tebow. If we were paying college athletes while Tim Tebow was the quarterback
36:45 of Florida, would we be paying Tim Tebow the same as the backup catcher on the softball team?
36:52 Do they get the same amount of money? Should we pay Tim Tebow the same as a quarterback of like a
36:59 D three school? Does he get the same amount of money? You know, how do we equal this out? Because
37:04 because here's the thing is you can't, you know, especially in this day and age, what if you paid
37:08 female basketball players differently than you pay the male basketball players? Like how are you
37:13 going to make this equal? Right? There's there's no extra title nine that you could add into there
37:17 that's going to take care of all those issues. But but here's the thing that a lot of people don't
37:20 realize is that most athletic departments in the country. And yes, I mean, most like overwhelmingly
37:27 most, almost all of them are operating in the negative. Almost all of them are operating in the
37:32 red. And so basically what you would be asking these people to do is they're already operating in
37:37 the red. They're getting taken care of by all these other different things on campus student fees
37:41 or tuition or something like that. They're being taken care of. And now you're going to ask them
37:44 to pay these pay these athletes. Like with what money? This is like the most Bernie Sanders thing
37:50 in the world. It's like, Oh, we're going to pay for it. How? Don't worry about it. Like it's just
37:53 kind of doesn't make any sense. For the most part, the only sports that make money at most college
37:59 campuses is football and men's basketball. That's it. And in some places, neither of those teams
38:05 make money. So literally nothing makes money. Like you'll have, you know, Oklahoma State wrestling,
38:08 they probably make money, you know, Oregon State baseball, they probably make money. But for the
38:13 most part, these sports don't make any money. So the question I would ask to these people that,
38:17 you know, they should be paid is with what? And you know, they always want to talk about how much
38:22 these schools make for their bowl games and how much the coaches are paid and all these different
38:26 things. But at the end of the day, that's their job. And if somebody wants to pay them extra from
38:31 the coffers of the university, let them that's fine. That's totally fine. Because these kids,
38:36 again, they have a choice. They don't have to play these sports. And so if you've chosen to play
38:41 these sports, and if you can't have a job outside of it, because of your, you know,
38:45 requirements from the football team or the basketball team or the badminton team or whatever team
38:48 you're on, it just is what it is. If you don't like it, you can quit. And then you can go into debt,
38:53 like just about every other, you know, student out there, they're going into debt in order to
38:58 go to college. Like in a lot of these situations, you are paid for to go to college. I don't really
39:02 get the funk, right? So a little bit on the on a high horse there, but I've literally never heard
39:06 a compelling argument on the other side of things is just people basically talking into the ether.
39:10 So all right, next question. Does God send people who haven't heard about him to help?
39:15 How should we respond to people who have objections about help? Okay, so a couple of different questions
39:20 there. So let's look at the first part. So the thing that I know about God that I'm very,
39:25 very comfortable with about God is that his judgment will be fair. I mean, we see that all
39:30 over the place in scripture, and I'll pull out a couple. So Psalm 96, 13 says this,
39:34 for he comes to judge the earth, he will judge the world in righteousness and the people in his
39:39 faithfulness. And Paul kind of corroborates this later when he's talking in Acts, this is Acts 1731,
39:44 because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has
39:50 appointed. And of this, he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead, obviously
39:54 talking about Jesus. So that's the thing that I that I know to be true here is that God is going
39:59 to judge fairly. And the thing is, is his definition of fair is not necessarily going to align with
40:04 your definition of fair. So let's go in to talk a little bit more about that. I want to kind of
40:09 do another quote from Paul. And this is Paul talking in Romans, and this is Romans two,
40:14 and I'm going to do verses 11 through 16. Because I think this will be helpful for us when it comes
40:18 to people that maybe have never heard the message of Jesus, and you're wondering, you know, where
40:22 these people are going to go. So Romans two, starting in verse 11 through 16. For God shows no
40:27 partiality for all who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law. And all who
40:32 have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. It's very important there. For it is not the
40:38 hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified.
40:43 For when Gentiles who do not have the law by nature do not what do or sorry by nature do what the
40:49 law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that
40:56 the work of the law is written on their hearts while they're conscious is also bears witness,
41:01 and they're conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them on that day when according to my gospel
41:07 God judges the secrets of men by Christ Jesus. So that's really important there. Sorry,
41:12 little clunky in the reading, but yeah, again, you know, Romans two 11 through 16, I think is
41:15 really important. And there's a lot of people that have given their summaries of kind of what that
41:19 means, but probably the most succinct way that I saw it summed up for our use and for our digestion
41:25 was by pastor Stephen Jay Cole. And so he talks about that right here. And again, I'll provide
41:30 the link to this later. So you can read all of it. But I just want to read this section to you right
41:33 here. And here's a section in Romans two 12 through 16, Paul's establishing the point of verse 11.
41:41 For there is no partiality with God. God will judge everyone with perfect justice. Paul is
41:47 anticipating a Jewish objection. But surely God will treat us more favorably than pagan Gentiles.
41:53 We know God's ways are as revealed in his law, but they don't. Or perhaps a Gentile would object.
41:58 It's not fair for God to judge me for disobeying a standard that I knew nothing about. I've done
42:03 the best that I could with what I knew. God won't judge me. Will he? So Paul shows God with impartiality.
42:09 God will impartially judge everyone for sinning against the light against the light that they
42:13 were given. His line of reasoning goes like this, the Gentiles send without the law. So he will
42:19 perish without the law. The Jews send under the law. And so he will be judged by the law. And that's
42:25 verses or book two or chapter two, verse 12. In other words, the verse as verse six stated,
42:31 God will render to each person according to his deeds, hearing the law isn't good enough.
42:36 You must be a doer of the law. And that's two 13. Although the Gentiles did not have God's law,
42:42 they all have an inner sense of right and wrong. That's first chapter two verse 14.
42:47 And although occasionally they may do what is right, they all have sinned against what they know
42:52 to be right. Their consciousnesses and thoughts convict them of their guilt. And that's two 15.
42:58 But whatever they think, or they may think of themselves, the day is coming when God will judge
43:02 not only outward deeds, but also the secrets of men through Jesus Christ. In accordance with the
43:07 gospel, that's two 16 to sum up Paul is saying this, since God will impartially judge everyone
43:13 for sinning against what they know to be right, everyone is guilty. And thus everyone needs the
43:18 gospel. So I hope that's helpful to the guy that put in this question. I really appreciate that.
43:24 I hope that's helpful. So again, this is a fair God, but this is a just God. There has to be
43:29 judgment. And he's leaving it open there to where you're going to be judged under what you know.
43:33 So I, you know, I've thought about this before it's kept me up and I will, what about these
43:36 unreached people groups? You know, these tribal peoples that literally don't even know the first,
43:41 you know, there were any words of English, much less the story of the gospel in any language,
43:46 including their own. But I think this speaks to that. And so to the second part of your question,
43:50 the second part of your question, just remind listeners is how should we respond to people who
43:54 have objections about hell? And this was pretty easy. Is your opinion about hell changes nothing
43:59 about the reality of hell? So people are like, well, I don't really think a good guy to send
44:03 somebody in the hell. Like that's that doesn't matter. Like your opinion really doesn't matter.
44:07 So think about this, that, you know, Rob Bell. So that's that's a guy who's pretty much a pagan.
44:13 Now he's like Oprah's favorite person on the planet. But he wrote a book called Love Wins,
44:17 which was basically talking about hell couldn't possibly exist if God was of love. And I love
44:21 that Francis Chan wrote an entire book called Erasing Hell, just responding to this book.
44:26 But again, just because hell makes you uncomfortable, just because you don't understand
44:31 exactly how hell works or how it reflects you or anything like that. It really doesn't change
44:36 the reality of it. So my encouragement to this listener would be if you're in a situation where
44:40 people are talking about hell and they're just like, man, I don't really like that. And that
44:43 doesn't really make sense to me. It really doesn't matter. It's kind of one of the same thing. Like
44:46 if someone's like, well, I don't believe in gravity, it's like, well, jump off of that building and
44:50 you're going to hit the ground. Like your belief in gravity changes nothing. All right, next question.
44:56 Who were your favorite athletes any sport when you were growing up? Okay, so let's look at baseball
45:02 first since that's the greatest sport ever invented. When I was a little kid, my favorite athlete,
45:06 my favorite player was Mark Maguire. And I wish it wasn't because the guy's like a dirty rotten
45:12 cheater and liar. And I wish I didn't buy all his baseball cards and spend all my summer money on
45:16 his rookie card. But I did. So that was my dude, even though I can't stand to even see the guy now.
45:21 But I also really liked Ken Griffey, Jr, Randy Johnson, Pudge Rodriguez. So the first major league
45:27 game I went to was a Rangers game. And so that was like the Pudge Rodriguez, Juan Gonzalez era
45:32 of the Texas Rangers. So I really liked them. And I thought Pudge, he was just great on defense.
45:36 You know, Randy Johnson, one of the greatest pitchers ever, maybe the greatest left handed
45:40 pitcher ever. And then current King Griffey, Jr, I just I don't really know how you have a
45:44 sweeter swing than that. I think in modern day, I think guys like Corey Seager and Cody Bellinger,
45:49 they happen to be on the same team, but they have just incredibly beautiful left handed swings.
45:53 But nothing is better than Griffey. With basketball, I mean, straight up Michael Jordan. I mean,
45:58 I grew up in the era where Michael Jordan was literally wrecking fools. And so just destroying
46:03 the Sonics and destroying the jazz and all that. And so for a little stretch there, I was really,
46:07 I really liked to keep a lot of one when I was a little kid. But I mean, when I was a little kid,
46:11 it was just being mesmerized by Michael Jordan. I remember telling my grandma, you know, she was
46:15 asking me what I wanted for Christmas. And I was like, you know, I want a Chicago Bulls hat.
46:19 And it was like crazy to me that anybody would be a fan of any other team. I was like,
46:23 why would anyone root for anybody else? The Bulls are clearly the best. So
46:26 MJ all the way on that. In the NFL, I really liked Barry Sanders and Brett Favre. So they were,
46:32 I think they won Cohen VPs even one year, but I just love Barry Sanders style. He played for an
46:36 awful team behind a terrible offensive line. And every time he got to the end zone, just like,
46:41 yeah, here's the ball. So I love that about him, you know, Brett Favre, just the gunslinger style,
46:45 just going crazy. I had a buddy who played for the New York Jets. And so I actually went up there
46:49 and watched the game when Brett Favre played for the Jets that one year, which was awesome.
46:53 I guess I also liked Kerry Collins. This is super, super random. But when I was a little,
46:57 little kid, I was like eight or nine or something like that, the Carolina Panthers was an expansion
47:02 franchise that came in with the Jacksonville Jaguars. And so like Kerry Collins came out of Penn State,
47:07 I was like, that's going to be my dude. And I started, you know, collecting all of his cards.
47:10 And like that was going to be my team. And I got, you know, a panther starter jacket that
47:14 year for Christmas. And I was like, this is awesome. And I even remember, I don't know if you all
47:18 remember this, but Kerry Collins, I quit football. This was before he made his comeback and he played
47:22 for like the Giants or something like that. But he like quit football to like go to Europe and like
47:26 find himself. And I remember being a little kid and I was just like crying and my dad's trying to
47:30 like explain to me that, you know, he's just, he wanted to make this decision for himself. And I was
47:34 like, what's in Europe? Dad, like what's in Europe? What is he looking for? So that's kind of funny.
47:38 But yeah, Kerry Collins was apparently a weirdo. But you know, that was, he was one of my dudes
47:42 growing up, I guess other sports. I liked Ryan Nyquist. He was a BMX guy. So he was a dirt BMX
47:49 guy. So everyone was like a Dave Miro person. So I was like, I'm gonna be a Ryan Nyquist guy.
47:53 Michael Johnson, I guess if you're thinking Olympics, you know, he had the gold shoes and he was going
47:57 all crazy back in the day, running sprint. So that was cool. Dominic Muchiano, I don't know if y'all
48:03 know that name, but she was on that like dream team, 1996 Olympic team in Atlanta where Kerry
48:09 struggled like broke her leg and, you know, on the final vault or whatever. But I thought Dominic
48:13 Muchiano was like the cutest thing in the world. I had a mad crush on her when I was a little kid.
48:16 That was like, I guess my first celebrity crush that wasn't Kelly Kapalski or something like that.
48:21 So yeah, those would be some of the athletes. And there's probably some others here or there,
48:24 you know, there's Tony Hawk and, and, and things like that. And just some random sports here or
48:28 there, you know, Wayne Gretzky, Bret Ho, but those were the athletes that I followed the most.
48:32 All right, next question. How do we properly use accountability with other men? And how do we
48:38 keep accountability from spilling over into inappropriate judgment? So I think this is a really important
48:44 question here. The thing about it is the guy who asked me this question is a guy that actually
48:48 spent quite a bit of time with training. And this is a group of guys that get together on Sunday
48:52 nights and we get together and we were normally going over a book, we have some time for discussion,
48:56 and then we train some jujitsu and do some other training. And, you know, we had a guy
49:01 share in the group this week about something that happened. One of the guys in the group,
49:05 his wife had a miscarriage. And, you know, it was kind of one of those things where it was just kind
49:09 of it was a really, really important moment for our group. Because that's kind of an important
49:15 thing to share. But it's kind of like, how do you share that? And what do you say? And, and it just
49:19 opened the door to a lot of very good conversations in the group. And, but the thing is, is like,
49:25 there should be accountability in groups like that, because most guys don't have accountability
49:28 when they spend all their time with themselves, you're basically only accountable to yourself and
49:32 maybe to your, to your wife, depending on your relationship. But, you know, the thing I like to
49:36 talk about all the time is like the atheist's favorite scripture is judge not lest you be judged,
49:42 right? They're like, you know, Christians are just always out there judging people and all
49:45 those different things. But, you know, I want to talk a little bit more specifically about that,
49:48 because you know, that comes from Matthew seven. So that's Matthew seven, one through five. And
49:52 this is Jesus talking, but I'll go ahead and read that here. Judge not that you be not judged.
49:58 For with judgment, you pronounce you will be judged. And with the measure you use, it will be measured
50:03 to you. Why do you see the speck in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own
50:08 eye? Or how can you say to your brother, let me take the speck out of your eye when there is a log
50:13 in your own eye, you hypocrite, first take the log, the log out of your own eye, and then you
50:19 will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye. So the thing that's important there
50:24 is the very last part there of verse five, which is to take the speck out of your brother's eye.
50:29 So this is actually telling you, this is Jesus telling you that you need to take the speck
50:34 out of your brother's eye. But he's just basically telling you from for alignment purposes, you need
50:39 to worry about yourself first, get your self right before you start messing with anybody else. But
50:42 he is telling you that you need to help other people out through judgment. And then Paul even
50:47 talked about this with the Romans with the Roman Christians, and he basically told them not to
50:51 judge and this was in Romans 14 verse 13. Therefore, let us not pass judgment on one another any
50:56 longer, but rather decide never to put a stumbling block or hindrance in the way of the brother.
51:01 But the thing about this is in when Paul's letter to the Corinthian Christians, he basically said that
51:08 they must judge simple believers and let God deal with the people that are non believers, right?
51:13 So you judge the people that are inside of your believer community and let God deal with the
51:17 people that are outside of that. And so this was talked about in 1 Corinthians 5 verses 12 and 13.
51:22 For what have I have I to do with judging outsiders? Is it not those inside the church whom you are
51:28 to judge? God judges those outside purge the evil person from among you. And so the thing is with
51:35 accountability is what you get from these verses from these two by Paul and one recorded about
51:41 Jesus talking is we are to judge people that are inside the church. We certainly are to do that.
51:47 What you're not to do is to take the judgment seat of God, right? You're not to be like,
51:51 well, I decree that this is good behavior and bad behavior and you're going to hell for that
51:54 or I'm punishing you for that. That's obviously not your right and that's not your place, right?
51:58 So the thing that I think is important here is when you're in any type of accountability
52:03 community, the first rule that I guess I would look at is that if the person is not willing to
52:08 be held accountable, you can't hold them accountable. So if someone's, you know, fat now to shape,
52:13 you can't just go up to him and be like, hey, you're Christian, you need to eat less and move more.
52:17 Like you shouldn't expect them to be like, yeah, you know what, you're right. And again,
52:22 I'm the type of guy that would have that conversation with somebody. But this person has to trust you.
52:26 It's a little bit different if that person comes up to you and says, man, I let myself go. I'm 100
52:30 pounds overweight and I got a kid on the way. And you know, I don't want them to ever see me as fat
52:35 and all those different things. And I want to be around long. And at that point, it's for you to
52:39 kind of step in and help them. But also it is imperative upon you probably to broach that subject
52:43 with them at some point, even if they haven't come up to you. So when we're thinking about
52:46 accountability purposes, in my group of guys, I'm specifically talking about here, if I see that
52:51 somebody, you know, maybe cheating on their wife, maybe they're looking at pornography, maybe they're
52:54 not using language as glorifying of God, maybe they're not taking care of their bodies, maybe they're
52:59 not doing things in the public sphere that is going to help them spread the gospel, any of those
53:04 things and make up a myriad of things, it is required of me to help that person through judgment
53:09 and accountability. To have that conversation, to have that awkward conversation, to put some
53:15 chips in the center and risk some relational equity in order to maybe set them on a better path.
53:19 And I have to be ready to receive that as well. So if I'm doing any of those things I just listed
53:26 or something else outside of that, that is simple. And somebody comes to me about it, I got to be
53:30 able to lay my pride aside for a second, be like, you know what, brother, you're right. I do need
53:34 to adjust that. You know, I was talking rudely on the phone to my wife just then when you overheard
53:39 that. And that's not good for me to do. And I'm really glad that you reached out and told me.
53:43 Now I would like to say that every time that's happened for me that it just, you know, worked out
53:46 and I was like, yeah, cool, you know, thanks, thanks for repuking me. But you know, I have my my
53:51 moments when it comes to to being humble and listening to those types of things. But that
53:55 doesn't change the setup about what we're supposed to do. We are called to keep our brothers in line,
54:01 to use judgment. But but the important thing here is if somebody is not a believer and they're not
54:06 in your sphere of influence, you can't judge them based on based on what we're doing. That's God's
54:10 job. So you would never go into the house of Muslims and judge them according to what's taught
54:15 in the Bible. That's not your place. It's your place to have that conversation. It's your place to
54:21 share the gospel with them. But you can't take the judgment seat there. Like, and you can't look at
54:26 their diet or their customs and say, well, that doesn't really jive with what I do. You wouldn't
54:29 appreciate if they did that to you. If a if a Sikh or a Hindu or someone like that came into your house
54:34 and tried to change things around on you, because you don't align with that worldview, our God is
54:39 going to deal with them. It's our job to share the gospel. It's our job to get them to understand
54:44 who Jesus is and who he can be for them. Next question. Is the UFC becoming too much like the
54:50 WWE? And specifically, he's talking about the Daniel Cormier and Brock Lesnar Scuffle. So
54:55 y'all probably saw this a few weeks ago, but UFC 226. That was a huge super fight. You know, we
55:01 we are kind of in the era of super fights now, but this was definitely a super fight.
55:05 Steepay Miyochich is the heavyweight champion of the world. He's the greatest heavyweight
55:09 in the history of mixed martial arts. And Daniel Cormier, who's one of the greatest fighters ever,
55:14 and there was the light heavyweight champion, the 205 champion was going to go up to heavyweight
55:18 to challenge tpei Miyochas for his belt. So obviously, by now, y'all know what happened.
55:22 DC knocked out steepay in the first round. It was really incredible. He
55:26 clinched up and then through through a short right hand dropped him and then finished him on the ground.
55:30 It was incredible. But before the fight, you saw that Brock Lesnar was there and it's like,
55:34 well, Brock Lesnar doesn't normally show up someplace unless he's going to be, you know,
55:38 picking a fight of some kind. And so, you know, afterwards, Joe Rogan's talking to DC and then
55:42 DC takes the mic and then he calls out Brock Lesnar and Brock Lesnar comes in the cage and
55:47 he pushes DC and everyone smiling and Joe Rogan doesn't know what to do. And, you know, the people
55:51 that are there doing security, they don't really know what to do. And, you know, it was kind of,
55:55 it was kind of felt WWE like and Brock Lesnar got on the mic and, you know, said a bunch of bad
56:00 words and called out this and called out that and like punched the camera and did all this crazy stuff.
56:04 Here's the thing. The UFC is not becoming too much like the WWE because for every one thing,
56:10 there's been like that. There's been a billion other things that aren't anything like that at all.
56:14 So there, there is kind of this thing where the guys that talk trash do get more opportunities.
56:20 So you think of a guy like Connor who has backed it up or you think like a guy like Chelsea Sonnen
56:24 or Kobe Covington or guys like that that talk trash. These guys may have gotten opportunities
56:28 that they wouldn't have gotten otherwise if they are quiet. But I don't think that meant
56:32 necessarily makes it like WWE because in WWE, that's fake, right? You know, these are athletes
56:37 that are actually taking bumps and doing things like that. But there's no no wonder in the back
56:42 about what the outcome is going to be. They know before they walk out there how this is going to go,
56:46 right? But they don't have that in MMA. So you can talk all you want and you can do all those
56:51 things and you can have your, you can have your lines ready to go and ready to spit out. But at
56:54 the end of the day, they locked the cage and it's you two in a referee and it's a real fight.
56:59 There's no whispering in each other's ears like, all right, go down here. I'm going to throw you
57:02 off the top turnbuckle or something like that. So no, I don't think this is becoming too much
57:06 like the WWE. I can say for me, I wasn't terribly bothered by all that stuff that happened afterwards.
57:12 It was ridiculous. At the end of the day, Brock Lesnar Daniel Cormier should not be much of a fight.
57:16 DC should be able to handle Brock Lesnar incredibly easily. Brock is not going to out wrestle DC
57:21 and Brock does not like getting punched in the face. So that is not exactly bold well for their
57:25 future setup. But yeah, so still a huge fan of the UFC that WWE nonsense with Brock Lesnar not
57:30 was standing. So next question. What are your thoughts on the Re voice conference? Okay, so to be honest,
57:36 when I got this question, I had no idea what what the Re voice conference was. But what I did is I
57:41 went and looked it up and this is happening. Apparently this year in St. Louis, or maybe it
57:44 already happened. I'm not exactly sure. But this was the tagline for this conference. It was supporting,
57:49 encouraging and empowering gay, lesbian, same sex attracted and other LGBT Christians so that
57:56 they can flourish while observing the historic Christian doctrine of marriage and sexuality.
58:01 Okay, so it was kind of one of the things I was like, all right, well, I guess there's a
58:04 conference full of people that are going to go and do that. So first of all, I guess I would
58:08 refer all of you back to episode 25 of this podcast. And it was a podcast I did called Why I Stopped
58:14 Using the word [inaudible]. And so I think that was a very important podcast, especially for a lot
58:18 of guys like myself and a lot of my listeners out there that used to use that word regularly.
58:23 And you know, you know, busting each other's balls type settings or in an athletic setting or
58:27 something like that. So here's the thing when I first heard that this conference was for LGBT
58:33 Christians, I immediately, you know, my antenna went up and I was like, Oh, okay, what are we doing
58:37 here? Are we going to be celebrating this? Or are we going to be absolving them of some sort
58:42 of sin? Like what are we doing? But I guess the thing that was encouraging to me a couple things
58:45 were encouraging was kind of the last part of the tagline when it said, you know, while observing
58:51 the historic Christian doctrine of marriage and sexuality. So it doesn't seem like they're
58:55 going to be rewriting scripture there. And here's the other thing is the keynote is being delivered
59:00 by Wesley Hill. And so Wesley Hill was kind of the main person about, you know, episode 25 of this
59:05 podcast. It was his book washed and waiting. That was kind of the the center point of that whole
59:10 podcast. Right. And so and his views were obviously that this is a celibate Christian theologian who
59:16 for the rest of his life is going to go to bed alone. And he's not going to live out his his gay
59:20 sexual desires for the sake of the gospel of Christ. And so I think that was very important.
59:25 And there should be a place for people like this that are same sex attracted to where they're not
59:30 just being told that no, you know, God just loves you as you are, you don't need to change. Because if
59:33 that was true, we don't need Jesus. Right. But the thing is, is they might be towing the line of heresy.
59:40 You know, if this event ends up celebrating sinfulness, but from for all intents and purposes and from
59:44 the things that I've seen having not gone to the conference and having not heard the speeches,
59:48 I don't even know if it has happened yet. I didn't look at the exact dates. But from where I'm sitting,
59:52 I think it's going to be all right. But I will say this, there was a podcast I listened to recently
59:57 and shout out to my boy CJ that's down at Dallas Theological Seminary. He sent me this podcast called
1:00:02 cross politic. So CR O S S P O L I T I C so cross politic. And you can search for it on Apple iTunes
1:00:10 or Google Play. And it's cross politics show and podcasts. And there's like a black and white logo.
1:00:16 And just started listening to it literally like a week ago. So I've only listened to a couple of
1:00:20 different episodes, but they did an episode back on, let me see when this was released,
1:00:24 it was on July 15th. And it's called family meeting with Greg Johnson, pastor of Memorial
1:00:29 Presbyterian Church and host church of re voice dot us. And so the thing that was interesting is,
1:00:36 again, I haven't attended the conference. I haven't heard any of the keynotes. I don't know what's
1:00:41 being said. But the three hosts of the show really lit into this pastor. And I can't say that I
1:00:47 disagree with a lot of their arguments. And to be honest, it's made me kind of rethink my position
1:00:53 on some of this. So I don't necessarily regret some of the things from podcast 25. But it did
1:00:59 kind of open up a different some different viewpoints on that. Like where exactly Wesley Hills coming
1:01:04 from or people that are like him. And so again, I don't think I've I've changed my philosophy or
1:01:10 standpoint wholesale. But these guys brought up a lot of really, really good points. And again,
1:01:14 I have not listened to this podcast for for very long. So if they've said crazy things in the past,
1:01:18 this is not endorsement of everything that they've ever said. But I will say that these guys would
1:01:23 not let this pastor off the hook when he was trying to do this Christianese or liberalese or just
1:01:28 basically making up bullcrap. They wouldn't let him off the hook, which I really, really appreciate.
1:01:33 And I've had conversations with guys that are in the ministry space in the podcast space.
1:01:38 And they'll have people that are on and they'll be talking about this subject. And they let
1:01:42 them off the hook. They just let them say bullcrap. And there's like, Oh, this should be okay. And
1:01:46 I'm like, no, like you got to you got to keep going and you got to drive some things home. So
1:01:50 I would encourage every single one of you to listen to that. So again, go to the cross politics show
1:01:55 and podcast. And let's see if it's got an episode number just one sec. Yeah, so it's just the July
1:02:01 15th episode. So it should be one of the very recent ones on there. So would highly, highly
1:02:06 suggest that you listen to that. So again, listen to my podcast 25 on this on this and then listen
1:02:11 to that interview that they did with him. And it should give you at least a basic overview of what
1:02:15 to expect. Next question, what is what is the joy you find in drinking whiskey? Okay, so this is
1:02:22 from a good buddy of mine who actually will have whiskey with me from time to time. So
1:02:26 serious thing, kind of like I told you early in the podcast, I didn't have my first drink
1:02:29 of anything until I was 20. And it was when I was overseas in Ireland, and it was legal there. And
1:02:34 so I had one drink. And the thing is, alcohol has never been a big part of my life. Like even now,
1:02:39 I may have, you know, three or four whiskeys on in one sitting and then I have another whiskey for
1:02:45 two months, or I may have one whiskey and then I have a whiskey for a few weeks. Like, it's just
1:02:49 not a huge part of my life. I don't have to have whiskey every day. But at the end of the day,
1:02:53 like I've never enjoyed beer, I've had three or four beers my entire life. And I thought they all
1:02:57 tasted terrible. And for a guy that doesn't really drink his calories anyway, I don't drink soda,
1:03:01 I don't drink coffee, I don't do any of those things. And you know, it makes sense that I wouldn't like
1:03:05 whiskey and or wouldn't like beer. But I have always been a fan of whiskey. So even at my bachelor
1:03:11 party, that was the very first time I ever had whiskey, had a buddy bring a bottle of wild turkey,
1:03:14 which is not an effectively, it's not a very good whiskey. But he brought it and I drank it right
1:03:19 out of the bottle and it just, you know, settled right through into my stomach, right through my
1:03:22 palate, there was no, you know, kicking the ground or doing anything crazy like that. So it just,
1:03:27 it just agreed with my palate. And since then, you know, it's kind of been a hobby of mine.
1:03:32 And I've had some incredible, incredible whiskeys. I've had 50 year old scotch. I've had 40 year old
1:03:37 scotch. I've had a lot of rare burbins and things like that. And so I've got some good friends that,
1:03:42 you know, I've got one friend in particular that his whiskey collection is worth well over
1:03:46 $5 million. He's one of the largest private collectors of whiskey on the planet. And so,
1:03:50 and he's kind of taken a liken to my style and my in my taste. And so it's been a really cool journey
1:03:55 that I get to share with people. And I get to share with a lot of Christians as well. I've helped
1:03:59 some guys kind of worked their way from crown honey or honey crown up to some some better burbins
1:04:05 and things like that. And the thing about it is, and I know for some of you, especially if you
1:04:09 have a more conservative background, like your your ears are perking up here, like what am I
1:04:12 going to be talking about? But here's the thing is Jesus's first miracle was turning water into
1:04:16 wine. There's plenty of scripture in support of alcohol, but never the abuse of it. You'll never
1:04:21 you'd be able to read a scripture and think that God is giving us this so that we can abuse it.
1:04:26 Kind of same thing going back to the marijuana example we talked about the very beginning of
1:04:30 this podcast. But I really do enjoy drinking whiskey. And I've had people ask me this before,
1:04:34 so I guess I'll get into it. Like kind of what my favorite bourbon is and what my favorite
1:04:39 scotch is. And so the best bourbon I've ever had was I had Pappy Van Winkle 23. And that is just
1:04:46 an incredible, incredible bourbon. So if you know anything about that, it's an incredibly rare
1:04:50 family of burbins. But the best whiskey that has ever been, you know, past my lips and into my
1:04:56 stomach was logovolin 25. And so if you know anything about logovolin, most of you probably
1:05:02 had logovolin 16. So if you're a Parks and Rec fan, that's Ron Swanson's drink of choice. He drinks
1:05:06 that several times throughout the show. And you know, roll out logovolin. They have a logovolin 8
1:05:11 and a 12. But one of my buddies had a logovolin 25. And this is, you know, very expensive bottle
1:05:16 scotch. And it's incredibly rare. But it was just fantastic. Of all the scotch regions, there's
1:05:23 Highland, lowland, space side, Campbelltown and Ila. I'm an Ila fan. That's incredibly
1:05:27 peaty, smoky scotches. And that's what logovolin is, you know, LaFroy guard beg those types. But
1:05:33 it was just an incredible, incredible whiskey. So if you ever get an opportunity to have any of
1:05:37 the puppies, definitely partake. But also if you can see a logovolin 25 anywhere, you should definitely
1:05:41 grab that. All right, next question. What's the most important role for the man of the house?
1:05:46 So I guess I kind of have a twofold answer here. And I think the important roles for a man is to be
1:05:52 number one protector and also to be model. And I don't mean like, you know, runway model, but
1:05:58 they should be a protector and model. So on the protector side, you should be able to physically
1:06:03 financially and mentally protect your family. You should be able to to stand in front of a
1:06:07 stand in the brink with your wife and take care of her in those ways to be able to physically
1:06:11 protect your family. You should be able to be able to provide provide for them and have the
1:06:16 mental capacity to stand up for them mentally. But also you need to model what it is to be a man
1:06:22 and again, we talk about that all time. That's a guy that cultivates spiritual, mental and physical
1:06:26 resilience daily. And so in terms of the role for a man in the house, if you're protecting and
1:06:31 modeling for them and helping them in those areas, I think you'll be squared away. Next question.
1:06:35 You've smashed all your workouts for the week. You have eaten clean every meal. It is now time
1:06:40 for your cheat meal. And your wife says, you pick, babe, what are you having? Okay, so
1:06:45 if I'm doing a cheat meal, I'm going crazy. And so the the restaurant where I go the most crazy is
1:06:50 here in in Oklahoma City, it's called Cajun King. So it is a Cajun buffet place, which automatically
1:06:56 you're like, that sounds gross. But here's the deal is the family from what I understand. This is
1:07:01 what I've been told. This family was displaced by Hurricane Katrina. And so this is like a legit
1:07:06 Cajun Creole like group of people and they brought their restaurant and their recipes here in Oklahoma
1:07:11 City. And it is some of the best, the best jambalaya for chicken, catfish that I've ever had like
1:07:19 home style cook and soul food, like that kind of that's like my favorite type of food. And I will
1:07:24 just eat as much of it as possible. And so there was one time when I ate their Cajun King, this was
1:07:28 very gluttonous of me. So you know, please judge harshly. But I literally got 100 200 feet out of
1:07:34 the parking lot and I had to pull over. And I said, babe, you're gonna have to drive home,
1:07:38 because I'm gonna have to sit in the passenger seat and just think about not throwing up because
1:07:42 that's like exactly how much food I stuffed in. But here's the other thing with me, whenever I eat
1:07:46 crazy meals, I feel like I have two stomachs, like I can be completely stuffed from the entrees and
1:07:51 everything. And then somebody offers up dessert and I'm like, yeah, I can kind of do that. So if
1:07:54 I'm going crazy, I'm gonna hit up Cajun King, eat three or four plates of food. And then I'm probably
1:07:59 gonna hit up something like banana pudding or milkshake or ice cream of some kind. So banana
1:08:04 pudding is probably my favorite dessert on the planet. I love my wife's banana pudding. It's
1:08:07 kind of their family recipe. So that would probably be what I would do for my cheat meal. Just and
1:08:12 one time I tried to calculate the calories, but I got about a quarter of the way in and got the
1:08:15 press. So I was like, I don't even care. If I'm gonna eat there, I'm going crazy. All right, next
1:08:19 question. How many hours per week should a man devote to his vocation? So this is an important
1:08:24 question that comes from a buddy of mine. He's actually a lawyer. But the thing about this question
1:08:28 is it's contextual to the person and it's contextual to the situation. Because I think there are guys
1:08:32 that work a lot of hours that it fits for their lifestyle. It fits for their relationship with
1:08:37 their wife where they're still a dutiful husband, and they're also a doting father and they're a
1:08:42 present father. But then there are other people that work a ton of hours and they can't be those
1:08:46 other things. They certainly don't spend any time with God because you know, they're trying to spend
1:08:50 all the time with their boss or with their clients or something like that. And then there are people
1:08:54 that don't work nearly enough. So they're not protecting their family financially. They're not
1:08:59 taking care of business. They're putting their family in a precarious financial situation, which
1:09:03 I see a lot in my line of work. And so that's something that's not really appropriate either.
1:09:08 So I guess I'm kind of skating around this question a little bit. I guess the answer that I would give
1:09:13 is in terms of the amount of time that you should devote to your vocation, it is whatever is an
1:09:18 appropriate amount of time that will allow you to provide for your family in a way that would
1:09:22 be pleasing to God. Because here's the thing is if making that extra 10% on the, you know,
1:09:28 of commission or something like that is going to take away from your late relationship with God,
1:09:32 your relationship with your wife and your relationship with your kids, I don't think God would be cool
1:09:35 with that, right? So that's kind of the thing is that you should probably avoid that. But for all
1:09:40 of us guys, we know that sweet spot. Some of us don't don't get to choose. Some of us work in
1:09:45 that normal cubicle eight to five job. And your hours are what they are, you don't get overtime,
1:09:49 you have to show up by eight, you take your one hour lunch and you got to leave at five. But other
1:09:52 guys, they get to choose, maybe they own their own business or they're in some type of sales.
1:09:57 And so you can kind of control your calendar. It should be whatever it helps is conducive for
1:10:01 your family and allows you to still be a good father, you know, husband, take care of yourself,
1:10:06 be a good Christian, you know, follow still be a disciple of Jesus and all that because all
1:10:10 those things do take time. All right, guys, last question here. What are the best tools for a man
1:10:14 to keep his masculinity and his Christian orthodoxy and survive in our current culture?
1:10:19 Okay, so the first part of that was basically keeping your masculinity. And you know, for us,
1:10:24 we talk about it, I'll say it again, cultivating spiritual, mental and physical resilience. So
1:10:28 we've had a lot of guys do our 21 day devotional and the U version Bible app. So we talk about that
1:10:32 a lot. But you know, at this point, over 40,000, 41,000 dudes have completed it. So if you go to
1:10:37 U version on your Bible app or on Bible calm, just search under plan shirts, undaunted life,
1:10:43 a man's podcast and our 21 day devotional is there. That's just kind of a good primer for,
1:10:47 you know, seven days on spiritual seven on mental and seven on physical resilience. So that's one way
1:10:52 to kind of keep up with how to keep your masculinity. But I guess the other part of that that question
1:10:57 is talking about Christian orthodoxy and you know, how to survive in current culture. Culture
1:11:01 doesn't supersede the Bible, y'all, like it doesn't. So culture would like to say that we're moving
1:11:06 past the Bible and we've progressed and we've, we've gotten better. I mean, we're killing babies
1:11:11 by the millions, but no, we've gotten better. We've progressed overall. So for me, I don't really
1:11:16 appreciate that line of thinking, but but the Bible is our foundation as Christians. And so
1:11:21 the 21 day devotional is going to really help you dig in because every single day, obviously,
1:11:24 has scripture readings with them, but the culture can't do anything to supersede what what the
1:11:29 truths are of the Bible, you know, to include in especially the gospel. So if you're trying to keep,
1:11:35 you know, your masculinity, look to the person of Jesus, who's the greatest man ever.
1:11:38 If you're thinking about Christian orthodoxy, where does Christian orthodoxy come from from the
1:11:43 Bible? How can we survive in our current culture where we look to the Bible to help us? We look
1:11:47 to the Bible to get wisdom. So that's how I would answer that one. So thanks a lot, guys. We're
1:11:51 going to do a quick resilience boost here before I let you go. We are a men's ministry. As you know,
1:11:55 this by now our mission is cultivating manly resilience. And specifically, we do that by
1:11:59 providing content that for just spiritual mental and physical toughness. So for today,
1:12:03 we're going to focus on mental and spiritual. And I just want to kind of I listed some things
1:12:06 here that I talked about here during this podcast, because I want to make sure that you know whenever
1:12:10 it's my ideas or if it's somebody else's that I'm barring their ideas, I want to always be up front
1:12:14 with that. So the stuff I included here is I have the article marijuana to the glory of God. I have
1:12:18 that article in here. When pot is legal, what do we say? And is recreational marijuana use a sin?
1:12:24 I also put the music videos for the three songs I talked about earlier. So that's
1:12:29 the finisher by Oh, sleeper whitewashed by August Burns red and Devastator by for today. I put those
1:12:34 in here. And then also that part where we're talking about, you know, basically, can we know
1:12:38 if people are going to hell if they haven't heard, you know, the message of the gospel, that kind of
1:12:41 thing. It's an article called lesson 11, God's impartial judgment Romans to 12 through 16. So I
1:12:46 put all those in there just so that y'all could follow up with that later. All right. Thank you as
1:12:50 always for listening to this podcast. We really, really appreciate it. Please subscribe on itunes
1:12:54 soundcloud or Google play and refer your friends to listen. Make sure you share this on social media.
1:12:58 If you use the hashtag on daunted life, we'll be sure to find it and give it a thumbs up.
1:13:02 If we deserve a five star review in your brain, please let us know that by giving us a five star
1:13:06 review hit that fist star. And then also don't forget to leave a couple of sentences to let us know
1:13:10 why you like it. I'm currently booking speaking engagements for the remainder of 2018. So and
1:13:16 for the beginning of 2019. So if you want to reach out to me in that way, just hit me at info at
1:13:20 undaunted.life again info at undaunted.life. I can come to speak to your church, to your team,
1:13:24 to your Sunday school, whatever you want. Our website is www dot undaunted.life. You can follow us on
1:13:30 Instagram and Twitter at undaunted life and Facebook dot com backslash undaunted life. You can also
1:13:35 check our free devotionals out on the U version Bible app just by searching undaunted life under
1:13:40 plans. And as always, we want to thank the band August Prince Red for allowing us to use their
1:13:44 music library for our content. The intro alto track on this podcast is their song King of Sorrow,
1:13:49 which is off their latest record entitled Phantom Anthem. The links to all this are in the description
1:13:52 and real quick before I let you go. If you guys want to make your way onto this podcast, if you
1:13:56 have questions for me, always do it the same way. Leave the questions on an Instagram or a Facebook
1:14:01 post or something like that, or you can send them directly to me info at undaunted.life info at
1:14:06 undaunted.life. I'm your host Kyle Thompson. Remember, keep cultivating mainly resilience,
1:14:13 keep forging spiritual, mental, and physical toughness. Keep seeking the lion of Judah.
Key quotes
2
Kyle Thompson
I think for us as Christians and as Christian men, the dictates that are put forth in the Bible and the hints that we get about things that are mind altering to the point of excess are really, really important for us to consider.
Kyle Thompson
Your opinion about hell changes nothing about the reality of hell.
Free Resource
31-Day Resilience Reset
If this episode hit, the next 31 days will be the reset. Free PDF, instant download.
START FREE →
Brotherhood
Apply to Dominion
Six pillars. Application only. The men's program Kyle built around the show.
APPLY NOW →
Dig Deeper
Ask the Archive
"Which episodes cover this topic?" Get answers grounded in all 940+ episodes.
START A CHAT →